RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Mark’

Canon EOS M6 Mark II sample gallery

29 Aug

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_2359636629″,”galleryId”:”2359636629″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

We took the new EOS M6 Mark II mirrorless camera to Atlanta, Georgia to put it through its paces at a Canon-sponsored launch event. Click through the gallery above to see how it performed capturing fast action at the world-famous Michelin Raceway, as well as how it handles high-ISO shooting at a wedding and event venue called The Estate.

And don’t miss our EOS 90D gallery, which has a different variety of images for your perusal.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Canon EOS M6 Mark II sample gallery

Posted in Uncategorized

 

DPReview TV: Canon EOS 90D and M6 Mark II first impressions in Atlanta

29 Aug

By now, you’ve had plenty to read up on regarding Canon’s new APS-C cameras, the EOS 90D and EOS M6 Mark II – now it’s time to see them in action. DPReview TV’s Chris Niccolls teams up with Reviews Editor Carey Rose in Atlanta to see just what these two cameras are capable of at Michelin Raceway.

What do you all think of the new cameras? Let us know in the comments.

Also, subscribe to our YouTube channel to get new episodes of DPReview TV every week.

  • Introduction
  • Main differences
  • Burst shooting
  • 90D autofocus
  • Drift photography
  • M6 Mark II dials
  • M6 Mark II handling
  • M6 Mark II autofocus
  • 90D mechanical shutter in live view
  • Face and eye detect
  • Video performance
  • Conclusion

EOS M6 Mark II sample galleries from this episode

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_3890485237″,”galleryId”:”3890485237″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

Canon 90D sample galleries from this episode

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_7051572497″,”galleryId”:”7051572497″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

Check out all of our Canon EOS 90D and EOS M6 Mark II launch content, including additional galleries and initial reviews

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on DPReview TV: Canon EOS 90D and M6 Mark II first impressions in Atlanta

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Which would you choose? Shooting the Canon EOS 90D and EOS M6 Mark II in Atlanta

28 Aug

Introduction

Small camera with a big lens, being filmed with a big camera with a moderately sized lens, all photographed with a big camera with a moderately sized lens.
Out of camera JPEG with the Canon EOS 90D.
Canon EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 @ 42mm | ISO 100 | 1/640 sec | F4.5

Due to the basic fundamentals of how the ol’ Internet works, if you’re into digital cameras, you’ve likely already heard of Canon’s newly released crop-sensor duo. We all know that the EOS 90D and EOS M6 Mark II both have 32.5MP sensors, fast burst shooting and crop-free 4K video. The former is a DSLR and the latter comes sans mirror.

But during my time spent sweating through my cotton v-neck at Canon’s Atlanta pre-launch event for the two cameras, I found more than few novel differences that aren’t necessarily obvious from a quick spec-sheet or design-ethos rundown. It’s not quite as simple as ‘EVF vs. OVF,’ ‘big grip vs. small grip,’ and so on.

‘Have it your way’

Lenses aside, the EOS 90D and EOS M6 Mark II should produce identical image quality.
Out-of-camera JPEG on the EOS 90D
Canon EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 @ 135 mm | ISO 100 | 1/80 sec | F14

As I began to think through this article, I couldn’t help but mentally write ‘Whether mirrorless or DSLR, Canon lets you have it your way,’ before remembering that we already had an article with an awfully similar title. Good grief, how much of the English language is doomed to cliché thanks in part to the thinning of popular culture among the rise of infinite and disparate sources of web-based entertainment? Anyway, I digress.

In keeping with the afore-linked tradition, Canon continues to give us the ingredients for broadly comparable image quality in two very different configurations. From a business perspective, it makes immense sense, at least in the United States. Here, DSLR cameras continue to be popular and Canon’s mirrorless presence has, well, room to grow.

I was prepared to prefer the EOS M6 II over the 90D, but that isn’t exactly what happened

And I have to admit, even as a former high-end DSLR user, that I’ve enjoyed the advantages that mirrorless cameras have brought to the market. Good touchscreen interfaces can make up for fewer physical controls, an electronic viewfinder makes it easy to check images in playback under bright daylight, and my back continues to thank me for a generally lighter overall kit.

