RSS
 

Archive for July, 2020

Canon EOS R6 sample gallery updated with Raw conversions

27 Jul

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_6671206782″,”galleryId”:”6671206782″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

We got our hands on a beta build of the latest version of Adobe Camera Raw with support for Canon EOS R6 Raw files and we’ve added a selection of of Raw conversions to our previously-published sample images. Take a look and get a sense of what this new full-framer is capable of in terms of Raw image quality.

See our updated Canon EOS R6 sample gallery with Raw conversions

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Canon EOS R6 sample gallery updated with Raw conversions

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Nikon Announces the Full-Frame Z5 With a Sub-$1500 Price

27 Jul

The post Nikon Announces the Full-Frame Z5 With a Sub-$ 1500 Price appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.

Nikon Z5 announcement

Last week, Nikon officially unveiled the Z5, an addition to the full-frame Z-mount mirrorless lineup that had previously only included the Z6 and the Z7.

While the Z5 doesn’t offer any groundbreaking features on par with Canon’s EOS R5/R6 announcement, the camera offers plenty to love, and will likely fall into place as an affordable full-frame option for those looking to move up from Nikon APS-C bodies.

So what does the Z5 include?

First, a full-frame, 24.3 MP sensor. This resolution is standard for entry-level APS-C and full-frame cameras, but it’s more than enough for all but the most megapixel-hungry of photographers, and generally offers a nice balance between detailed images and low-light capabilities.

Nikon Z5

Nikon promises a spectacular high-ISO performance, claiming that the Z5 will “excel in low-light situations, making it ideal for shooting everything from low-light events to an all-nighter under the Milky Way.”

As with the Z6 and Z7, you’ll also get in-body image stabilization, which ensures the Z5 is handholdable even in more difficult low-light scenarios or when shooting video, and allows the camera to deliver high-quality landscapes and travel photos even when there’s no tripod at hand.

You also get a 3.6M-dot electronic viewfinder, which should be enough to impress even more demanding shooters, as well as a 3.2-inch rear-LCD with tilting and touchscreen capabilities. Interestingly (and perhaps in response to complaints from Z6/Z7 users), the Z5 will offer dual SD card slots, which provide a level of redundancy required by many professional shooters.

As for autofocus, Nikon promises 273 AF points, which “cover nearly the entire frame,” as well as human and animal eye-detection technology for easy tracking of pet, portrait, and wildlife subjects. This appears identical to the highly-regarded AF system on the Z6, and should provide Z5 shooters with fast focusing and tracking, even in trickier conditions.

Unfortunately, while the Z5 boasts a maximum shutter speed of 1/800s, a significant drawback is the continuous shooting speed, which tops out at 4.5 fps, and makes the Z5 immediately unsuitable for more serious sports and wildlife photographers.

And while the Z5 is compatible with a slew of excellent lenses via the FTZ adapter, the number of native Z lenses is still limited compared to mirrorless competitors such as Sony and Fujifilm.

Nikon Z5 announcement

On the other hand, the Z5 features a weather-sealed body, which is (surprisingly) on the same level as the Z6 and Z7. And regarding video: The Z5 does offer 4K/30p recording, but this comes with a pretty substantial (1.7x) crop, which will undoubtedly make the Z5 less compelling for more serious video shooters.

Bottom line:

The Z5 will be an appealing option for photographers looking to transition to mirrorless, especially given a relatively reasonable ($ 1400 USD) body-only price. But the slow continuous shooting speeds will force fast-paced photographers (e.g., wildlife, sports, and street) to look elsewhere, while the presence of the Z6 (at around $ 1800 USD) will be a compelling alternative for photographers desiring faster (12 fps) shooting speeds.

The Z5 will begin shipping in late August, and is currently available for pre-order here.

Now over to you:

What do you think of the Nikon Z5? What is your favorite and least favorite feature? And is it a model you’d be interested in purchasing? Share your thoughts in the comments!

