RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Alliance’

Sony sells entire 5% stake in Olympus but continues its business alliance

31 Aug

Sony has sold the rest of the shares it held in Olympus after declaring the alliance between the two companies has achieved what it set out to do. The sale of the 68,975,800 shares, which have been bought back by Olympus, raised 80 billion yen ($ 75m) on a value of 1165 yen per share. The holding had represented 5.03 percent of the total common shares in Olympus.

Sony has made a tidy profit on the sale as the shares were purchased in 2012-13 as part of an 11.5 percent stake in Olympus that cost only 50 billion yen ($ 47m at today’s rate). Part of that share-holding was sold in 2015 for 46.8 billion yen, making a total of nearly 127 billion yen ($ 120m) from a 50 billion yen purchase.

The original stake in Olympus was made directly after the company’s accounting scandal came to light and provided a much-needed injection of cash to keep the company secure at a time when its share price had dropped dramatically. The purchase was in the medical and camera businesses, and the two companies set-up Sony Olympus Medical Solutions together. Sony has said that despite the sale of the share the two companies will continue the business alliance and collaborative partnership.

For more information see the Sony website.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Sony sells entire 5% stake in Olympus but continues its business alliance

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Photokina 2018: Leica, Sigma and Panasonic talk L-mount Alliance

26 Nov

Autumn 2018 saw the launch of two new full-frame systems and one full-frame alliance. A month or so after Canon and Nikon launched their RF and Z mount systems respectively, Leica, Sigma and Panasonic announced that they would be partnering to develop new cameras and lenses around a shared standard: the L-mount.

The so-called L mount alliance was announced at the Photokina tradeshow in Cologne, Germany. We were there, and the following interview is an edited transcript of a group interview conducted with Stephen Schultz and Dr. Andreas Kaufmann of Leica, Junichiro Kitagawa of Panasonic, and Kazuto Yamaki of Sigma. The following interview contains questions from various members of the photo press, and has been edited for clarity and flow.


Since the announcement of the alliance, have you been approached by any other companies interested in licensing the L mount?

Leica: Not yet. But it’s only been a short time since we made the announcement. Leica has been collaborating with Panasonic since 2001, and three years ago we met with Yamaki-san [of Sigma], and since then we’ve been [developing our partnership].

How will you make this work? Three different companies, three different backgrounds…

Leica: We are going to have regular meetings in order to keep the standard up to date, and to ensure that all products work smoothly and seamlessly with each other. We share a long history of collaboration with Panasonic, and we have had very close connections on a development level for many years. This is not new for us.

Sigma: Since the beginning of Four Thirds we’ve been working with Panasonic on the development of the Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds systems.

‘Collaboration is necessary to make sure that all three companies are making products at the same level’ – Leica

Is there a timeline mapped out for future product development within the L mount standard?

Sigma: We have agreed to work on products using the same platform, but regarding products from each of the three companies, we’re working independently. We’re not exchanging [that kind of] information. Each company is working on its own roadmap. We have our own strategy and our own customers, so we’re just trying to bring high quality products to the market at the right price.

Leica: It’s a little bit like Android, the mobile standard. We make our own [separate] products but we use the same standard. Collaboration is necessary to make sure that all three companies are making products at the same level, for the [shared] standard. And that’s it.

We work in an alliance at a high level, but Leica is the licensor of the L mount standard. We developed the L mount brand: it’s a Leica brand, and Sigma and Panasonic are licensees. But in our daily work, we are all part of this alliance.

Panasonic: Each companies has its own responsibilities and its own obligations. To [preserve] the standard is really important.

‘Technically the L mount is a very good standard. A wide lens mount diameter and a short flange back – there are no technical drawbacks’ – Sigma

What made the L mount the preferred choice of mount for Sigma and Panasonic?

Sigma: Technically the L mount is a very good standard. A wide lens mount diameter and a short flange back: there are no technical drawbacks. At the beginning we were planning to develop our own full frame mirrorless system, but we concluded eventually that it was more beneficial to our customers to enter a partnership. The customer can use a wider variety of cameras and lenses.

