RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘impresses’

Olympus OM-D E-M1X in the studio: familiar image quality, Pixel-Shift still impresses

26 Jan

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-13871818″,”widgetId”:655,”initialStateId”:null}) })

We’ve been shooting with the new Olympus OM-D E-M1X for a little while now, both in and out of our studio. Our standard studio tests show that conventional stills performance is little changed from the E-M1 II, but its high-res Pixel Shift mode is still impressive.

Click here to read our Olympus OM-D E-M1X First Impressions Review

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Olympus OM-D E-M1X in the studio: familiar image quality, Pixel-Shift still impresses

Posted in Uncategorized

 

The thing that impresses me most about Leica? Its innovation

01 Nov
Ok, so maybe there’s still room for innovation when it comes to memory card access.

It might sound odd to discuss the innovations of a company whose best-known product is anachronistic to the point that you have to take the baseplate off to change the film memory card, but I’m serious.

I know I’m supposed to be impressed by the company’s history, its (rather outdated) use as a press camera and the stellar reputation of its lenses. But I’m not, especially*.

I love that Leica doesn’t just have crazy ideas, but that it turns them into workable, purchasable products.

It’s not that the lenses aren’t great. It’s just that I’m not terribly impressed a company’s ability to make single focal length, manual focus lenses good when money’s essentially no object and you can individually correct every one if you have to. My experience of working as an engineering journalist always reminds me that it’s many times harder to produce a kit zoom that has to offer decent performance at multiple focal lengths, offers fast autofocus for both stills and video, includes image stabilization and can be made with a degree of consistency for something like $ 35.

But while I’m not that fussed about all that ‘red dot’ business, I love that Leica doesn’t just have crazy ideas, but that it turns them into workable, purchasable products. Even if they’re not necessarily the most affordable ones.

Take an ‘e’ (off the word Monochrome)

The Bayer color filter array is amazing. It lets spectrally-indifferent sensors perceive color and does so with a good level of resolution and fairly few downsides. Except that it steals around a stop of light.

I love the idea of a mono-only second camera. But perhaps not one that costs more than my (admittedly ludicrous) road bike.

So why not make a mono-only camera? None of the softness and noise that comes from demosaicing, and better, cleaner image capture because you’re not letting a series of color filters absorb half your light. That’s a great idea, why doesn’t someone do that?

Well, Leica has, with the Monochrom series of cameras. They do exactly what you’d hope: produce super-detailed mono images.

Of course, given that you have only one ‘color’ channel, it becomes more important than ever to avoid clipping, so I wish there was monochrome camera that didn’t meter by looking at the light reflected off the stripes painted on its shutter blades. Also, since it would need to be a second camera for me, I’d prefer it to cost less than a small car. But I have to applaud Leica for doing it, rather than just thinking about it.

What’s the opposite of Iconoclasticism?

Again, who would have thought it’d be Leica: a camera brand that added a faux winder lever onto its latest camera, that would design one of the most innovative user interfaces of the past decade?

Love it or hate it, the icon-led touchscreen interface of the Leica T series is one of the few genuine attempts we’ve seen to completely re-think how you should interact with a camera and its settings. Interestingly, the person I’ve met who dislikes it most is also one of the few I know who owns a digital Leica rangefinder (though that could be because the first iteration had some interesting quirks). Personally, though, I thought the design struck a good balance between command dials that controlled the primary exposure parameters while letting you tap and swipe the settings, just as you might on a smartphone. Certainly an ambitious thing for a ‘traditional’ camera company to do.

Settings? There’s an app for that

On the subject of smartphones, it’s long been suggested that they might provide a solution to the uncontrolled menu sprawl that’s overwhelming even the best-designed modern UI. Connecting cameras to smartphones over Bluetooth and Wi-Fi is becomes ever more easy and ever more commonplace, just as the complexity of menu options becomes unbearable, so why not pass-off responsibility for settings to the phone?

Handing off responsibilities for camera settings to a smartphone app makes great sense. I’m not sure the same is true of taking away the rear screen or adding a faux-winder ‘thumb rest.’

And, if looked at from a certain angle, that’s what Leica’s M10-D does. I’m not necessarily convinced that it made sense to keep going and take the entire LCD screen away but pushing set-and-forget settings off to a smartphone app I could get behind. An app can offer a nicer interface with better guides and instructions, meaning the on-camera interface can be stripped back to focus on the main shooting parameters. But perhaps leave me a screen, eh, Leica?

You can’t be serious?