So I was prepared to greatly prefer the EOS M6 II over the EOS 90D on this pre-launch event. But that isn’t exactly what happened.

First, bursts

Fast burst speeds mean it’s more likely I’ll have a decent image from a pan – so long as I don’t fill the buffer up first.
Out-of-camera JPEG with the EOS M6 Mark II
Canon EF-M 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 @ 76mm | ISO 100 | 1/250 sec | F9

I generally think of myself as a car guy, but even so, I didn’t realize that the lifecycle of a drift-car tire is best measured in seconds, not minutes. And with those very fast (10-14 fps) burst speeds, both the EOS 90D and EOS M6 Mark II have buffer life that measures in at far fewer seconds of life than even drift-car tires.

So although the burst rates on the spec sheet may communicate that these cameras can replace your older double-grip sports DSLR, the reality is that you’ll run out of buffer and miss shots unless you dial your speed back, your image quality back, or both. At least the new C-Raw option (which gives you 30-40% smaller Raw files) won’t have a huge impact on image quality for most users, and extends the buffer noticeably.

But buffer depth isn’t all. Yes, let’s delve into EVF vs. OVF.

Viewfinder experiences

The add-on EVF on the EOS M6 Mark II is good, but fast-action aficionados will likely still prefer the OVF on the EOS 90D.
Out-of-camera JPEG with the EOS 90D
Canon EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 @ 135mm | ISO 100 | 1/60 sec | F14

The optional electronic viewfinder on the EOS M6 II doesn’t come with the largest magnification on the market (Canon does not disclose the actual figure), but it does offer a good refresh rate and great contrast. At 14 fps on the M6 II, you get a slideshow of the previous images – drop to 7 fps, and you get a live view between shots. I found 7 fps to get me plenty of keepers, plus I was able to easily follow fast-moving cars, and not-so-fast-moving models. And, I was able to use Canon’s Face + Tracking mode: an option only available in live view on the EOS 90D.

The EOS 90D’s iTR tracking accuracy is leagues ahead of the older EOS 80D

Switching over to the optical viewfinder on the EOS 90D, I exclusively used Canon’s iTR tracking through the viewfinder. It’s not as robust as Canon’s Dual Pixel AF in live view – there’s a much smaller AF area, for starters – but I found accuracy and tracking tenacity to be leagues ahead of the older EOS 80D, probably thanks to Canon’s new metering sensor. We’ll be taking a closer look in our full review.

The 90D’s new ‘face detection’ option in the viewfinder is honestly hard to evaluate, as it was hard to tell if it was tracking a face simply because I placed my initial AF point over it and it was tracking color or depth, as opposed to really recognizing a face. There were times when I placed my initial AF point over a face, initiated tracking, and the system jumped to an adjacent face. I’d wager that, at this point, the system just isn’t as reliable as Dual Pixel’s face and eye detection in live view.

Video-centric, stills-centric

Full disclosure – I didn’t shoot any video with these cameras, but I did work alongside a man shooting video with these cameras. We were hoping to have him trade back-and-forth between both the 90D and M6 Mark II while shooting our DPReview TV episode, but fun fact, the 90D is the only camera of the two with a headphone port. Rather than risk losing entire takes due to bad audio, we opted to use the 90D for almost all of our video shooting so we could monitor the microphones Chris and I were using.

For stills shooters, 32.5MP should be plenty for almost any purpose.
Out-of-camera JPEG using the EOS 90D
Canon EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 @ 35mm | ISO 400 | 1/60 sec | F4.5

Audio features aside, the 90D also has a crop mode that improves detail capture in video, and of course, the fully articulating touchscreen which many video shooters prefer over the tilting screen mechanism on the 6D Mark II. This makes it by far the more useful video camera of the two – despite the fact that it comes with a mirrorbox that is totally unnecessary for video capture.

Meanwhile, the EOS M6 Mark II has a 30 fps Raw Burst mode, which is distinctly aimed at stills-photography shooters. Additionally, its short flange-back distance encourages the adapting of non-native lenses, and there’s not a mess of glass and hinges obstructing the sensor if one did want to launch their way into capturing moving pictures.

