RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘talks’

Interview: Photographer Cath Simard talks about developing your own personal style

11 Aug

Introduction

Above: El Chaltén, located in the Argentine side of Patagonia, is known as the National Capital of trekking.

I first stumbled across Cath Simard’s work on Instagram and was instantly mesmerized by its beauty. Not only does the Canadian photographer capture stunning and unsullied locations around the globe, she’s developed a distinctive style. Every photographer serious about making a living with their work especially needs to focus on creating an aesthetic that makes them instantly recognizable.

Simard’s humble, down-to-earth demeanor and grace dealing with the occasional critic is also refreshing. I got a chance to catch up with the former model and find out how she got into photography, why she’s passionate about teaching others her methods, and how traveling solo altered her outlook.

What inspired you to get into photography?

Above: This campsite, located at an altitude well above 4,000 meters, was the perfect site to capture the night sky against the Andes Mountains in Peru.

I started in the creative industry as a model when I was 15 years old. I modeled for ten years and worked as an Art Director and fashion stylist for four years. I’ve always been attracted to the visual arts but I would have never thought I’d be a photographer one day. Then, back in 2014, I got tired of the fashion industry. I decided to sell all my belongings and buy a one-way ticket to Australia with very little money in the bank.

I did farm work for two years over there, documenting my journey with my iPhone. I was approached by an Australian bandana company to take photos of their products. I said yes, immediately, even if I had no experience using a camera or in professional shooting. I decided to purchase a Sony a6000 with a 35mm F1.8 lens and started photographing people wearing bandanas doing outdoor activities.

Why did you gravitate toward nature?

Above: After a long evening hike, the best was made of a foggy morning in the mountains of Peru.

After completing my farm work, I decided to go on a three-month solo trip covering Indonesia, Hawaii, and Western Canada. Never before had I seen such huge mountains as when arriving in Alberta. The feeling I got when I saw them for the first time is indescribable. It was in Alberta I discovered my passion for hiking and I was introduced to scrambling, which allowed me to access more remote areas and reach viewpoints that have never been photographed before.

I started to document my adventures and fell in love with photographing the mountains, specifically. It was the first time in my life I found something that made me feel whole and brought me so much joy and energy.

How were you inspired to grow into offering workshops?

Above: Here are the Cerro Yerupajá and Siula Grande mountains, in Peru, amongst other giants, captured between 2:00 and 3:00 am.

Three years ago, a company from Quebec (my hometown) asked me if I would be interested in teaching photography to a group of 10 people for one day. It was something I have never done before and I was curious to find out if it is something I’d enjoy, so I said ‘yes.’ That day was quite a revelation for me – the amount of excitement, satisfaction, and the feeling of accomplishment I got from teaching each student was indescribable. A new passion was born.

After this experience, I decided to combine my passion for teaching, hiking and traveling into unique international photography workshops for people to learn photography while completely immersing themselves in nature. I highly enjoy spending time with people that have similar interests, sharing my knowledge, and giving as much insight as possible so they can return home with images they are proud of.

Which photo are you most proud of and why?

Above: My favorite photo to date was captured at Jasper National Park in the Alberta province of Canada.

I don’t have one in particular but, in general, the images I’m the proudest of are the ones where I followed my own personal creative vision. They often involve a lot of physical work and perseverance. Being unique is also something I value and prioritize a lot, so I’d say that my favorite images usually have a unique and original compositional component or mood along with a great story behind them.

What gear are you using lately?

Above: I wanted to capture this ice cave in Iceland at night. Although I didn’t get Northern Lights when I took this particular image, I decided to composite it with a night sky I captured a couple of days before.

I use the Sony a7R III + 16-34mm F2.8 lens for 80% of my images. I also love the Sony 100-400mm F4.5-5.8 lens for tighter shots of mountain peaks and compression.

What is your favorite photo editing software?

Above: This image was taken with a drone at El Chaltén National Park. It’s important to note that you need a permit to fly inside the borders of a National Park, or you need to take off outside the border.

I used to say Lightroom Classic CC, but I’ve been experimenting much more with Photoshop over the last year. I like to combine both software programs for my editing.

You’ve traveled extensively. Do you have a favorite place? If so, why?

Above: My favorite image from 2019 was taken at Torres del Paine National Park in Chile’s Patagonia region.

I simply cannot choose between Patagonia and Peru. I love the variety in landscape and wilderness that Patagonia offers and the remoteness and untouched beauty of Peru. Both places demand that you put work into creating great images – especially Peru, since you need to trek in high altitude for many days to reach interesting viewpoints.

Any destinations you wish to visit?

Above: Also captured in El Chaltén, I challenged myself to get out of my comfort zone by creating something interesting out of an average foreground and backdrop.

I would love to explore Alaska – especially its giant snow-covered peaks, glaciers, lakes, and ice caves. It seems this part of the world has it all!

What grounds you and keeps you inspired?

Above: I spent all night photographing the Andes Mountains in Peru. Obviously the Milky Way doesn’t bend in an arch but I had some fun with compositing to create this effect.

Traveling solo multiple times allowed me to do discover hidden parts of myself through self-reflection and introspection. I think that introspection is essential for becoming a better person and it is the single most powerful tool for internal self-awareness and how to find true happiness.

When you take the time to become an expert, you make better decisions, you are more confident, you learn to respect your limits which all brings you closer to live the life you want. You worry less about what other people think of you, you become more empathic to others, and have a more positive attitude towards life.

This is definitely easier said than done. You need to find a time and space for this, and to me this happens whenever I’m alone hiking in the mountains. It’s like a meditation that grounds me and helps me get back to what’s important in life.

Other tools that help are self improvement books such as How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie and What to Say When You Talk to Yourself by Dr. Shad Helmstetter, to name a few.

What advice do you have for someone looking to develop their own style?

Above: A final perspective of El Chaltén, located in Patagonia.

Pick three photographers that inspire you and analyze their images. Why do they speak to you? Try to identify the elements that you like in their photos and look for them when you are shooting or editing. I do believe that imitating – not copying – is a great way to learn and find your own personal style.

Another thing is to listen and trust your creative instinct. For example, I started creating composites at a very early stage of my learning process. Compositing has always been a creative way for me to express myself but it has always attracted negative comments. I’ve often been told that my images were too contrasting, too blue or too Photoshopped.

If I would have left these comments get to me and influence the way I create, I would never be where I am today as an artist. The moral of the story for me is to ignore negative comments and only take constructive criticism from people you trust and who you know truly believe in you.

Lastly, developing your style takes time. A lot of a time. So be patient, learn new techniques and practice as much as you can.


Catherine Simard is a Canadian-born self-taught travel/landscape photographer and digital artist with a passion for the outdoors and the wilderness. She is a Sony Artisan of Imagery. Simard will be resuming workshops at various international destinations in 2021.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Interview: Photographer Cath Simard talks about developing your own personal style

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Interview: Photographer Cath Simard talks about developing your own unique style

10 Aug

Introduction

Above: El Chaltén, located in the Argentine side of Patagonia, is known as the National Capital of trekking.

I first stumbled across Cath Simard’s work on Instagram and was instantly mesmerized by its beauty. Not only does the Canadian photographer capture stunning and unsullied locations around the globe, she’s developed a distinctive style. Every photographer serious about making a living with their work especially needs to focus on creating an aesthetic that makes them instantly recognizable.

Simard’s humble, down-to-earth demeanor and grace dealing with the occasional critic is also refreshing. I got a chance to catch up with the former model and find out how she got into photography, why she’s passionate about teaching others her methods, and how traveling solo altered her outlook.

What inspired you to get into photography?

Above: This campsite, located at an altitude well above 4,000 meters, was the perfect site to capture the night sky against the Andes Mountains in Peru.

I started in the creative industry as a model when I was 15 years old. I modeled for ten years and worked as an Art Director and fashion stylist for four years. I’ve always been attracted to the visual arts but I would have never thought I’d be a photographer one day. Then, back in 2014, I got tired of the fashion industry. I decided to sell all my belongings and buy a one-way ticket to Australia with very little money in the bank.

I did farm work for two years over there, documenting my journey with my iPhone. I was approached by an Australian bandana company to take photos of their products. I said yes, immediately, even if I had no experience using a camera or in professional shooting. I decided to purchase a Sony a6000 with a 35mm F1.8 lens and started photographing people wearing bandanas doing outdoor activities.

Why did you gravitate toward nature?

Above: After a long evening hike, the best was made of a foggy morning in the mountains of Peru.

After completing my farm work, I decided to go on a three-month solo trip covering Indonesia, Hawaii, and Western Canada. Never before had I seen such huge mountains as when arriving in Alberta. The feeling I got when I saw them for the first time is indescribable. It was in Alberta I discovered my passion for hiking and I was introduced to scrambling, which allowed me to access more remote areas and reach viewpoints that have never been photographed before.

I started to document my adventures and fell in love with photographing the mountains, specifically. It was the first time in my life I found something that made me feel whole and brought me so much joy and energy.

