Att välja Hur länge behöver Ethereum Price de bästa kryptosystem som finns på marknaden är en mycket viktig aspekt av handeln. Om du inte är medveten om detta kan det sluta med att du förlorar mycket pengar i det långa loppet. Om du vill göra mest vinst på kortast möjliga tid måste du göra din hemläxa väl. Här är några av de grunder som du bör känna till innan du väljer de bästa mynten att handla på marknaden med.
Hur länge behöver Ethereum Price
En av de första sakerna du måste titta efter i de bästa valutorna som finns på marknaden är deras inflationsgrad. För att förstå detta måste du först förstå vad inflation är. Inflation är helt enkelt en ökning av priserna utan att varor och tjänster minskar. Till exempel är en enårig dollar värd mycket mer om några månader, eller hur? Så om du väljer att investera i de bästa råvarorna för det här århundradet vore det klokt att hålla utkik efter de valutor som enligt prognoserna kommer att uppleva den högsta inflationen under de kommande tio åren.
Ett annat grundläggande övervägande när det gäller att investera i de bästa valutorna är deras historik när det gäller handel och gruvdrift. Man kan inte bara välja vilket gammalt system som helst att investera i idag. Det finns hundratusentals valutor som handlas på marknaden och endast ett fåtal utvalda är lönsamma. Därför är det nödvändigt att du forskar väl om de olika systemen som finns tillgängliga för att veta vilket av de tillgängliga kryptosystemen som är det bästa att investera i.
Ett av de enklaste sätten att avgöra vilken av de bästa valutorna att investera i är genom att titta på den underliggande tillgångens egenskaper. Detta kallas tillgångens egenskaper och de är kända som Ripples. Låt oss ta en titt på två exempel på de bästa valutorna att investera i under det kommande decenniet. Den första typen av tillgång är aktier. Ett index som följer värdet av olika typer av företag kallas aktier. Så om vi tittar på de tio främsta valutorna som kommer att styra aktiemarknadens värde i framtiden är det troligt att dollarn kommer att fortsätta sin uppgång eftersom värdet på aktier i USA och Europa förväntas stiga.
Den andra typen av tillgångar är guld. Det finns en stor sannolikhet för att guldpriset kommer att stiga under det kommande decenniet. Om du håller på med handel och inte har teknisk kunskap om vilken av de bästa valutorna du ska investera i bör du prova de bästa kryptovalutorna som sannolikt kommer att öka i värde under detta årtionde. Bland de möjliga valutorna att investera i Hur länge behöver Ethereum Price finns euron, den japanska yenen, den australiska dollarn, schweiziska francen, den kanadensiska dollarn och det brittiska pundet. Var och en av dessa valutor har sina egna för- och nackdelar och du bör noggrant studera dem innan du investerar i dem.
Även om det är lätt att bli lockad av de dåliga nyheterna om att investera i kryptovalutor finns det ingen dålig investering när det gäller mynt. Anledningen till detta är att de flesta investerare som är nya i den här branschen slutar med att förlora sina pengar eftersom de inte har rätt kunskap om vilka av de bästa valutorna de ska investera i. Så när du letar efter de bästa valutorna att investera i är det viktigt att du blir bekant med alla dessa. Detta beror på att endast genom att bli en registrerad användare av en onlinehandelsplats kan du få tillgång till alla de bästa kryptovalutorna som finns tillgängliga i världen idag.
Det finns många fördelar som är förknippade med att investera i de bästa kryptokurvorna, bland annat det faktum att de handlas på den globala marknaden. Därför är det lätt att handla med de bästa valutorna och du kan också förvänta dig god avkastning. Att investera i de bästa valutorna kräver dock att du lär dig hur systemet fungerar, grunderna i ekonomi och företagsledning. Om du till exempel är en investerare som är ny på att investera på altcoin-marknaden, är det bättre om du får hjälp av professionella personer som experter och handlare.
Det finns många fördelar som du kan njuta av när du investerar i de bästa valutorna i världen. En av dessa är att när du väljer de bästa kryptosurferna kan du vara säker på att värdet på din investering alltid kommer att vara stabilt. Eftersom värdet på varje mynt varierar beroende på utbud och efterfrågan är det viktigt att du investerar i de bästa valutorna och sedan handlar med dem enligt dina behov. När värdet på en valuta fluktuerar kan du alltså enkelt sälja dina tillgångar och investera i de nya.
Det bästa sättet att investera i de bästa kryptosurfarna är att se till att du är välinformerad om de olika faktorer som påverkar värdet på ett visst mynt och du har också en expert som kan lära dig hur du väljer de bästa valutorna att investera i. När du vill göra vinster från handeln med den bästa kryptosurf bör du alltså se till att du utbildar dig om marknadens ekonomi och affärsmodeller. Här är nästa intressanta blogginlägg: Avstängning Usa Bitcoin.
The post Hur länge behöver Ethereum Price Erfarenheter first appeared on Hur man använder kryptovalutor på rätt sätt.
I’m, at best, a keen enthusiast photographer but the GFX 100S’ strengths are all in areas that benefit the kinds of photos I like to take (everyday scenes, landscape, portraiture), whereas the a1’s aren’t: its speed would be utterly wasted on me.