Most perplexing is that neither camera shoots 24p video at any resolution

But most perplexing for us on staff is the fact that neither camera shoots 24p video – at any resolution. For the average consumer, and indeed, most people who are looking at cameras around this price point for shooting video, it isn’t a deal-breaker. But it’s also simply a software choice – if the camera can record 30p footage, it can certainly record 24p footage. So for those looking at (particularly regarding the M6 II) a small, easily mountable secondary camera for a larger production, you’ll have to pony up the extra cash for a higher-end Canon camera (or a cheaper camera from another brand) that does natively offer this.

The wrap

Out-of-camera JPEG with the EOS 90D
Canon EF-S 17-55mm F2.8 @ 20mm | ISO 1000 | 1/80 sec | F4

So, which did I really end up preferring? In case it isn’t obvious by now, I like each camera for different reasons.

The EOS M6 Mark II is very quick, but the DSLR still has an advantage in terms of absolute immediacy, helped in no small part by the optical viewfinder. But I just can’t trust viewfinder autofocus the way I can trust Dual Pixel AF. Turns out, though, the bigger and weightier EOS 90D made panning much easier for me, and I consistently got more keepers at lower shutter speeds than I could on the M6 Mark II – and at F9 and up, absolute autofocus accuracy is pretty moot.

But perhaps most telling, I largely prefer the overall selection of images I got from the 90D. Of course there’s no real quality difference – but I used the 90D during the second half of the day and the EOS M6 Mark II during the first half, so maybe I was just more warmed up photographically.

For most other people… the EOS M6 Mark II is probably the better choice

In the end, the EOS 90D is really best suited for those with larger hands and larger lenses, or those traveling in inclement environments, thanks to its tougher weather-sealed body. For most other people, though, the EOS M6 Mark II is probably the better choice. Thanks to its small size (which belies its huge capability), you’re more likely to carry it with you and make more photographs with it as a result. And that’s what really counts.

Oh, and the EOS M6 Mark II is $ 250 US cheaper regardless of what kit option you choose. So, that counts too.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Which would you choose? Shooting the Canon EOS 90D and EOS M6 Mark II in Atlanta

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Canon Australia shares accidental ‘first look’ at EOS M6 Mark II, EOS 90D cameras

20 Aug

Canon Australia appears to have leaked two upcoming cameras – the EOS M6 Mark II and the EOS 90D, in a pair of videos posted on its YouTube channel (which have been taken down in the minutes since we started drafting this article). The two videos gave a ‘first look’ at what appear to be forthcoming mirrorless and DSLR APS-C products.

Canon Australia has since removed the videos, but Canon Rumors downloaded them before they were taken down and uploaded the videos to its YouTube channel.

Canon M6 Mark II

According to the video, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II will feature major improvements over its predecessor, the EOS M6, both in terms of ergonomics and specifications.

Most notably, it looks like the EOS M6 Mark II will feature a 32.5-megapixel CMOS sensor powered by a Digic 8 processor. It will have a continuous shooting speed up to 14 fps with autofocus, Eye Detection, Dual Pixel AF and a dedicated MF/AF Focus Mode Switch button on the rear of the camera.

A screenshot from the video showing the new Focus Switch Mode on the back of the M6 Mark II.

Canon Australia notes in the video’s description that the M6 Mark II will be able to shoot 4K/30p video and 1080p at 120 fps. Also shown in the video is a removable OLED viewfinder that works with the Touch & Drag AF on the rear camera display and a Wi-Fi/Bluetooth transfer option, although the specifics of the transfer technology remain unknown.

Canon EOS 90D

Also leaked by Canon Australia was what we presume to be the promo video for the EOS 90D, Canon’s next-generation APS-C DSLR.

According to the video, the 90D will feature a 32.5-megapixel sensor with a Digic 8 processor behind it (presumably the same combination found in the EOS M6 Mark II). IThe 90D appears to be limited to 10 fps continuous shooting, but it too has Dual Pixel AF, Eye Detection AF and a 45-point all-cross-type autofocus sensor with a joystick for navigating through the AF points.

