Amateur Photographer magazine has published an interesting story about a copyright infringement case of similar, but not directly copied, images. The issue of copyright is thorny, contentious and often misunderstood but this case sheds some light on the current attitude of courts in the UK. Despite significant differences between the two images (there was no implication that the second image was a duplicate of the first), the court found that the second image copied substantially from the ‘creative expression’ of the first (that is the elements that can be protected by copyright in the original image, including a consideration of the composition, lighting and processing of the image).
News: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)