RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘choice’

DPReview Readers’ Choice Awards 2018: the winners

10 Jan

DPReview Readers’ Choice Awards 2018: the winners

The votes have been tallied and final results are in! After first picking winners in six sub-categories, DPReview readers voted for their top gear of 2018 from a final selection of twelve outstanding lenses and cameras. Without further ado, here are the results of that selection process.

Third place: Nikon Z7

With the third-highest number of votes, the Nikon Z7 earns a place as one of DPR readers’ favorite cameras of the year. It’s easy to see why: while there’s a little room for improvement, the Z7 packs excellent image quality and solid 4K video into a well-built package that’s a pleasure to shoot with.

Find out why it’s Barney’s
Gear of the Year too

Second place: Fujifilm X-T3

Fujifilm impressed a lot of folks with the X-T3 this year, ourselves included. Simply put, it’s one of the best hybrid stills/video cameras we’ve ever tested, and it clearly made an impression on a lot of our readers too as it earned the second-place position in our year-end poll.

Find out why we gave the Fujifilm X-T3 a Gold Award

Winner: Sony a7 III

The third-generation of Sony’s entry-level full framer is a huge leap forward for the system. Autofocus has been improved, with Eye-AF in continuous AF a stand-out feature, and Sony has even tried to make sense of its menus at last. But overall it’s the all-round capability that makes the a7 III so good: it’ll turn its hand to almost anything that’s asked of it, meaning it’s an excellent camera almost regardless of your needs. We’re not surprised so many of you were as impressed as we were.

See how the a7 III stacks up against the Nikon Z6 and Canon EOS R

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on DPReview Readers’ Choice Awards 2018: the winners

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Readers’ Choice Awards: voting extended

05 Jan

If you’ve been sleeping on your chance to weigh in on the best photographic product of 2018, we’ve got great news: you have a little extra time. Voting in our final poll – the winner-takes-all – has been extended through Sunday, January 6th. Currently, the Sony a7 III is in the lead by 5 percent of the vote – a healthy but not insurmountable lead over the Fujifilm X-T3. Don’t miss the chance to have your say in the results!

See the winning products from the first round of voting and cast your ballot now

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Readers’ Choice Awards: voting extended

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Gear of the Year 2018 – Dale’s choice: DJI Ronin-S

30 Dec

When it came time to select my 2018 gear of the year, my first inclination was to think about cameras and lenses. After all, we’ve seen some great ones in 2018, and that would have been an easy path to follow. No doubt, I could have picked something both technically impressive and fun to use.

However, when I really thought about what product had the most impact on the quality of my work this year, both at DPReview as well as for my own projects, it wasn’t a camera at all. Rather, it was the DJI Ronin-S camera gimbal – a tool that allowed me to significantly improve the quality of my video work using the cameras and lenses that I already had.

Anyone who has shot much video knows that camera movement can be as important as composition.

Anyone who has shot much video knows that camera movement can be as important as composition, and while most cameras now include some form of image stabilization, camera-based stabilization systems can only do so much. Gimbals provide more latitude to create movement, but usually add some complexity to your shooting workflow. With the Ronin-S, I feel like I’ve found the Goldilocks combination: a great gimbal that fits so seamlessly into my workflow that I barely notice.

I was impressed with the Ronin-S almost from the moment it arrived in our office. After a few weeks of testing I was confident enough to choose it for a larger project: a documentary film I was shooting in the Peruvian Amazon.

Filming with the DJI Ronin-S in Iquitos, Peru. Photo by Matt Fraser

Like any filmmaker, I wanted to get the best results possible, but I also had some pretty strict requirements. Since I had keep my kit compact and easy to carry, I decided to shoot on a pair of Panasonic GH5s. I needed a gimbal that would work well with these cameras, could be easily reconfigured for different camera setups in the field, and which could quickly adapt to different shooting conditions on the fly.

The subject of my film was The Great Amazon River Raft Race, a 180km race down the Amazon river on rafts made from balsa logs. Over the course of this multi-day event I had to keep cameras rolling in conditions that included crowded street markets, unstable boats, and and all the rain that comes with Amazon thunderstorms.

The wide variety of shooting conditions certainly put the Ronin-S to the test, and it came through with flying colors.

I immediately came to appreciate just how quickly I could set up a camera in the field. With a bit of practice, I could balance a camera and lens combination in about a minute, which the Ronin’s auto-tune feature would then fine tune in just a few seconds.

In this b-roll clip from my film, I was shooting from the back of a 3-wheeled ‘mototaxi’ driving down a fairly rough road. The footage isn’t bounce-free, but it’s much smoother than I could have produced shooting hand-held.

The strong motors in the Ronin-S also made it possible to use zoom lenses without adjusting balance or recalibrating the system. As a result, I was able to use a single zoom lens for most of my primary filming – something particularly helpful in a location where it seems like everything around you is actively trying to contaminate a camera sensor. The ability to quickly switch among different gimbal settings at the touch of a button also saved me on more than a few occasions when the story took unexpected turns.

