RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘likely’

It’s (most likely) alive! Adobe Camera Raw release includes support for Zeiss ZX1

11 Dec

Rumors of the death of the Zeiss project to introduce a full-frame compact camera appear to have been exaggerated if Adobe’s latest Camera Raw update is anything to go by. Sitting at the bottom of the list of new cameras supported by version 12.1 of the application is the Zeiss ZX1 and the DNG raw file type it will use.

The Android-based camera will offer in-camera RAW processing via an on-board version of Adobe’s Lightroom, which will allow users will be able to edit and share their images to email and social media directly from the camera. The full-frame sensor will have 37.4 million pixels and will be serviced by a 35mm F2 Distagon lens.

The camera was announced at Photokina in September 2018, but the company has been incredibly quiet about progress since the camera was shown at CP+ in February, to the extent that some commentators have suspected the camera would never become a reality. Inclusion on Adobe’s list of newly supported cameras though suggests otherwise, and even that the ZX1 may be almost ready to ship.

Other new models supported by Camera Raw 12.1 include Leica’s already released SL2, Canon’s EOS Ra and M200, the Google Pixel 4 and 4 XL, the Nikon Z50, Sigma fp and Sony’s a9 II. For more information see the Adobe Camera Raw web page.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on It’s (most likely) alive! Adobe Camera Raw release includes support for Zeiss ZX1

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Panasonic S1H: What we know so far, and what we think’s likely

01 Jun

What do we know about the Panasonic S1H?

Panasonic has announced the development of the S1H: a full-frame counterpart to its video-focused GH series.

The company has revealed a handful of specs about the forthcoming camera (due in the second half of 2019 for around $ 4000), from which we can draw some interesting conclusions.

Published specs:

  • 6K 3:2 capture at 24p
  • 16:9 5.9K capture at up to 30p
  • ‘Multi aspect’ recording including anamorphic 4:3 capture
  • 10-bit DCI and UHD 4K capture at up to 60p
  • Unlimited recording times
  • 14+ stop V-Log/V-Gamut capture
  • Color reproduction to match Cinema VariCam series

It’s essentially a full-frame ‘GH’

In addition to this, Panasonic has said the ‘H’ in the name represents the same qualities as the one in the GH models: a stills/video hybrid with high quality. And, if we look at the specifications, there’s a lot of overlap with the capabilities of the company’s GH5.

Panasonic says it will combine aspects from the GH-series, the full-frame S-series and its pro-level Cinema Varicam series.

It’ll almost certainly be 24MP

The most likely implication of these specs is that the camera has a 24MP sensor. While it’s theoretically possible that the chip has more than 6000 horizontal pixels and these are then downsampled to the quoted ‘6K’ resolution, this would be a challenging both in terms of computation and readout speed. It’s far more likely that it’ll be a 6000 x 4000 pixel sensor achieving the 6K 3:2 figure given.

It probably won’t be ‘multi-aspect’ in the same sense as the GH5S

Panasonic talks about the S1H offering ‘multi-aspect’ shooting, including 4:3 anamorphic shooting. But we’re not taking this as proof that it has an multi-aspect sensor, in the same way the GH2 and GH5S have.

While it’s theoretically possible the camera will have a larger-than-full-frame sensor, with the different aspect ratios cropped out to the edges of the image circle, we think it’s pretty unlikely for three reasons:

1) 24MP full-frame chips already exist and would make sense with all the other details given. 2) it would be expensive to develop or commission a dedicated oversized sensor for a relatively niche product. 3) If the 3:2 region is 6000 pixels wide, then a multi-aspect design would lead you to expect a 16:9 region with nearly 6.3K resolution, not the 5.9K quoted.

It’s not impossible, but we think it’s pretty unlikely.

The 60p video will probably come from a Super35 crop

If the camera can only shoot 5.9K (ie full-sensor width), video at up to 30p, then it must either pixel bin, line skip or crop to achieve a rate faster than this. A roughly 6000 x 4000 pixel sensor would yield a roughly 4000 x 2250 APS-C region, which would make sense (this is what the S1 does).