The post Nikon Announces the Full-Frame Z5 With a Sub-$ 1500 Price appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.


Digital Photography School

 
Comments Off on Nikon Announces the Full-Frame Z5 With a Sub-$1500 Price

Posted in Photography

 

Canon EOS R5 added to studio test scene

27 Jul

The Canon EOS R5 comes with a newly designed 45MP sensor that we were excited to get in front of our studio test. Here, we’ve put it up against some other high-megapixel heavyweights, but feel free to select the comparison camera of your choice and explore.

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-14929297″,”widgetId”:775,”initialStateId”:null}) })
Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Canon EOS R5 added to studio test scene

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Astronomers capture first-ever image of two exoplanets orbiting a 17M year-old Sun-like star

27 Jul

The European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (ESO VLT) has captured the first-ever image that captures two exoplanets orbiting a Sun-like star.

As the ESO explains in its blog post on the impressive feat, observing systems with multiple exoplanets is ‘extremely rare’ and, until this image, astronomers had never ‘directly observed’ multiple planets orbiting a young star.

Credit: ESO/Bohn et al.

In this groundbreaking image, captured by the SPHERE instrument onboard the ESO VLT, two ‘giant’ exoplanets are shown orbiting the star TYV 8998–760–1, which is estimated to be 17 million years old. Scientists captured the image by using a coronagraph to block the light from the young star, allowing for the light bouncing off the fainter planets to be seen.

The two gas giants are approximately 160 and 320 times as far away from their host star as the Earth is to the Sun. ‘This places these planets much further away from their star than Jupiter or Saturn, also two gas giants, are from the Sun; they lie at only 5 and 10 times the Earth-Sun distance, respectively,’ reads the blog post.

This chart shows the location of the TYC 8998-760-1 system. This map shows most of the stars visible to the unaided eye under good conditions and the system itself is marked with a red circle.

You can find information on this image and future findings by heading over the the ESO website.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Astronomers capture first-ever image of two exoplanets orbiting a 17M year-old Sun-like star

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Tested: Four travel tripods for every budget

26 Jul
From left to right, the MeFoto BackPacker S, Manfrotto BeFree Advanced, Peak Design Travel Tripod and Gitzo Traveler Series 1.

Although image stabilization technology has come along in leaps and bounds over the past few years, there are few things you can do to improve your low-light or telephoto images more than mounting your camera on a tripod. But many tripods are heavy and bulky, making them inconvenient to bring along on longer hikes or when traveling by air. That’s where the humble travel tripod comes to the rescue.

In this review we compare the following travel tripods:

  • MeFoto BackPacker S – $ 159.95 list / ~$ 120 street
  • Manfrotto BeFree Advanced – $ 324.99 list / ~$ 280 street
  • Peak Design Travel Tripod – $ 599.95 list / ~$ 600 street
  • Gitzo Traveler Series 1 – $ 1014.99 list / ~$ 600 street

Travel tripods are available across a very wide price range, from consumer models that cost not much more than $ 100 to professional-grade ones that can run into the high hundreds of dollars or more. But is it worth spending that extra cash, and can you expect a significantly better experience from a more expensive tripod? To find out, we rounded up a selection of name-brand carbon-fiber travel tripods spanning the pricing gamut for an in-depth, side-by-side comparison.

In many respects, all four tripods have a lot in common. They all come with quick-release plates that you can leave attached to your camera for quicker setup, for example. And they all have reversible center columns which also let you shoot straight downwards, something that can be handy for macro shooting in particular.

They also share locks and/or safety pins to help prevent your camera accidentally being disconnected, and sandbag hooks either at the end of the center column or on the side of the spider, from which you can hang some weight for extra stability. (Just remember to include this weight along with that of your chosen camera and lens when determining your required payload!)

In this review, we’ll focus mostly on how these four tripods differ from each other, and their advantages and disadvantages in real-world shooting. Read on to find out how they performed, and which was our favorite.