I don’t want flippant tone to completely undermine my sincerity. I genuinely am more impressed with Leica’s innovative thinking than the specifics of its products. I’d love to see some of them more widely adopted. Like having a 36 x 24mm image capture area, that might take off.


* Full marks to every comment or blog post concluding that I don’t ‘get’ Leica. To be clear, I love shooting with its rangefinders. They deliver a unique shooting experience that every keen photographer should strive to have. Even if I wouldn’t necessarily recommend spending the cost of a hatchback (or a nice road bike) on one. [Return to text]

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on The thing that impresses me most about Leica? Its innovation

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Nikon 8-15mm F3.5-4.5E ED fisheye lens impresses in underwater review

04 Aug
Photo © Robin Dodd

Our friends at Backscatter Underwater Video & Photo—the world’s leading supplier for underwater imaging equipment, the same folks behind this impressive underwater review of the Canon 1DX Mark II—recently took the new Nikon 8-15mm F3.5-4.5E ED fisheye zoom lens for a spin beneath the waves. As usual, they came back with some stunning photographs, along with a few thoughts about Nikon’s new fisheye zoom lens.

Backscatter CEO Jim Decker and Producer Robin Dodd were able to ‘MacGyver’ a makeshift zoom gear from some stuff they had lying around the shop, slapped the lens onto a Nikon D810, and went diving. Immediately they were impressed.

“The lens is a fisheye zoom lens that is a full frame diagonal fisheye lens at the 15mm side of the zoom, and a circular fisheye at the 8mm side,” explains Decker in their review. “It’s great to have the versatility of being able to shoot a circular fisheye, without having to dedicate your whole dive to it.” The photo up top was shot at 8mm, the one below at 15mm.

Photo © Robin Dodd

But it’s not just the versatility of having both a diagonal fisheye and a circular fisheye in one lens—a first for Nikon—that impressed Backscatter. The photos turned out great, too.

“We were super impressed with the image quality of this lens along with the versatility,” writes Decker, “and will now recommend this lens as the primary lens for wide angle use with full frame Nikon cameras.”

That’s some high praise. To read Backscatter’s full review and see several more underwater sample shots captured with the Nikon 8-15mm F3.5-4.5E ED fisheye, head over to their website by clicking here. And if you want to see some above-ground sample photos, you can see our sample gallery here.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Nikon 8-15mm F3.5-4.5E ED fisheye lens impresses in underwater review

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 impresses with image quality, versatility

19 Jun

Key Features

  • 16MP Four Thirds MOS sensor
  • Electromagnetically driven shutter
  • Depth from Defocus AF
  • 2.76M-dot field sequential EVF
  • 1.04M-dot tilting touchscreen display
  • 4K video / photo
  • 5-axis image stabilization with Dual I.S.
  • Bouncable pop-up flash
  • Wi-Fi

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 is a mid-range interchangeable lens camera sporting a 16MP Four Thirds sensor and 4K video capability. In markets outside of North America the GX85 is sold as the GX80; in Japan it is sold as the GX7 Mark II.

Sliding in directly below the flagship GX8, the GX85 is targeted toward enthusiast photographers and videographers. It doesn’t use the new 20MP Four Thirds chip we saw in the GX8, instead it sticks with the familiar 16MP sensor used on many other Micro Four Thirds cameras. It also does not have the tilting EVF, weather-sealing or microphone input offered by the GX8. 

Still, the GX85 shares many of its big brother’s features like 4K photo mode, Post Focus, Depth from Defocus AF, and Dual I.S.. It also has a redesigned shutter mechanism. Shutter-induced blur (‘shutter shock’) was an issue we encountered on the GX8, which used a motor and spring arrangement in its shutter mechanisms. The new electromagnetic shutter found in the GX85 resolves this problem.

The GX85 also has no anti-aliasing filter, a first for Panasonic cameras. This should lead to better detail retention at the pixel level, but can also lead to moiré. However, Panasonic claims that the new Venus Engine image processor is specially tuned to combat moiré and false color and in use, we’ve found that it does so pretty well.

Like the GX8, the GX85 offers Dual I.S., combining sensor-based image stabilization with lens-based IS. But unlike the GX8, which has 4-axis sensor IS, the GX85 offers 5-axis sensor IS with rotation correction. Another advantage over its big bro: the GX85 can also use Dual IS during 4K video capture, something that the GX8 cannot.

