RSS
 

Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 Wide Angle | Lens Review

05 Jan

A test of the Sigma 10-20 mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM mounted on a Canon 550D (T2i). These clips are unedited and straight out of the camera using stock settings and the standard color profile. All clips at 10mm unless otherwise noted. I just received this camera and lens a few days ago, so I haven’t had much of a chance to thoroughly test them. However, I can easily say that this lens has been one of the most fun that I have ever used. The distortion at 10mm is very noticeable, but that’s part of the fun. Edges are also a bit soft at 10mm. I showed the lens at 10mm and 20mm so you can see how versatile it is. Let me know if there are any specific tests that you’d like to see done with this lens or any other lens. Please let me know how I can improve and subscribe as well! Song: soundcloud.com The T2i produces the same video as the T3i. (and similar video and FOV with this lens on the 7D, Ti1, 50D, 60D, and various Nikons and other cameras with 1.5x & 1.6x crop factors. This lens will vignette on a 5D)
Video Rating: 4 / 5

 
 

Tags: , , , , , ,

  1. KingLeetv

    January 5, 2013 at 11:56 pm

    cool. thanks

     
  2. MikesLensReview

    January 6, 2013 at 12:01 am

    Just a cheap tripod.

     
  3. Bylochino

    January 6, 2013 at 12:42 am

    very nice video.. cool lens .. Thanks for sharing .. Thumb up for the cat

     
  4. KingLeetv

    January 6, 2013 at 12:44 am

    were you using a dolly or tripod with those patio shots

     
  5. KmcStas

    January 6, 2013 at 1:38 am

    a cat! <3

     
  6. nitto1320i

    January 6, 2013 at 1:39 am

    how many feet away were you from that chair where you made the comparison of 10 and 20mm?

     
  7. MikesLensReview

    January 6, 2013 at 1:41 am

    =D

     
  8. siscopiso

    January 6, 2013 at 1:56 am

    @1:20 hahahahahahahahahahahahaha awesome awesome

     
  9. MikesLensReview

    January 6, 2013 at 2:51 am

    Thanks for the comment. Did you buy it new or used? I’d try to get it replaced if it’s that bad. You might have received a defective copy. The only time the lack of sharpness bugs me is at the far corners, which is to be expected. Otherwise it’s decently sharp.

     
  10. MikesLensReview

    January 6, 2013 at 3:34 am

    No problem, glad you found it helpful!

     
  11. grenademagnet09

    January 6, 2013 at 3:54 am

    great demo man, thanks, better vid than most at showing its strong points