RSS
 

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX Lens Review (Now in HD!)

23 Jan

My review of the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX Lens

 
24 Comments

Posted in Nikon Videos

 

Tags: , , , ,

 
 

  1. hamsterpoop

    January 23, 2013 at 6:44 pm

    I disliked and left at “I’ve shot parties…”

     

  2. Brady O'Brien

    January 23, 2013 at 7:05 pm

    Priorities 🙂 – Gotta sacrifice the clothing for the cameras lol.

     

  3. BittersweetEuphoria1

    January 23, 2013 at 7:17 pm

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    YOUR NOT A BOSS

    BREDANS A BOSSSS

    LOLFAG

     

  4. BittersweetEuphoria1

    January 23, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    ROFLCOPTOR

    YOU THINK YOUR A BOSSS???

    BRENDANS A BOSS

     

  5. tony77tony77

    January 23, 2013 at 8:03 pm

    is this better then the 35mm f1.8?

     

  6. Flyelskeren

    January 23, 2013 at 8:08 pm

    i mean, I’m 17 and got both a 70-200 and a 100-400 on a 40D… With my native prices it’s crazy. But I guess his a good photographer who can earn cash on his photos 😉 Or has a job or two as me 🙂

     

  7. Reinier Bonis

    January 23, 2013 at 8:47 pm

    Well, he has a hole in his jeans… So??

     

  8. turdferguson0010

    January 23, 2013 at 9:19 pm

    Do you not know your own country? Canada is a socialist country. Everything cost more, while America is capitalistic.

     

  9. dzvsk39

    January 23, 2013 at 10:13 pm

    u r a faget.

     

  10. sasktank

    January 23, 2013 at 10:52 pm

    this lens is$700 +tax in Canada , and our dollar is at par with usa —?——- it’s only $439 in usa –WTF is up with that ? — are we being punished for living up here ,you’dd think our winter’s are punishment enough—//—another par dollar example–a 8×10 print at walmart canada is $3.28+tax —- usa walmart$1.47 —-???

     

  11. chasemcevers

    January 23, 2013 at 11:32 pm

    im 17 and have that camera. i baught it myself. but when you love something it doesnt matter how much it costs.

     

  12. sacredgeometry

    January 24, 2013 at 12:04 am

    ? i allready stated i didnt see the previous post i know bokeh means blur. i thought you where saying there i no point making any definition between good and bad bokeh….because the only defining feature is the amount…and that would be stupid 😛

    peace

    brian

     

  13. d4n131M3j14

    January 24, 2013 at 12:10 am

    Hahahaha you are dumb as shit man. That is exactly what I mean, that dumb people think that word means more than it does. Just like idiots call “prime lens” to a fixed focal lengh lens, what a bunch of retards…

     

  14. sacredgeometry

    January 24, 2013 at 12:25 am

    its pronounced bo-keh

     

  15. sacredgeometry

    January 24, 2013 at 12:59 am

    whoops sorry didnt see what you where replying to yeah that guy was talking crap and i misunderstood your comment from it being out of context.

    peace

    brian

     

  16. sacredgeometry

    January 24, 2013 at 1:40 am

    actually thats bollocks there is beautiful bokeh and awful bokeh its based on more than just the amount of blur. for example harsh specular highlights are horrible…angular (non spherical) highlights are not appealing the transition between in focus and out of focus areas the blurs ability to keep colour contrast the list is huge

    peace

    brian

     

  17. thebedtimestory

    January 24, 2013 at 2:14 am

    He knows his shit, so you have no place to say anything.

     

  18. exe163

    January 24, 2013 at 2:33 am

    Jealous?

     

  19. Dahoef2

    January 24, 2013 at 2:35 am

    Take it easy on him. He’s trying to help you. He seems like a very well rounded, intelligent person with a passion for photography.  Thanks for the review!

     

  20. Mario Almanza

    January 24, 2013 at 3:00 am

    How old are you, with a d300?? Rich folks huh…

     

  21. d4n131M3j14

    January 24, 2013 at 3:42 am

    Actually bokeh means out of focus, so “beautiful out of focus” means -nothing- the same as “lots of out of focus”

     

  22. darkernights

    January 24, 2013 at 3:51 am

    if i wanted to do very tight portrait work i’d go for the 85 1.8, or if i had more money i’d buy the 85 1.4 which has just about the creamiest bokeh ever. I use the 30mm for everyday shooting in low light or group/half body portrait work.

     

  23. kiewas

    January 24, 2013 at 4:27 am

    i also like very much this lens. using it most the time. great videos.

    BTW. What camcorder you using now?

     

  24. DavidTheDivine

    January 24, 2013 at 5:06 am

    Bokeh refers to the quality of the out of focus rendering not the amount… “beautiful bokeh” would be correct, “lots of bokeh” makes no sense. I think you’re looking for “it’s good for shallow depth of field”.