Compared to its peers

  Panasonic GX85 Panasonic GX8 Panasonic GX7 Olympus PEN-F  Sony a6300
Sensor 16.0MP Four Thirds CMOS  20.3MP Four Thirds CMOS 16.0MP Four Thirds CMOS  20.3MP Four Thirds CMOS  24.0MP APS-C CMOS
Anti-aliasing filter  No  Yes Yes  No  Yes
Image stabilization Sensor-shift (5-axis) + Dual I.S.
Sensor-shift (4-axis) + Dual I.S. Sensor-shift (2-axis) Sensor-shift (5-axis) In-lens only
AF system  49-pt CDAF 49-pt CDAF 23-pt CDAF 81-pt CDAF Hybrid AF
(with 425 PDAF points)
Flash x-sync  1/160 sec  1/250 sec   1/320 sec 1/250 sec  1/160 sec
Burst rate
(with C-AF)
 6  fps   6 fps 5 fps 5 fps   11 fps
EVF res/type 2.76M-dot field sequential LCD 2.36M-dot tilting OLED 2.76M-dot tilting field sequential LCD 2.36M-dot fixed OLED 2.36M-dot fixed OLED
EVF magnification  0.7X 0.77x  0.7x 0.62x  0.7x
LCD type/res 3″ tilting touch 1.04M-dot LCD 3″ vari-angle touch
1.04M-dot OLED
3″ tilting touch
1.04M-dot LCD
3″ vari-angle touch
1.04M-dot LCD

3″ tilting
921.6k-Dot  LCD

Built-in flash  Yes  No  Yes No *  Yes
Video 2160/30p @ 100Mbps 2160/30p @ 100Mbps 1080/60p @ 28Mbps 1080/60p @ 77Mbps  2160/30p @ 100Mbps
Mic/headphone sockets No / No Yes / No No / No No / No Yes / No
Weather-sealing No Yes No No  Yes
Battery life  290 shots 330 shots 320 shots 330 shots 400 shots 
Dimensions 122 x 71 x 44 mm 133 x 78 x 63mm 123 x 71 x 55mm 125 x 72 x 37mm 120 x 67 x 49 mm
Weight (CIPA) 426 g 487 g 402 g  427 g 404 g
* External flash included in box 

It’s arguable whether the GX85 should be called the little brother of the GX8 or the true replacement to the GX7. And the different regional naming conventions for the GX85 only add to the confusion. The chart above seems to give support to both ways of looking at it: the GX85 uses the same field sequential EVF as the GX7 (although it doesn’t tilt), and what is presumably the same sensor (sans AA filter). And like the GX7, it lacks weather sealing and microphone/headphone ports but has a pop-up flash.

However, aside from its sensor and EVF, the GX85 also shares a lot of core components and specs with the GX8, such as its 49-point AF system, 4K video capture and 6 fps burst with AF. So whichever way you view the GX85, it certainly stacks up nicely to its Panasonic peers, as well as to the competition.

Part of the family: The GX85 (top) alongside its Lumix stablemates, the GX7 and GX8.

Pricing and availability 

Kitted with the collapsible 12-32mm F3.5-5.6 zoom lens, the GX85/GX80 will run you $ 799/£599/€699. In the UK and Europe it’s available body-only for £509/€599 and with both the 12-32mm F3.5-5.6 and a 35-100mm F4-5.6 for £729/€899.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 impresses with image quality, versatility

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 impresses with image quality, versatility

14 Jun

Key Features

  • 16MP Four Thirds MOS sensor
  • Electromagnetically driven shutter
  • Depth from Defocus AF
  • 2.76M-dot field sequential EVF
  • 1.04M-dot tilting touchscreen display
  • 4K video / photo
  • 5-axis image stabilization with Dual I.S.
  • Bouncable pop-up flash
  • Wi-Fi

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 is a mid-range interchangeable lens camera sporting a 16MP Four Thirds sensor and 4K video capability. In markets outside of North America the GX85 is sold as the GX80; in Japan it is sold as the GX7 Mark II.

Sliding in directly below the flagship GX8, the GX85 is targeted toward enthusiast photographers and videographers. It doesn’t use the new 20MP Four Thirds chip we saw in the GX8, instead it sticks with the familiar 16MP sensor used on many other Micro Four Thirds cameras. It also does not have the tilting EVF, weather-sealing or microphone input offered by the GX8. 

Still, the GX85 shares many of its big brother’s features like 4K photo mode, Post Focus, Depth from Defocus AF, and Dual I.S.. It also has a redesigned shutter mechanism. Shutter-induced blur (‘shutter shock’) was an issue we encountered on the GX8, which used a motor and spring arrangement in its shutter mechanisms. The new electromagnetic shutter found in the GX8 resolves this problem.