The GFX 100S is one of the highest-end cameras we’ve ever reviewed, which has the effect of making it a difficult camera to review. I wanted to write a little bit about that challenge, why we compared it with full-frame cameras, and yet didn’t compare it to others.
The main difficulty of reviewing a medium-format camera is that there’s a class of wildly expensive, essentially pro-only camera bodies beyond it, that we don’t cover. And, while Phase One has been kind enough to lend us some cameras and digital backs in the past, I wouldn’t claim to have used them enough to form an opinion worth publishing. It could be argued that without testing it in a series of studio shoots, it’s not really practical to form an opinion worth publishing.
The GFX 100S seems pricey when compared to most full-frame cameras but is comparatively affordable for something offering beyond full-frame image quality.
It’s a similar challenge with the more ambitious video gear we’re starting to encounter. Obviously the world of ALL CAPS cinema cameras from ARRI and RED exists beyond the more accessible likes of the Sony FX3 and Panasonic S1H, so how can we put the more affordable models in context? How can you review them properly?
The clue both for ‘affordable’ medium-format and video-focused hybrids, is that they’re at the upper extreme what we test. In other words, they’re the option you might reach for, if you go beyond the level of gear we usually cover. And, in turn, that explains why we tend to compare them to the level of gear below: because that’s the alternative you might otherwise settle for.
The comparative accessibility of the GFX 100S means it’s likely that some photographers who’d otherwise buy something like a Canon EOS R5, Sony a7R IV or Nikon Z7 II might consider stretching their budget to get one. At which point, it’s important that our review makes sense of the difference.
So why didn’t we compare it with the Sony a1 if we’re comparing it to full-frame cameras?
It’s understandable why some people draw parallels between the Fujifilm GFX 100S and the Sony a1. For a start, they were released at a similar time, so the earlier camera will have still been very fresh in the mind when the second was launched. Also, both cameras cost a similar amount of money. Finally, they’re both cameras that try to offer something beyond the latest fast-ish high resolution full-frame models. So why, if it makes sense to compare both with the likes of the Canon EOS R5, aren’t we comparing them to each other?
The Canon EOS R5 is high res, fast, and a pretty capable video camera. You have to spend a fair amount more money to get something significantly more capable. The Fujifilm and Sony offer very different types of ‘more.’
Quite simply because, while all the above is true, the comparison falls apart as soon as you look at precisely what they offer over high-res full-frame. The a1 offers speed (of both shooting and autofocus), along with 8K video and photojournalist-friendly communication options. The GFX 100S offers resolution and image quality in a way that is likely to delight landscape shooters and studio-based pros. There’s no real overlap in the things they offer over the more affordable cameras.
There’s no real overlap in the things they offer over the more affordable cameras.
The context for each camera is also rather different. Whereas $ 6500 is fairly typical for a flagship sports camera, it’s comparatively inexpensive for a medium-format camera offering a step up in image quality.
It’s easy to argue that the a1 is the more impressive technological achievement: its cutting-edge sensor raises the level of what mirrorless cameras can do (at least until we’ve seen what Nikon and Canon’s Stacked CMOS cameras are capable of). And it’s a project with no obvious corner cutting: none of the stripped-down video capabilities of the a9 series, for instance. By contrast, the GFX 100S has been reworked by the engineering and marketing departments to make the original GFX 100’s capabilities accessible to a wider audience.
In addition to speed of shooting, speed of AF and impressive video, the a1 offers a range of pro-friendly features, including an Ethernet connection.
Which is why, as hard as we’ve tried to make our scoring system coherent across categories, you can’t just look at the numbers and say ‘the Sony scored 3% more, and hence is better, without qualification, than the Fujifilm’. It’s a level of nuance that is never going to be conveyed by a single number (or a single number and an award).
Instead our reviews spell out the basis on which the conclusion was drawn. The ‘How it compares…’ section of our reviews lists what we believe a camera’s peers to be, and why. We then explicitly detail the pertinent real-world differences after the conclusion.
Reviewing always gets more difficult when it comes to extremes of price and performance, which is why we try to contextualize how these exotic outliers compare to the more affordable options. Because ultimately, our job is to provide a basis from which people can make informed decisions (whichever way they decide), not to award bragging rights.
The post Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 for Sony Review: A Versatile Lens for a Great Price appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Suzi Pratt.
In December 2020, Tamron announced an exciting new lens: the 17-70mm f/2.8 for Sony.
The Tamron 17-70mm is small, lightweight, and designed for APS-C cameras – plus, it offers two excellent features often lacking on Tamron lenses.
But how does it function in the real world? And is it worth the $ 799 price tag?
Let’s find out in this hands-on Tamron 17-70mm for Sony review!
Tamron 17-70mm for Sony: overview
A 24-105mm lens offers one of the most popular focal length ranges available, thanks to its wide-to-telephoto reach. It’s a versatile pick used by casual and professional photographers alike.
And the 17-70mm is Tamron’s version of this lens because its focal length translates to 25.5-105mm on an APS-C body.