Panasonic: Panasonic’s customer coverage [at present] is maybe more high-level amateurs, not professionals. The new [customer segment] of videographers appreciates what we’ve introduced for movie making, but still there are customer segments that we cannot reach. So the L mount gives us a chance to challenge in these top-end segments. I hope that the L mount gives us a chance to complete our lineup, [by] supporting our current Micro Four Thirds business.

The GH5S is a video-focused Micro Four Thirds camera which has been received by a constituent of video professionals, but Panasonic does not offer a full-frame rival to Sony’s a7S-series. Could the company fill this gap with a future L-mount camera?

How much room for future growth is built into the L mount standard?

Leica: Regarding functionality, we think that the standard will cover everything that we can anticipate, at the moment. We think that the standard is sufficient [for the foreseeable future]. The mount was developed very thoroughly in order to have enough space to make the biggest and fastest lenses for full frame, while also being as compact as possible to make attractive APS-C cameras as well. We think this is a big benefit of the L mount.

The flange back distance could be shorter, but if someone wants to make a professional L mount video camera for example, its better to have a little more room, for filters [built into the camera body] and so on. With 20mm, that’s fine. If you go closer, it becomes very difficult.

Do Sigma and Panasonic see the L mount as an APS-C mount as well? Are you planning on developing APS-C lenses for L?

Sigma: Yes, we have a plan to develop APS-C lenses for L mount, but the main focus is full-frame.

Panasonic: No. We will only develop [L mount products] for full-frame sensors.

The forthcoming Panasonic Lumix DC-S1/R are advanced mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras, built around the full-frame L mount standard. The S1R (pictured) will be Panasonic’s high-resolution stills flagship when it’s released next spring.

Do you see the Panasonic Lumix DC S1 and S1R as companion cameras to the Leica SL or as competitive cameras?

Leica: They’re an addition to the market, and they’re also competition. We’re three independent companies. From our point of view, [the S1/R] will bring customers into the L mount system. A Leica price-point will always be a Leica price point. That has to do with how we do things, and how we develop products. So if someone wants to [shoot with] a different body, but using Leica lenses, we’re OK with that.

Is any money changing hands, or are you just bound by a common agreement?

Leica: We cannot comment on that, but think of it as a very friendly agreement.

As licensor, does Leica maintain any kind of design approval over lens designs from Sigma and Panasonic for the L mount?

Leica: We host all of the information relating to the L mount standard, but there is no more exchange than that. Regarding products that we may [all, separately] be developing, it’s actually not allowed [due to anti-trust legislation]. Leica does not have design approval.

‘This alliance is like marriage. The previous arrangement [with Olympus] was more like we were just living together’ – Panasonic

One thing that we saw happen in the Micro Four Thirds market it is that over time there was a divergence between Panasonic and Olympus technologies. Will this alliance avoid that kind of issue?

Leica: We plan to have regular committees to define the standard, and to get common agreements about changes and updates to the technology, in order to avoid that situation.

Panasonic: The difference, maybe, is that this alliance is like marriage. The previous arrangement [with Olympus] was more like we were just living together. So the obligation [now] is a little more high-level.

Are the L mount partners working on a unified solution for service?

Panasonic: At the very least we have to exchange all of the necessary information, in advance. And if a situation arises in future [where a customer requires service to L mount products of two brands] we need to find a way of responding. For example if [in future] a customer brings a Panasonic camera to one of our service centers with a Leica lens, we need to work out how to deal with things like that.

‘When it comes to products, there’s a distinct firewall between the three companies’ – Sigma

Leica: Let’s see what the future may bring. Leica has a unique business model, and maybe we can add some [insight] based on our experiences, but it hasn’t been discussed yet. But by creating a shared technical platform, that’s a great step in this industry. Because normally this industry works more like several little ‘boxes’ [of separate technologies].

Panasonic: In 2020, on the 24th of July the Tokyo Olympic Games will open. And there we will see many professionals and advanced amateur photographers, and I hope that we will see many L mount products [being used]. So we will need to provide service facilities for professional photographers from all over the world. We’re starting now to think about how we will do that.

The Leica SL is still going strong, several years after announcement. Even in its dotage however, it is still priced out of reach for most photographers. The addition of cameras from Panasonic and Leica should make the L mount standard more accessible.

