RSS
 

Review: Sigma 10-20mm f3.5 EX DC HSM Lens – Nikon Fit

20 Dec

Here i review the Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 Lens – Nikon Fit. It’s a good lens for the money, and it is still one of the widest on the market for DX (APS-C) Sensors. Old review of the 10-20 F4-5.6: www.youtube.com Twitter: twitter.com Filmed on the NIkon D3100 with the Nikkor 18-55mm and Sigma 10-20mm
Video Rating: 4 / 5

 
 

Tags: , , , , ,

  1. damaged2

    December 20, 2012 at 5:37 pm

    I got the f/3.5 over the f/4.5. There was a huge price difference for me though: f/3.5 cost near $800! I think f/4.5-f/5.6 was near $500? Gah, I’m unsure if I should return it and get the other one….but a lower f is still better than 4.5-5.6, right? From my understanding it is… And I do want to do night photography..

     
  2. Bylochino

    December 20, 2012 at 6:14 pm

    great video , Thanks for sharing !

     
  3. MrSblbo

    December 20, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    is autofocus work with 3100??

     
  4. ARKAN0752

    December 20, 2012 at 7:47 pm

    YES…
    

     
  5. Артём Аюпов

    December 20, 2012 at 8:16 pm

    Here it is the fov of my dreams!

     
  6. pandanese90

    December 20, 2012 at 8:24 pm

    So this lens wont work on bodies that dont have crop factors of 1.3, 1.6 , 1.5, etc? so will this lens work on a 5d?

     
  7. WelshTraceur

    December 20, 2012 at 9:08 pm

    thanks, just ordered the 4-5.6

     
  8. dsoupashis

    December 20, 2012 at 9:46 pm

    Awesome review thanks mate!

     
  9. major holland

    December 20, 2012 at 9:51 pm

    Change your appurture higher to arround 8+

     
  10. commentbox123

    December 20, 2012 at 10:32 pm

    how to set the video in manual mode??

     
  11. thisisgtv

    December 20, 2012 at 10:54 pm

    Probably one of the best reviews i’ve seen done so far. great work man!

     
  12. iderren

    December 20, 2012 at 11:41 pm

    I was told a constant aperture is good on a lens being used for video if you intend to zoom, is this correct?

     
  13. mazdaman1980

    December 21, 2012 at 12:20 am

    Jesus mate, you really are so dull. Let’s be a bit more enthusiastic and animated shall we!!

     
  14. bernhardtsen74

    December 21, 2012 at 12:43 am

    I chose the Tamron 10-24mm over this after I tried out the aperture in the local photo store!
    maybe I chose wrong, the autofocus on the Tamron is pretty slow which means it chases at least 3-4 times back and forth before deciding on taking the picture!!!!!
    Getting a D7000 later this year!

     
  15. Christophe Sterkens

    December 21, 2012 at 1:09 am

    open ure aperture to about 5.6 or even maybe higher, crank up you’re ISO to 3200 if you can, done

     
  16. MadStylezuk

    December 21, 2012 at 2:03 am

    Nice setup Bro !!! 

     
  17. Owen J.

    December 21, 2012 at 2:26 am

    Depends on your budget, canon lenses will always have better quality, but some people don’t care that much.

     
  18. eosbill

    December 21, 2012 at 2:44 am

    I use Canon 500D and I’m deciding between Sigma 10-22mm f/3.5 that you review and Canon 10-22 f/3.5-5.6.
    Please help me. Thank you

     
  19. Bunchpoland

    December 21, 2012 at 3:00 am

    Thumbs up for a hut in a room!

     
  20. TokyoFreeze79

    December 21, 2012 at 3:49 am

    The 10-20 F4-5.6 doesn’t for Nikon. Glad to see this one does.

     
  21. idkagoodusernameyet

    December 21, 2012 at 4:20 am

    Just saying, but: an 18mm standard lens on a camera body with a 1.6 crop factor becomes a 28.8 (29) mm lens whereas a 10mm lens becomes a 16mm lens. thats quite a difference.

     
  22. idkagoodusernameyet

    December 21, 2012 at 4:46 am

    yep (ofcourse.. LOL)

     
  23. TokyoFreeze79

    December 21, 2012 at 5:42 am

    Does this lens for Nikon have an AF/M switch on it?