RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Upwardly’

Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 First Impressions Review

17 Mar

The Sony a6300 is the company’s latest mid-range mirrorless camera. Like the a6000 it still offers 24MP resolution but the autofocus ability, video capability, build quality, viewfinder resolution and price have all been increased.

The most exciting change from our perspective is the a6300’s new sensor. Although the pixel count remains the same, the a6300’s sensor has a whopping 425 phase-detection AF points ranged across the sensor. The a6000 already offered one of the best AF systems in its class, when it comes to identifying and tracking subjects, so an upgrade in this area sounds extremely promising. The sensor is also built using newer fabrication processes that use copper wiring to help improve the sensor’s performance and possibly contributing to the camera’s slightly enhanced battery life.

The a6000 has been a huge success and has dominated its field to the extent that its combination of capability and price still looks impressive even as it enters the twilight of its career (Sony says it will live on, alongside the a6300*). That model represented a dip down-market for the series, with a drop in build-quality and spec relative to the NEX-6 that preceded it. The a6300 corrects that course, and sees the model regain the high-resolution viewfinder and magnesium alloy build offered by the older NEX-6.

Key features:

  • 24MP Exmor CMOS sensor
  • 425 phase detection points to give ‘4D Focus’ Hybrid AF
  • 4K (UHD) video – 25/24p from full width, 30p from smaller crop
  • 2.36m dot OLED finder with 120fps mode
  • Dust and moisture resisitant magnesium alloy body
  • Built-in Wi-Fi with NFC connection option
  • Built-in microphone socket

As with the previous 6-series E-mount cameras, the a6300 features a flip up/down 16:9 ratio screen. The shape of this screen hints at the 6300’s intended uses: video shooting as well as stills. The a6300’s movie features have been considerably uprated. It not only shoots 4K (UHD) at 24p or 25p from its full sensor width (or 30p from a tighter crop). It also gains a mic socket, the video-focused Picture Profile system (which includes the flat S-Log2 and S-Log3 gamma curves), and the ability to record time code.

This added emphasis on video makes absolute sense, since the camera’s stills performance is likely to be competitive with the best on the market but its video capabilities trounce most of its current rivals. The a6300 not only includes focus peaking and zebra stripes but, if its on-sensor phase detection works well, the ability to re-focus as you shoot with minimal risk of focus wobble and hunting, should make it easier to shoot great-looking footage.

All this makes it hard to overstate how promising the a6300 looks. A latest-generation sensor can only mean good things for the camera’s image quality and an autofocus system that moves beyond the performance of one of our benchmark cameras is an enticing prospect. Add to that excellent, well-supported video specifications, a better viewfinder and weather-sealed build, and it’s tempting to start planning for the camera’s coronation as King of the APS-C ILCs. Perhaps with only the price tag floating over proceedings, threatening just a little rain on that particular parade.

Specifications compared:

As well as comparing the a6300 with the a6000 as its predecessor/sister model, we’ll also look at what you get if you save up a bit more money and opt for full frame, rather than APS-C. We think at least some enthusiast users will find themselves making this decision, so are highlighting the differences.

  Sony a6000 Sony a6300 Sony a7 II
MSRP (Body Only) $ 650 $ 1000 $ 1700
Sensor size APS-C (23.5 x 15.6mm) APS-C (23.5 x 15.6mm) Full Frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm)
Pixel count 24MP 24MP 24MP
AF system Hybrid AF
(with 179 PDAF points)
Hybrid AF
(with 425 PDAF points)
Hybrid AF
(with 117 PDAF points)
Continuous shooting rate 11.0 fps 11.0 fps 5.0 fps
Screen 3″ tilting 921k dot LCD 3″ tilting 921k dot LCD 3″ tilting 1.23m dot LCD
Viewfinder OLED 1.44m dots OLED 2.36m dots 120fps refresh option OLED 2.36m dots
Movie Resolution 1920 x 1080 / 60p 4K 3840 x 2160 / 30p, 1920 x 1080 / 120p, 60p 1920 x 1080 / 60p
Image stabilization In-lens only In-lens only In-body 5-axis
Number of dials Two Two Three (plus Exp Comp.)
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000sec 1/4000sec 1/8000sec
Built-in flash  Yes Yes No
Hot shoe Yes Yes Yes
Flash sync speed 1/160sec 1/160sec 1/250sec
Battery life
(with EVF)
360 shots
(310 shots)
400 shots
(350 shots)
350 shots
(270 shots)
Weight (w/battery) 344 g (12.1 oz) 404 g (14.3 oz) 599 g (21.1 oz)
Dimensions 120 x 67 x 45 mm (4.7 x 2.6 x 1.8″) 120 x 67 x 49 mm (4.7 x 2.6 x 1.9″) 127 x 96 x 60 mm (5 x 3.8 x 2.4″)

A hit-for-six, slam-dunk, home-run?

If it’s successful in its attempts to step up from the performance of the a6000 then the a6300 could be sensational. However, there are three questions that we’d like to see addressed. The first relates to handling: why does a camera costing this much only have one dial that you can access without changing the position of your grip? The rear dial isn’t the worst we’ve encountered, but at this price point, we’d usually expect to find a dial under the forefinger and another under the thumb while maintaining a shooting grip.

The second relates to lenses. Sony is bundling the a6300 with the 16-50mm power zoom that’s far more notable for its convenience than its optical consistency, a move that’s likely to raise the question of what other lenses to fit. Sony offers a handful of reasonably-priced APS-C specific prime lenses as well as some more expensive FE-compatible full frame primes. However, in terms of standard zooms, you’re currently limited to the inexpensive 16-50mm or the considerably better 16-70mm F4 Zeiss that costs around the same amount as the camera again. The success of Sony’s full frame a7 cameras is only likely to improve third-party lens availability but there’s a risk that Sony’s focus will be on those full frame users for the foreseeable future.

Our final concern is the lack of joystick or touchscreen to reposition the AF point. This may be mitigated during stills shooting if the lock-on AF system works well enough (starting AF tracking and then recompose your shot in the knowledge that the AF point will stay where you want it), but it appears to be a real omission for refocusing while shooting video. We’ll see how significant all these concerns turn out to be, as the review unfolds.

Price and kit options

 The 16-50mm power zoom is far more notable for its convenience than its optical consistency.

The a6300 will sell for around $ 1000/£1000/€1,250, with a 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 power zoom kit commanding an MSRP of $ 1,150/£1,100/€1,400. This is a significant step up from the a6000’s $ 650/$ 800 launch price and even an increase compared to the similarly well-built NEX-6’s $ 750/$ 900 MSRP.

 Review History
17 March 2016 Intro, Specs, Body and Handling, Operations and Control and Studio Comparison published

*Unusually, the manufacturer’s claim that it’ll live on, alongside its apparent replacement model seems plausible. The differences in spec and price could allow them to sit fairly comfortably alongside one another, rather than the claim simply meaning ‘we’ll keep saying it’s a current model until most of the unsold stock has gone, to avoid angering retailers.’


If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).

Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.

We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X, Y, and Z and ideally A, B, and C.

This article is Copyright 1998 – 2016 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 First Impressions Review

Posted in Uncategorized