How were you inspired to grow into offering workshops?

Above: Here are the Cerro Yerupajá and Siula Grande mountains, in Peru, amongst other giants, captured between 2:00 and 3:00 am.

Three years ago, a company from Quebec (my hometown) asked me if I would be interested in teaching photography to a group of 10 people for one day. It was something I have never done before and I was curious to find out if it is something I’d enjoy, so I said ‘yes.’ That day was quite a revelation for me – the amount of excitement, satisfaction, and the feeling of accomplishment I got from teaching each student was indescribable. A new passion was born.

After this experience, I decided to combine my passion for teaching, hiking and traveling into unique international photography workshops for people to learn photography while completely immersing themselves in nature. I highly enjoy spending time with people that have similar interests, sharing my knowledge, and giving as much insight as possible so they can return home with images they are proud of.

Which photo are you most proud of and why?

Above: My favorite photo to date was captured at Jasper National Park in the Alberta province of Canada.

I don’t have one in particular but, in general, the images I’m the proudest of are the ones where I followed my own personal creative vision. They often involve a lot of physical work and perseverance. Being unique is also something I value and prioritize a lot, so I’d say that my favorite images usually have a unique and original compositional component or mood along with a great story behind them.

What gear are you using lately?

Above: I wanted to capture this ice cave in Iceland at night. Although I didn’t get Northern Lights when I took this particular image, I decided to composite it with a night sky I captured a couple of days before.

I use the Sony a7R III + 16-34mm F2.8 lens for 80% of my images. I also love the Sony 100-400mm F4.5-5.8 lens for tighter shots of mountain peaks and compression.

What is your favorite photo editing software?

Above: This image was taken with a drone at El Chaltén National Park. It’s important to note that you need a permit to fly inside the borders of a National Park, or you need to take off outside the border.

I used to say Lightroom Classic CC, but I’ve been experimenting much more with Photoshop over the last year. I like to combine both software programs for my editing.

You’ve traveled extensively. Do you have a favorite place? If so, why?

Above: My favorite image from 2019 was taken at Torres del Paine National Park in Chile’s Patagonia region.

I simply cannot choose between Patagonia and Peru. I love the variety in landscape and wilderness that Patagonia offers and the remoteness and untouched beauty of Peru. Both places demand that you put work into creating great images – especially Peru, since you need to trek in high altitude for many days to reach interesting viewpoints.

Any destinations you wish to visit?

Above: Also captured in El Chaltén, I challenged myself to get out of my comfort zone by creating something interesting out of an average foreground and backdrop.

I would love to explore Alaska – especially its giant snow-covered peaks, glaciers, lakes, and ice caves. It seems this part of the world has it all!

What grounds you and keeps you inspired?

Above: I spent all night photographing the Andes Mountains in Peru. Obviously the Milky Way doesn’t bend in an arch but I had some fun with compositing to create this effect.

Traveling solo multiple times allowed me to do discover hidden parts of myself through self-reflection and introspection. I think that introspection is essential for becoming a better person and it is the single most powerful tool for internal self-awareness and how to find true happiness.

When you take the time to become an expert, you make better decisions, you are more confident, you learn to respect your limits which all brings you closer to live the life you want. You worry less about what other people think of you, you become more empathic to others, and have a more positive attitude towards life.

This is definitely easier said than done. You need to find a time and space for this, and to me this happens whenever I’m alone hiking in the mountains. It’s like a meditation that grounds me and helps me get back to what’s important in life.

Other tools that help are self improvement books such as How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie and What to Say When You Talk to Yourself by Dr. Shad Helmstetter, to name a few.

What advice do you have for someone looking to develop their own style?

Above: A final perspective of El Chaltén, located in Patagonia.

Pick three photographers that inspire you and analyze their images. Why do they speak to you? Try to identify the elements that you like in their photos and look for them when you are shooting or editing. I do believe that imitating – not copying – is a great way to learn and find your own personal style.

Another thing is to listen and trust your creative instinct. For example, I started creating composites at a very early stage of my learning process. Compositing has always been a creative way for me to express myself but it has always attracted negative comments. I’ve often been told that my images were too contrasting, too blue or too Photoshopped.

If I would have left these comments get to me and influence the way I create, I would never be where I am today as an artist. The moral of the story for me is to ignore negative comments and only take constructive criticism from people you trust and who you know truly believe in you.

Lastly, developing your style takes time. A lot of a time. So be patient, learn new techniques and practice as much as you can.


Catherine Simard is a Canadian-born self-taught travel/landscape photographer and digital artist with a passion for the outdoors and the wilderness. She is a Sony Artisan of Imagery. Simard will be resuming workshops at various international destinations in 2021.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Interview: Photographer Cath Simard talks about developing your own unique style

Posted in Uncategorized

 

‘Accurate autofocus on any subject in any environment’: Olympus engineer talks OM-D E-M1 Mark III AF

14 Apr
Olympus’ newly-announced OM-D E-M1 Mark III (left) alongside the OM-D E-M1X.

The recently-launched Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III features an advanced 121-point all cross-type autofocus system, and many other capabilities inherited from the flagship OM-D E-M1X including Live ND mode and various multi-shot features.

Modern mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras use one, or a combination of two main types of autofocus: contrast-detection and phase-detection. Contrast-detection autofocus works by driving focus until the contrast of a sampled area on the sensor is at its maximum – the presumed point of sharp focus. Contrast-detection is highly accurate, but can be slow, and relies on a certain amount of ‘trial and error’.

Phase-detection works more like human vision, using dedicated pixels to compare light coming from your subject from two slightly different perspectives at the same time. This allows the camera to judge depth, allowing for faster focus acquisition, without the ‘hunting’ characteristic of many purely contrast-detection autofocus systems.

Traditional phase-detection autofocus systems rely on pixels that are sensitive to vertical lines in a scene. Some, more sophisticated systems use a ‘cross-type’ pixel arrangement, which can detect horizontal or vertical detail, meaning that accurate focus can be achieved even with complex, non-linear subjects.

The 121-point autofocus system in the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and the E-M1X uses a combination of cross-type phase and contrast-detection, to ensure fast and accurate focus in a range of challenging environments.

In this interview, Tetsuo Kikuchi, manager of Imaging System Development at Olympus Corp explains how the E-M1 Mark III’s autofocus system was developed, and what it means to design a camera for demanding professionals.


What are the user requirements for professional-grade autofocus systems?

The most common requests we receive from professionals are that the camera must focus on their desired subject as quickly and accurately as possible, and it must continue to focus on that subject in any situation.

Professionals often stress the importance of operability, too. Their work requires the ability to quickly and easily adjust autofocus settings as shooting situations and subjects change. We believe that in order to satisfy professionals, we have to be able to meet all of those requirements.

What was the main customer feedback about autofocus in previous models?

After releasing the OM-D E-M1, which was Olympus’ first on-chip PDAF mirrorless camera, we received many requests for more AF points. These requests came from professional photographers and ‘prothusiasts’, especially in the genres of sports, bird, wildlife, and aviation.

We collated performance feedback and took special note of comments regarding focus drift to the background. Then, we set out to develop the 121-point all-cross-type PDAF system to eradicate this issue, delivering highly accurate focusing with all AF points, enabling photographers to keep their subject in focus.

Olympus’ 121-point all-cross-type PDAF system covers the majority of the frame.

What was the main priority when developing autofocus for the E-M1X and E-M1 Mark III?

There were two main goals, actually: ‘Quick focusing on targeted subjects after engaging autofocus’ and ‘stable and highly accurate continuous focusing on targeted subjects in any environment’.

What was the concept behind the 121-point all-cross-type On-chip Phase Detection AF point array?

We developed our on-chip PDAF system to achieve our goal of accurate and continuous autofocus on any subject in any environment.

The AF sensor array layout on the image sensor – which is unique to Olympus – is designed to detect any vertical, horizontal, or diagonal line patterns on subjects, and to find a defocused subject in the foreground. Thanks to our AF sensor layout design, our on-chip PDAF can deliver the high-speed focusing of phase detection and the accurate subject detection of cross-type sensors that DSLR cameras have previously achieved with a dedicated AF sensor. Our system has the added advantage of wider autofocus area coverage.

What makes Olympus autofocus technologies different to or better than competitors?

Our PDAF system can detect vertical and horizontal line patterns equally, allowing the camera to detect and focus on subjects in the foreground. This is a merit of Olympus. Because the PDAF sensors are arrayed not in one high density line but discretely over the entire area of the image sensor, any potential negative effect on image quality is also reduced.

Olympus’ most recent firmware delivers accurate autofocus without the risk of ‘focus drift’ to the background.

OM-D E-M1 Mark III, M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO. F4, 1/250sec, ISO 3200

How difficult is it to implement cross-type on-chip phase-detection autofocus technology?