However, the feature I probably appreciated the most on the Ronin-S was remote camera operation, including remote follow focus with focus peaking.

As an aside, it’s worth noting that the Ronin-S can provide various levels of remote camera control, and the level of functionality differs a lot by camera model and lens. Fortunately, DJI has done an excellent job integrating it with the GH5 I chose for this project.

I’ve been asked a number of times why I didn’t use autofocus. While it’s true that the video AF on many cameras is impressively good today, it still doesn’t provide the level of control or predictability I want when filming. In contrast, I found the remote follow focus on the Ronin-S to be very precise, predictable, and easy to use.

In this b-roll clip, I was shooting from a small, moving boat with three other people in it. The camera movement came out much smoother than my experience in the boat led me to expect.

Ironically, the one thing I was actually worried about turned out to be a non-starter. With limited access to power, I had concerns about how long the Ronin’s battery would last, but it never let me down. After a full day of shooting, my arm was borderline useless while the Ronin-S had hours of power left in reserve. So much for the superiority of man over machine.

The final area where I have to give the Ronin-S high marks is what I’ll call “Dale’s jungle survivability index.” I’ve worked in the Amazon before, and electronic equipment just doesn’t do well there. It’s hot and humid, and can be very wet, dirty and muddy. It’s damn near impossible to properly clean or dry equipment in the field, especially when you’re out for multiple days at a time. I’ve had equipment failures on previous trips, but the Ronin-S took everything I could throw at it and never blinked. It’s a solid piece of equipment.

I’ve had equipment failures on previous trips, but the Ronin-S took everything I could throw at it and never blinked. It’s a solid piece of equipment.

Sure, I have a few minor complaints, such as having to leave the entire system assembled just to charge the battery or the fact that the rubber seal over the battery’s on/off button keeps falling off, but those aren’t showstoppers.

Ultimately, what makes the Ronin-S my 2018 gear of the year isn’t the fact that it’s a camera gimbal – after all, those have been around for years – but the fact that it’s so flexible, configurable, and easy to operate. My footage looks better as a result of using it, and I won’t hesitate to use it again for future projects.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Gear of the Year 2018 – Dale’s choice: DJI Ronin-S

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Gear of the Year 2018 – Carey’s choice: Panasonic GX9

29 Dec

The Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 is one of those rare cameras that seems to be more than the sum of its parts. It’s not a market leader in any specific area, it’s not particularly inexpensive, and I’ve used and reviewed cameras that offer objectively better results than the GX9 is capable of. And yet, there’s something about its combination of features, build, form factor, image quality and controls that make it a camera I really enjoy using and want to carry around with me wherever.

Maybe most importantly, I think this is the first Panasonic camera I’ve truly felt this way about.

‘They’ve got a great personality’

Out-of-camera JPEG.
ISO 200 | 1/1250 sec | F2.8 | Lumix G Vario 35-100mm F2.8

That’s a phrase that isn’t exactly positive in the dating world, but bear with me – we’re talking about cameras, after all. There are subtleties and intangibles – ‘personalities’ – cameras have about them that can impact how they make a photographer feel. And while Panasonic has made some mighty fine cameras over the past few years, I’ve never really felt that emotional pull to pick them up and go out shooting just for fun.

Back when the Panasonic GX85 came out, I thought that was the one. That was the Panasonic camera that I’d want to pick up and take with me, even if I’m just going out for a bite to eat. But there were some issues with that camera – one issue specifically – that really turned me off, but Panasonic has addressed them in the GX9, and then some.

Enough already, what’s so good about it?

Out-of-camera JPEG.
ISO 200 | 1/500 sec | F5 | Panasonic Leica 15mm F1.7

First of all, my hat is off to the folks at Panasonic for their work on the JPEG engine. When I started at DPReview, I hadn’t been fond of Panasonic colors, particularly the skin tones, and while the noise reduction did a so-so job of reducing noise, it did a tremendous job at smearing away detail. This was the single biggest issue I had with the GX85, honestly.

I’m happy to say that’s no longer the case. Even just previewing images on the rear of the camera, I can see that the color out of the standard picture profile is rich, warm and doesn’t render my friends as green-skinned zombies. Plus, the shadowy regions of my images no longer look like mush.

This all means I’m likely to transfer images to my phone without needing to process Raws (though the GX9 can do that in-camera), and then post straight away to social media or send them to a friend. And the less processing I need to do, the more images I’m going to take.

Beyond that, I’m really happy to see the return of the addictive tilting viewfinder, though it’s a tad small. The controls aren’t quite as customizable as some competitors’, but the highly customizable touchscreen makes up for this somewhat. And personally, I prefer the tilting screen mechanism on the GX9 to fully articulating screens on other models. And when the screen is tilted out, the eye sensor disables so you don’t accidentally trip it when shooting from the waist. Why this still isn’t standard practice, I have no idea.