The S1 video upgrade (SFU2) raises the bar

The DMW-SFU2 upgrade for the S1 raises the expectations of what the S1H will be able to do.

Panasonic had already said that the $ 200 SFU2 upgrade would add 10-bit, 4:2:2 150Mbps full-width 4K capture and full V-Log implementation, but the announced specs go further than this. It not only lifts the 29:59 recording limits and enables 10-bit 4:2:2 output of the camera’s 4K 60p footage, over HDMI.

More than this, it adds GH5-like video features such as waveform display, the ability to upload LUTs for a corrected preview, and the ability to limit the recording to industry-recognized ‘safe’ output (giving a choice of 0-1023, 64-940 or 64-1023, to match different workflows).

These additions are likely to hint at the minimum capabilities of the S1H: with it being safe to assume the inclusion of waveforms. Given the S1H’s anamorphic capture capabilities, it’s also likely that it’ll gain the GH5’s ability to present ‘de-squeezed’ playback of anamorphic footage as well as on-screen indicators of the output dimensions.

The body will resemble, but not be shared with, the S1 and S1R

Panasonic says the S1H will look similar to the S1 and S1R but won’t share the same body Instead the company implied it would be slightly larger. The early imagery shows a camera that’s slightly taller than the existing bodies.

This raises the likelihood that the S1H is essentially an S1 will more processing power and the improved heat dissipation that this would need.

But beyond that, the capabilities look remarkably similar:

Panasonic S1
(with paid SFU2 upgrade)
Panasonic S1H
Pixel Count 24MP 24MP*
30p capture Full-width 4K downscaled from 6K Full-width 6K
60p capture UHD from Super35 region DCI or UHD from Super35 region*
Other aspect ratios 3:2 6K at up to 24p
In-body stabilization Yes Unknown

*logical assumptions, based on information provided.

What will the S1H offer over an upgraded S1?

The limited details we have of the S1H suggest it may be based on similar hardware to the S1, though perhaps with a more powerful processor (or the same processor running faster, with some means to cool it).

What is clear is that Panasonic thinks these differences will be worth at least a $ 1300 premium over the cost of the S1 and SFU2 upgrade. The company says it’ll be a product aimed at pro videographers and cinematographers, rather than the S1, which is described as being a good fit for wedding photographers who are also looking to deliver video.

So, what might the S1H offer to justify this price-hike (and the creation of a whole new model)?

Full resolution output

The Panasonic S1 creates its 4K footage from 5.9K capture, but we’re assuming Panasonic means that the S1H won’t downsample to 4K, when it says the S1H will shoot 5.9K.

The camera’s 6K 3:2 mode is likely to essentially an ‘open gate’ mode, shooting a larger area than the final shot, giving scope for cropping, re-positioning, rotating or stabilizing the footage. To achieve the full benefit of this, the camera would need to output its 6K capture at 6K.

Likewise, we’d expect the camera’s ‘5.9K 16:9’ footage to be retained at full resolution. For a professional workflow, this greater detail would provide some flexibility to crop in post while still maintaining true 4K resolution could be the difference between a primary camera and a secondary ‘B’ camera, and a major selling point over the S1.

Higher bitrates?

Even with the paid video upgrade, the Panasonic S1 can only shoot video at up to 150Mbps: a long way short of the 400Mbps capabilities of the GH5 and GH5S. This seems like the most obvious added extra to include in the camera.

The GH5 and GH5S already show that Panasonic can write 400Mbps (50 MB/s) to the latest V90-rated SD cards, which is not necessarily utilized in the S1.

There’s also the possibility that the S1H will support the Micro P2 standard of cards, used elsewhere in Panasonic’s VariCam range. These look like standard SD cards but use a different write method with greater data integrity. Adding P2 support would boost cross-compatibility with VariCam cameras.

Regardless of memory format, we think higher bitrate capture is a near certainty.

ProRes-compatible Raw output?