MeFoto BackPacker S Manfrotto BeFree Advanced Peak Design Travel Tripod Gitzo Traveler Series 1
MSRP $ 159.95 $ 324.99 $ 599.95 $ 1014.99
Street price ~$ 120 ~$ 280 ~$ 600 ~$ 600
Length and diameter (folded)* 33.5 x 9.5cm 41.0 x 10.5 cm 39.1 x 7.9 cm 42.5 x 1 cm
Max. height (with center column)* 140.0cm 151.0cm 153.5cm 164.5cm
Max. height (no center column)* 108.0cm 127.0cm 131.0cm 141.0cm
Min. height (standard center column)* 33.5cm 40.5cm 34.5cm 42.5cm
Min. height (short center column)* N/A 19cm (optional extra) 15.5cm (included) 33.0cm (included)
Weight with accessories* 1017g** 1268g*** 1342g**** 1489g*****
Load limit 6kg 8kg 9.1kg 10kg
Number of leg angles 3 3 2 2
Converts to monopod? Yes (143.0cm max.)* No No No
Bubble level? Yes No Yes Yes
Panorama control? Yes, with degree scale Yes, lacks degree scale No Yes, with degree scale
Swappable head / feet? Head only Head only Both (with optional head adapter kit) Both
QR plate type ARCA Manfrotto RC2 ARCA ARCA
Special features N/A EasyLink attachment Smartphone holder N/A
Warranty (with registration) 5 years 10 years Lifetime 7 years

* All sizes and weights based on in-house measurements.
** Includes ball head, QR plate with safety pins, center-column hook and hex key
*** Includes ball head, QR plate, EasyLink / center-column caps and hex key
**** Includes ball head with safety pins, QR plate, full center column with hook and phone holder, hex tool and tool holder
***** Includes ball head with safety pin, QR plate, long and short center columns and three hex/Torx keys

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Tested: Four travel tripods for every budget

Posted in Uncategorized

 

A 40-minute video tour through the history of photography

26 Jul

Chemist, educator and photography enthusiast Andrew Szydlo recently gave an excellent video tour through the history of photography for Britain’s Royal Institution. While some of the topics may be well-worn territory for many of our readers, there should still be the opportunity to learn. Of course, if you’re a beginner, it’s a great watch for all 40-plus minutes.

With his own vintage camera collection on display, Szydlo takes us back in time to the first photographs and cameras. To understand how people tried to record their history and the world around them, we must first discuss the concept of the pinhole camera and the camera obscura effect.

Szydlo then discusses the first photographs and cameras, talks about the importance of famed photographer Henri Cartier Bresson, the advent of SLR cameras and talks about different interesting cameras in his collection. The final 10 or so minutes of the video are dedicated to Szydlo demonstrating his chemical expertise by making a photogram.

If you would like to watch Szydlo discuss a specific topic, you can click on the topics from the list below, which are timestamped links in chronological order.

  • Introduction
  • Pinhole cameras
  • The first photograph
  • The first cameras
  • Henri Cartier Bresson
  • SLR cameras
  • Other interesting cameras
  • Digital cameras
  • Demonstrating the chemistry of photograms

The above video is the first part of a two-part series from Andrew Szydlo. Next week, the Royal Institution will publish a video all about the chemistry of photography.

If you’d like to try your own hand at making a photogram at home, which is simply the art of using photosensitive materials to make a photograph without a camera, you can refer to this guide from BBC.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on A 40-minute video tour through the history of photography

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Nikon might just have made the best entry-level full-framer

25 Jul

It’s famously such a fine line between stupid and clever. And, for that matter, between a brilliant piece of product planning and a complete head-scratcher. History and sales figures may well prove me wrong, but I personally think that the Nikon Z5 makes perfect sense in a way the Z50 didn’t. And that might make it the most interesting entry-level full frame camera.

I criticized Nikon when it launched the Z50, because I didn’t recognize the Instagram-friendly camera the company claimed to have made. Instead I found a rather good enthusiast-friendly camera in a system with few obvious lens options. The Z5 looks a lot like a full-frame Z50, but the different audience that its higher price implies and the shift in sensor size makes all the difference.