But it only got a silver award!

Obligatory angry cat photo. Out-of-camera JPEG.
ISO 1600 | 1/60 sec | F1.7 | Panasonic Leica 15mm F1.7

I know, I know. I was the lead reviewer for the GX9, and after all this gushing, I still only gave it a silver. But remember at the top, how I said it wasn’t a market leader in any particular way, and wasn’t particularly inexpensive? Then, consider that cheaper competition can often give you better outright image quality.

And even though the awards are weighted more toward subjective rather than objective criteria – that was all just too much for me to ignore. Bam, silver award.

But there are a few other considerations I’d like to see addressed in the GX9’s successor. First of all, enough with the field sequential electronic viewfinder. Second, this camera launched at $ 999 with a kit lens – for that price, I expect a dedicated battery charger in the box, particularly with battery life this limited (though USB charging is handy for topping up on the go).

Lastly, if you’re one of those folks that love Panasonic for their video chops, the GX9 is not the camera for you. It’s not really geared for hardcore videophiles, but even for casual shooters, it’s disappointing to see the newer model step backward in video capability with a 1.2x crop compared to the GX85.

The wrap

Out-of-camera JPEG.
ISO 200 | 1/80 sec | F2.8 | Lumix G 20mm F1.7 II

In the end, the GX9 is very capable camera. It’s not necessarily the sort of camera I’d be eyeing for high-end, paid professional gigs – though I’m sure the GX9 could handle them in a pinch – but it is the sort of camera that I enjoy for personal, casual photography. It’s also something I would absolutely recommend as a second body for more established shooters wanting a smaller package.

More to the point, I also think the GX9 is a good sign for Panasonic going forward. They tried splitting the GX lineup in two with the high-end GX8 and midrange GX85, but then decided that wasn’t working, and quickly iterated to come up with a fantastic middle-ground in the GX9. I personally appreciate that level of responsiveness, and in my opinion, the GX9 really is the best of both worlds for those cameras. Well, almost.

For the last time – let’s ditch the field sequential viewfinder.

Sample gallery

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_5058069396″,”galleryId”:”5058069396″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });
Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Gear of the Year 2018 – Carey’s choice: Panasonic GX9

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Gear of the Year 2018 – Allison’s choice: Google Photos

28 Dec

At some point in elementary school my sister was required to study San Francisco, which – if you’ve only ever lived in the Midwest – is a far-off, exotic city. She took an interest in the place, and over the dinner table she’d rattle off facts about the city, like how many hills there are (seven) and how many mosquitos there are (none). In contrast to our part of the country, an extremely flat, mosquito-riddled hellscape, San Fransisco seemed like almost a mythical place.

Jumping ahead a few years, my sister was on the verge of turning thirty, and we decided to celebrate with a trip to the destination of her choice. Naturally, San Francisco was at the top of the list. At last, she’d finally get to experience the seven mosquito-free hills for herself.

In four days we covered most of the standard stuff – the bridge, the prison, the endless souvenir gift shop that is the Fisherman’s Wharf. We drank Irish coffees at the cafe that claims to have invented them (but probably didn’t), ate avocado toast at the place that claims to have invented it (and probably did), and took a lot of selfies in front of iconic things.

Our technique on this kind of shot needs work, but you get the idea.

During the course of the trip, we documented our adventure the way most older millennials do: on our phones. When we returned to our respective homes, she requested that I add my photos to a shared Google Photos album so she could show our mother over dinner. I already backup my iPhone photos to the Google Photos app, so that was easy enough to do.

I also wanted to show the Alcatraz photos to my boyfriend (disused prisons are his thing) but flipping through them on my phone clearly wasn’t going to do them justice. Then I remembered the Chromecast plugged into the back of our TV, and within a few minutes I had a good old fashioned “How I Spent my Summer Vacation at a Former Federal Penitentiary” slideshow going.

To commemorate the whole trip, it occurred to me that a photo book might make a nice birthday present for my kid sister. And at this point, the whole thing starts to sound like a commercial for Google Photos: I selected images, added a title and text, paid for and shipped the whole thing from my phone while commuting to work on the bus. I didn’t even need to get out my wallet, because Google remembers my credit card number.

Here’s the thing: having the device I use to capture the images integrated into an ecosystem designed for sharing actually is really useful. My photos from that trip didn’t die on a hard drive – they came to life. And sure, my iPhone SE takes some pretty lousy photos in low light. But you know what? They’re fine. Nobody I showed them to complained about detail retention. And I wasn’t looking to blow them up and put them on my wall, I just wanted to remember a trip that was about hanging out with my sister.

There’s still room for improvement – the Assistant feature continues to be a mixed bag of sometimes nice, sometimes ridiculous AI-generated albums, videos and “stylized” photos. At least it does a good job of auto-suggesting items to archive, like screengrabs and pictures of packaged dinner re-heating instructions. But really, it’s fine because it’s not a core feature – anything useful the Assistant does is basically a bonus.