Also possible is that Panasonic has been working on a way to deliver the sensor’s Raw output (in a manageable bit-depth) across the HDMI port, to allow the potential for ProRes Raw or CinemaDNG Raw capture using an external recorder.

Nikon has rather stolen a march on the rest of the photo industry by promising Raw video output from the Z6. Raw video hasn’t been universally adopted, as a result of the storage and processing demands that it imposes on the workflow. However, the ProRes Raw format offers clever-enough compression options that it becomes easier to adopt. Panasonic may already looking ahead to Raw becoming format of choice in the industry. We’d rate this as 50/50.

Industry-standard connectors

The hint of a slightly larger body makes SDI, micro XLR or more pro-friendly connectors a possibility. However, historically Panasonic has preferred to offer these through a series of adapter add-ons (such as the XLR-1 adapter) that can be compatible with a number of cameras, so we think this is pretty unlikely.

Fixed sensor?

The company was distinctly tight-lipped when we asked whether the S1H would be image stabilized. At the time of the GH5S launch, the company claimed that a fixed sensor works better with external stabilization system (though it’s equally true that the GH5S’s sensor is so big that there’s limited scope for moving it around within the image circle of Micro Four Thirds lenses).

It’s possible that this greater gimbal and steadicam friendliness, combined with the improved heat management of being able to attach the sensor to a heat sync would push the S1H towards using a fixed sensor. That would also explain its existence as a distinct model, since most photographers would prefer to have in-body IS.

We’d rate this one as 50/50, too.

It’ll be fascinating to find out

At this point we can only speculate but, if Panasonic thinks it can charge an extra $ 1300 for the S1H, then they must be pretty confident about the value proposition it’ll offer.

We’d expect Panasonic to hold onto the precise details of the S1H until nearer its autumn/fall release. We’d also expect them to hold some surprises back, to really catch the industry’s attention.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Panasonic S1H: What we know so far, and what we think’s likely

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Samsung announces two new 1/2-inch sensors likely destined for future Galaxy devices

31 Oct

Recent flagship smartphones have shown the newest arms race in the world of mobile photography is how many lenses you can stick on a device, but Samsung isn’t giving up on the megapixels yet. Samsung has announced a new pair of half-inch image sensors destined for future smartphones: the 48-megapixel GM1 and 32-megapixel GD1.

Both the 48MP ISOCELL Bright GM1 and 32MP ISOCELL Bright GD1 have 0.8?m pixels and are backside illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensors that use Samsung’s latest pixel isolation technology, nicknamed ISOCELL Plus. They also use Samsung’s Tetracell technology, which merges four pixels together to create a single pixel that’s more effective in low-light environments. Samsung claims “the GM1 and GD1 can deliver light sensitivity equivalent to that of a 1.6?m-pixel image sensor at 12MP and 8MP resolution, respectively.”

Both sensors support gyro-based electronic image stabilization and the 32MP GD1 supports real-time HDR image capture.

Samsung expects the ISOCELL Bright GM1 and GD1 to be in mass production by the end of 2018, which would likely pave the way for an appearance in future Samsung Galaxy devices in 2019.

Samsung Introduces Two New 0.8?m ISOCELL Image Sensors to the Smartphone Market

Ultra-small pixel size combined with ISOCELL Plus and Tetracell technologies enhance sharpness and detail in smartphone photos

Samsung Electronics, a world leader in advanced semiconductor technology, today introduced two new 0.8-micrometer (?m) pixel image sensors – the 48-megapixel (Mp) Samsung ISOCELL Bright GM1 and the 32Mp ISOCELL Bright GD1.

“Demand for ultra-small, high-resolution image sensors are growing as smartphones evolve to deliver new and more exciting camera experiences for users,” said Ben K. Hur, vice president of System LSI marketing at Samsung Electronics. “With the introduction of our cutting-edge 0.8?m-pixel Samsung ISOCELL Bright GM1 and GD1 image sensors, we are committed to continue driving innovation in image sensor technologies.”