Are you each developing your own sensors, separately from one another?

Leica: From the point of view of the alliance, again, we’re completely different companies. This will continue and we’re not going to disclose where we get components from, and I suspect that Panasonic and Sigma won’t either.

Sigma: When it comes to products, there’s a distinct firewall between the three companies but we work together as a technical committee just to maintain compatibility between products.

Leica: The standard needs to provide for seamless compatibility between products from all three manufacturers. For Leica, our business model is very different [to other manufacturers]. We own most of our distribution, and also retail. It’s a different concept. Here, [with the L mount alliance] we’re talking about a technical platform.

Sigma is one of many third party lens manufacturers. What made Sigma your choice of partner?

Leica: It’s a great company. And it’s family owned. That means that certain decisions can be reached in a very effective way.


Editors’ note: Barnaby Britton

The L-mount isn’t a new system, but the addition of two new manufacturers to the standard is potentially very significant. Leica’s L-mount cameras have been good products for the most part, but as Dr Kaufmann said, ‘a Leica price-point will always be a Leica price-point’. And as such, cameras like the Leica SL and TL/CL are completely ignored by the vast majority of the camera-buying public, who don’t understand why they cost so much. While entirely understandable, this is a shame, if only because many of Leica’s L-mount lenses are so good.

It seems unlikely that Panasonic’s upcoming Lumix S1 and S1R will be cheap, but it’s a safe bet that in terms of price per line of spec, they’ll be a hell of a lot more reasonably priced than anything Leica will come out with in the near future. It’s anyone’s guess what Canon and Nikon will do next with their new RF and Z mounts, but for now it looks like the S1R could be the most ‘pro’ of all the new crop of full-frame mirrorless cameras when it becomes available next spring. It could, in fact end up being one of the most compelling options in the entire full-frame space.

I bet that Panasonic is itching to knock Sony off its perch as king of full-frame mirrorless video

The lower-resolution Lumix S1 looks set to be more of an all-rounder, which we’re expecting to offer a very compelling video feature set. And speaking of video, Stephan Schultz’s passing comment about a hypothetical ‘professional L mount video camera’ is intriguing. I doubt whether Leica would ever attempt such a thing (although you never know, with Leica) but I bet that Panasonic is itching to fill the troublesome hole in its product lineup between cameras like the GH5/S and cinema-focused offerings like the Varicam – and knock Sony off its perch as king of full-frame mirrorless video in the process.

That hole, between consumer video and professional cine cameras, is where we expect to see a lot of growth over the next few years since it represents the growing emerging production market. Given Panasonic’s history in video, this fertile ‘middle market’ seems to represent an obvious opportunity for the company.

More products means more competition, which is almost always good for consumers

Sigma meanwhile, although best known as a lens manufacturer, has been quietly developing a range of quirky, high-quality cameras for years. The move away from its SA mount might prove painful for a small number of loyal Merillites, but I suspect it will prove to be a very smart move in the long run. More products means more competition, which is almost always good for consumers. Arguably, friendly competition – where manufacturers compete for the same customers with rival but cross-compatible products – is even better, assuming it’s sustainable for the manufacturers involved.

One of the questions raised in the group interview session was whether the three companies in the L mount alliance will work to avoid the kind of technological divergence which we saw emerge over time between Panasonic and Olympus’s rival Micro Four Thirds systems. Mr Kitagawa of Panasonic replied with an unusually candid metaphor about cohabitation versus marriage. The new alliance, it seems, is more serious than his company’s previous partnership with Olympus. I hope it works out.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Photokina 2018: Leica, Sigma and Panasonic talk L-mount Alliance

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Peak Design will donate today’s online sale proceeds to Conservation Alliance

22 Apr

If you’ve been eyeing a Peak Design bag, today may be the day to strike. In honor of Earth Day, the company is donating 100% of proceeds from the day’s online sales to the Conservation Alliance. The organization provides a link between outdoor brands like Peak Design and community efforts to protect and restore public lands.