The Tamron 17-70mm is made for Sony APS-C (crop-sensor) cameras, so it’s ideal when combined with the popular Sony a6000 (or any of its recent variations). The lens can also be used on Sony full-frame cameras like the Sony a7S III – as long as the APS-C mode is selected.
Constant fast aperture
The 17-70mm f/2.8 for Sony is Tamron’s first fast-aperture zoom lens for APS-C cameras.
The lens maintains a constant f/2.8 aperture throughout the entire zoom range, while other APS-C Tamron zooms use variable apertures (i.e., apertures that shift as you zoom).
A constant aperture, especially a fast f/2.8 aperture, makes the 17-70mm great for shooting in low light. And at f/2.8, you can capture shots with creamy bokeh, like this one here:
1/1000s | f/2.8 | ISO 640
Vibration compensation
The 17-70mm also comes with Tamron’s image stabilization (Tamron calls this VC, or Vibration Compensation) to reduce camera shake.
Note that VC is often missing on Tamron lenses, especially those with constant apertures, so it’s certainly a welcome bonus on the 17-70mm.
Lenses with VC make it easier to shoot handheld photos and videos, especially at slow shutter speeds. That’s how I was able to pull off this handheld long exposure:
Handheld shooting at low shutter speeds is made possible by Vibration Compensation. 1/6s | f/13 | ISO 320
(Speaking of video: the 17-70 is a great video lens, thanks to the flexible zoom range, constant aperture, and inclusion of VC!)
Build and handling
If you’ve tried any recent Tamron lenses, the 17-70mm will look and feel very similar.
The lens is made mostly of plastic, which helps keep the weight down (it comes in at 1.2 lb/525 g), though you also get rubber zoom and focus rings.
The lens physically extends and retracts when the zoom ring is twisted. With dimensions of 2.9 x 4.7 in (74.6 x 119.3 mm), the lens can feel a bit large and off-balance when attached to a smaller camera like the Sony a6000. It definitely feels more balanced when used with a Sony full-frame camera.
The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 for Sony is moisture resistant and also has a front element with a fluorine coating to protect it from smudging.
And speaking of the front element, the lens has a filter size of 67 mm, common among Tamron’s recent lenses.
1/250s | f/4 | ISO 640
Performance
I used the Tamron 17-70mm in outdoor hiking and indoor restaurant settings, and the autofocus worked well for photos and videos.
The lens has quiet focusing thanks to an RXD stepping motor. This works wonderfully with Sony mirrorless cameras, which still offer the best autofocus on the market.
It’s easy to switch to full manual focus simply by twisting the focus ring. Also, with a minimum focusing distance of 7.5 in (19 cm), the lens has decent macro capabilities (and close-up shots look great with that gorgeous f/2.8 bokeh).
1/200s | f/4 | ISO 640
Image quality
Constant-aperture lenses tend to produce sharp, crisp images. You pay for it, though, because constant-aperture lenses – especially zoom lenses – don’t come cheap.
But while the Tamron 17-70mm is priced well under $ 1000, image quality is tack sharp across the entire focal length range, even at f/2.8. If Tamron can make more lenses like this at similar price points, they’ll win over many photographers and videographers.
At times, the 17-70mm does produce chromatic aberration and excessive vignetting, especially when shooting scenes with high contrast. Luckily, these are problems that can easily be solved in most photo editing programs, including Lightroom or Photoshop.
1/60s | f/2.8 | ISO 2000
Tamron 17-70mm alternatives
There are no true competitors to the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8, at least not at its price point. When looking at similar lenses, the price goes up dramatically – or you sacrifice certain features.
Sony lens choices
The closest Sony competitor is the Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 (24-82.5mm on APS-C cameras), which offers the constant f/2.8 aperture but is 15mm short on the telephoto side. The 16-55 also lacks image stabilization and will set you back $ 1,300.
The Sony E 18-105mm f/4 is a more affordable choice, coming in at around $ 600. This APS-C zoom lens offers a wider focal range than the Tamron plus image stabilization. However, the constant aperture is f/4, which is a lot slower than the Tamron’s f/2.8.
1/320s | f/10 | ISO 640
Who should buy the Tamron 17-70mm for Sony?
Considering the price and features of this lens, the Tamron 17-70mm is suitable for both professional photographers and videomakers alike, especially for those on a budget.
The lens’s features are typically found on glass that costs twice as much, including the constant f/2.8 aperture and the Vibration Compensation. It also offers remarkably sharp image quality considering its cost.
And given the relatively accessible price, the Tamron 17-70mm is also appropriate for beginner or amateur photographers and videomakers looking to increase their skills.
Using a constant f/2.8 aperture is a treat, and this lens will help budding photographers take better images in low light with nice, creamy bokeh.
So grab the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 for Sony right here!
Now over to you:
What do you think about the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8? What do you like about it? What do you dislike? Will you consider buying it? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 sample images
1/60s | f/2.8 | ISO 800
1/100s | f/3.5 | ISO 640
1/320s | f/2.8 | ISO 300
1/1250s | f/2.8 | ISO 300
1/1000s | f/2.8 | ISO 300
The post Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 for Sony Review: A Versatile Lens for a Great Price appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Suzi Pratt.