A Z6/Z50 hybrid

Visually the Z5 looks like a Z6/Z50 hybrid, with the conventional mode dial from the Z50 grafted on in place of the Z6’s top-panel LCD. You could describe it as a full-frame Z50 or a slightly simplified Z6 and you’d still be right.

It uses an older, front-side illuminated CMOS sensor, which is likely to mean it doesn’t quite match its big brother in terms of image quality but the differences are likely to be small, except in very low light.

With its collapsible zoom and mode dial, the Z5 feels like a hybrid of the Z50 and Z6.

The Z5’s viewfinder is the same resolution as the Z6’s and its control layout is essentially the same. Its back panel is reinforced plastic, rather than magnesium alloy, but Nikon says the weather sealing is just as extensive and both the dimensions and weight are all-but identical.

Lenses

Whereas an APS-C sensor leaves Z50 owners with the choice of a couple of variable aperture zooms (and the promise of an 18-140mm in the works), the move to full frame and slightly more lofty ambitions of the Z5 are much better fit for the Z-mount lenses currently available.

To make a broad generalization, I suspect the kinds of photographers (and, according to Nikon, non-photographers) willing to spend $ 1400 on a Z5 will be more likely to want and buy the well-priced, though still pricey, F1.8 primes the company has introduced. And, by dint of being full-frame, the focal lengths of those primes are more likely to be useful on this camera than the Z50.

The most complete entry-level

Even with its more modest video spec the Z5 isn’t out-gunned by its entry-level peers. But you don’t need to look through its higher-res viewfinder for the Z5 to look like the most interesting entry-level full-frame mirrorless camera. You get a similar perspective if you look at the other cameras’ backstories.

The Sony a7 II was designed as a mid-range camera, but an aging mid-range camera isn’t necessarily better than a modern entry-level one. The distinction is even more dramatic if you compare the higher-end a7R II (which has dropped to the Z5’s launch price) the a7R II has a very good sensor but a very different shooting experience.

Sony has very much done its product development in the public realm: each model in the a7 series has been significantly better than its predecessor (first by adding stabilization, then by offering a larger battery, better AF and revised ergonomics). This leaves the now six-year-old a7 Mark II looking awkward: it’s a very difficult camera to use as soon as you’ve seen or experienced the improvements introduced with the Mark III, no matter how keenly-priced it is.

So it’s not the automatic bargain that getting a formerly $ 1700 for $ 1000 might appear to be. The areas in which it once excelled are at least matched by its entry-level peers and it hasn’t gained any of the ergonomic or interface improvements that have subsequently been developed. So it’s the only camera here without a touchscreen and it hasn’t got the usability improvements of the Mark III. By contrast, the Z5 includes all the AF improvements that the Z6 has gained in firmware over the past two years.

The Canon EOS RP is a really likable camera and the least-expensive full-frame digital camera yet launched, but Nikon has provided a lot of camera for a launch price just $ 100 higher.

Canon approached things from the other direction with the EOS RP: building what software developers might describe as a minimum viable product: the bare basic specs to deliver a credible camera. The result is actually rather likable: it’s not very fast at shooting, the video’s not great and it uses a sensor that’s never been considered particularly good, but the dials are in the right place, it’s easy to use and it produces attractive images. Only the battery life really detracts from the day-to-day experience.

With the Z5 Nikon has clearly started with the Z6 (originally a $ 2000 camera) and found a way to to offer it with a launch price 1/3rd lower. You even get the twin card slots that internet commenters suddenly decided were essential when Canon and Nikon didn’t include them on their mid-priced models (an argument that feels more convincing when it comes to the higher-end Z7).

So it’s not the full-frame Digital Rebel that Canon made, nor is it the tired-looking ex-middleweight champ that Sony offers. It’s not even comparable to the Z50, with its odd mixture of enthusiast-friendly experience and mass-market zooms. Instead the Z5 is a more affordable way to get most of a Z6, and it includes a great many of the improvements that Nikon has made on its Z-mount journey so far.