The most difficult challenge we faced when developing our all cross-type on-chip PDAF system was in determining the optimal layout of the PDAF sensors: one that would achieve the highest level of focusing accuracy with horizontally-arrayed and vertically-arrayed AF sensors simultaneously. In principle, utilizing phase detection AF can cause measurement errors; minimizing such errors is required for highly accurate focusing.

Could you elaborate on the sources of these measurement errors?

The measurement errors are attributed to a combination of factors, but the degree of measurement error is specific to the PDAF sensor layout. Therefore, we needed to build a proprietary in-house method to evaluate the reliability of measured distance data. This was important when we commenced development of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II, which was our first camera model equipped with all cross-type PDAF sensors.

Using pre-production cameras, our R&D members worked closely with professional photographers

Using pre-production cameras, our R&D members worked closely with professional photographers to conduct shooting tests, and these tests were repeated many times to refine our method. As a result, we are able to accurately evaluate our PDAF reliability and deliver exceptional performance.

Measurement errors can also come from the lens. However, our cameras can automatically correct for such errors according to the lens’ known characteristics, thus eliminating any effect.

Concept rendering, showing how cross-type phase-detection autofocus pixels are arrayed on the sensor of Olympus’ OM-D E-M1 Mark III and E-M1X.

Is there an autofocus advantage to a smaller sensor compared to APS-C or full-frame?

In principle, there is no correlation between PDAF performance and sensor size. However, our on-chip PDAF strongly complements our compact system size (which is ideal for photography genres such as bird and wildlife) because this autofocus method allows for a small camera body and fast focusing on moving subjects.

Lens resolution can affect autofocus accuracy though, because high resolution lenses make it possible to more precisely detect focus position.

The OM-D E-M1X is one of Olympus’ OM-D models that utilizes its contrast-detection plus all-cross-type phase-detection AF system.

How will the computational and machine learning based approaches we’ve seen in Olympus cameras evolve?

To ensure our products deliver the highest levels of performance, continuous device evolution must be paired with ever-evolving computational photography technologies. We have been heavily investing our resources to meet this challenge. For example, the E-M1 Mark III boasts our Handheld High Res Shot Mode, a technology that can produce high resolution low noise images, similar to those of full frame cameras, but with a system that’s significantly smaller in size.

We will develop new technologies to enable photographers to capture challenging images which are only possible using an Olympus camera and lens

We have also achieved advanced subject detection AF with AI-based deep learning technology. Features such as these will be continuously improved. Looking to the future, we will develop new technologies to enable photographers to capture challenging images which are only possible using an Olympus camera and lens, negating the need for extra equipment, special shooting skills, or additional post-processing.

The OM-D E-M1X has 121-point contrast-detection plus all-cross-type phase-detection AF. It features Olympus’ Subject Detection AF with AI-based deep learning technology.

OM-D E-M1 Mark III, M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO. F5.6, 1/1600sec, ISO 400

Smartphone cameras today perform dynamic and local adjustments to automatically create a pleasing image. Do you see Olympus cameras also adopting this ‘auto’ approach in the future?

Our goals do not include the development of technology that significantly limits users in their individual creativity and expression. Instead, we develop cameras that facilitate the creative process, helping photographers bring their image concepts to life. While it is important that we enable photographers to utilize their skills and knowledge, we also see value to improving camera features for shooting assistance.

Thus, we will strive to uphold a balance between expression and automation with new technology that can benefit photographers of all skill levels and genres.


Tetsuo Kikuchi is manager of Imaging System Development at Olympus Corp, in Tokyo.

This is sponsored content, created with the support of Olympus. What does this mean?

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on ‘Accurate autofocus on any subject in any environment’: Olympus engineer talks OM-D E-M1 Mark III AF

Posted in Uncategorized

 

‘Future lenses for today’: Sony’s Yasuyuki Nagata talks high-end optics

11 Jun
Yasuyuki Nagata, Head of Sony’s global Interchangeable Lens business, pictured at the press event where US journalists got our first look at the new G Master 600mm F4.

We were in New Jersey recently, for the unveiling of two new Sony lenses – the G Master 600mm F4 OSS, and the more enthusiast-focused 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS. During the event, we spent some time with Yasuyuki Nagata, head of Sony’s global interchangeable lens business, to discuss the new products, and Sony’s approach to mirrorless lens development.


These products use technologies developed for the 400mm F2.8 – how has that product performed in the market?

The sales have been much higher than we expected – more than double. We thought at the first stages of development for the lens that there were only a few people who would shoot sports with our products – for example only Alpha 9 users, or photographers who shoot smaller small sporting events. But after we launched the 400mm, we have seen demand from many of the top sports photographers working at large events.

Do you have a sense of how many professional photographers are using that lens, versus enthusiasts?

Almost 70% of the [customer base] for that lens are professionals. But we have prioritized allocation for agency photographers. Availability is still capped – there is a long waiting list.

Who do you see as the target market for the new lenses?

Compared to the 400mm, the 600mm is more targeted at high-end amateurs. Photographers that shoot birds, wildlife, aircraft. Maybe 70-80% will be wildlife photographers. That’s why the market is bigger for the 600mm than the 400mm.

The 200-600 will appeal to the same audience [to some extent] but some people who use those kinds of lenses will use them with APS-C cameras. To get more reach.

The new GM 600mm F4 is a big lens, but it’s the lightest in its class, coming in at just 10g less than the similarly-styled Canon EF 600mm F4 III

What are the specific differences between the two new lenses that account for the difference between ‘G’ and ‘GM’?

With G Master lenses we always include the latest, innovative technologies. We never compromise. Always the latest technologies. With the 200-600mm, there are some compromises, for example in the materials, or the body. We didn’t use magnesium-alloy, or the [newer XD linear autofocus] actuator.

The key concept is ‘future lenses for today’

Affordability is also important for the G series, to expand the size of the market. And sometimes it’s practicality. We don’t actually need to use the XD linear actuators with a small focusing group for example [like the one in the 200-600mm].

What were the major priorities for the design of the 600mm?

Basically we’re targeting the best of the best. Without compromise. Every time we plan to make a G Master series lens, we aim for ‘no competition’. Which means the highest spec. We don’t compromise on anything. Autofocus, image quality, light weight. What I mean by that is we develop new technologies every time. So there’s not a particular standard for G Master, we just include innovative technologies every time. Technologies that didn’t exist before.

We’re always listening to our professionals. And after we launched the 400mm, a lot of professionals told us they wanted a 600mm. We also consider camera bodies that will come in the future as well. The key concept is ‘future lenses for today’.

All of the main controls on the 600mm F4 are the same size, and in the same position as those on the 400mm F2.8. This is deliberate, and intended to make it as easy as possible for photographers to use the lenses alongside one another at events.

So when you’re designing a lens like this are you planning for even more focus calculations per second and faster frame rates than the a9 can achieve, for example?

Yes.

If we assume that this is a lens that will be used by a lot of a9 photographers, what kind of camera do they want next?

They always request more speed, less weight, greater usability. I think that every professional photographer wants something different. We gather all those voices and we use that feedback to plan what we should do.

When you develop a lens like the 200-600mm, how important is the requirement for video shooting?

It must support video functions. Convergence from the video side is a very obvious trend, even in the US market. That’s why we use linear action autofocus actuators. Part of it is mechanics, and part of it is optics.

The integration with our camera bodies is much better than our competitors

In zooms we’re always trying to reduce focus breathing for example, and axial shift. All of the characteristics in zooms which [can] make it a challenge to use them for video.

How would you summarize the competitive advantages of these new lenses compared to existing products on the market?

If you shoot seriously, the 600mm is for you. The spec of the lens itself, its weight and its resolution is perhaps almost the same [as the current best competitive alternative]. But the integration with our camera bodies is much better than our competitors, I think. So if photographers want to maximize the performance of their camera body, they should use this lens. At this moment, there is no competition to the Alpha 9. Its performance is the best.

The 200-600mm is a more comfortable lens to carry, at a reasonable price. We want many customers to use the 200-600mm. And we made it compatible with our tele-converters. We want to expand that field.

The 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 is a pretty long lens, but a lot of that length is the removable hood. Unlike most lenses of its kind though, the zoom is internal, so it doesn’t get longer when zoomed in.

How much difference does the body make to lens focus performance? For example if someone is using a first generation Sony Alpha 7, how different will their experience of this lens be to someone using an a9?

It will be a totally different experience. We’re always saying that we try to see the future of cameras, and this lens is capable of much [faster] performance than the current specs of the a9. So this lens will be able to keep up with the next generation. It has much more potential [than the specifications of the current generation cameras].

Is the speed of electronic communication between the camera and lens a big part of that?

Yes. We hear some manufacturers talking a lot about the number of channels of communication between camera and lens, but if the autofocus actuators in the lens can’t keep up, it doesn’t matter.

The biggest challenge is keeping the size and weight down

When we design lenses we’re always thinking about the camera bodies. Compatibility between the mechanical parts, electrics, even software. These lenses are designed specifically for our mirrorless cameras.