The post Nikon Announces the Full-Frame Z5 With a Sub-$ 1500 Price appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.
Last week, Nikon officially unveiled the Z5, an addition to the full-frame Z-mount mirrorless lineup that had previously only included the Z6 and the Z7.
While the Z5 doesn’t offer any groundbreaking features on par with Canon’s EOS R5/R6 announcement, the camera offers plenty to love, and will likely fall into place as an affordable full-frame option for those looking to move up from Nikon APS-C bodies.
So what does the Z5 include?
First, a full-frame, 24.3 MP sensor. This resolution is standard for entry-level APS-C and full-frame cameras, but it’s more than enough for all but the most megapixel-hungry of photographers, and generally offers a nice balance between detailed images and low-light capabilities.
Nikon promises a spectacular high-ISO performance, claiming that the Z5 will “excel in low-light situations, making it ideal for shooting everything from low-light events to an all-nighter under the Milky Way.”
As with the Z6 and Z7, you’ll also get in-body image stabilization, which ensures the Z5 is handholdable even in more difficult low-light scenarios or when shooting video, and allows the camera to deliver high-quality landscapes and travel photos even when there’s no tripod at hand.
You also get a 3.6M-dot electronic viewfinder, which should be enough to impress even more demanding shooters, as well as a 3.2-inch rear-LCD with tilting and touchscreen capabilities. Interestingly (and perhaps in response to complaints from Z6/Z7 users), the Z5 will offer dual SD card slots, which provide a level of redundancy required by many professional shooters.
As for autofocus, Nikon promises 273 AF points, which “cover nearly the entire frame,” as well as human and animal eye-detection technology for easy tracking of pet, portrait, and wildlife subjects. This appears identical to the highly-regarded AF system on the Z6, and should provide Z5 shooters with fast focusing and tracking, even in trickier conditions.
Unfortunately, while the Z5 boasts a maximum shutter speed of 1/800s, a significant drawback is the continuous shooting speed, which tops out at 4.5 fps, and makes the Z5 immediately unsuitable for more serious sports and wildlife photographers.
And while the Z5 is compatible with a slew of excellent lenses via the FTZ adapter, the number of native Z lenses is still limited compared to mirrorless competitors such as Sony and Fujifilm.
On the other hand, the Z5 features a weather-sealed body, which is (surprisingly) on the same level as the Z6 and Z7. And regarding video: The Z5 does offer 4K/30p recording, but this comes with a pretty substantial (1.7x) crop, which will undoubtedly make the Z5 less compelling for more serious video shooters.
Bottom line:
The Z5 will be an appealing option for photographers looking to transition to mirrorless, especially given a relatively reasonable ($ 1400 USD) body-only price. But the slow continuous shooting speeds will force fast-paced photographers (e.g., wildlife, sports, and street) to look elsewhere, while the presence of the Z6 (at around $ 1800 USD) will be a compelling alternative for photographers desiring faster (12 fps) shooting speeds.
The Z5 will begin shipping in late August, and is currently available for pre-order here.
Now over to you:
What do you think of the Nikon Z5? What is your favorite and least favorite feature? And is it a model you’d be interested in purchasing? Share your thoughts in the comments!
The post Nikon Announces the Full-Frame Z5 With a Sub-$ 1500 Price appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.
The post Fujifilm X-T4 Review: The Best APS-C Camera on the Market (For a Price) appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.
If you’re trying to decide whether the Fujifilm X-T4 is the right camera for you, then this comprehensive Fujifilm X-T4 review is exactly what you need.
For several weeks, I’ve been putting Fujifilm’s newest camera through its paces, with the goal of answering a few key questions:
What does the X-T4 offer over the X-T3?
How does the X-T4 compare to other options on the market?
And, ultimately, is the X-T4 worth the price?
All these questions, and more, will be answered in this review.
The Fujifilm X-T4 comes as the latest addition to Fujifilm’s flagship lineup, previously headed by the Fujifilm X-T3. Note that Fujifilm explicitly indicated that the X-T4 does not replace the X-T3, but enters the lineup as a sister model.
In many ways, the X-T3 and the X-T4 are the same; the ergonomics and aesthetics are exceedingly similar, plus you get 26 MP X-trans sensors, dual card slots, and 4K/60p video.
But there are also some fundamental differences. While there’s certainly still room for the X-T3 in a Fujifilm lover’s gear bag, the truth is, the X-T4 is the better camera (though significantly pricier!).
In fact, I’d go so far to say that the X-T4 is one of the absolute best cameras I’ve ever used, and certainly one of my favorites, thanks to its Fujifilm retro charm, as well as its generally strong performance across the board.
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 32.5 mm | 1/250s | f/8 | ISO 200
Fujifilm is in the business of making all-around cameras: Mirrorless models that can do pretty much anything at a high level, from action to landscape to video. The X-T4 is simply another level of this superb well-roundedness, giving a combination of top-notch handling, improved autofocus, blazing-fast continuous shooting speeds, high-powered video, and excellent image quality.