As cameras are becoming a key distinguishing feature in today’s mobile devices, smartphone makers are faced with the challenge to fit multiple cameras into the sleek designs of their latest flagships. At a reduced pixel size, the new sensors provide greater design flexibility, enabling camera module manufacturers to build smaller modules or pack more pixels into existing designs, and consequently allowing smartphone makers to maximize space utilization in slim, bezel-less smartphones.

The GM1 and the GD1 sensors are based on the company’s latest pixel isolation technology – the ISOCELL Plus* – which optimizes performance especially for smaller-dimension pixels, making them the ideal solution for today’s super-resolution cameras. In addition, thanks to Tetracell technology, where four pixels are merged to work as one to increase light sensitivity, the GM1 and GD1 can deliver light sensitivity equivalent to that of a 1.6?m-pixel image sensor at 12Mp and 8Mp resolution, respectively. The sensors also support Gyro-based electronic image stabilization (EIS) for fast and accurate image capture.

A real-time high dynamic range (HDR) feature is added to the GD1 to deliver more balanced exposure, richer color and detail when filming selfie-videos or streaming live video content even in low-light, high-contrast environments.

The Samsung ISOCELL Bright GM1 and GD1 are expected to be in mass production in the fourth quarter of this year.

*Samsung first announced its ISOCELL technology in 2013, which reduces color-cross talk between pixels by placing a physical barrier, allowing small-sized pixels to achieve higher color fidelity. Based on this technology, Samsung introduced the industry’s first 1.0um-pixel image sensor in 2015 and 0.9-pixel sensor in 2017. In June 2018, Samsung introduced an upgraded pixel isolation technology, the ISOCELL Plus.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Samsung announces two new 1/2-inch sensors likely destined for future Galaxy devices

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Xperia XZ3 likely to come with Sony’s new 48MP Quad-Bayer sensor

27 Jul

Only a few days ago Sony announced its latest smartphone sensor, a 1/2″ stacked 48MP beast with Quad-Bayer design for improved low light performance at 12MP output size. And if rumors turn out to be true, we won’t have to wait long before the chip is available in a production smartphone.

Renders of the upcoming Sony Xperia XZ3 flagship smartphone that are floating around the internet show the new device with just one rear camera, as distinct from the dual-camera setup used by the Xperia XZ2 Premium.

This one-camera design has been confirmed by a benchmark listing, showing only one rear camera sensor with a 47MP output size. As those benchmark listings are created using pre-production models some of the specifications could still change before the launch but it’s highly likely we are looking at Sony’s new IMX586 sensor here.

We’ll know more on August 30 when the Xperia XZ3 will be officially launched at IFA and we’re looking forward to evaluating camera performance when the device is available for testing.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Xperia XZ3 likely to come with Sony’s new 48MP Quad-Bayer sensor

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Panasonic likely to scale-back camera division

28 Mar

Panasonic is likely to significantly scale-back its camera business, according to a report by Japan’s largest business newspaper. The Nikkei Asian Review says the move is one of the proposals of a report prepared by the company’s business planning department.

Like all large electronics makers, Panasonic has found it hard to make profit in an industry with increasingly tight margins. The report puts forth ways to rationalize the business, sell or close loss-making groups and focus on the company’s areas of strength.

The paper identifies three businesses: ‘digital cameras, private branch exchange telephone systems and optical disk drives,’ which, it says: ‘will be dismantled. Each will be scaled back and placed under the umbrella of other operations, with headcount to be reduced.’

With the number of compact cameras being sold having fallen precipitously and the interchangeable lens camera market stagnant, the digital camera division is an obvious target for cuts as part of the company’s restructuring.

The Nikkei also says that ‘In the chip business, the company is weighing unloading shares in a joint venture with an Israeli enterprise,’ presumably a reference to the TowerJazz Panasonic Semiconductor joint venture that builds CMOS sensors, amongst other things.