Peak Design also recently launched Give a Shot, a website where wildlife non-profits can connect with visual content creators looking to volunteer their skills for a good cause. To sweeten the deal, the company offers creators who take on a volunteer project credit toward Peak Design goods.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Peak Design will donate today’s online sale proceeds to Conservation Alliance

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

14 Apr

Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

Natalie Fobes on assignment in Russia for National Geographic. Fobes is an award-winning photographer who founded the nonprofit Blue Earth Alliance in order to work with photographers to share their stories.

“You don’t have to travel overseas to make a difference with your photography. Your world starts outside your front door,” says Natalie Fobes, a Seattle-based photographer with a resume many photographers dream of. Assignments for major magazines including National Geographic, dozens of awards as well as being a finalist for a Pulitzer, a photography instructor with courses on Lynda.com, and now a successful wedding and commercial photography business in Seattle, Washington where she lives with her family.

It all might sound a little intimidating, but spend just a few minutes in conversation with Fobes and you’ll come to understand not only her passion for the power of photography, but how much she wants to help other photographers succeed.

Almost 22 years ago Fobes formed the non-profit Blue Earth Alliance, along with fellow photographer Phil Borges and attorney Malcolm Edwards, who provided legal guidance. The philosophy behind Blue Earth Alliance is simple – photography and filmmaking can lead to positive change.

DPReview had the opportunity to talk with Fobes about Blue Earth Alliance, the impact of photography and the mission of Blue Earth Alliance.

Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

The opportunity to share her photographs and the difficulty in finding funding lead Fobes to collaborate and begin Blue Earth Alliance. Photo by Natalie Fobes.

Blue Earth Alliance was formed almost 22 years ago to help photographers. Why did you feel it was needed?

I had just had a book published, had spent 10 years traveling the Pacific Rim and was doing well and I was approached to put together a traveling exhibit. It was expensive to put on the exhibit and hard to find sponsors. I was told if I had been a 501(c)(3) sponsors could help, and I learned other photographers were having similar problems. We saw the media landscape was changing and it was going to get harder to do long documentary projects.

I think the underlying philosophy of Blue Earth Alliance is we feel an individual can make a difference in this world. There are so many things that need attention:  the environment, disappearing cultures, social issues or a local situation. These are all things that matter in our lives, no matter if you live in a small town or in New York City or Seattle. By raising awareness of these issues, you can make a difference; you can make a change. It’s a very high level look, but I think that no matter who you are — whether you’re a professional photographer or advanced amateur — you recognize the power of photography.

Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

Photojournalist Tom Reese spotlights the devastation of toxic waste in his project, “Choosing Hope: Reclaiming The Duwamish River.” Photo by Tom Reese.

Can you explain how Blue Earth Alliance works with photographers who become sponsored?

First, I need to be very clear:  Blue Earth does not provide direct funding or grants. That is a common misconception about Blue Earth. The biggest service Blue Earth provides is fiscal sponsorship. This is a huge asset to individual photographers and filmmakers since when we accept a project for sponsorship we extend our 501(c)(3) status to it. The photographer/filmmaker can then apply for grants from organizations and foundations that only donate to a 501(c)(3). After 21 years, we have a great reputation with funders for sponsoring worthwhile projects. Blue Earth provides a vetted seal of approval for donors.

Sometimes photographers and filmmakers just need encouragement for their projects. More than one photographer has mentioned that when Blue Earth selected their project for sponsorship, it encouraged and inspired them to continue their work.

Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

Daniel Beltra’s project has documented conservation around the planet. He has shot on all seven continents, many of his photographs are shot from the air. Photo by Daniel Beltra.

Blue Earth Alliance has sponsored more than 134 photography and filmmaking projects over the last two decades. Can you reflect on a few that have had an impact?

We have had had many, but a couple that stand out. These projects can start the conversation, even raise the visibility of some of these issues. One was a really long term project by the late Gary Braasch. He came on board in the late 90’s, early 2000 and was talking about global warming before it became popular. It was important work in that it elevated the conversation because of his photography and his dedication.

Another is Subhankar Banerjee and his story about the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and how important it was to keep that area pristine. He had worked at Boeing and had no professional photography experience. He came to us and wanted to do this project and applied for sponsorship.