An automatically generated “stylized” photo courtesy of Google Photos Assistant. Just… no.

I think what impresses me most is that I didn’t at any point decide “Alright, I’m going to go all in on the Google ecosystem.” It just happened organically. I didn’t think I was the kind of person who would want to play a summer vacation slideshow on her TV – until I was. When the technology is seamless and available at your fingertips, it turns out you’re more likely to use it. And if that means more people doing more to share their photos, then that’s enough for me to call Google Photos my gear of the year.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Gear of the Year 2018 – Allison’s choice: Google Photos

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Gear of the year – Carey’s choice: Panasonic GX9

27 Dec

The Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 is one of those rare cameras that seems to be more than the sum of its parts. It’s not a market leader in any specific area, it’s not particularly inexpensive, and I’ve used and reviewed cameras that offer objectively better results than the GX9 is capable of. And yet, there’s something about its combination of features, build, form factor, image quality and controls that make it a camera I really enjoy using and want to carry around with me wherever.

Maybe most importantly, I think this is the first Panasonic camera I’ve truly felt this way about.

‘They’ve got a great personality’

Out-of-camera JPEG.
ISO 200 | 1/1250 sec | F2.8 | Lumix G Vario 35-100mm F2.8

That’s a phrase that isn’t exactly positive in the dating world, but bear with me – we’re talking about cameras, after all. There are subtleties and intangibles – ‘personalities’ – cameras have about them that can impact how they make a photographer feel. And while Panasonic has made some mighty fine cameras over the past few years, I’ve never really felt that emotional pull to pick them up and go out shooting just for fun.

Back when the Panasonic GX85 came out, I thought that was the one. That was the Panasonic camera that I’d want to pick up and take with me, even if I’m just going out for a bite to eat. But there were some issues with that camera – one issue specifically – that really turned me off, but Panasonic has addressed them in the GX9, and then some.

Enough already, what’s so good about it?

Out-of-camera JPEG.
ISO 200 | 1/500 sec | F5 | Panasonic Leica 15mm F1.7

First of all, my hat is off to the folks at Panasonic for their work on the JPEG engine. When I started at DPReview, I hadn’t been fond of Panasonic colors, particularly the skin tones, and while the noise reduction did a so-so job of reducing noise, it did a tremendous job at smearing away detail. This was the single biggest issue I had with the GX85, honestly.

I’m happy to say that’s no longer the case. Even just previewing images on the rear of the camera, I can see that the color out of the standard picture profile is rich, warm and doesn’t render my friends as green-skinned zombies. Plus, the shadowy regions of my images no longer look like mush.

This all means I’m likely to transfer images to my phone without needing to process Raws (though the GX9 can do that in-camera), and then post straight away to social media or send them to a friend. And the less processing I need to do, the more images I’m going to take.

Beyond that, I’m really happy to see the return of the addictive tilting viewfinder, though it’s a tad small. The controls aren’t quite as customizable as some competitors’, but the highly customizable touchscreen makes up for this somewhat. And personally, I prefer the tilting screen mechanism on the GX9 to fully articulating screens on other models. And when the screen is tilted out, the eye sensor disables so you don’t accidentally trip it when shooting from the waist. Why this still isn’t standard practice, I have no idea.

But it only got a silver award!

Obligatory angry cat photo. Out-of-camera JPEG.
ISO 1600 | 1/60 sec | F1.7 | Panasonic Leica 15mm F1.7

I know, I know. I was the lead reviewer for the GX9, and after all this gushing, I still only gave it a silver. But remember at the top, how I said it wasn’t a market leader in any particular way, and wasn’t particularly inexpensive? Then, consider that cheaper competition can often give you better outright image quality.

And even though the awards are weighted more toward subjective rather than objective criteria – that was all just too much for me to ignore. Bam, silver award.

But there are a few other considerations I’d like to see addressed in the GX9’s successor. First of all, enough with the field sequential electronic viewfinder. Second, this camera launched at $ 999 with a kit lens – for that price, I expect a dedicated battery charger in the box, particularly with battery life this limited (though USB charging is handy for topping up on the go).

Lastly, if you’re one of those folks that love Panasonic for their video chops, the GX9 is not the camera for you. It’s not really geared for hardcore videophiles, but even for casual shooters, it’s disappointing to see the newer model step backward in video capability with a 1.2x crop compared to the GX85.

The wrap

Out-of-camera JPEG.
ISO 200 | 1/80 sec | F2.8 | Lumix G 20mm F1.7 II

In the end, the GX9 is very capable camera. It’s not necessarily the sort of camera I’d be eyeing for high-end, paid professional gigs – though I’m sure the GX9 could handle them in a pinch – but it is the sort of camera that I enjoy for personal, casual photography. It’s also something I would absolutely recommend as a second body for more established shooters wanting a smaller package.