The GX85 also has no anti-aliasing filter, a first for Panasonic cameras. This should lead to better detail retention at the pixel level, but can also lead to moiré. However, Panasonic claims that the new Venus Engine image processor is specially tuned to combat moiré and false color and in use, we’ve found that it does so pretty well.

Like the GX8, the GX85 offers Dual I.S., combining sensor-based image stabilization with lens-based IS. But unlike the GX8, which has 4-axis sensor IS, the GX85 offers 5-axis sensor IS with rotation correction. Another advantage over its big bro: the GX85 can also use Dual IS during 4K video capture, something that the GX8 cannot.

Compared to its peers

  Panasonic GX85 Panasonic GX8 Panasonic GX7 Olympus PEN-F  Sony a6300
Sensor 16.0MP Four Thirds CMOS  20.3MP Four Thirds CMOS 16.0MP Four Thirds CMOS  20.3MP Four Thirds CMOS  24.0MP APS-C CMOS
Anti-aliasing filter  No  Yes Yes  No  Yes
Image stabilization Sensor-shift (5-axis) + Dual I.S.
Sensor-shift (4-axis) + Dual I.S. Sensor-shift (2-axis) Sensor-shift (5-axis) In-lens only
AF system  49-pt CDAF 49-pt CDAF 23-pt CDAF 81-pt CDAF Hybrid AF
(with 425 PDAF points)
Flash x-sync  1/160 sec  1/250 sec   1/320 sec 1/250 sec  1/160 sec
Burst rate
(with C-AF)
 6  fps   6 fps 5 fps 5 fps   11 fps
EVF res/type 2.76M-dot field sequential LCD 2.36M-dot tilting OLED 2.76M-dot tilting field sequential LCD 2.36M-dot fixed OLED 2.36M-dot fixed OLED
EVF magnification  0.7X 0.77x  0.7x 1.23x  0.7x
LCD type/res 3″ tilting touch 1.04M-dot LCD 3″ vari-angle touch
1.04M-dot OLED
3″ tilting touch
1.04M-dot LCD
3″ vari-angle touch
1.04M-dot LCD

3″ tilting
921.6k-Dot  LCD

Built-in flash  Yes  No  Yes No *  Yes
Video 2160/30p @ 100MBps 2160/30p @ 100MBps 1080/60p @ 28MBps 1080/60p @ 77Mbps  2160/30p @ 100MBps
Mic/headphone sockets No / No Yes / No No / No No / No Yes / No
Weather-sealing No Yes No No  Yes
Battery life  290 shots 330 shots 320 shots 330 shots 400 shots 
Dimensions 122 x 71 x 44 mm 133 x 78 x 63mm 123 x 71 x 55mm 125 x 72 x 37mm 120 x 67 x 49 mm
Weight (CIPA) 426 g 487 g 402 g  427 g 404 g
* External flash included in box 

It’s arguable whether the GX85 should be called the little brother of the GX8 or the true replacement to the GX7. And the different regional naming conventions for the GX85 only add to the confusion. The chart above seems to give support to both ways of looking at it: the GX85 uses the same field sequential EVF as the GX7 (although it doesn’t tilt), and what is presumably the same sensor (sans AA filter). And like the GX7, it lacks weather sealing and microphone/headphone ports but has a pop-up flash.

However, aside from its sensor and EVF, the GX85 also shares a lot of core components and specs with the GX8, such as its 49-point AF system, 4K video capture and 6 fps burst with AF. So whichever way you view the GX85, it certainly stacks up nicely to its Panasonic peers, as well as to the competition.

Part of the family: The GX85 (top) alongside its Lumix stablemates, the GX7 and GX8.

Pricing and availability 

Kitted with the collapsible 12-32mm F3.5-5.6 zoom lens, the GX85/GX80 will run you $ 799/£599/€699. In the UK and Europe it’s available body-only for £509/€599 and with both the 12-32mm F3.5-5.6 and a 35-100mm F4-5.6 for £729/€899.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 impresses with image quality, versatility

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Sony Xperia Z1 impresses in DxOMark Mobile Report

16 Oct

TS520x0~cms_posts-8667499256-title.png

The Sony Xperia Z1 is Sony’s top-of-the-line smartphone, and for photographers, the really big news is the Z1’s camera. At 1/2.3-inch the sensor in the Sony’s camera module is larger than the 1/3-inch sensors that are common in the current crop of smartphones. Our partners at DxOMark have put the Sony Xperia Z1 through their comprehensive image quality testing regime. Click through to find out if the Z1’s impressive specs translate into great image quality.

News: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Sony Xperia Z1 impresses in DxOMark Mobile Report

Posted in Uncategorized