What are the major challenges in making such a small, lightweight lens with such a fast autofocus actuator?

The biggest challenge is keeping the size and weight down. The optical components are determined largely by [the constraints of] optical physics. There aren’t any magic technologies to reduce the size of optical elements, and the diameter of the elements can’t be reduced because it determines the F number. The electronic parts on the other hand, like the autofocus unit, we can introduce innovative technologies which make the difference. Size and weight is the most difficult thing.

This schematic shows the weight distribution of the older 400mm F2.8 compared to the last-generation 500mm F4 for the DSLR A-mount. The new 600mm F4, like the 400mm, concentrates is weight towards the center-rear of the lens, which helps a lot when shooting with a monopod or for hand-held work.

What does Sony need to do with its optical lineup to become the number one manufacturer in terms of sales?

I can’t disclose future plans, but there are a lot of opportunities, both on the telephoto side and the wide-angle side. Every segment of the lineup, there are opportunities to expand.

What is the attachment rate for teleconverters with the 400mm F2.8?

It’s at least 10%. Teleconverter compatibility was a big priority with these new 200-600mm and 600mm lenses.

Clearly the GM line is where the premium technologies are introduced – will they filter down into consumer products?

It’s possible, depending on timing. Over time we’ll introduce new technologies, and then the [existing] technologies will cascade down, one by one. Lenses are on the market for a long time, not like bodies which can launch every couple of years. But lenses it’s easily more than five years. It’s very hard to compare the camera and lens markets.

You talk about these lenses as being designed for the next generation of cameras – how long do you think these lenses will stand as benchmark performers?

Much longer [than camera bodies], I think maybe about 10 years.


Editor’s note: Barnaby Britton

When I last spoke to Mr. Nagata in 2017, he spoke of the increasing importance of professional photographers to Sony, and his ‘dream’ of seeing Sony cameras and lenses at the Tokyo Olympics in 2020. With the new G Master 600mm F4, he and his designers have taken one step further towards that goal, providing a lens which – like the G Master 400mm F2.8 – represents an almost symbolic position in any ‘serious’ camera system’s lens portfolio. It’s clearly very important to Sony that the brand is taken seriously by professional sports and wildlife photographers, and with lenses like these – and cameras like the all-powerful a9 the company is making a very strong case.

In my opinion, the a9 is the most effective camera on the market today for shooting sports. A lot of people will argue the point, but I think the technical evidence, if you care to go looking for it, is clear. That doesn’t mean that overnight, professionals will ditch their Canon and Nikon gear for Sony, of course. Without the lenses – and the professional service support – that they need, the a9 is little more than a curiosity. According to Mr Nagata, the entire concept of the G Master lens lineup is ‘future lenses for today’. This means two things. Firstly, that the lenses should offer the kind of image quality which won’t look out of date in a number of years, and secondly, that they’ll be able to keep up with – and take advantage of – future Sony camera technologies.

Older D/SLR lenses were not designed for 20fps capture using on-sensor phase-detection autofocus

The a9 is a seriously powerful camera, capable of communicating with compatible lenses at a rate of sixty times per second, but at some point it will be replaced by something even more powerful, with a higher sensor resolution, and capable of even greater performance. A lens like the G Master 600mm F4, with its twin high-speed ‘extreme dynamic (XD)’ linear focus motors, has to be designed with this kind of development in mind.

While Mr. Nagata is perfectly candid that in terms of image quality and basic specs alone, it might look similar to existing lenses from other manufacturers (the newest version of Canon’s EF 600mm F4 being the most obvious reference point), those older D/SLR lenses were not designed for 20fps capture using on-sensor phase-detection autofocus. ‘No competition’ indeed…

Slightly further down the lineup, the 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 is a more mass-market lens. Despite its lower positioning, it’s actually likely to be more important to, and more widely used by, enthusiast photographers and DPReview readers. It’s not a small lens, but the internal zoom and focus keep it relatively compact when out and about, and in my experience of shooting with it, the versatility – and sharpness – is impressive. This is the kind of lens that Sony has to release, in order to ‘expand the size of the market’ and hit Canon and Nikon where it hurts – in the high-end enthusiast market segment.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on ‘Future lenses for today’: Sony’s Yasuyuki Nagata talks high-end optics

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Motorcycle photographer Mark ‘Kato’ Kariya talks gear

29 Jan

California native Mark ‘Kato’ Kariya has been shooting motorsports for more than 30 years, during which time he’s used countless cameras, lenses and bags. Recently he’s been working with Lowepro’s new range of ‘ProTactic AW II’ camera backpacks, designed for use in tough conditions. We spoke to him about his career, his gear, and his tips for successful motorsports photography.


What’s your background?

I grew up in rural Southern California, where my family grows oranges and avocados. I’ve been riding motorcycles since I was nine because that’s how we checked the sprinklers every morning and afternoon – a Honda 90 trail bike fits between the trees easily and it’s a lot faster than walking! I worked on the high school yearbook as a photographer in my junior and senior years, and I joined the Daily Trojan newspaper when I was at USC, where I got my BA in journalism.

After graduating, I figured I’d end up on a daily paper somewhere but instead I started covering local motocross races for Cycle News – a weekly publication centered heavily on race coverage. A year after graduating, Cycle News offered me a job as a staff editor, which was a dream melding of being in the motorcycle industry and using my degree.

After two years at CN, my former editor offered me a staff position at a new magazine he was starting called Dirt Rider. I accepted and stayed there for almost 15 years before going freelance in the late 90s, specializing in event coverage as well as photo shoots for various race teams and, on occasion, manufacturers.

How did you get your start in photography?

Upon graduating eighth grade we were asked what we wanted to do when we grew up. I had no idea! The first thing that popped into mind was photographer so I went with that. I took a basic photo class at a junior college one summer, but other than that, I learned by seeing what others were doing and figuring things out for myself.


Mark Kariya portfolio gallery

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_0363762435″,”galleryId”:”0363762435″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

What’s your ideal way of working?

It depends on the job. Even for race coverage, it varies. At some races, I can get by with hiking around to various shoot locations and get different types of shots. At other races, it really helps being able to ride to locations, usually on the course before the race starts, though this limits the equipment I can take. Then there are races like the Baja 1000 where there’s so much distance between locations that I drive my truck to various access points off the highway.

It just depends on what the client wants. If I’m shooting at a track or somewhere I don’t have to go too far, I can bring more equipment and hike around while sometimes the client wants a more remote location so I ride with a backpack to carry what I can.

What’s your perfect camera bag?

There’s no perfect bag. Each type of job seems to require a different bag depending on what equipment’s needed. I usually use one bag as a travel bag because it’ll carry most of the stuff I’ll need and fits underneath the seat in front of me or in the overhead of most larger commercial airliners (Boeing 737 Airbus A321 and larger, for the most part). For the smaller regional jets, it can get a little tricky; most of the time my travel bag will fit underneath the seat in front. The hard case/trunk for a 400mm F2.8 or 200-400mm F4 will fit in either spot on big and small jets.

What’s the most important factor for you, when it comes to gear?

As I cover a lot of desert races, dust is a huge issue so I try to stay upwind whenever possible. If it’s not dusty, then it’ll likely be muddy and rainy. Due to the harsh environments off-road motorcycle races are held in, I need my gear to be rugged as well as easily portable. I always use two of the same camera bodies and am currently running Nikon D5s as my primaries with a D4 as a third when required.

You don’t want to expose the sensor or other internals so I’ll typically leave lenses on the cameras all day, with the 17-35mm F2.8 on one body (always with a a Speedlight SB-900 or 910 on it for fill) and 70-200mm F2.8 on the other. If I think there’s going to be a situation where multiple lights might be called for, I’ll also carry two extra lights; the last of my SB-800s just died so I’m trying to get SB-5000s dialed in.


Mark’s top tips for motorsports photography:

  1. Know your equipment and what all the different buttons and settings are, something that only comes from reading the manual.

  2. Study the work of photographers you admire and figure out what makes their shots stand out for you.

  3. You’re not always going to be in a place with the best action so at least make sure the shots are technically excellent (in focus, properly exposed, composed well).

  4. Experiment with different settings, locations and equipment (one thing I’ve learned is my bodies produce the best color when I’m underexposing by anywhere from 0 to 1.7 EV depending on ambient light and where the sun is).

  5. Since everyone wears helmets you won’t be able to photograph the emotion associated with racing unless you shoot people shots (spectators, mechanics or racers after the event like on the podium or in their pit area).

How are you finding the LowePro ProTactic II bags?

I’m using the prototype BP 450 AW II that we used for the intro video and it is far superior to the kind of generic backpack I’d been using for 20 years. It’ll accept the two bodies with lenses attached that are my go-to’s with little more required than turning the lens hoods around. When I find a shoot location, I hop off the bike, take the ProTactic off, put it on the ground and unzip the rear panel. Easy! I haven’t needed to access gear through the side doors yet, though I appreciate their availability.