More to the point, I also think the GX9 is a good sign for Panasonic going forward. They tried splitting the GX lineup in two with the high-end GX8 and midrange GX85, but then decided that wasn’t working, and quickly iterated to come up with a fantastic middle-ground in the GX9. I personally appreciate that level of responsiveness, and in my opinion, the GX9 really is the best of both worlds for those cameras. Well, almost.

For the last time – let’s ditch the field sequential viewfinder.

Sample gallery

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_5058069396″,”galleryId”:”5058069396″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });
Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Gear of the year – Carey’s choice: Panasonic GX9

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Gear of the year 2018 – Jeff’s choice: Nikon Coolpix P1000

26 Dec

The evolution of the super zoom camera that resulted in the Nikon Coolpix P1000 reminds me of the development of rollercoasters over the last twenty years. Every year, amusement parks would try to out-do the competition. Bigger drops. More inversions. Faster speeds. Sitting, standing, flying. At some point you just can’t go any further without putting riders in danger.

The Coolpix P1000 won’t put anyone in danger (I hope!), but it does symbolize the culmination of manufacturers trying to make their cameras harder, bigger, faster, stronger (with apologies to Daft Punk). I’ve been in the digital camera business since the beginning and recall when breaking the 10X zoom barrier was a big deal.

Out of camera JPEG | ISO 110 | 1/400 sec | F6.3 | 1700mm equiv.
Photo by Jeff Keller

After manufacturers seemed to pause at 50X zooms, Nikon went for broke with its Coolpix P900, which had an 83X lens that topped out at 2000mm equivalent. When Nikon first told us about the Coolpix P1000, with its 125X, 24-3000mm equiv. lens, I didn’t know how to respond. I do, however, recall thinking “wow… but why?”.

After getting my hands on a P1000, my initial feelings were unchanged: it’s cool, but why does one need so much zoom? The P1000’s lens is so prominent that the camera got attention everywhere it went, whether at a wildlife refuge, the zoo or a random tourist attraction in Vancouver, where a man walked up to me and asked, “is that a P1000?”. (Turns out he was a DPReview fan and knew his stuff.)

The people to whom I showed the camera weren’t asking about sensor size, viewfinder resolution or video. They wanted to see that lens could do. So, I’d have them point it toward an object in the distance or, in the case of the zoo, at a monkey that could barely be seen with the naked eye, to see for themselves. It’s a great party trick.

Out of camera JPEG | ISO 560 | 1/400 sec | F7.1 | 2600mm equiv.
Photo by Jeff Keller

I spent over a month shooting with the Coolpix P1000 while writing its review and grew to really enjoy using it for the same reason as those who asked me about it: the lens, and what it could do. During those weeks I took photos of zoo animals, birds, cruise ships and, of course, the moon. It felt a bit awkward crossing paths with other photographers at a nearby bird refuges who were each carrying two high-end DSLR bodies, with huge telephoto lens attached, while I was holding a ‘Coolpix’ that had a much longer focal range. What I’m getting at here is that the P1000 inspired me to take photos that I never would (or could).

While shooting around with the P1000 was a blast, I usually had to make a decision about whether I wanted to haul it around with me. The camera weighs over 1.4 kg (3 lbs), so if I didn’t think that I needed a lot of zoom (which was most of the time,) the P1000 stayed home. The P1000 also taught me that, despite owning what I thought was a good tripod, I needed something much more robust, since the camera is so front-heavy that my tripod head would slowly tilt downward. My first attempt at moon photos were essentially timed for the moment when the moon entered the frame as the tripod sagged.

Out of camera JPEG, cropped to taste | ISO 180 | 1/500 sec | F6.3 | 1800mm equiv.
Photo by Jeff Keller

One downside of a lens as long as the P1000’s is that atmospheric distortion is a problem. You could easily see ‘waves of haze’ in my long telephoto shots, but I reminded myself that even the most expensive telephoto lens would see the same. The camera’s noise reduction system exacerbates the problem, turning distant subjects into an impressionist painting. And, despite having Raw support, the P1000’s small sensor didn’t give me a lot of detail to work with.

Out-of-camera JPEG | ISO 100 | 1/500 sec | F5.6 | 1300mm equiv.
Photo by Jeff Keller

Ultimately, none of that mattered. I wasn’t shooting for National Geographic, I was shooting for me. And these days, that means social media rather than 11″ x 17″ prints on my wall. Would I take it on a trip to Southeast Asia or a night out on the town? Certainly not. But would I go somewhere in the Pacific Northwest to photograph things that I normally wouldn’t? You bet.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Gear of the year 2018 – Jeff’s choice: Nikon Coolpix P1000

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Gear of the Year 2018 – Dan’s choice: Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD

24 Dec

My past Gear of the Year choices – the Nikon D750, DJI Mavic Pro and Sony a9 – were based on the strong emotional connection I made with each, as a photographer and videographer during the given year. This year I’ve picked the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8, a lens I’ve recommended more than any other in 2018 and one Sony desperately needed for its system.