The optical viewfinder inside the 90D features 100-percent coverage and includes a 220K-dot RGB + IR metering sensor that features Canon’s iTR AF (face-detection).

On the video front, the video doesn’t share much, but notes the 90D will shoot 4K 30p video and up to 120 fps when shooting in 1080. The video also says the 90D is dust- and water-resistant and can be paired with Canon’s BG-E14 battery grip, the same one used for Canon’s 70D and 80D cameras.

No pricing information or definitive release date was mentioned in the videos, but given both were posted on an official Canon channel, and have since been removed from YouTube, we assume that the EOS M6 II and EOS 90D are real, and coming soon.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Canon Australia shares accidental ‘first look’ at EOS M6 Mark II, EOS 90D cameras

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Canon to Announce the 90D or the EOS M5 Mark II Next Month

27 Jul

The post Canon to Announce the 90D or the EOS M5 Mark II Next Month appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.

canon-camera-announcement

August is bound to be an exciting month for Canon fans.

Rumors indicate that either the Canon 90D or the Canon EOS M5 Mark II will be announced next month, though it is also possible that we’ll get an announcement for both.

The Canon 90D would likely be the replacement for the Canon 80D, a mid-level Canon DSLR aimed at enthusiasts. The Canon EOS M5 Mark II, meanwhile, replaces the Canon EOS M5, an APS-C mirrorless camera.

The Canon 80D debuted back in February of 2016, and a lot has changed since then in the camera world. For one, the 80D lacks 4K video, and Canon fans expect to see this featured in a new 90D. Recent speculation suggests that the 90D may also be the first Canon DSLR to contain in-body image stabilization (IBIS).

Here are several rumored Canon 90D specifications:

  • A 31.2 (or a 32.5) megapixel APS-C sensor
  • 10 frames-per-second continuous shooting
  • 4K video
  • Dual card slots
  • Bluetooth
  • Wi-Fi
  • An articulating 3.2-inch LCD
  • 45 autofocus points
  • $ 1399 USD price

Note the 30+ megapixel sensor, which will take Canon APS-C cameras to a new level. And the dual card slots point to this being a slightly higher-end body than the Canon 80D.

The Canon 90D may not be replacing only the Canon 80D, however. Canon 7D Mark II fans have long awaited a 7D Mark III, but may have to settle with a Canon 80D/Canon 7D Mark II replacement hybrid, which will combine both APS-C camera lines into one.

The Canon M5 Mark II, on the other hand, would be an upgraded APS-C mirrorless body. It’s rumored to have an electronic viewfinder like the Canon RP, and enhanced video capabilities, including 4K and high frame-rate slow motion.

Note that the Canon EOS M6, another Canon APS-C mirrorless body, may also see a replacement announced sometime late next month.

Now I’d like to ask you:

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post’s poll.

Let me know why in the comments!

The post Canon to Announce the 90D or the EOS M5 Mark II Next Month appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.


Digital Photography School

 
Comments Off on Canon to Announce the 90D or the EOS M5 Mark II Next Month

Posted in Photography

 

Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review: Full-Frame King?

02 Jul

Moving from the APS-C to the full-frame world can be a very intimidating thing to do. After all, you’re going to spend a significant amount of money; money you have most likely been saving up for quite some time. There are so many options out there, and we know you want to pick a camera that will give the most Continue Reading

The post Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review: Full-Frame King? appeared first on Photodoto.


Photodoto

 
Comments Off on Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review: Full-Frame King?

Posted in Photography

 

Firmware upgrade brings features from Olympus’s E-M1X to the E-M1 Mark II

19 Jun

Olympus has released a major firmware update for its nearly three-year-old OM-D E-M1 Mark II. Many of the additions come straight from the company’s flagship E-M1X, so now you can have a camera that shares many of the same features but in a much smaller package.

