Photo shoot with model Kelly Ruth and photographers Dave Gruentzel, Alvin Arzaga, and Rob Gustafson. www.davegruentzel.com
Video Rating: 5 / 5
See and buy my Photos at: www.momentsofnaturephotography.com This review is mainly for DX camera users deciding between these two lenses. Comparison of the nikon 14-24mm lens and the nikon 10-24mm DX lens. Which one is right for you?
Video Rating: 3 / 5
Joshua Kern
December 20, 2012 at 4:19 am
Unless you plan on upgrading your camera ever.
I am upgrading my glass first (14-24) and Ill be getting the D800 later. theres no sense in wasting money on dx lenses if you ever want to upgrade sensors
QQQQcon
December 20, 2012 at 5:11 am
yes, if you have the money
ad99jr
December 20, 2012 at 6:02 am
is 10-24mm great for d90?
QQQQcon
December 20, 2012 at 6:41 am
no, i have been using fx for a couple years now
Hector Reyes
December 20, 2012 at 7:08 am
You wouldnt get one, yet you shot it on the D300s correct?
ryUzaki deathnOte
December 20, 2012 at 8:06 am
thanks.
QQQQcon
December 20, 2012 at 8:35 am
No, the nikon 10-24mm is a much better lens for dx cameras
ryUzaki deathnOte
December 20, 2012 at 8:48 am
is 14-24mm suitable for nikon d5100?pls reply.thanks.
QQQQcon
December 20, 2012 at 9:42 am
They are probably close to the same. I wouldnt get a 14-24mm for a dx camera
Thecookingfreak
December 20, 2012 at 9:52 am
What is the minimum focal length for landscape shooting? I want a landscape lens too on My D7000 DX camera. 14mm x 1.5 crop = 21mm field of view sounds pretty wide to me. But apparently its not?
Is the 10-24mm at F10 as sharp as the 14-24mm at F10?
QQQQcon
December 20, 2012 at 10:21 am
if you mean the tokina 12-24mm it is a amazing lens.
jonnie davies
December 20, 2012 at 10:56 am
what’s you opinion on the tokina 10-24 because i really can’t afford the nikon one but i want to start landscape/wide-angle
Bassbuilding
December 20, 2012 at 11:19 am
The 12-24 is far better than the 10-24.
phonedork
December 20, 2012 at 12:06 pm
@phonedork Also I use a ISO of 100 for no noise. The night shots come out really good still since I am using a tripod. Only if I shoot while holding the camera do I need to up the ISO to compensate for the slow shutter speed@3.5 aperture..
phonedork
December 20, 2012 at 12:43 pm
If your a DX user get the Nikon 10-24, because with the 1.5 crop factor a 14-24 mm will be 21-37mm. That is not wide enough. The 3.5 aperture still gets nice night shots while using a tripod with slow shutter speeds.
Stefan Matei
December 20, 2012 at 12:43 pm
When i first saw your reviews i thought to myself r u serious?! But after listening to some you seem fairly objective, give good arguments and best of all you have experience so all the best for you!
Thanks bro this was much useful jus got the 10-24mm very impressed!! almost got the 14 but i don’t have a full frame.
MrD0BR0
December 20, 2012 at 1:08 pm
nice video, but the one vs. the other is a bit like the 24-70 f/2.8 vs. the 16-85 VR…
vancouverdogdowncast
December 20, 2012 at 1:51 pm
excellent explanation. the one thing u forgot is the price tag that comes along with the 14-24. it might change a few minds for those who own a dx camera. the 14-24 is about $2000 brand new while the 10-24 is half of that.
pedalman
December 20, 2012 at 2:12 pm
The 200- 400 I found I never used the 200mm end, instead I got a used 400VR f2.8 and a 1.7x and 2.0x converters.
I get 400mm2.8 – 650mmf4.5 – 800mm f5.6 with full auto focus.
Im thinking of getting a DX D300 that will give me 600mm 1020mm 1200mm awesome !
I do miss some shots if I need to change converters but Im developing a skill of quick changes and putting the correct one on for the situation .
I also get some shots with this set up that I missed with the zoom, no need to zoom.
pedalman
December 20, 2012 at 2:48 pm
An camera body with an FX sensor the same as 35mm or “full frame”, so if your lens is a 100mm you will get 100mm .
A Nikon DX sensor is smaller 1.5x so your 100mm lens will give you 150mm.
Canon is 1.6x so you would get 160mm with their DX sensor.
For wildlife or sport etc the DX is good, where it might not be so good is if you use a wide angle lens for landscapes your wide lens will not be as wide with DX.
The Nikon14-24 lens in this video ends up a 21-36
QQQQcon
December 20, 2012 at 3:46 pm
a dx camera has a sensor that is 1.5x smaller than an FX sensor. An FX sensor is equivalent to a 35mm slide of film in size.
turtleman220
December 20, 2012 at 4:04 pm
whats the difference between DX and FX?