Here are a few key Fujifilm X-T4 specifications:
26 MP APS-C sensor
4K/60p video
Continuous shooting up to 20 fps with electronic shutter (15 fps with mechanical shutter)
3.68M-dot electronic viewfinder
500 shot-per-charge battery
Dual SD card slots
In-body image stabilization
Note that, in purchasing the X-T4, you also get access to Fujifilm’s very impressive array of lenses. Many of these are very reasonably priced, not to mention optically stellar, which is why I consider Fujifilm to be something of a dark horse in the photography world.
That said, there are some drawbacks to buying the X-T4.
While it’s a fantastic all-around camera, it has no particular specialties, which means that it’s probably not the right choice if you’re seeking to capture, say, high-level sports or nothing but detailed HDR landscape photos.
So to find out more about the X-T4, both the good and the bad, read on.
If you’re a long-time Fujifilm shooter, the design of the X-T4 will feel familiar to you. It’s very much in line with the X-T3’s thin, metallic form, though it’s gained a slight amount of bulk, presumably due to the inclusion of IBIS.
For non-Fujifilm shooters, however, holding the X-T4 for the first time may offer a bit of a shock.
First, it feels like a squashed brick; you get a very well-made body, compressed into a compact form. And while the X-T4 does offer a decent-sized handgrip, it’s not as large as what you might expect from a Nikon or Canon camera (and certainly not a Nikon or Canon DSLR), which might take some getting used to.
The Fujifilm X-T4 is weather-sealed, and it feels it; honestly, the whole body just screams durability, which means that you can feel comfortable taking the X-T4 in inclement weather (always important for serious outdoor and nature shooters).
I know I mentioned it above, but I really am a huge fan of the Fujifilm retro aesthetic, which somehow makes the X-T4 feel like less of a finely-crafted tool and more of a camera that works with you.
Handling
As with all Fujifilm cameras, handling is excellent, assuming you don’t mind the old-school dials and switches.
Note that this old-school aesthetic manifests in the form of a dedicated aperture ring on Fujifilm’s lenses, which means that you have to select the aperture by turning the ring on the lens rather than turning a dial on your camera. Also part of the old-school aesthetic is the dedicated ISO, exposure compensation, and shutter speed dials on the top of the X-T4.
I can see how this very external, dial-based handling would annoy some photographers. It’s certainly not built for speed and muscle memory in split-second action, but there’s something really wonderful about setting your shutter speed and ISO via dials on the top of the camera, as opposed to through your camera knobs or touchscreen.
The X-T4’s buttons are well-placed, and I like the focus mode dial on the front (also present on other Fujifilm models); it’s much easier to access in the heat of the moment.
A noticeable upgrade over the X-T3 here is the addition of in-body image stabilization, which allows you to get up to 6.5 extra stops of handholding. This is a huge deal for anyone who frequently shoots in low light, and is a fantastic addition to the X-T4 over the X-T3. In fact, if you haven’t used IBIS before, then you’re going to want to check the X-T4 out immediately. It’s a big help for handheld landscape photography, macro photography, walkaround photography, and much more, further increasing the X-T4’s versatility.
One last handling upgrade worth noting:
The X-T4 comes with a brand-new battery, one that’s rated at 500 images per charge. As with most battery ratings, this one seems to (happily!) undershoot reality. There were at least a few days when I shot over 500 images and still had significant charge left to work with.
For me, and for many shooters out there, this is a big deal. For one, if you’re shooting in adverse conditions, you want to swap batteries as infrequently as possible.
Plus, the better the battery life, the fewer batteries you need to take with you when traveling, for outdoor trips, etc.
The electronic viewfinder looks spectacularly life-like and features a 3.68M-dot resolution. Personally, I neither love nor hate EVFs (they can be great in some situations and terrible in others), but I do think that a minimum resolution of 3.68M-dots is required for good viewing, at least for me, personally, and the X-T4 brings that to the table.
There was never a time when I wished for an optical viewfinder while using the X-T4, and the clarity of the EVF was a huge benefit when working with Fujifilm’s Film Simulation modes (more on these later!).
You also get a fully-articulating rear LCD. This is useful for anyone who prefers to shoot without the EVF to their eye, but it’s especially important for macro photographers, architectural photographers, and landscape photographers in particular; basically, anyone who sets up their camera at odd angles.
With the X-T4’s articulating screen, you can get down-low perspective shots without having to get dirty (and without having to hurt your neck!).
Note that the X-T4’s screen does offer touch functionality, though it’s pretty much limited to setting the autofocus points. This is just fine in my book, because that’s really all I like to use touch screens for since it’s far faster than moving between points with the AF joystick.
Autofocus and Continuous Shooting
The Fujifilm X-T3 was a decent autofocus performer in its own right, but the X-T4 improves on this AF prowess, primarily in terms of tracking. Honestly, I’ve always been impressed by the X-T3’s focusing capabilities, which makes me all the more pleased with the X-T4.
Focusing on still subjects was extremely snappy, even in more difficult lighting situations.
In terms of tracking, I found the X-T4 able to follow predictably moving subjects with ease (e.g., cars), and while my keeper rate wasn’t 100 percent, I was very pleased with the results. Face and eye detection are a bit variable, especially in lower light, but are far from bad.