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_9978621535″,”galleryId”:”9978621535″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

I like how the ProTactic is a dedicated camera bag so the internal dividers are movable, allowing me to arrange things as I need to, and its padding provides a bit more protection from the elements (dust and mud, usually) and crashes, which happen occasionally when I run out of talent.

What advice would you give someone who wants to get into motorsports photography?

it’s very difficult to get trackside access for auto races, at least in the US. Dirt bike races are easier, except for the professional Supercross or motocross Nationals, flat track and road races – those are treated like car races as far as credentialing is concerned. But accessing the course for off-road motorcycle races is much easier. Contact the promoter/organizer a week or two before the race to see what’s needed. Even if you can’t get trackside, you can usually still get some nice shots from the fence.

Watch the way the light changes throughout the day and don’t ignore what’s in the background. Use everything you can environmentally to enhance your shot. If you’re just getting into race shots, fast shutter speeds like 1/1000 and higher are ‘safer’ and will let you get a higher percentage of good shots. I’m old school so I still try to keep my ISO as low as possible.

Once you get fairly comfortable capturing good action, experiment with different settings, from shutter speeds to white balance (again, keeping an eye on environmental factors).

Learn more about the Lowepro ProTactic range of bags and accessories


This is sponsored content, created by Vitec. What does this mean?

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Motorcycle photographer Mark ‘Kato’ Kariya talks gear

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Keith Ladzinski talks Nikon mirrorless: ‘It’s a different world now. But it’s so much more fun’

21 Nov

Keith Ladzinski is a wildlife and adventure photographer, filmmaker and Nikon Ambassador based in Colorado. He’s been using Nikon DSLRs since the early 2000s, and his most recent film project was created using the new Z 6. In this interview he explains the background of the project, how the Z 6 allows him to bounce seamlessly between photo and video, and what’s changed since he bought his first digital camera in 2004.


Can you describe the project you’ve been working on?

I’ve been working with athletes, old friends, they’re professional climbers and we’ve been shooting in areas where when I first started working as a professional photographer. So one place for example is where I shot my first cover story, and another was where I did another of my first big stories. So we basically went from Utah all the way back to Colorado. As I started thinking about this project, it became sort of one big nostalgic trip in a lot of ways. It was with people I had history with, and locations I had history with.

The way I wanted to put this thing together was to sort of look back right to 2004 when I was working with my first proper digital camera, which was the Nikon D2X. The only things that have stayed the same over that time are my relationships with people, and with those places. So coming back into Colorado, where I first learned to shoot photos in the Rockies, and building a narrative to go along with that story – it just worked so well.

So you’ve got to see 15 years of digital photography evolution.

Absolutely. I’ve been lucky to get a view of the evolution of digital photography from 2004 to where we’re at now, these tiny mirrorless cameras that give you extraordinary video. When I first started it was all about just photography, but now there’s this stills and video duality which is really interesting.

Nikon Z 6 sample images by Keith Ladzinski

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_5344490010″,”galleryId”:”5344490010″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

So I’m looking back, and there’s nothing more nostalgic than a road trip. That’s something we can all identify with. There’s a lot of laughter and memories. So there was a lot of serendipity that came together with these themes and this project. This trip was primarily focused on landscape and nature work, with the main activity being rock climbing.

How does the Z 6 fit into your workflow?

I use it for climbing, actually. Climbing is a pretty slow activity but I shoot bursts a lot because there could be that one moment when someone’s on tiny hand holds and there’s this momentary facial expression that tells the story, so having a high frame rate is really useful in that regard.

I lean on the Z 6 for video. There’s no crop shooting in 4K, so your wide lenses stay wide. And I shot some video at ISO 8000 lit by headlamps, and I was expecting crap image quality, but it was amazing. It blew me away how clean it was. I didn’t know what it was going to look like, and it’s damned good.

Is climbing one of the ways that you got into photography?

Natural history, landscapes, wildlife and – oddly enough – skateboarding were actually my initial avenues into photography. Living in Colorado you’re surrounded by wilderness all the time, but skateboarding kind of ruled my youth. And at the time, skateboarding meant trespassing, getting kicked out by security guards from wherever we were – there weren’t a lot of skate parks at the time, so you just went to the city.

And the wilderness is such a different vibe. From a photography perspective, skateboard photography is all about low light, artificial lighting, which of course was required when I was shooting film, but it was also the style of the magazines I was reading at the time. And of course landscape photography is about being alone, being patient, waiting for the moment to unfold.

Image courtesy of Keith Ladzinski.

As I got older and I started finding my own voice as a photographer, the two activities sort of came together. Along the way I got into rock climbing, and with every activity in my life, photography has a way of taking over whatever it is, and merging into it.

It’s a wonderful thing, because you end up compelled to document what you love. Once that started happening, I didn’t realize it but I’d inadvertently created a style that the climbing world hadn’t seen up until that point, because I was shooting it the way I’d shoot skateboarding. I shot the way I knew, which was a mix of using available light and artificial light. I got some magazine work and developed a career.

The challenge is that when you’re shooting photos often you’ll see video moments, and when you’re rolling video you’ll see still photography opportunities

How do you plan a multi-media trip like this?

There’s more involved, for sure. If I was doing a story on just rock climbing, I’ve covered that a lot for so many years, so like any photographer that’s shot something for long enough, I kind of know what I’m doing. But when you’re putting things into a video timeline you’re quadrupling your shot list, and you’re looking for moments that maybe have more personality and character to them, like soundbites, something funny someone’s doing, or an unexpected moment.

The challenge is that when you’re shooting photos often you’ll see video moments, and when you’re rolling video you’ll see still photography opportunities. That’s the conflict, but on a shoot like this I had help. I had two other people with me, capturing behind the scenes footage but also capturing some A roll and B roll as needed. Video is so much more of a team sport than photography.

Keith Ladzinski on location in Antarctica. Picture by Cristina Mittermeier, used with permission.

How does your kit now compare to your kit back in 2004?

Oh my god, it’s so much lighter now. I used haul a 70-200mm F2.8, 17-35mm F2.8 and a 24-70mm F2.8 up the wall with a D2X, and it was heavy! Lenses have made tremendous progress. The current 70-200mm F2.8 compared to the original, it’s so much lighter. Now you look at mirrorless, and it’s smaller, lighter, faster. Things have become so much better for outdoor photographers.

I love looking through an EVF, too. I much prefer it because focus peaking is really important for me. There are times when I’ll switch to manual focus, even if I’m just shooting still photos, and of course just for blocking out the light. Living on the back of an LCD is just not effective if it’s high noon, for example. Those things mean a lot if you’re in the field.

What are your must-have camera features?

Focus peaking is huge for video, for sure. But I’ve tried the face detection autofocus on the Z 6 and I was very, very impressed. I ended up using it a lot on this shoot. 120fps video is so standard, now too. The camera has to have that now for shooting video, because those moments do present themselves. I don’t like to lean on it too much, but I need it when I need it. So that is really important to me. Being able to shoot in low light, obviously I need that too but I feel like the low light game was changed when the D3 came out [in late 2007] and it’s just been great since then.

You’ve used several generations of digital cameras – what are the biggest changes that you’ve seen?

ISO sensitivity is a big one, it’s incredible really, the kind of light you can work in these days, it’s so great. The introduction of video into DSLRs and mirrorless has been a huge thing, too. When the D90 came out and all of a sudden we had this capability to shoot video and I started to look into that world, first I was doing it out of fear. People were saying ‘you need to be a director, you need to shoot video, you don’t want to be left behind’ so I was reading all this information thinking ‘oh my god I should really figure this out’, and going down that wormhole.

Video was just such a completely different thing. I was told if you want to get serious about it, you’d better know how to edit, you’d better know how audio works.. it was this whole new thing. But the fear turned into love.

It’s a completely different world now. But it’s so much more fun

In photography you’re hunting for a moment, but in videography you’re looking for a sequence, and a scene. And it made me work differently. I started to think in terms of scenes and edits. You learn that when you first attempt to make films, you realize what you don’t know! You quickly realize ‘ok, I need to look at what I’m doing, differently’. That helped me become a better story teller, which helped me later when I started working with National Geographic and magazines like that because they require so much more. They require photographers to look at a subject differently because they’ve seen it all. It’s a high pressure place to work.

Working in video actually really helped me. I started breaking into a dual role, so that technological advancement, seeing that and living through it, I’m very grateful. Coming from film, into digital and now true multimedia where you’re working with stills and audio and video, it’s a completely different world now. But it’s so much more fun.


This is sponsored content, created by Nikon. What does this mean?

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Keith Ladzinski talks Nikon mirrorless: ‘It’s a different world now. But it’s so much more fun’

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Photokina’s new manager talks about the future of the trade show

18 Jul

Back in May, Photokina, the biennial photo industry trade show in Cologne, Germany, announced that it would become an annual event and include products and technologies beyond its historical focus of cameras and photography.