Panasonic’s financial year ends on March 31st, so we’ll be watching the announcement of its 2017/18 plans for signs of the report being implemented.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Panasonic likely to scale-back camera division

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Samsung Galaxy S8 likely to come with same camera specs as S7

28 Jan

More than six months ago the upcoming Samsung flagship smartphone Galaxy S8 was rumored to come with a dual-cam setup. Now, that we are much closer to the actual launch of the device, it’s looking more and more like those rumors were unfounded. Today a major leak, via the usually very reliable Evan Blass (a.k.a @evleaks), has revealed that the S8’s camera specification will indeed be very similar to its predecessor S7: a 12MP sensor and F1.7 aperture in the main camera and 8MP with F1.7 at the front. The latter has an iris scanner next to it, like we’ve already seen it on the now discontinued Galaxy Note 7. There is no talk of OIS but we’d be surprised if it would not be included. 

There will be a new visual search function that uses the camera, though. The technology will be able to identify objects and users will then be able to perform searches on shopping sites or search engines. We have seen a similar feature on Amazon’s Fire Phone before. The same tool will also offer OCR functionality. 

Other specs sound interesting as well. There will be a Plus version with a large 6.2″ display alongside the 8-8″ standard model. Both displays will be curved AMOLED variants with an unusual 18.5:9 aspect ratio. Both phones will, depending on region, be powered by the brand new Snapdragon 835 or Samsung’s latest in-house Exynos chipset, combined with 4GB RAM and 64GB of expandable storage. The batteries will have a capacity of 3,500 and 3,000 mAh respectively. Both phones are expected to be announced on March 29. In Europe the Galaxy S8 will set you back €799 (approximately $ 855), the Plus model will be €899 ($ 960).

What do you think about the upcoming S8 from a mobile photography point of view? Will it, despite seemingly unchanged camera specs, be able to keep up with its high-end rivals? Let us know what you think in the comments.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Samsung Galaxy S8 likely to come with same camera specs as S7

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Epson announces mass production of 4.41m dot LCD likely used in Leica SL

11 Dec

Epson has announced its latest electronic viewfinder panel: a 4.41m dot SXGA+ display, a spec that may sound familiar to anyone who’s been reading about Leica’s SL full-frame mirrorless camera. Epson had shown a mockup of the panel at CP+ back in February 2015, and says the unit is now in mass production.

The 4.41m dot unit offers an SXGA+ display: 1,400 x 1,050 pixels. This equates to 1.87x as many pixels as the existing XGA viewfinders used in most high-end mirrorless cameras: a 36% increase in linear resolution. Everyone who’s used it at DPReview has been very impressed by the level of detail shown by the SL’s 4.41m dot viewfinder.

Leica has previously offered Epson-based EVFs as accessory finders for its X1 and X2 models, but these were likely to have been brought in from Olympus, given the similar styling and cross-compatibility with Olympus units. Considering the dot count and panel size (0.66″), it seems very probable that this is the LCD panel in the SL.

The Leica SL, as seen from behind

At present, most high-end EVFs we’ve seen are XGA 2.36m dot displays, using either LCD or OLED technologies. Olympus used LCD panels in its earlier OM-D cameras but has shifted towards OLED in its latest generation. Likewise, Fujfilm used LCDs in its X-Pro1 and X100 series models, only to embrace OLED across the rest of its range. Despite this shift, we’d be surprised if we didn’t start seeing this LCD panel in some of the higher-end mirrorless cameras over the coming year or so, especially given the greater longevity of LCD panels that Leica mentioned as its reason for choosing the technology.

That said, the 0.66″ panel size could limit its usage, since this is considerably larger than the 0.48″ LCD and 0.5″ OLEDs currently in use.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Epson announces mass production of 4.41m dot LCD likely used in Leica SL

Posted in Uncategorized

 

The Story of Photographing my First Wedding also Likely my Last

20 Mar

There’s really no question that wedding photography is one of the most common forms of professional photography and if you’ve recently become the owner of a DSLR odds are sooner or later someone you know might ask you to photograph their wedding. Though this might be a tempting offer, I want you to think long and hard before saying yes, because photographing a wedding is a lot more than pointing a camera and capturing the moments. To help drive home this point I’m telling a bit of a story today.

weddingalt

My story is about why, even though photographing this wedding was the best experience of my photography life, I more than likely won’t be photographing another wedding anytime soon.