One of the great things about Fujifilm cameras is the continuous shooting speeds, which are blazing-fast by any metric. On the X-T4, you get 20 fps shooting using the electronic shutter, and this drops to a very respectable 15 fps using the mechanical shutter (up over the 11 fps mechanical shutter on the X-T3).
In fact, continuous shooting is one of the many reasons why the X-T4, and Fujifilm’s top cameras more generally, are such excellent all-around options. While they aren’t really designed as action cameras, you can certainly use them for fast-paced street photography, sports photography, and wildlife photography, assuming you can get the autofocus to work for you.
The X-T4 packs a 26 MP, APS-C sensor, and while it doesn’t offer many changes over the X-T3, it’s still pretty darn powerful.
I tend to be conservative in terms of my tolerance of noise levels, but I feel comfortable pushing the X-T4 to at least ISO 800. Really, noise doesn’t start to become noticeable until around ISO 1600, and images can remain usable through ISO 6400 or so, depending on your purpose.
This is a good performance, especially for an APS-C camera; to my eye, it’s around a half-stop better than the Sony a6600 and pretty much on par with the Nikon Z50. And while the X-T4 can’t quite compete with the full-frame heavy hitters, it’s still plenty useful for photographers seeking a camera that can handle itself in low light.
As mentioned above, one of the benefits of a Fujifilm camera is the film simulation modes, and here the X-T4 doesn’t disappoint. You get 12 high-quality options; it’s a lot of fun to toggle between them, just to see how the world will look with different types of film.
I find these modes to be especially useful for types of shooting where noticeable color grading is acceptable, such as street photography and portrait photography. However, you always have the option of experimenting with film simulation and making changes in post-processing if you’re not pleased.
At the time of writing, the Fujifilm X-T4 costs $ 1700 USD, which is $ 500 USD more than its X-T3 sibling, and is nearly $ 1000 USD more than the X-T30.
And this is where things get a little tricky because while the X-T4 does offer some serious upgrades over the X-T3, I’m just not sure it’s enough to justify $ 500. If I were trying to decide between the X-T3 and the X-T4, I’d feel more tempted by the X-T3, unless I desperately needed the IBIS or autofocus improvements.
Another issue with the X-T4’s price point is that it puts the camera on par with full-frame options such as the Nikon Z6, and only a few hundred dollars cheaper than the Sony a7 III. This isn’t going to make the X-T4 compelling for DSLR photographers looking to make the leap to mirrorless, or non-Fujifilm mirrorless shooters looking for a more powerful camera.
That said, if you’re already a Fujifilm shooter, or you’re a photographer who appreciates the unique design and all-around capabilities of the X-T4, the $ 1700 may be worth it.
But I’m an even bigger fan of the X-T4, mostly thanks to the addition of in-body image stabilization, which makes the camera even more impressive for low-light shooting. It’s the ultimate generalist camera for hobbyists and professionals, and it’s an excellent addition to any kit.
Is the X-T4 the best APS-C camera out there?
Truthfully, I think it is. You get excellent image quality, blazing-fast continuous shooting, great handling, dual card slots, good autofocus, and more.
My only reservation is the price, which feels a bit high compared to the X-T3. But you do get in-body image stabilization, as well as improved autofocus, so if you have the extra money to spend, go for it!
You won’t be disappointed.
?????
The post Fujifilm X-T4 Review: The Best APS-C Camera on the Market (For a Price) appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.
Adorama’s house brand Flashpoint has formally announced the much-anticipated XPLOR 300 Pro. The 300W/s battery-powered monolight, which is a rebranded version of the Godox AD 300 Pro, is available starting today for $ 499.
As its name alludes to, the CPLOR 300 Pro offers 300W/s of power with nine stops of control, a minimum flash duration between 1/220 and 1/11490, a recycle time between 0.01 and 1.5 seconds depending on the power level and a 2,600Ah battery that can fire off up to 320 max-power flashes on a single charge. The light also features a bi-color 12W LED modeling light, TTL metering, high-speed sync up to 1/8000th of a second and a 328-foot range when used with Flashpoint’s R2 Pro Mark II trigger.
The XPLOR 300 Pro measures in at 19cm (7.48”) long, and 10cm (3.94”) in diameter, and weighs just 1.25kg (2.76lbs). It comes with a Bowens S-Type bracket, but Flashpoint also offers a number of adapters for mounting lighting modifiers from Broncolor, Elinchrom and Profoto.
Below is an overview video of the Flashpoint XPLOR 300 Pro from Adorama:
As is the case for many of Flashpoint and Godox products, the XPLOR 300 Pro is meant to be a direct competitor to Profoto’s more expensive 250W/s B10 monolight, which retails for $ 1,695—more than three times the price. You won’t get all of the extra controls or fine-tuning the B10 offers, but for less than 1/3rd the price, Flashpoint drives a hard bargain.
The Flashpoint XPLOR 300 Pro is currently available to purchase at Adorama for $ 499 and comes with the monolight, a single rechargeable Li-Ion battery, the flashtube, a charger with a power adapter, a basic reflector, a protective cap and a case to carry it all in. While the light is also sold as the Godox AD 300 Pro, the Flashpoint unit carries a two-year warranty when purchased in the United States through Adorama.