Now I just really hope it tests and shoots as well as it handles.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Nikon might just have made the best entry-level full-framer

Posted in Uncategorized

 

The GF 30mm F3.5 R WR? sample gallery (DPReview TV)

25 Jul

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_6872107241″,”galleryId”:”6872107241″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

How does the Fujifilm GF 30mm F3.5 stack up to other lenses for Fujifilm’s medium format system? In this gallery from DPReview TV we feautres samples that assess sharpness, bokeh, flare and more.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on The GF 30mm F3.5 R WR? sample gallery (DPReview TV)

Posted in Uncategorized

 

6 Portrait Lighting Patterns Every Photographer Should Know

25 Jul

The post 6 Portrait Lighting Patterns Every Photographer Should Know appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Darlene Hildebrandt.

lighting-patterns-2.jpg

In classical portraiture there are several things you need to control and think about to make a flattering portrait of your subjects, including: lighting ratio, lighting pattern, facial view, and angle of view. I suggest you get to know these basics inside out, and as with most things, then you can break the rules. But if you can nail this one thing you’ll be well on your way to great people photos. In this article we’re going to look at lighting pattern: what is it, why it’s important, and how to use it. Perhaps in another future article, if you enjoy this one, I’ll talk about the other aspects of good portraiture.

Lighting pattern I’d define as, how light and shadow play across the face to create different shapes. What shape is the shadow on the face, in simple terms. There are four common portrait lighting patterns, they are:

  • Split lighting
  • Loop lighting
  • Rembrandt lighting
  • Butterfly lighting

There are also Broad and Short lighting which are more of a style, and can be used with most of the patterns above. Let’s look at each of them individually.

1. Split Lighting

split-lighting-pattern1.jpg

Split lighting is exactly as the name implies – it splits the face exactly into equal halves with one side being in the light, and the other in shadow. It is often used to create dramatic images for things such as a portrait of a musician or an artist. Split lighting tends to be a more masculine pattern and as such is usually more appropriate or applicable on men than it is for women. Keep in mind however, there are no hard and fast rules, so I suggest you use the information I provide here as a starting point or guideline. Until you learn this and can do it in your sleep, default to the guideline whenever you’re not sure.

split lighting by Darlene Hildebrandt.png

To achieve split lighting simply put the light source 90 degrees to the left or right of the subject, and possibly even slightly behind their head. Where you place the light in relation to the subject will depend on the person’s face. Watch how the light falls on them and adjust accordingly. In true split lighting, the eye on the shadow side of the face does pick up light in the eye only. If by rotating their face a bit more light falls on their cheek, it’s possible their face just isn’t ideal for split lighting.

NOTE: any lighting pattern can be created on any facial view (frontal view showing both ears, or ¾ face, or even profile). Just keep in mind that your light source must follow the face to maintain the lighting pattern. If they turn their head the pattern will change. So you can use that to your advantage to easily adjust the patten just by them rotating their head a little.

What the heck is a “catchlight”?

Catch-lights-example.jpg

Notice in this photo above that the baby’s eyes have a reflection of the actual light source in them. It shows up as a little white spot, but if we look closer we can actually see the shape of the light I used in this portrait.

Catch-lights-closeup.jpg

See how the bright spot is actually hexagon with a dark centre? That’s the light I used which was a small hexagon shaped soft box on my Canon speedlight.

This is what is known as the “catchlight”. Without the eye of the subject catching this light, the eyes will appear dark, dead and lifeless. You need to ensure that at least one eye has a catchlight to give the subject life. Notice it also lightens the iris and brightens the eye overall. This also adds to the feeling of life and gives them a sparkle.

2. Loop Lighting

Loop-lighting-pattern.jpg

Loop lighting is made by creating a small shadow of the subjects noses on their cheeks. To create loop lighting, the light source must be slightly higher than eye level and about 30-45 degrees from the camera (depends on the person, you have to learn how to read people’s faces).