He spent a couple of years in the Arctic and showed how beautiful it was even when some senators were calling it a frozen wasteland. The Preserve is one of the last pristine areas of that particular environment and there was a lot of discussion about oil, a lot of senators wanted to open it out to oil exploration. He also contracted with a number of museums including the Smithsonian to exhibit his work from this project. In one of the Senate debates about drilling in the refuge Senator Boxer held up his book.

Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

Katherine Jack’s project with Blue Earth Alliance is documenting life in the Palawan Sea, in the Philippines and how changes to our marine ecosystem is affecting the life of the Palawan residents.

What are the steps a photographer would need to take to get support from Blue Earth Alliance? What are the criteria that makes a project worthwhile?

Blue Earth accepts project proposals twice a year: January 20 and July 20. The submission requirements can be found on our website. In a proposal we look for a clear description of the project, a unique viewpoint or topic and clarity around how the project fits within the Blue Earth mission. Having a project with a 501c3 status does not mean that money magically appears. Finding funding can be difficult, and it takes time to thoughtfully research funders and write grants.

When we review our project proposals one of the first things I look at their budget to see if they know what they are doing financially.

We have a responsibility to make sure funds are used as they should be. One of the first things I look for is are the photographers paying themselves, through a stipend. We are too important not to pay ourselves.

Blue Earth wants our project photographer/filmmakers to succeed, and we scrutinize all proposals in order in ensure that likelihood.

Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

Greg Constantine’s decade-long project, Nowhere People, focuses on the plight of people forced from their homes, without citizenship and looks at the challenges of their daily lives and their future. Photo by Greg Constantine.

What advice do you have to photographers who are looking for a way to use their photography to make a difference?

Photographers and filmmakers should try to form coalitions with other like-minded people and organizations. I believe in the strength of an individual. But I believe in the power that comes when individuals come together for a common goal.

Photographers and filmmakers also need to realize that one grant will seldom fund their entire project. They should apply for many: large, small and in-between. For my first long-term project I used my savings, a grant and assignments to fund it.

It’s imperative to create a coalition of funders. Funders like to see support from other organizations when considering an application. They see it as a third-party endorsement of the photographer/filmmaker and the project. It’s true that success leads to success.

Photographers and filmmakers often forget, or are afraid of, including friends and family in their fundraising efforts. People are often more likely to give a donation to someone they know. Crowd-sourcing websites make fundraising campaigns much easier than in the past.

If a photographer doesn’t believe they can make a difference then they won’t.

Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

Natalie Fobe’s captured the extensive damage of the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound while on a three month assignment for National Geographic. Photo by Natalie Fobes.

Your photography has included extensive work around the Pacific Salmon, wildlife and landscapes. What are you most proud of?

I think probably the work that may have had the most impact on society was the Exxon Valdez oil spill in. That was also the hardest story I photographed because of the difficulty of the working conditions and getting access. And the chaos, the chaos of the spill and the emotional impact of the destruction of the environment. The horrible pain that the animals and birds suffered and the people too.

This happened in a beautiful pristine area that was home and sustenance for the native Alaskans but also the commercial fishermen and townspeople who lived there.

Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

Annie Musselman’s first project with Blue Earth Alliance focused on the delicate balance of human impact on wild animals. Her project Wolf Haven documents animals in sanctuaries. Photo by Annie Musselman.

What does the future hold for Blue Earth Alliance?

We are an organization with a passionate and dedicated board that donates thousands of hours each year to our mission.

We hold an annual conference “Collaborations for Cause.” This will be held in May 5-6, 2017, in Seattle. The goal of Collaborations for Cause is to put non-profits, educators, communications professionals and visual storytellers in the same room for education, inspiration and networking. Presentations and interviews of our past speakers can be viewed at photowings.org.

Our conference supports our mission to form a coalition of non-profits and visual storytellers. We hope that our photographers’ projects educate the public about important issues. Simply: we want our projects to change the world for the better.

Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

Photographer Tim Matsui’s project focused on human trafficking and lead to the film, ‘Leaving the Life’ as well as working with King County Government in Washington State to create policy around human trafficking. Photo by Tim Matsui.

