RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Destroying’

Tourists are destroying New Zealand’s iconic Lake Wanaka tree for Instagram photos

30 Jan

The solitary tree found in New Zealand’s Lake Wanaka—an iconic landscape photography subject—is at risk of destruction if tourists, particularly Instagrammers, don’t start showing it more respect. The Lake Wanaka Tree is a crack willow—its very name refers to the tree’s brittle nature—and its social media popularity has fueled an influx of tourists who are destroying the tree as they attempt to capture Instagram-worthy shots.

There’s even an Instagram hashtag dedicated to the tree: #ThatWanakaTree.

Climbing this tree will soon be banned! Take care and protect it for future photographers. No harm was done to this tree to make this shot. ##ThatWanakaTree #samyanglensglobal #milkyway #stars #epic #selfie #wanaka #lakewanaka #nzmustdo #protectthetree

A post shared by Mikey Mack (@mack_photography_nz) on

The tree lost a limb around Christmas time last year, spurring officials to take proactive measures in protecting the tree. According to Lonely Planet, which spoke with Queenstown Lakes District Council arboricultural officer Tim Errington, officials will now place warning signs near the tree alerting visitors about the dangers of climbing on it.

The warning signs will be written in both English and Chinese, though more drastic measures may be taken if tourists ignore them. Errington explained that officials haven’t put a fence around the tree thus far because it would “take away some of the beauty associated with its stunning background,” but the idea is being considered.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Tourists are destroying New Zealand’s iconic Lake Wanaka tree for Instagram photos

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Destroying Landmarks: The Majority or Exception to the Rule

21 Oct

In news recently was the utterly astonishing video posted by Boy Scout leaders who purposely destroyed an 20-million-year-old  rock formation in Goblin Valley State Park, Utah. Since their video surfaced (see below) they’ve been subject to death threats and its come to light one of the suspects, the one toppling the formation, is in a law suit for disability. This is astonishing for numerous reasons. Their disregard for leave no trace, their stupidity for recording and sharing their law breaking actions on YouTube, their continued denial they’ve done something wrong and the utter disregard for nature. While these individuals are easy to vilify because of their stupidity it leaves me wondering are they really the exception or do the majority of people actually harm these types of locations just in a non-public fashion? This question comes to mind both because of this event and a recent trip of mine to a very sensitive place (photo to come tomorrow) where photographers, in the name of preservation, hold its location secret.

One could take a hardline interpretation to my question and state that everyone stepping foot on a protected area is technically destroying it, albeit slowly. The term “loving to death” comes to mind in these situations because it is the volume of people doing the damage, even if they are nature loving and respectful. As to the number of people who blatantly damage protected areas, I get the vibe the numbers are far higher than most would estimate. Those who are preservation minded often assume more people are like them than not, but the more I read about articles of vandalism & theft in state and national parks/monuments the more I think preservationists are the minority. Even with in the photography community I’ve seen people put their photo efforts first as they tread over protected areas.

This brings me back to my recent photo shoot where photographers keep a sensitive location secret. I was ultimately successful on my photo shoot in finding a hidden and very sensitive location, but to do so I had to piece clues together through research and spend a couple hours hiking/searching. How far should photographers go to keep sensitive locations secret?

The answer to that question likely depends on whether you consider yourself a conservation photographer, or at a minimum preservation minded photographer. I’ve gone back and forth on this with other photographers in private conversation and I always side on keeping the most sensitive locations secret. While I normally feel sharing information is the way to go, some locations are just too easily destroyed even by photographers. The problem with secrets of course is that it drives some to find it at all costs and those individuals aren’t always guaranteed to be preservationist minded. Ultimately its a real pickle of an ethics question. The right answer is ultimately the one that allows you to sleep at night.

As to the Goblin Valley incident This is beyond my comprehension that anyone could be this stupid. Given their role as Boy Scout leaders they really need to be made an example of when prosecuted.

The underlying disrespect and ignorance people have for nature is what irks me the most. While this flaw in our society is highlighted in this horrible situation, I find some solace knowing that it generates an uproar among those that know better. It creates an opportunity to education people. It’s just unfortunate it comes at such a cost.

Related Reading

  • Men may face felony charges after toppling Goblin Valley formation
  • Scout leader who filmed himself lifting and destroying ancient rock formation sued a motorist claiming car crash had left him with ‘debilitating and disabling’ back injury only LAST MONT
  • Professional Climber Cuts Down Juniper Trees to Enable New Route
  • Petroglyph thefts near Bishop stun federal authorities, Paiutes

Copyright Jim M. Goldstein, All Rights Reserved

Destroying Landmarks: The Majority or Exception to the Rule

The post Destroying Landmarks: The Majority or Exception to the Rule appeared first on JMG-Galleries – Landscape, Nature & Travel Photography.

       

Related Stories

  • Destroying Landmarks: The Majority or Exception to the Rule – Enclosure
  • Hunter’s Moon Rising
  • Hunter’s Moon Rising – Enclosure
Feed Ads by FeedBlitz
powered by ad choices

 


JMG-Galleries

 
Comments Off on Destroying Landmarks: The Majority or Exception to the Rule

Posted in Equipment

 

20 August, 2012 – Are Museums Destroying Art?

25 Aug

Many photographers find visiting art museums to be inspirational. But there is another type of photographer – trophy hunting tourists and school kids – who are destroying not just the pleasure of a museum visit, but likely also the art itself.

Find out more in Mark Dubovoy‘s most recent essay – Are Museums Destrying Art?

 

   

 "Every time I go back to a module I had already seen, I learn additional things.  I have never seen tutorials that have the excellent mix of what the features are, 
how to use them, enough of the under-the-hood information 
and concepts so that I can utilize the features creatively and efficiently, 
and just enough humor to keep the motivation level high.  Wow!
"


 


The Luminous Landscape – What’s New

 
Comments Off on 20 August, 2012 – Are Museums Destroying Art?

Posted in News