I don’t want you to think that I’m here to tell you that it’s a bad idea to get into wedding photography, or even that my first (and last) time as a wedding photographer was a bad experience. Neither of these are the case – in fact I quite enjoyed photographing this wedding, but there are some things that I learned about myself which would make me hesitate if I were asked to do it again.

SneakPeak1

First some background

Like most new photographers these days I created a website, set up a Facebook page, and started sharing my photos on a daily basis. Over time I noticed that my page was growing with not only my immediate friends, but friends of friends, and even people I didn’t know – I guess you could say I started attracting a following.

After a couple of years of sharing landscape and wildlife shots from around the New England area, one of my sister’s friends reached out to me and asked if I’d photograph her wedding.

My first instinct was to say “I’m not a wedding photographer – why are you asking me?”. So I sort of brushed it off as a random thing, but she insisted that she liked my style and wanted to work with someone she knew and trusted. If there’s anything to my credit – I’ve always been a hard worker. So, as this post requires that I photograph a wedding, you probably won’t be surprised to hear that I eventually did commit to the job.

Months of preparation

And I mean months!

The bride-to-be was extremely organized and prepared, having everything booked months in advance – in fact – the photographer was one of her last jobs to tackle. After accepting the job I had nearly a full year to learn as much as I could about photographing weddings and that’s exactly what I did. This three part series here on dPS: Wedding Photography 101 (Part 1), Wedding Photography 101 (Part 2), Wedding Photography 101 (Part 3) should be on every prospective wedding photographer’s reading list. But a quick search for “wedding photography” on dPS will yield dozens of other great reads.

SneakPeak5

However, all the reading that I was doing, really couldn’t prepare me for the real thing. Emotions, stress, time crunch, uncontrollable problems, and anything else that you can pack into the ten hour day – you simply can’t read that, so I enlisted the help of a professional. I reached out to a local photographer, who worked closely with a friend of mine, and he was kind enough to allow me to shadow him, and even second shoot for him on a couple of occasions.

This experience gave me a huge boost of confidence going into the event, and I highly recommend reaching out to your own local wedding photographers prior to photographing a wedding on your own for the first time. The experience is priceless.

The final bit of preparation was gear related – I was being paid for this shoot and as a landscape/wildlife photographer my ultra-wide angle and telephoto zooms were not ideal for the task at hand. So I spent a little of the money that I was paid for the wedding to rent a second camera (you can never be too prepared) and a 24-70mm f/2.8 lens which would be my workhorse for the night.

The wedding was a success

Due to my preparation and my commitment to wanting to provide the best possible photographs that my ability would allow, I’d say the wedding was a success. The bride and groom got photos that they will enjoy for the rest of their lives and I learned more than I could ever have imagined in a very short amount of time.

SneakPeak4

The day of the wedding I was at my wits end, running on pretty much pure adrenaline at that point. I had a list of ‘must have shots’ which I was able to check off throughout the day and night. It’s hard to imagine that the event lasted as long as it did, as it all went by so quickly, with barely a break for food or drink. All said and done, I left the reception after the last dance feeling confident that I had done the best that I could. So why never again?

Why I won’t photograph another wedding

There’s no question that this was a valuable experience. I learned more about myself as a photographer photographing this wedding than I had in the nearly 3 years of photographing landscapes, but I’d also learned that it wasn’t for me. I enjoy the peace and quite of nature and the ability to go back to the same location to fine tune the shot over a period of time and lighting conditions. Weddings are a one shot deal – you get the light you get – you get the weather you get, and you get one shot to make it happen.

You have to be a people person – something I am not. Going around to get various people that I didn’t know together for photographs was hard enough when there were actually a handful of people that I did know at this wedding (sister’s friend remember?). I don’t think that I could do this on my own, without help, and without a lot more practice. So I urge anyone who’s thinking about photographing a wedding to not take it lightly. It’s an important day for a lot of people – not just the bride and groom – but their parents, extended family, and friends will want to remember this day as well so you MUST get it right.