DPReview also spoke with Tim Matsui, a photographer who has worked on two projects in conjunction with Blue Earth Alliance. He explains how the organization helped him to make a difference with his photography.

I first went to Blue Earth because I was ‘just a photographer’ and unable to apply to many foundation grants or other funding opportunities. I was doing grassroots fundraisers, silent auctions, even burger-beer events with local businesses willing to support my work with their proceeds. Old school.

Leaving the Life is my second project with Blue Earth. My first one, over a decade ago, used documentary multimedia—when slide projectors and dissolve units were still a thing—to create dialog about the lasting effects of sexual violence on individuals and communities.

Being accepted at that time was not only validating of the social justice work I felt compelled to do, but it opened the door to foundation grants and private donations; something I knew very little about.

The learning curve was steep, but I was no longer ‘just a photographer.’ I was in the company of others who were much more accomplished than myself. I had access to their knowledge and this helped me understand how I could increase the impact and reach of my work.

Years later, when I realized Leaving the Life and The Long Night could create impact, I reapplied to Blue Earth. This allowed me to receive a grant from The Fledgling Fund. That grant lead to the policy work I’ve done with King County government.

In fact, it was a screening of The Long Night at Collaborations for Cause where I met a King County employee who became instrumental in my work with King County. Without her, I doubt that two-year journey would have come to fruition.

Blue Earth continues to support my work as I’m now looking for investors for a follow up film to The Long Night— these are people who see their return on investment not as financial renumeration, but policy change. And through Blue Earth I’ve had the opportunity to share what I’ve learned about using film to support social and policy change. Blue Earth is grassroots, created and run by photojournalists, and helping stories have impact is woven into the fabric of the organization. That matters to me.


Blue Earth Alliance’s Collaborations for Cause takes place May 5th and 6th in Seattle. You can find the speaker schedule and registration information online at blueearth.org.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Blue Earth Alliance: Collaboration is key for photography that makes a difference

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Blue Earth Alliance presents Collaborations for Cause 2016

31 Mar

Are you in Seattle in April? Come down to the Seattle Downtown Public Library, on Friday April 15th and Saturday April 16th 9 AM-4 PM, and join our friends the Blue Earth Alliance for Collaborations for Cause 2016.

This year’s Collaborations for Cause theme is “Innovations in Visual Storytelling for Impact.” It’s a rare opportunity for visual storytellers, writers, funders, non-profits, corporations and public agencies to join together as peers: to learn new strategies, tools and ideas to leverage the power of story and effect social change. As well as talks and seminars from photographers, filmmakers and activists, attendees can also pay for three one-on-one portfolio review sessions, at the show. Reserve your tickets from the link below.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Blue Earth Alliance presents Collaborations for Cause 2016

Posted in Uncategorized

 

UHD Alliance sets ‘premium’ standards that could prompt higher-quality 4K cameras

07 Jan

As the industry starts to set quality standards, camera manufacturers may be pushed towards offering higher-quality 10-bit 4K recording. The UHD Alliance, a group made up from leading producers, distributors and device makers has defined the Ultra HD Premium brand that requires certain minimum specifications to be met for content production, streaming and replay.

The most interesting detail is the requirement for 10-bit capture, distribution and playback, meaning cameras must be able to record 10-bit footage to meet the standard. We’re hoping this will mean higher bit-depth recording from 4K-capable cameras to allow their use in productions hoping to carry the Ultra HD Premium branding.

At present, most cameras we encounter can only capture 8-bit files, limiting dynamic range and flexibility at the color grading stage.


Press Release:

UHD Alliance Defines Premium Home Entertainment Experience

LAS VEGAS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Enjoying a premium, full-featured Ultra High Definition in-home experience has been simplified for consumers as the UHD Alliance (UHDA), the inter-industry group charged with fostering the Ultra HD ecosystem and promoting the benefits of Ultra HD entertainment technology, today unveiled a consumer-facing logo to identify devices, content and services capable of delivering a premium experience to an exploding Ultra HD market that is expected to grow eightfold by 2019. The UHDA also announced the start of licensing of its ULTRA HD PREMIUM logo.