Now recently appointed show manager Christoph Menke is providing some background on the decision to change the dates of the future shows and other changes in a short Q&A session with the internal PR team of Koelnmesse, the company that is organizing Photokina.

You can read the full Q&A below, in case you’re curious:

What made Koelnmesse decide to change the show cycle from every other year show to a yearly show?

Today, professionals and consumers view the subject of imaging completely different compared to 10 years ago. Now virtual reality, wearables, tablets, mobile and smart home security are an integral part of the imaging world. The same applies to imaging software for editing, sorting, storing images, or even for CGI & sharing solutions.

As an imaging platform, we need to embrace those new technologies. As a part of this embrace, we acknowledge the significantly shorter innovation cycles of those new technologies compared to established capture technologies. For instance, the software industry has always been characterized by short development cycles. To offer these industries a suitable exhibition platform, the answer can only be a shorter cycle.

Based on surveys we know that our visitors prefer an annual photokina. The annual show cycle will also put a more regular spot light on other segments of our show such as photo equipment, photo accessories and photo studio segments and the brands represented there. They will benefit from more frequent exposure to buyers, consumers and the international media attending our show

Why is photokina going to move to May in 2019 and the following years?

The photokina dates for the next 2 years are Sept 26-29, 2018 and May 8-11, 2019 (Wednesday to Saturday). The switch to the May dates starting in 2019 is the result of conversations with key accounts from all segments. The feedback we received indicated that the May dates will provide an ideal time frame to fully take advantage of international demand before the start of the summer season.

The Show will be shortened from six to four days – what will be the upside of this change?

Based on attendees surveys we conducted we know that four show days are sufficient to see all the imaging technologies and content. Within those four days we create a more compact and thereby more intense show experience that is appreciated by both exhibitors and visitors. The fact that our customers will no longer have to wait two years for the next photokina had a significant impact on the decision to shorten the sequence.

Will the annual show cycle also mean changes to the content and focus of this event?

The changes in content and focus are what led to the structural changes. New technologies are accelerating in the innovation cycles in the imaging world. The annual show cycle is photokina’s response to a rapidly changing market place. Our mission is to provide a platform that shows the imaging technologies of the future and promotes the exchange between developers, engineers, start-ups and manufacturers.

Take video for example: In times of the YouTube-revamped trend towards amateur videos and an increasing convergence of the technologies for photo & video (4K-Grabbing), the moving picture is as important as it was in the first hour of photokina – hence the name. One of the highlights for the next event will be an Imaging Lab at photokina.

What has been the reaction of your photokina customers to the date change?

So far the responses are mostly positive. Budgets and logistics are certainly issues which have to be dealt with and we expect a transition process to adjust to the yearly dates. We are confident that the date change will provide an improved photokina for exhibitors and attendees alike.

The latest editions of Photokina were noticeably smaller and less busy than previous shows which is not much of a surprise given the decline of the camera market. Let’s hope the changes mentioned by Christoph Menke will help Photokina remain as relevant and vibrant as it has been throughout most of its existence.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Photokina’s new manager talks about the future of the trade show

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Pete Souza talks about life as a presidential photographer

27 Jun

Photojournalist Pete Souza served as the presidential photographer for both Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. In an interview with Pulitzer Prize-winner Marcia Nighswander at Ohio University, he tells the story behind several of his most noteworthy images from the Obama presidency. Some of his most memorable photos of Obama were taken at the Christ the Reedemer statue in Rio and while crossing the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama.

Souza has a popular Instagram account and will be publishing a book with 300 photos from the eight years he spent in the Obama White House.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Pete Souza talks about life as a presidential photographer

Posted in Uncategorized

 

‘That article was more like gossip’ Panasonic’s head of cameras talks downsizing, GH5 and the 8K era

08 May
 Yosuke Yamane: Division President, Imagine Network Business Division

Yosuke Yamane, the Director of Panasonic’s imaging business visited DPReview on a recent trip to the United States. He spoke to us about the GH5, the promise of 8K, reports of downsizing and why we haven’t seen on-sensor phase detection in one of the company’s cameras.

Initial response to the GH5

Given it’s the company’s latest product and that Yamane arrived after visiting the video-focused NAB Show in Las Vegas, we started off asking about the GH5.

Early response has been positive, he says, pointing out that it immediately topped the sales chart at one of the US’s largest dealers. ‘The sales were more than we’d originally planned for,’ he says: ‘It depends on the region: some regions sold three times more than we planned and others it was one-point-five times. We’re very satisfied with the result.’

‘Based on our survey, the first customers are mainly videographers,’ he says. But he expects this mix to change: ‘The GH5 provides the best still picture as well as the best moving picture quality ever in any Lumix, so we expect hybrid photographers and videographers to be 50:50.’

‘For video users, the specifications of the video are very important whereas the stills photographers tend to want to evaluate the image quality, based on pictures taken with the camera. In that sense, more and more photographers will come to the GH5. That’s what we expect.’

Who is buying the GH5?

We pressed Yamane on whether he thought the GH5 was selling beyond existing GH4 owners. ‘We don’t have any specific numbers,’ he says: ‘but my gut feeling is that many GH4 users are upgrading to the GH5, this is a decent portion of our first buyers. But, beside GH4 users, maybe it’ll be Canon EOS 5D III and IV users, or Alpha 7S Mark II users. Especially, my feeling was that EOS 5D Mark III users are very much interested in GH5.’

‘The majority of GH5 sales have been body only: that means lots of GH4 users are buying GH5. But also, at the introduction of the Sony a7S, it took share from the Canon EOS 5D Mark II because of the size. I think the same tendency is happening here: Canon EOS 5D Mark III customers are coming to the GH5 because of the compact size and the quality.’

‘The professional camcorder users coming to the GH5 because of the 4:2:2 10-bit video. 4:2:2 10-bit capable cameras are usually very expensive. It’s a feature mainly incorporated in cameras costing over $ 10,000 but we realized these functions for the GH5, so it can easily become part of their workflow at a very affordable price.’

Stumbling over Log?

On the topic of high-end video users buying the camera, we asked about the popularity of the paid upgrade to add V-Log. ‘We started selling V-Log as an upgrade with the GH4,’ explains Yamane: ‘We don’t know the exact attachment ratio but I know we sold more V-Log packages than we expected. When it comes to the GH5, because the stills side is improved, we don’t know if the attachment rate will be higher or not.’

Yamane was very open about the reasoning behind selling the V-Log feature as a paid upgrade: ‘If we incorporated it into the camera, we would have to charge a higher price for the GH5. As of now we believe it’s appropriate to offer V-Log as an option.’

‘It’s not a cost issue, it’s that Log is recognized as having a certain value in the market. If we want to add that value into this camera, we need to keep the value of Log video to the industry.’

Improvements to be made

With the GH5, Panasonic took the unusual decision to launch the camera with the promise of more features that would come after a few months. Yamane confirmed that the delay to introducing 4:2:2 All-Intra recording was simply because it wasn’t ready in time for the planned launch, though it’s noticeable that the V60 cards guaranteed to support its 400mbps write speed aren’t widely available yet. However, he confirms the engineering team is working on more than just delivering the promised features: there will be an update to improve movie autofocus.

‘Now we are brushing up the smoothness of DFD for video. We don’t know when we can announce it but there will be firmware.’

‘The most important part of video autofocus is not just speed but also the smoothness. We need to find a concession point for the smoothness of autofocus and the speed of autofocus. First we realized fast AF on the stills side using depth-from-defocus (DFD). Now we are brushing up the smoothness of the DFD for the video category. We are working on it right now. We still don’t know when we can announce it but there will be firmware.’

Why not adopt the phase detection approach used by many of its rivals, we asked. ‘On-sensor phase detection doesn’t work any darker than F8, [which can be a problem in video]. It’s not necessarily true that phase detection is better than DFD plus contrast detection.’

‘We think our DFD is going to be better than [the best of our rivals]. That’s our target.’

‘We are also aware of other brands’ excellent [phase detection-based] autofocus: we really respect the quality of their sensors and their technology. But if we wanted to do the same; to make our own sensors [using a comparable technology], we’d have to apply those sensors to all of our cameras. The development costs for this kind of sensor would be huge.’

‘Our DFD system is not dependent on a specific sensor, so from the viewpoint of expandability, we should probably go with DFD technology.’

‘But,’ he says: ‘we think our DFD is going to be better than [the best phase-based AF]. That’s our target and we want to realize that accurate autofocus.’

Engine of change

This bold claim is likely to stem from Yamane’s confidence in the GH5’s underlying hardware. This was the most difficult aspect to develop, he says. ‘Really at the core of the camera is its performance, which comes from the LSI’s development: the new processing engine. I truly believe this is the most special engine in the entire industry. This is not only for DSC but also for consumer and professional camcorders.’

He gave examples of all the things that are asked of the processor: ‘4:2:2 10-bit codec is 64x as much data as before. 4:2:0 8-bit at 60p. Also the DFD system’s speed, Dual IS stabilization, the best image quality for Lumix all need to be calculated in a very short time.’