It’s the first third-party zoom for Sony E-mount to offer autofocus and it plays nice with all AF modes; even Eye-AF. It’s also the piece of gear in the DPReview cupboard I’m most excited to get out and shoot with once Seattle’s weather turns.

The Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 is a lens I’ve recommended more than any other in 2018

Last year’s pick, the a9, was an admission that I’ve finally come around to enjoying Sony’s cameras. But for me as a reviewer, a camera brand is only as good as its best budget lens options. In my opinion, Sony (in common with quite a few other brands) has done a poor job ensuring budding photographers on a tight budget have access to affordable, fast zooms.

ISO 200 | 1/60 sec | F8 | 28mm
Photo by Carey Rose

At $ 800, the 28-75mm F2.8 isn’t exactly cheap, but it does offer a-single-lens-solution to new E-mount customers and is a great companion to the a7 III – for about $ 2800 total, you’ve got a killer combo. It also makes Sony’s own 24-70mm F4, which costs about the same, seem irrelevant.

But the price is not the only thing Tamron got right: it nailed the size and weight, too. Sony’s F2.8 zooms tend to be large and heavy: the $ 2200 24-70mm F2.8, for instance, weighs 886g, compared to 550g in the Tamron. Size-wise, the Tamron is also much smaller, about the same size as a can of soda pop (until you zoom, that is).

It offers good center sharpness throughout its zoom range and for most photographers, that’s what counts

And just because it’s priced a lot lower than comparable native glass doesn’t mean it’s built with a ‘budget’ mindset. Sure, the body is made of polycarbonate, but it feels and handles like a high-quality piece of gear. It also well-suited to take on the elements: a fluorine coating on the front repels grime and a moisture-resistant construction, including gaskets around the barrel and at the mount, keeps water out.

It can also handle both stills and video capture as well as Sony’s modern full-frame cameras. A ‘Rapid eXtra-silent stepping Drive’ – the RXD at the end of its name – is virtually silent, ensuring accurate focus with no unwanted focus motor sounds in your videos.

It’s the most sensible zoom currently available for E-mount

Now some will argue Sony’s heavier, pricier lenses offer sharper results, nicer bokeh, etc., and honestly, this might be true. But who cares? The Tamron offers good central sharpness throughout its zoom range and for most photographers, that’s what counts. Those who want to spend 3x the cash on Sony’s version can go right ahead, while the rest of us use the Tamron.

ISO 1250 | 1/160 sec | F2.8 | 35mm
Photo by Carey Rose

The Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 my choice for 2018 Gear of the Year because it is a wonderful solution to a problem Sony has long had: the lack of a fast, affordable zoom full-frame zoom. For years, Tamron has concentrated on producing lenses that fill gaps in the market and this might be its most successful to date – there’s a reason it was back-ordered months after its launch.

Ultimately, it’s a lens for the many, not the few and in this writer’s opinion, the most sensible zoom currently available for E-mount.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Gear of the Year 2018 – Dan’s choice: Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Gear of the Year 2018 – Barney’s choice: Nikon Z7

24 Dec

This year seems like it went by in a flash (although thinking back to some of the news headlines I’m still tempted to say ‘good riddance’). In the photo industry, 2018 has definitely felt like a year of transitions: not least because this was the year that Canon and Nikon finally entered the full-frame mirrorless market, and in so doing began the slow process of moving beyond their respective legacy EF and F mounts.

Appropriately, perhaps, I sold a lot of camera equipment this year too, including my long-serving/suffering DSLR and several lenses. It’s always hard to say goodbye to gear, but there’s no point keeping expensive cameras and lenses around if they’re not getting used. The end result is that without a ‘main’ camera to reach for I’ve been feeling a little transitional myself. Of course I’m lucky that I can raid the DPReview gear cupboards when I need to, but more often than not I’ve been grabbing one of my old film cameras when I want to go out shooting. Sometimes I’ll even remember to grab a roll of film, too.

But enough about me – let’s talk about me!

My pick for Gear of the Year is the Nikon Z7, which is actually one of the few digital cameras released in the past 12 months that I’ve enjoyed spending any significant amount of time shooting with. That doesn’t mean I’m writing about it by default, just because I can’t think of anything else – far from it. For the kind of photography that I do, it’s close to being the perfect camera.

When the light gets low, the Z7’s autofocus system can start to struggle. Usually, though, if you can point it at a contrasty line or point of light (like the frames of the windows reflecting the sunset in this shot) it’ll lock on just fine.

My preferred style of photography (“interesting boring” to quote a friend whose opinion I don’t remember asking) rarely stresses any camera’s continuous autofocus system. I actually shoot manual focus lenses much of the time, and I almost never need to fire off images faster than 1-2 frames per second. As such, two of the major shortcomings of the Z7 are pretty much irrelevant to me. I’d love a taller handgrip, but I’ll take the Z7’s rather short, stubby one for the sake of a smaller and lighter body. Ditto a single card slot.