The moral of this story is that wedding photography can be a very rewarding experience, but you have got to put the work into it. If you are thinking to yourself that it will be an easy job – think again. Oh and please – don’t ever do this for free – being paid to shoot this wedding was what motivated me to find help, rent gear, drive to their location and process hundreds of photos – the experience was a bonus.

Some stats from the wedding

  • hours shot from start to finish on the day – 10 hours
  • number of images shot total – 1500
  • number of images given to the couple – 500
  • how long it took to edit it – approximately 5-6 hours
  • number of hours estimated spent preparing: time with other photographer, etc –  Dozens and dozens of hours of prep time between reading articles and spending time with this mentor photographer I would say easily 50 hours or more went into the prep.

Equipment used to shoot the wedding

  • camera bodies:  rental D600 and my own D7000 as backup
  • lenses:  rented the 24-70 f/2.8 (pretty much used for the entire event) also had my 55-300mm Nikon & 11-16mm Tokina, and a 50mm prime on my D7000 for odds and ends shots
  • flash:  Nikon SB700
  • light modifiers like umbrellas or reflectors – none
  • tripod:  had my Manfrotto 190XBPRO with me but rarely used it
  • other:  nothing else, But Jim (my mentor of sorts) told me that if I were to get into this that it’s a good idea to stock up on things like needles, various threads, safety pins, tape, Advil, Aspirin, Tylenol, scissors, and so much other stuff – not really for you, but you’ll be the hero of the wedding if you pull something the bride needs out of your magic bag of tricks

Editors note: 

Having done somewhere in the neighbourhood of 250 weddings in my time, I can concur that everything John has said is absolutely true, and some of the same advice I give people considering doing one for the first time. Being prepared is the number one thing I can say also. I remember wanting to throw up the entire first year I did weddings, the pressure is THAT intense. These are people’s memories and not something to take lightly. I too, like John’s mentor did carry such an emergency kit and can tell you I’ve used deodorant, men’s black socks, nylons, clear nail polish to stop runs in nylons, safety pins, After Bite for bug bites, Visine, allergy meds, Stain remover (get the stick, takes grease right out of a wedding gown), nail glue, bug spray, sunscreen,  and more. John gives great advice from his experience – heed it well.

The post The Story of Photographing my First Wedding also Likely my Last by John Davenport appeared first on Digital Photography School.


Digital Photography School

 
Comments Off on The Story of Photographing my First Wedding also Likely my Last

Posted in Photography

 

Nokia EOS rumors abound: A look at what’s likely

08 Jun

EOS.png

Rumors are flying about a supposed Nokia EOS smartphone that would surpass even the 41-megapixel Nokia 808 PureView model. Reports indicate that the ‘EOS’ will sport the same size sensor that made the Nokia 808 so remarkable. Photos of a purported EOS prototype also show a similar raised camera profile as the 808. See what other speculations are likely by clicking through to connect.dpreview.com.

News: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Nokia EOS rumors abound: A look at what’s likely

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Low-res iPad Mini likely a disappointment for photographers in Apple refresh

24 Oct

iPadMini.png

Apple has announced an updated iPad but its low-resolution iPad Mini is likely to be a disappointment for photographers looking to do precision work. While the fourth-generation iPad features a 263 pixel-per-inch ‘Retina’ display, the 7.9″ (20cm)  iPad Mini makes do with a 163 pixel-per-inch panel with a quarter of the pixel count (just 1024 x 768, rather than its big brother’s 2048 x 1536 pixels). The iPad Mini’s screen is step behind the latest panels, such as the 217ppi, 1280 x 800 pixel display in the less expensive Nexus 7. The fourth-gen iPad also features a faster A6X processor that is claimed to offer twice the performance, plus an HD (720p) front-facing camera.

News: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Low-res iPad Mini likely a disappointment for photographers in Apple refresh

Posted in Uncategorized