The challenge extended beyond simply making a powerful processor, he says: the chip has to be efficient so that it allows good battery life and doesn’t generate excessive heat. ‘The heating issue was very tough to overcome. How to make the most efficient engine and how to dissipate heat was the most difficult part of the product development.’

Lenses for a hybrid camera

The Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 12-60mm / F2.8-4.0 ASPH. / POWER O.I.S. is the first in a range of F2.8-4.0 zooms for the Micro Four Thirds system

Moving on from the GH5, we expressed our surprise that the company would introduce a range of variable aperture zooms alongside such a capable video camera.

‘We are not just targeting GH5 customers,’ he explains: ‘we’re targeting all the other Micro Four Thirds cameras users. We’ve also taken other cameras’ sizing into account, and it also fits on the G85 and the GX85 and some other Micro Four Thirds cameras.’

‘The benefit of Micro Four Thirds style is that it can be smaller and lighter. If we made constant aperture F2.8 lenses, they’d be more expensive and bigger. Considering the benefit we can provide stills photographers we decided to go with F2.8-4 and give rather smaller lenses at reasonable prices.’

The lenses include stepless apertures, to minimize any impact on video while zooming, and, he suggests, for anyone concerned about changes in exposure while video shooting, there are workarounds: ‘Videographers can use them as a constant F4: I think we can also give videographers a solution in that way. I agree that in the future we need to offer lenses that best suit videographers but this camera is targeting hybrid users, both videographers and stills shooters, so we decided with this direction for the next three or four lenses.’

Ambitions and focus

It’s unusual for camera makers to talk much about the future, but during our discussion, Yamane set out some pretty bullish ambitions. ‘For Lumix, the United States is a very strategic market. Our target is to double the business volume by 2020.’

We asked him how this would be achieved.The current business in the United States is 30% mirrorless and 70% compact camera,’ he says: ‘though nearer to 50:50 if you count interchangeable lenses as well.’

‘For the future, to double the business, we’re going to focus on high end product: mirrorless cameras and high-end compacts. We expect a decent increase of the compact market to be sustainable.’

In addition to this, he says: ‘We’re also going to strengthen our product for the high-end video market.’

But, initially at least, this is going to be through cameras like the GH5: ‘firstly we’ll focus on the hybrid form factor. Also help photographers interested in making additional income from providing video. I think this camera will help this kind of photographer.’

In terms of compacts, we’ll focus on the ZS (TZ) series, such as the ZS100. Then the LX series, we’d like to strengthen. In this category the Sony RX100 series is very important, we have to directly compete with that. Our strength comes from ZS series. We’ll focus on that strength and FZ series long zoom.’

One camera he didn’t mention was the LX100, which we know to have an avid following. Should we expect a successor, we asked. ‘As I said, RX100 competes directly with LX10 but LX100 is one step higher. So as the customer expects LX200 we will also strengthen the successor of LX100. How will we answer to the passionate customers of the LX100? We will study how we’re going to answer these customers.’

Trickle-down of technology?

Yamane (center) was accompanied on his visit by Terry Takabayashi (left), General Manager, Merchandising Department and Kazuki Sugahara (right), Manager, Americas Section, Imaging Marketing Group.

One method for refreshing models might be through the trickle-down of technology, Yamane suggested: ‘After we introduced the GH4, which was the world’s first 4K mirrorless camera, this 4K technology has been applied in models like G7, G8 and LX100. For the development roadmap, the new technology will first appear in the flagship and then, looking at price and value for money, we will expand the range.’

‘we would like to expand the [GH5’s] technology to other models’

The rationale is pretty straightforward, he says: ‘R&D development of technology requires a lot of investment. So to amortize that investment we have to apply that technology to other models to expand the volume and realize a return on our investment. After we get a return on that investment we have to reinvest that return in new technology: we have to continue that kind of cycle to evolve our product.’

This means using the GH5 technology more widely, without under-selling it, he says: ‘With GH5 also we would like to expand the technology to other models, looking at striking a balance between offering good value for money and at the price zone at which a customer can expect that technology.’

All of this comes back to a phrase that recurred throughout our talk: the use of features such as 4K and 6K Photo modes to ‘create a new photo culture.’

Nikkei, restructuring and gossip

This all sounds very ambitious for a company reported to be considering scaling back its camera business. Yamane says customers shouldn’t worry too much about what the Nikkei, which published the story, said.

‘That article was more like gossip, saying the business may be moving towards the smaller side in the restructuring,’ he says, before explaining what’s happened.

‘Panasonic has four companies. The camera division used to be in the AVC Networks business but, as of the first of April, we moved Digital Camera and Camcorders to the Appliances company.’

‘I’m really proud of the engineering groups that made this camera available to the market’

Moving cameras and camcorders away from the pro video division and into the same company as refrigerators may seem odd, but Yamane explains the logic: ‘The Appliances business is much more consumer focused than the AVC group, which has a significant business-to-business component.’

‘The move will bring our marketing, manufacturing and R&D departments together in one place, so we gain better integration [by moving]. We’ll still co-ordinate across with the AVC business on advanced technologies but [the restructuring] means our R&D and marketing efforts are together.’

The coming of the 8K era

Along with its ambitious targets for US sales, Yamane says the company has ambitious targets for hardware, too. ‘Towards the year 2020, 4K will evolve to 8K. Panasonic has supported the Olympic Games for a long time and in 2020, when the games are in Tokyo, the era of 8K will start, [and] we will develop the hardware to develop the 8K picture.’

This doesn’t necessarily mean 8K video, though: ‘As far as for the customer category, we don’t know if we will be able to record all of the output from 8K video. So the question is how we utilize 8K information and create a new photographic culture’

‘In 2020, when the [Olympics] are in Tokyo, the era of 8K will start: we will develop the hardware to develop the 8K picture’

‘8K Photo will completely change the photo shooting style with 33MP resolution. Whether that’s a 4K crop from 8K or 2K cropping from 8K or it’s 33MP images on the stills side.’

But Yamane makes clear that he’s not just interested in the technology: he’s interested in its photographic benefits to users: ‘Based on the customer voice and the customer opinion, we will make the maximum effort to develop strong products to answer the needs of the customers.’

A team effort

Yamane is immediately clear about what’s going to enable the company to achieve these ambitions: when asked what he was most proud of, he was quick to give credit. ‘The engineers who make the product: my team. As the director of the imaging group I’m really proud of the engineering groups that made this camera available to the market. I am proud of every single feature and I respect the engineers who made each function. As long as those talented and reliable engineers are with me, I believe we can make even more innovative products.’

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on ‘That article was more like gossip’ Panasonic’s head of cameras talks downsizing, GH5 and the 8K era

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Interview: Fujifilm talks GFX, X100F and getting serious about video

24 Jan
 Makoto Oishi, Billy Luong and Yuji Igarashi from Fujifilm

Following the launch of the GFX 50S, the X100F and the X-T20, we spoke to Fujifilm executives about their models, their ambitions and what we might be able to expect in the future in terms of medium format, the XE range and video. 

We spoke to Makoto Oishi, manager of Fujifilm’s Sales and Marketing Group, Optical Device and Electronic Imaging Products division, Yuji Igarashi, general manager of Fujifilm’s Electronic Imaging Division, and Billy Luong, Manager for the Technical Marketing and Product Specialist Group. They answered our burning questions as best they could: Will the GFX series gain phase detection AF? Will it ever have a fixed lens model? How is the X-E series faring?

GFX 50S: who is it for, and what’s next?

As you’d expect, we started by discussing the GFX 50S and who it’s for. ‘Fashion, commercial and landscape photographers are the main targets,’ says Oishi. ‘And especially when it comes to landscape, it’s not just professional photographers, but also amateur photographers.’

‘The tonality and dynamic range also mean it’ll appeal to wedding photographers,’ adds Luong. ‘And architecture,’ says Oishi: ‘But you can see from the weather sealing that we want landscape and outdoor photographers to feel confident using this camera.’

Consequently, these users groups will direct which lenses the company creates for the system. ‘We’ve already announced our first six lenses but we’re thinking about what comes next,’ says Oishi: ‘We have some ideas but haven’t decided yet. For example maybe a wide-angle zoom for landscape photographers or maybe something like a 200 or 250mm and so on. We want more feedback from users about what to make next.’

Image quality and autofocus

In the early days of the X-mount system, the company said it had chosen to prioritize image quality even if it that meant using a design with slightly slower focus. This compromise wasn’t necessary with the GFX, Oishi says: ‘The first priority must be image quality, of course. After our experience with the X-series we’ve developed a series of technologies in lens design as well as autofocus motors.’

The GFX 50S is designed to be relatively small and swap easily from being a studio camera to a field camera. The 50mm-equivalent 63mm F2.8 lens focuses pretty quickly despite the absence of phase-detection elements or a linear motor to drive focus.