Speaking as someone who lugged a D850 (my favorite camera of last year) up and down four mountains in a day in 90+ degree heat in Japan this August,* I can tell you that the Z7 is a very pleasant traveling companion by comparison. And shooting the production of a music video back in August, coming from a D810/D850 I was very impressed by how easy the Z7 was to get to grips with, too, even without an instruction manual (the camera was still strictly embargoed at the time and the manuals were still being translated).

It’s only been very recently that electronic finders have started to compete with the best DSLRs in terms of sharpness and responsiveness

Jumping back to earlier in the summer, when Nikon first briefed us on its then-unnamed camera, it was clear that the company’s engineers had set some pretty tough internal benchmarks for what became the Z7. One of those was image quality, and another was the viewfinder experience – both of which had to be comparable to the D850. I’ve never been particularly nostalgic about the optical viewfinders in DSLRs – the sooner they’re replaced by good EVFs the better in my opinion. But note my use of the crucial word ‘good’ in that last sentence. It’s only been very recently that electronic finders have started to compete with the best DSLRs. The Z7’s EVF is one of the sharpest and most detailed out there. So sharp and detailed, in fact, that I often find myself forgetting that its electronic at all, except in really high-contrast situations.

Ruby Beach, on the Olympic Peninsular, a few hours’ drive west from Seattle. Shot with the compact Z 24-70mm F4, this shot demonstrates the lens’s high contrast and almost clinical sharpness.

Where I tend to run into the Z7’s limitations, though, is with low-contrast subjects in subdued light when, even in AF-S mode, its autofocus system becomes… let’s say… unpredictable. If you’ve ever used first-generation Nikon AF systems such as those found in the likes of the F/N90X and F4, you’ll be familiar with the need to find a bright point of light or a contrasty line or something around the desired plane of focus for the AF system to lock onto. If you can’t find one, good luck and happy hunting. Literally.

Fortunately, the Z7’s EVF remains sharp and contrasty even in poor light, so if autofocus gives up completely I just pop it into magnified manual focus mode and do things the old fashioned way. The effort is usually worth it, especially with the 35mm F1.8, which – while it might not have the nicest bokeh around – is sharp enough for landscape work at F1.8.

Another shot taken with the 24-70mm, in Japan. At F13 (for the sunstar) diffraction is taking a bite out of critical sharpness.

In fact, Nikon appears to have designed all three of the new ‘S’ lenses for optimal sharpness, with admirable success. The result is images which are phenomenally detailed across the frame, but lack the pleasant bokeh of certain Nikon and third-party F-mount lenses. Of course, if you have a favorite F-mount lens that you want to use instead, there’s an adapter for that.

Thanks to the built-in stabilization and wide, shallow dimensions of the Z mount, the Z7 has a lot of potential as a 46MP digital back

What I’m most looking forward to, though, is trying out the Z7 with my collection of older third-party primes. High quality adapters from the likes of Novoflex are slowly starting to become available, and thanks to the built-in stabilization and wide, shallow dimensions of the Z mount, the Z7 has a lot of potential as a 46MP digital back. I have a Leica M to Nikon Z adapter on order, and I can’t wait to try out: there’s an uncoated 1936 Leica 50mm Summar on my shelf just crying out for some love…

The Z7 pictured next to one of my personal cameras, a much-used mid-60s F. As you can see, the new Z mount is significantly larger than the old F mount, despite covering the same imaging area. This gives Nikon’s optical engineers a lot more flexibility when designing certain kinds of lenses for the new mount.

Nikon could have played it safe with the Z7, but its engineers decided to aim for high-end and professional photographers and launch the Z7 with their best sensor. It was a risky decision, and I can completely understand why some of the photojournalists I’ve spoken to haven’t taken to the Z7. Without a doubt, its autofocus isn’t on a par with the D850 or D5, particularly in dull, low-contrast conditions. Speaking to wildfire photographer Stuart Palley recently, it’s obvious that Nikon has some work to do before he’ll feel comfortable leaving his DSLRs at home. But while the Z7 isn’t quite the ‘mirrorless D850’ that we had hoped for, it’s close enough for me. I think I might buy Stuart’s.

Nikon Z7 Sample Gallery

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_4819511289″,”galleryId”:”4819511289″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

* Impressed? I think I was trying to prove a point about how much of a pain DSLR photography is, with the intention eventually of writing an article about it. I suppose this is that article. [Return to text]

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Gear of the Year 2018 – Barney’s choice: Nikon Z7

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Gear of the Year 2018 – Richard’s Choice: Fujifilm’s 4K video cameras

21 Dec

My Gear of the Year pick relates to the photos I’ve most enjoyed taking and the ones I’m most proud of. I’ve chosen the kit I used to shoot my favorite images of the year: all 17,100 of them. Specifically two series of 8MP images. Shot at a rate of 23.97 frames per second.