Developed through the collaborative efforts of leading film studios, consumer electronics manufacturers, content distributors and technology companies, the Ultra HD Premium specifications reflect collective expertise from across the Ultra HD ecosystem, as well as significant input gleaned from experiential consumer testing.

The UHDA’s ULTRA HD PREMIUM logo is reserved for products and services that comply with performance metrics for resolution, high dynamic range (HDR), peak luminance, black levels and wide color gamut among others. The specifications also make recommendations for immersive audio and other features. These advances in resolution, contrast, brightness, color and audio will enable certified displays and content to replicate the richness of life’s sights and sounds and allow in-home viewers to more fully and accurately experience the content creator’s vision.

“The diverse group of UHDA companies agreed that to realize the full potential of Ultra HD the specs need to go beyond resolution and address enhancements like HDR, expanded color and ultimately even immersive audio. Consumer testing confirmed this,” said UHD Alliance President Hanno Basse. “The criteria established by this broad cross section of the Ultra HD ecosystem enables the delivery of a revolutionary in-home experience, and the ULTRA HD PREMIUM logo gives consumers a single, identifying mark to seek out so they can purchase with confidence.”

To ensure products bearing the ULTRA HD PREMIUM logo are certified and conform to the organization’s specifications, the UHDA has designated multiple, independent centers around the globe to handle testing. Companies throughout the ecosystem will work directly with these centers to have their products tested and certified.

The UHDA’s new ULTRA HD PREMIUM specifications cover multiple display technologies and reference established industry standards and recommended practices from the Consumer Technology Association, the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, the International Telecommunications Union and others.

“Ever-rising consumer adoption of Ultra HD TV sets will fuel strong growth for the entire Ultra HD ecosystem over the next few years,” noted Paul Erickson, senior analyst at IHS Technology. “Annual worldwide shipments of Ultra HD TVs are expected to grow nearly 719% over the next several years according to IHS’ forecasts, from nearly 12 million in 2014 to nearly 96 million in 2019, with over 300 million in use by the end of 2019. For the many mainstream consumers looking to make sense of the various terminologies, acronyms and feature descriptions at retail, standardization efforts such as the UHDA’s “ULTRA HD PREMIUM” can reduce consumer confusion and help ensure consistency of both buyer expectations and the delivery of the end experience – benefiting not only consumers, but also the industry as a whole.”

Founded in January, 2015, the UHDA, has grown to more than 35 companies in two membership categories – Board and Contributor. In 2016, the UHDA will add a third member category, Adopter, for those who wish to license the Ultra HD Premium specifications. Collectively, the UHDA member companies will continue to lead the charge into this new era of home entertainment through advances in resolution, brightness, contrast, dynamic range, color and audio.

Companies interested in the UHDA specification and the associated licensing terms can obtain the UHDA Information Agreement and/or licensing terms by going through: http://www.uhdalliance.org/contact-us/.

ABOUT THE UHD ALLIANCE:

The UHD Alliance (UHDA), comprising more than 35 member companies, is a global coalition of leading film studios, consumer electronics manufacturers, content distributors and technology companies aligned to foster the creation of an ecosystem that fully realizes and promotes the next generation premium in-home entertainment platform. Key characteristics of a robust next generation experience should offer 4K resolution as well as a mix of other features that include high dynamic range, wide color gamut, high frame rate and immersive audio, among other features. UHDA Board members are executives from: The DIRECTV Group Inc, Dolby Laboratories, LG Electronics, Netflix, Panasonic Corporation, Samsung Electronics, Sony Corporation, Technicolor, The Walt Disney Studios, Twentieth Century Fox, Universal Pictures and Warner Bros. Entertainment. To learn more about the UHD Alliance, please visit: www.uhdalliance.org

“ULTRA HD PREMIUM” Logo
“ULTRA HD PREMIUM” logo is trademark of the UHD Alliance, Inc.

UHD Alliance Technical Specifications Overview

The UHD Alliance has developed three specifications to support the next-generation premium home entertainment experience. The three specifications cover the entertainment ecosystem in the following categories:

  • Devices (currently, television displays, with other devices under consideration)
  • Distribution
  • Content

A high level overview of each technical specification can be found below. Please join the UHD Alliance for full access to all technical and test specifications.