‘Some of the first [GF] lenses have linear motors, whereas the 63mm has a different motor, more like the one used in the 23mm F2. The autofocus speed is already very good: we haven’t had any complaints. Instead we’ve had some users surprised by how fast the contrast-detection system is.’

This doesn’t mean the GFX series will never have phase detection, though. ‘This is our first development of this sensor,’ says Oishi: ‘we’d have needed more time to develop on-sensor phase detection. The image quality of medium format is our first priority. From a technical point of view, maybe in the future we might incorporate phase-detection pixels. On the other hand, we’re already developed advanced CDAF algorithms.’ There’s no image quality cost to using phase detection, he says.

‘We’re designing all our GF lenses to work with 100 megapixels, so there’s just as much of a challenge of resolution’ – Makoto Oishi

This need for optimal image quality got us wondering: which is more difficult to design, an F1.4 lens for APS-C or an F2.8 lens with the IQ expectations but less dense sensor of medium format? ‘The fundamental design doesn’t change,’ says Oishi: ‘things like the availability of an appropriate autofocus motor to deal with bigger, heavier lenses in medium format always adds problems. They’re both difficult, both to design and manufacture.’

‘The medium format lens is physically bigger which seems like it should be easier to manufacture but you have to pay just as much attention to how sensitively each element is aligned. I’d say they’re both difficult. Differently difficult.’

‘One thing to remember is that we’re designing all our GF lenses to work with 100 megapixels, so there’s just as much of a challenge of resolution.’

‘As the sensor becomes bigger, that means chromatic aberration becomes bigger: it’s proportional to the size. In GFX we’ve minimized aberrations optically and the used digital compensation only to refine the final result, and it depends on lens.’

Makoto Oishi shows-off the GFX 50S’s 44x33mm sensor

As with the X series, Fujifilm has decided not to use in-body image stabilization. ‘Some of the lenses we’ve already announced have OIS built in,’ Oishi points out: ‘but basically our image circle is perfect for the 44 x 33mm sensor size.’

The undeniable appeal of the X100 series

The discussion then turned to the X100 series and its role in the company’s lineup, now that a 23mm F2 lens is available for the X-mount system.

‘Of course using the 23mm F2 on one of our X-mount cameras, you get the same sensor, the same processor, but they’re two different things,’ says Oishi. ‘The X100 lens and sensor are optimized to work together, [whereas] on the ILCs, the sensor has to work with every lens. This means the X100’s image quality can be very good but the lens remains small. The 23mm F2 [XF] lens is also good, the size is a bit bigger but the autofocus can be a bit faster. Then, of course, the X100 series has the optical viewfinder.’

‘A good proportion of our customers are saying the X100 brought back their passion for photography’ – Billy Luong

‘The X100 also has a leaf shutter and built-in ND filter, which make a big difference,’ says Luong: ‘The faster sync speed is an important difference for anyone using flash. Then there’s the silent operation.’

But the appeal is about the format, as much as the specs, suggests Oishi: ‘The X100 series presents a great opportunity: the body size means it works as a second camera for anyone: not just Fujifilm users. If they fall in love with your system then maybe they’ll consider your cameras in future.’

Luong concurs: ‘It’s an iconic shape, it has a distinctive style. Some customers are at the point where they’re done with interchangeable lens camera, they just want the one focal length.’

 ‘The X100 series continues to perform well. In the US, each generation has sold better than the last,’ says Yuji Igarashi.

So who is the X100 series customer? ‘Normally 30% of buyers are people who already use an X100 series camera. But we’re always attracting new customers, too,’ says Oishi.

‘We look at how we retain our customers,’ says Luong: ‘the X100 is often photographers’ first foray into the Fujifilm system. The size, the weight, the image quality. A good proportion of our customers are saying the X100 brought back their passion for photography. That type of person is very much part of the equation.’

Could these same benefits be applied to medium format, we asked. ‘Of course it could be an idea for medium format,’ says Oishi: ‘it depends on demand and the market. The GFX 50S is one style: the ‘S’ means ‘SLR-style.’ Another way to do it would be a rangefinder style camera. Maybe an ‘R’ could be a rangefinder: we’re always considering other options and possibilities.’

‘If mirrorless interchangeable lens camera is too big as a rangefinder style, a fixed lens camera could be smaller, like the GF670.’

X-T20: putting X-T2 image quality in a smaller body

The SLR-style has wide appeal, Luong explains: ‘The SLR style targets a wider audience. We find pro and enthusiast photographers gravitate towards the SLR-style camera. Back to the GFX camera, that’s why we went with the SLR style.’

What does this tell us about the X-T20 target customer, then?

‘There will be a lot of X-T2 and X-T1 users wanting a second body,’ says Luong. ‘Then, of course, there’ll be people wanting X-T2 image quality in a more compact body. It could be a step up from the X-A series or a step over from an entry-level DSLR to a mirrorless type camera.’

‘We wanted to expand the range of users with the X-T10,’ says Oishi. ‘The X-T20 has more capability than ever before, in autofocus, for instance. For casual users, AF speed is important, especially compared with other cameras, such as DSLRs.’

Touchpad AF

However, the X-T20 doesn’t offer the increasingly popular ‘touchpad’ function to control the AF point with the camera to your eye. Mr Oishi explains why: ‘It’s possible. We know some people have difficulty with their nose operating the focus. We think our eight-way joystick is better in many circumstances but we’ll listen to feedback about a camera like the X-T20.’

The FujiFilm X-T20 offers X-T20 image quality in a smaller body. Despite having a touchscreen, it can’t offer touchpad AF control. For now…

This makes us wonder how the company decides which models feature touchscreens and which don’t. ‘It’s a question of the customer response,’ Oishi says. ‘The X100 has an optical viewfinder so it doesn’t make sense to put a touchscreen behind that. Maybe the joystick is better. With the X70, though, it’s a much smaller camera and you have to use the screen so it made sense to control with the screen.’

‘On the X-T20, we were trying to keep the camera small, so there wasn’t room for a joystick. So it depends on the product. It’s not about whether it’s seen as professional or not: the GFX has one.’

‘Product design for each model is focused on certain priorities,’ explains Luong: ‘X100 is about design. Even making it a couple of millimeters thicker to incorporate a touchscreen or tilt screen would make a big difference. It could change the design completely.’

‘We always think about the real target user’s priorities,’ says Oishi. ‘What does the target user want to use?’

Don’t count the X-E series out

The release of three SLR-style cameras in a row (X-T2, X-T20 and GFX 50S) doesn’t mean the company is abandoning the rangefinder style, though. ‘XE is an important series for us,’ Oishi says: ‘There are so many XE1, 2 and 2S users in the world. We are always thinking about the next model, whether that’s XT, XE or X-Pro. Obviously we can’t confirm anything at this point but we are aware there are many requests for this type of camera.’

Unmet needs?

With the X-series lineup looking increasingly mature, both in terms of lenses and bodies, what unmet needs remain?

‘Video is a big growth area for us,’ acknowledges Luong: ‘Our latest cameras such as the X-Pro2 and X-T2 show there’s a lot we’ve learned.’

 The Fujifilm X-T2 is a significantly more capable video camera than we were expecting.

And there’s an audience for video, he says: ‘If you look at who’s producing material, there’s a generation of YouTube content providers. People are increasingly watching content on their computers, on YouTube, rather than traditional TV.’

‘In Japan the developers worked very closely with production studios. A lot of their feedback shaped the outcome of the X-T2’s video quality and the way it operates.’

‘Features like Film Simulation, taking them from stills to video they found really useful but things such as bitrate, file format and compression, that came from us listening to feedback.’

‘Video is a big growth area for us, the X-Pro2 and X-T2 show there’s a lot we’ve learned’ – Billy Luong

There are challenges, though, says Oishi: ‘Movie AF is very difficult: it depends on the subject. Sometimes you want it to be quick, other times you want it to be slower and smooth.’

‘Whether it’s an algorithm that recognizes a tap on the screen should be a smooth focus pull, or potentially a custom setting, we’re very serious about getting it right,’ says Luong.

Does this mean we could expect an even more video-centric camera, given that all the X-series lenses are essentially in the Super 35 format?

‘We already have cinema lenses that are Super 35,’ Luong reminds us. ‘We’re continuing to develop video features, so we’ll continue to investigate.’

‘There’s a market there,’ Luong says.

Listening to customer feedback

Since the idea of user feedback had come up so often in the discussion, we ended by asking what the company’s process was for collecting feedback.

‘Our X Photographers: professionals who use the camera day in, day out, that’s the first line of feedback,’ says Luong: ‘It’s quite a large group. With the GFX we had something like 50 photographers around the world using pre-production cameras.’

‘We also monitor the comments on our YouTube channel and I personally scour through DPReview and try to work out which things are a must and which are ‘would be nice’.’

‘We don’t systematically seek feedback from our existing users,’ says Igarashi: ‘but we try to listen to everyone and evaluate those opinions.’

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Interview: Fujifilm talks GFX, X100F and getting serious about video

Posted in Uncategorized