Blackmagic Design has announced it’s dropping the price of its Pocket Cinema Camera 6K (BMPCC6K) by $ 500, bringing the retail price down to $ 1,995.
Although Blackmagic Design doesn’t explicitly say the price drop is due to the current COVID-19 pandemic in the press release, it does suggest the decision was made alongside the release of its ATEM Mini switchers to help the current demand for at-home livestreaming efforts, saying ‘With the current demand for multi camera live streaming from home broadcast studios, the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K makes a perfect studio camera when combined with the recent studio camera software update!’
The BMPCC6K offers 6K30p recording on its Super 35 sensor (6144 x 3456 pixels), up to 13 stops of dynamic range, built-in SD UHS-II and CFast card slots, HDMI output, an expandable USB-C port, a built-in 5” touchscreen and Blackmagic OS to run it all. All of that is packed inside the carbon fiber polycarbonate composite frame, which comes with a built-in Canon EF mount.
You can find the new price live at retailers around the globe, including Adorama and B&H.
Press release:
Blackmagic Design Announces New Low Price for Pocket Cinema Camera 6K
Fremont, CA, USA – Friday, 24 April 2020 – Blackmagic Design today announced a new lower price for the popular Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K of US$ 1,995. This is a reduction of $ 500 which will help make this camera more affordable for users working on digital film as well as live production with the new ATEM Mini switchers. With the current demand for multi camera live streaming from home broadcast studios, the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K makes a perfect studio camera when combined with the recent studio camera software update!
Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K is available immediately from Blackmagic Design resellers worldwide for US$ 1,995.
Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera now works as a studio camera for live production when used with ATEM Mini. Video and control is via the HDMI connection, which is available as soon as customers plug the cameras in. The record light becomes a tally light so customers can see which camera is on air. The ATEM Software Control camera page has a camera control unit (CCU) style interface for adjusting and matching their cameras. Move the CCU control vertically for iris and left to right to adjust black level. It’s the same as a broadcast CCU. There are also controls for color tint to balance camera as well as focus, gain and shutter speed. Customers can even ISO record Blackmagic RAW in the camera for editing later.
The elegant design of the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera packs an incredible number of high end digital film features into a miniaturized, handheld design. Made from lightweight carbon fiber polycarbonate composite, the camera features a multifunction handgrip with all controls for recording, ISO, WB and shutter angle right at their fingertips.
Featuring a larger 6144 x 3456 Super 35 sensor and EF lens mount, the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K model lets customers use larger EF photographic lenses to create cinematic images with shallower depth of field, allowing creative defocussed backgrounds and gorgeous bokeh effects.
Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Cameras have an incredible 13 stops of dynamic range which means they preserve more detail in the lightest and darkest areas of an image than simple video cameras can. This allows customers to set exposure for an indoor scene and still retain the details of bright outdoor light coming through a window.
The Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera features built in CFast and SD UHS-II card recorders, and a USB-C expansion port for recording direct to an external media disk. Customers can use regular SD cards for HD or higher performance UHS-II and CFast cards for native 4K or 6K when using Blackmagic RAW. Imagine capturing over an hour of full resolution 6K images on a single 256GB SD UHS-II card. The ProRes and Blackmagic RAW files work with all video software.
Blackmagic RAW is a revolutionary new format designed to capture and preserve the quality of the sensor data from their camera. Video formats such as H.264 are highly compressed, plus add noise and artifacts, causing original sensor detail to be lost forever. Blackmagic RAW eliminates this problem and gives customers stunning images with incredible detail and color throughout the production pipeline from camera to edit, color and mastering. It also saves camera settings as metadata so customers can set ISO, white balance and exposure in camera or override them later while editing, all without any loss of quality. Blackmagic RAW files are also small and fast to use making them easy to work with.
Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera features a large, bright 5 inch touchscreen that makes it easy for customers to frame shots and accurately focus. The touchscreen displays critical information while users are shooting, menus for setting up the camera and intuitive touch to focus controls. On screen overlays show status, a histogram, focus and peaking indicators, levels, frame guides, playback controls and more.
With the advanced Blackmagic OS, customers get an intuitive and user friendly camera operating system based on the latest technology. The interface uses simple tap and swipe gestures to adjust settings, add metadata and view recording status. Customers also get full control over advanced camera features such as on screen focus and exposure tools, 3D LUTs, HDR, metadata entry, timecode, Blackmagic RAW settings and more.
Both Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera models feature a mini XLR input with 48 volts of phantom power for connecting professional microphones such as lapel mics and booms. The four built in microphones have an extremely low noise floor and are shock and wind resistant, allowing customers to capture great sound in any location. There’s also a 3.5mm audio input for connecting video camera style microphones, along with a built in speaker for playback and a 3.5mm headphone jack.
“We have worked very hard to build this camera at lower cost, and we think even more people will be able to take advantage of this price reduction to move into a more advanced and much higher quality digital film workflow,” said Grant Petty, Blackmagic Design CEO. “This has become more important with COVID-19. Many broadcasters have been setting up home studios for presenters, which have used ATEM Mini switchers and Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Cameras. We think with the recent software updates for switcher control of the Pocket Cinema Cameras from the ATEM Mini switchers, combined with this more affordable price it will greatly help this workflow.”
Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K Features
Works as a studio camera when connected to ATEM Mini.
Designed from carbon fiber polycarbonate composite.
Wide 13 stops of dynamic range for film looks.
Built in SD, UHS-II and CFast card recorders.
Features incredible quality Blackmagic RAW recording.
Built in 5″ touchscreen allows accurate focus when shooting 6K.
Blackmagic OS as used in URSA Mini and URSA Broadcast cameras.
Professional mini XLR input with 48 volt phantom power.
Availability and Price
Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K is available now for US$ 1,995, excluding local duties and taxes, from Blackmagic Design resellers worldwide.
The Fujifilm XC 35mm F2 prime lens has the same optical formula as the company’s XF 35mm F2 WR prime but costs half as much. How can this be? Chris and Jordan explain the differences.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to get new episodes of DPReview TV every week.
Introduction
Fujifilm 35mm lens options
Sharpness
Image quality
Build quality
Weather sealing
Which one should you buy?
Want to make your own side-by-side comparisons between the two lenses? All the photos from this episode (and more) are in the sample gallery below.
Sample gallery from this episode
$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_0632252312″,”galleryId”:”0632252312″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) }); Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)
Comments Off on DPReview TV: Fujifilm 35mm XC vs XF. Same performance for half the price?
Flickr has notified its Pro subscribers about a price increase that brings the current annual rate to $ 60, a ten dollar increase over the previous $ 50 annual fee. Customers are also offered other plan options, such as a monthly subscription for $ 7, a three-month subscription for $ 19 and a two-year subscription for $ 118.
The price increase is not surprising in light of CEO Don MacAskill’s impassioned plea for more Flickr Pro subscribers published in mid-December. In it, MacAskill explained that parent company SmugMug didn’t acquire Flickr because it is a wealthy company — in fact, MacAskill says, ‘Flickr was losing tens of millions of dollars a year.’
Despite the work that SmugMug put into Flickr, MacAskill had explained that the company was still losing money and that it needed more of its users to sign up for the Pro subscription. This subscription offers a number of benefits for users, including unlimited storage, ad-free browsing, discounts from partners, access to advanced account states, priority exposure in the service’s Explore section and more.
The price increase went into effect yesterday, on Tuesday, January 21. Existing Pro customers are given the option of immediately renewing their plan at the lower price using a link in the notification email sent to users. In explaining why it decided to increase the price, Flickr points toward MacAskill’s December letter and states that the company ‘cannot continue to operate at a loss.’
The post News: Tamron Announces E-Mount Prime Lenses for a Great Price appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.
Last month, Tamron announced three Sony E-mount lenses:
The 20mm f/2.8 Di III
The 24mm f/2.8 Di III
The 35mm f/2.8 Di III
These new E-mount lenses expand the range of glass for Sony mirrorless shooters while making the Sony full-frame lens lineup more affordable for those who can’t justify Sony prices.
In other words: If you’re thinking of switching to Sony but don’t want to pay a premium for full-frame E-mount glass, you have a way in. Each of these lenses is debuting for an ultra-low price of $ 349 USD; compare this to some of Sony’s full-frame E-mount lenses, and you’ll understand why these Tamron offerings are so exciting.
Of course, there’s always a question of optical quality. Can a sub-$ 500 USD lens really be equivalent to Sony’s current 24mm and 35mm glass? The answer is undoubtedly “No,” but not everyone requires the sharpest, fastest, most perfect lenses money can buy. And Tamron has proven themselves to be very capable lens manufacturers in the past, making me think that these lenses will be optically satisfying, even if they can’t go toe-to-toe with some of Sony’s fastest primes.
According to Tamron, we should expect “superb high-resolution performance,” and that “these lenses can be used with complete confidence for a wide range of applications from casual family snaps to serious professional photography.”
While these are bold words from Tamron, I wouldn’t dismiss them out of hand. Plus, Tamron has made sure to include some extra features that make these lenses impressively flexible. For instance, the lenses themselves are relatively small, which makes them ideal for walkaround shooting and travel photography. And all three lenses also offer 1:2 close-focusing capabilities. This won’t get you to true macro magnifications, but you’ll be able to capture some gorgeous close-ups, even as you use the lenses for more general wide-angle photography.
Speaking of wide-angle photography:
For me, the main drawback of this announcement is the lack of focal length diversity. While lenses in the 20-35mm focal length range are undoubtedly useful for a broad range of Sony photographers, I’d have liked to see a telephoto in the mix.
Here’s the bottom line:
For hobbyist and enthusiast photographers who like to work with lightweight wide-angle primes but don’t require f/1.2-f/1.8 apertures, these Tamron lenses are definitely worth a look. The 24mm f/2.8 is available for pre-order, while the 35mm f/2.8 has begun to ship. The 20mm f/2.8 should hit the shelves in January.
What do you think of this announcement? Are you interested in these lenses? Would you have preferred different focal lengths? Share your thoughts in the comments!
The post News: Tamron Announces E-Mount Prime Lenses for a Great Price appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.
You must be logged in to post a comment.