Because, while I’ve been rather enjoying thinking in 1:1 terms for Instagram this year and have had a chance to engage with and shoot some experienced models in pre-lit setups, the thing I’ve enjoyed most of all this year has been shooting and editing 4K video from the Fujifilm X-H1 and X-T3.

The great outdoors

The first opportunity came in April, when I took some time off work to walk Hadrian’s Wall: the path of a Roman fortification that ran across the North of England. I had to choose a camera that I could carry on my back for five consecutive days, along with a week’s clothes and full wet-weather gear. This ruled out the GFX 50S because, while I thought it would be funny to haul a massive great medium format lump out of my bag every time I wanted to take a picture, it also struck me as the kind of joke that would wear thin pretty quickly.

When planning for my trip, I wasn’t sure what sorts of things I’d be shooting.

My next thought was the Sony a7 III. It’s a terrific camera for both stills and video, but the more I thought about which lenses to take, the more it started to creep towards GFX proportions (the Sony 35mm F1.4 is optically very good but it’s neither small, nor especially light).

The compromise ended up being the Fujifilm X-H1 paired with a 23mm F2 and 18mm F1.8. This little kit, plus a vari-ND filter, filter adapter so it would fit both lenses and a USB battery pack to keep both the camera and my phone alive during the trip, ended up being pretty convenient. Two card slots meant I could have a big, fast card dedicated to video and stills going to the other slot (perhaps the first time I’ve found this feature useful).

The X-H1 and a pair of lenses was light enough that I didn’t mind carrying it for five days.

The video I captured is somewhat shambolic: I’d not really decided whether I was going to shoot video or stick mainly to stills until the second day of the walk, by which stage I was a Transatlantic flight away from any of the audio equipment from the office and a day’s walk from anywhere I could buy some. The result is an audio track that’s primarily WHSSHHHSSSSSWUHWUHWUHHHHHHHHHind noise.

There were certainly times I wished for something wider than the 34mm equiv of an 18mm lens.

But the footage itself is better than I could have hoped for. Highlight warnings gave me enough information to exposure correctly and the camera’s stabilization meant I could shoot hand-held, so long as I didn’t try to pan (which the IS would try to fight against). But the levels of detail are stunning, even when downscaled for playback on a lower-res device.

It’s hard to argue with this level of detail (shot hand-held into a significant headwind).

The final result is too long, too rough and too personal to be shared here, but it’s ended up being an excellent memento of something I hope to remember for the rest of my life. Which presumably isn’t why the color mode is called Eterna, but still.

Back in Seattle

The video I shot with the X-T3 has things in common with my X-H1 project in that both depict events with an inherent narrative: The X-H1 video follows a path from Carlisle to Wallsend, and the X-T3 follows the creation of a sculpture from a roughly-shaped lump of clay through to being a finished, painted object. But beyond that, they couldn’t be more different. The X-T3 project was much more planned, in the sense that I went into it with a much clearer picture of what I wanted to shoot. I even remembered to think about audio for most of the shoot.

Without any in-body stabilization I had to teach myself how to use a handheld gimbal if I wasn’t going to be limited to tripod shots (itself an enjoyable process). But, unlike the X-H1, I was able to use the full width of the sensor. (I’d ended up using the 18mm lens for almost all of my UK video, since the X-H1’s 4K crop gives it a wide-ish 34mm equivalent field of view, leaving me without the wide and wide-ish combination I thought I’d packed). Moreover I felt much more able to trust the camera’s autofocus than I had with the older camera.

Again, I shot primarily in Eterna, but the T3 also gave me the option to shoot 10-bit Log, for the times I needed to capture more dynamic range, with the knowledge that Fujifilm provides an F-Log to Eterna LUT to make sure it matched the rest of my footage.

The final video is one of the best things I’ve done in any medium for quite some time, in part thanks to the lessons I’d learned on my UK trip.

To end the video I had the idea of a matched transition: lining-up the two shots I wanted to fade between.

Both are really good stills cameras, of course and I’ve had a number of positive experiences of shooting with them both. But it’s been the process of shooting and editing these two videos I’ve really enjoyed. For instance, I knew I wanted to start and finish the X-T3 video in a natural setting. I’d worked out the transition at the beginning, but I couldn’t work out how to get back again at the end. Having the idea of a matched transition (even if I’ve not edited it perfectly) was one of the single most satisfying creative moments I’ve had in a very long time.

I remain primarily a keen stills photographer, and both the X-H1 and X-T3 are superb stills cameras, as well as really capable video tools.

I still think of myself primarily as a keen amateur photographer. But after my experience along Hadrian’s Wall, my favorite cameras are increasingly the ones that make it easy for me to shoot some stills, grab some video, then go back to shooting stills. All the brands are getting better at this, but with the X-H1 and X-T3, Fujifilm got closest, first.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Gear of the Year 2018 – Richard’s Choice: Fujifilm’s 4K video cameras

Posted in Uncategorized