Devices

The UHD Alliance supports various display technologies and consequently, have defined combinations of parameters to ensure a premium experience across a wide range of devices. In order to receive the UHD Alliance Premium Logo, the device must meet or exceed the following specifications:

  • Image Resolution: 3840×2160
  • Color Bit Depth: 10-bit signal
  • Color Palette (Wide Color Gamut)
    • Signal Input: BT.2020 color representation
    • Display Reproduction: More than 90% of P3 colors
  • High Dynamic Range
    • SMPTE ST2084 EOTF
    • A combination of peak brightness and black level either:
      • More than 1000 nits peak brightness and less than 0.05 nits black levelOR
      • More than 540 nits peak brightness and less than 0.0005 nits black level

Distribution

Any distribution channel delivering the UHD Alliance content must support

  • Image Resolution: 3840×2160
  • Color Bit Depth: Minimum 10-bit signal
  • Color: BT.2020 color representation
  • High Dynamic Range: SMPTE ST2084 EOTF

Content Master

  • The UHD Alliance Content Master must meet the following requirements:
  • Image Resolution: 3840×2160
  • Color Bit Depth: Minimum 10-bit signal
  • Color: BT.2020 color representation
  • High Dynamic Range: SMPTE ST2084 EOTF

The UHD Alliance recommends the following mastering display specifications:

  • Display Reproduction: Minimum 100% of P3 colors
  • Peak Brightness: More than 1000 nits
  • Black Level: Less than 0.03 nits

The UHD Alliance technical specifications prioritize image quality and recommend support for next-generation audio.

UHDA Member Companies

Company

Membership Level

The DIRECTV Group, Inc. Board Member Company
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. Board Member Company
LG Electronics Board Member Company
Netflix, Inc. Board Member Company
Panasonic Corporation Board Member Company
Samsung Electronics Corporation Board Member Company
Sony Corporation Board Member Company
Technicolor Board Member Company
The Walt Disney Studios Board Member Company
Twentieth Century Fox Board Member Company
Universal Pictures Board Member Company
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Board Member Company
 
Amazon.com Contributor
ARRI, Inc. Contributor
Dreamworks Contributor
DTS Contributor
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft Contributor
Hisense Contributor
HiSilicon Technologies Contributor
Intel Corporation Contributor
Koninklijke Philips N.V. Contributor
MStar Semiconductor, Inc. Contributor
Nanosys Inc. Contributor
Novatek Contributor
NVIDIA Contributor
Orange Contributor
Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Contributor
Rogers Communications Contributor
Sharp Corporation Contributor
Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co., Ltd. Contributor
Sky UK Ltd Contributor
THX Ltd Contributor
Toshiba Lifestyle Products & Services Corporation Contributor
TP Vision Europe B.V. Contributor

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on UHD Alliance sets ‘premium’ standards that could prompt higher-quality 4K cameras

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Rebel Alliance: Hands-on with Canon’s new Rebel T6s and T6i

06 Feb

The Rebels are coming, and they’re more powerful than ever. Alongside the new full-frame EOS 5Ds and 5Dr, Canon has announced two new Rebel-class DSLRs, the T6i and Tsi (EOS 760D and 750D in Europe) with new 24MP sensors, improved Hybrid CMOS AF III and a host of other refinements. We got our hands on the new models recently to see for ourselves how they operate. Click through for pictures 

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Rebel Alliance: Hands-on with Canon’s new Rebel T6s and T6i

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Art of the Game: Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2: Part 5 (Making-of Documentary)

30 Oct

Art Of The Game: Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2- Part 5 Art Of The Game explores the many roles that help breathe life into today’s most amazing games. From Art Directors to Sound Designers, each job is vital to the game designing process. Through interviews, concept art, motion capture video, prototype animations, and gameplay, this show reveals the process behind the art form of video game design. In this 6 -part series, we talk with the team from Vicarious Visions, makers of Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2. In Part 5, Concept Artist Christian Piccolo explains how he provides the basic concepts for what becomes epic environments in the Marvel universe. FOR MORE MACHINIMA GOTO: www.youtube.com