Loop-lighting-pattern-example.jpg

Look at this image to see where the shadows fall, and on their left sides you can see a small shadow of their noses. In loop lighting the shadow of the nose and that of the cheek do NOT touch. Keep the shadow small and slightly downward pointing, but be aware of having your light source too high which will create odd shadows and cause loss of the catchlights. Loop light is probably the most common or popular lighting pattern as it is easy to create and flatters most people.

loop lighting by Darlene Hildebrandt.png

In this diagram the black backdrop represents the bank of trees behind them. The sun is coming over the trees but they are completely in the shade. A white reflector is used at camera left to bounce light back into the subjects’ faces. The reflector may or may not be in the sun but you can still pick up light even if it’s not. Just play with the angles, by changing the placement of the reflector you can change the lighting pattern. For Loop lighting it will need to be somewhere around 30-45 degrees from the camera. It also needs to be slightly above their eye level so the shadow or loop of their nose angles down towards the corner of the mouth. That is one mistake I often see beginners make with reflectors is to place them down low and angle it up. That lights up the bottom of your subject’s nose and does not create a flattering pattern.

3. Rembrandt Lighting

Rembrandt.jpg

Rembrandt lighting is so named because the Rembrandt the painter often used this pattern of light in his paintings, as you can see in his self portrait here. Rembrandt lighting is identified by the triangle of light on the cheek. Unlike loop lighting where the shadow of the nose and cheek do not touch, in Rembrandt lighting they do meet which, creates that trapped little triangle of light in the middle. To create proper Rembrandt lighting make sure the eye on the shadow side of the face has light in it and has a catch light, otherwise the eye will be “dead” and not have a nice sparkle. Rembrandt lighting is more dramatic, so like split lighting it creates more mood and a darker feel to your image. Use it appropriately.

Rembrandt-lighting-pattern.jpg

Rembrandt lighting by Darlene Hildebrandt.png

To create Rembrandt lighting the subject must turn slightly away from the light. The light must be above the top of their head so that the shadow from their nose falls down towards the cheek. Not every person’s face is ideal for creating Rembrandt lighting. If they have high or prominent cheek bones it will probably work. If they have a small nose or flat bridge of the nose, it may be difficult to achieve. Again, keep in mind you don’t have to make exactly this pattern or another, just so long as the person is flattered, and the mood you want is created – then the lighting is working. If you are using window light and the window goes down to the floor, you may have to block off the bottom portion with a gobo or card, to achieve this type of lighting.

4. Butterfly Lighting

Butterfly-lighting-pattern.jpg

Butterfly lighting is aptly named for the butterfly shaped shadow that is created under the nose by placing the main light source above and directly behind the camera. The photographer is basically shooting underneath the light source for this pattern. It is most often used for glamour style shots and to create shadows under the cheeks and chin. It is also flattering for older subjects as it emphasizes wrinkles less than side lighting.

butterfly lighting by Darlene Hildebrandt-1.png

Butterfly lighting is created by having the light source directly behind the camera and slightly above eye or head level of the subject (depends on the person). It is sometimes supplemented by placing a reflector directly under their chin, with the subject themselves even holding it! This pattern flatters subjects with defined or prominent cheek bones and a slim face. Someone with a round, wide face would look better with loop or even split to slim their face. This pattern is tougher to create using windowlight or a reflector alone. Often a harder light source like the sun or a flash is needed to produce the more defined shadow under the nose.

5. Broad Lighting

Broad lighting is not so much a particular pattern, but a style of lighting. Any of the following patterns of light can be either broad or short: loop, Rembrandt, split.

Broad-lighting.jpg

Broad lighting is when the subject’s face is slightly turned away from centre, and the side of the face which is toward the camera (is broader) is in the light. This produces a larger area of light on the face, and a shadow side which appears smaller. Broad lighting is sometimes used for “high key” portraits. This type of lighting makes a person’s face look broader or wider (hence the name) and can be used on someone with a very slim face to widen it. Most people however want to look slimmer, not wider so this type of lighting would not be appropriate for someone who is heavier or round faced.

broad lighting by Darlene Hildebrandt.png

To create broad lighting the face is turned away from the light source. Notice how the side of the face that is towards the camera has the most light on it and the shadows are falling on the far side of the face, furthest from the camera. Simply put broad lighting illuminates the largest part of the face showing.

6. Short Lighting

Short-lighting.jpg

Short lighting is the opposite of broad lighting. As you can see by the example here, short lighting puts the side turned towards the camera (that which appears larger) in more shadow. It is often used for low key, or darker portraits. It puts more of the face in shadow, is more sculpting, add 3D qualities, and is slimming and flattering for most people.

short lighting by Darlene Hildebrandt.png

In short lighting, the face is turned towards the light source this time. Notice how the part of the face that is turned away from the camera has the most light on it and the shadows are falling on the near side of the face, closet to the camera. Simply put short lighting has shadows on the largest part of the face showing.

Putting it all together

Once you learn how to recognize and create each of the different lighting patterns you can then start to learn how and when to apply them. By studying your subject’s face you will learn which lighting pattern will be best for them, and for the type of portrait and mood desired. Someone with a very round face that wants to appear slimmer in a grad portrait, will be lit very differently than someone that wants a promo shot for their band that makes them appear mean or angry. Once you know all the patterns, how to recognize and master quality of light, direction of light and ratio (we’ll discuss that in a future article) then you will be well equipped to handle the challenge.

Of course it is much easier to change the lighting pattern if you can move the light source. However if the main light source is the sun, or a window – it’s a bit tougher to do that. So what you will need to do instead of moving the light, is to have the subject rotate in respect to the light to change the direction it falls on them. Or change your camera position. Or change their position. So basically move the things you can move in relation to the light, if you cannot move the light source itself.

Practice Exercise

Corral yourself a subject (as in a real live person, not your dog) and practice creating each of the lighting patterns we just discussed including:

  • butterfly lighting
  • loop lighting
  • Rembrandt lighting
  • split lighting

Remember to show both broad lighting and short lighting – for each of the different patterns, where applicable. Don’t worry about any other aspect (ratio, fill light, etc) for now, just concentrate getting the patterns down pat first. Use light from a window, a floor lamp with a bare bulb (take the shade off) or the sun – but try and use a light source that you can see what’s happening (I’d suggest that you do not try using flash until you’ve got more experience, it’s harder to learn with because you can’t see it until after the photo is taken) This also works best to start out with the subject facing the camera directly, no turning except to create the broad and short.

Show us your results please and share any challenges or problems you encountered. I’ll try and help you solve them so you and others can learn from it, and get better for next time.

If you’re on Pinterest – here’s a graphic to save this tutorial.

6 Portrait Lighting Patterns Every Photographer Should Know

The post 6 Portrait Lighting Patterns Every Photographer Should Know appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Darlene Hildebrandt.


Digital Photography School

 
Comments Off on 6 Portrait Lighting Patterns Every Photographer Should Know

Posted in Photography

 

DPReview TV: Fujifilm GF 30mm F3.5 review

25 Jul

The GF 30mm F3.5 R WR is a wide angle prime lens for Fujifilm’s medium format GFX system, with a focal length equivalent to 24mm on full frame. It offers impressive sharpness, but not without a few compromises. Watch our review to learn more.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to get new episodes of DPReview TV every week.

  • Intro
  • Sample photos
  • Size and design
  • Chromatic aberration
  • Minimum focus
  • Flare control
  • Autofocus speed
  • More sample images!
  • Bokeh
  • Sharpness
  • Who's it for?

Sample gallery from this episode

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_6872107241″,”galleryId”:”6872107241″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });
Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on DPReview TV: Fujifilm GF 30mm F3.5 review

Posted in Uncategorized