The most significant features include:

  • Autofocus
    • Autofocus algorithms from the E-M1X improves performance tracking moving subjects and makes S-AF more accurate
    • Group 25-point AF mode added; Center priority mode sticks to center focus point and will use surrounding points if subject moves ‘vigorously’
    • ‘Active use’ of PDAF improves performance when shooting video
    • Camera can now focus down to -6EV when using an F1.2 lens
  • Image quality
    • A new ‘Detail Priority’ mode reduces noise (at the expense of burst speed) at low ISOs in JPEGs
    • High ISO performance has been improved by 1/3-stop, according to Olympus
    • ISO 100 (Low) added
    • Anti-flicker mode added
  • Other
    • OM-Log400 added for more flexibility for color grading in video
    • Menus/playback mode can be entered while camera is writing to a memory card
    • Focus Stacking now offers choice of 3-15 shots
    • New Instant Film Art Filter
    • Support for USB Raw Data Edit with Olympus Workspace (see below)
    • Support for new MC-20 teleconverter

You can see the full list of changes in the press release further down this page.

The E-M1X has also received a firmware bump to v1.1, with the only new features being support for the MC-20 teleconverter and USB Raw Data Edit.

Finally, Olympus has updated its Workspace software to version 1.1. The big new feature is the ability to edit Raw images over USB, with the camera doing the processing. Other updates include Focus Stacking from images taken in Focus Bracketing mode and the ability to create Live Composite images.


Press Release

OLYMPUS ANNOUNCES FIRMWARE UPGRADES ENHANCING AUTOFOCUS PERFORMANCE AND IMAGE QUALITY

Version 3.0 for the OM-D® E-M1 Mark II, Version 1.1 for the OM-D E-M1X and Version 1.1 for Olympus® Workspace

CENTER VALLEY, Pa., June 19, 2019 – Olympus is pleased to announce availability of the latest firmware upgrade for two interchangeable lens cameras, Version 3.0 for the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Version 1.1 for the Olympus OM-D E-M1X. Additionally, Firmware Version 1.1 is now available for Olympus Workspace. OM-D E-M1 Mark II firmware Version 3.0 adds high-precision autofocus (AF) performance and the high image quality currently available on Olympus’ newest OM-D, the E-M1X. Specifically designed for the professional models in the OM-D series, the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and OM-D E-M1X, this new firmware provides feature enhancements for photographers who require portability and smooth operation of the camera when shooting.

OM-D E-M1 Mark II Firmware Version 3.0: Main Features

Advanced AF Performance

This upgrade utilizes the OM-D E-M1X algorithm, which was developed based on the shooting needs of the professional photographer. With the goal of achieving performance that responds to demanding shooting conditions, such as fast movement in sports, etc., C-AF Center Priority delivers high-precision tracking of moving subjects and sudden subject movement. AF precision for still subjects when using S-AF is improved for various subjects compared to OM-D E-M1 Mark II firmware Version 2.3. Active use of information from the On-chip Phase Detection AF sensor also improves AF performance while shooting video.

Newest AutoFocus Features

Group 25-point has been added to AF Target, and is effective for photographing birds and other small subjects. C-AF Center Priority is now available, and repeatedly autofocuses with priority on the center point in Group 5-point, Group 9-point, and Group 25-point. If AF is not possible in the center point, the peripheral points in the group area assists, which is effective for subjects that move around quickly. In addition, C-AF+MF1 is included which allows users to instantly switch to MF by turning the focus ring while in C-AF for fine tuning the focus.

Low Light Limit Update

The AF low light limit when an f/1.2 lens is attached is -6.0 EV (ISO 100 equivalent for S-AF), enabling high precision focusing in both dark scenes and for low-contrast subjects.

Improved Image Quality

Low ISO Processing (Detail Priority) has been added for higher resolution when shooting at low ISO sensitivity[1], making it possible to reduce noise while shooting with low ISO settings. Compared with OM-D E-M1 Mark II firmware Version 2.3, noise that occurs when shooting at high ISO sensitivity is improved approximately 1/3 of a step.

Support for New Functions in Olympus Workspace

USB RAW Data Edit[2] is now supported for much faster RAW processing in Olympus Workspace by connecting the camera to a computer to use the power of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II TruePic™ VIII image processor.

Enhanced Operability

  • Anti-flicker shooting added to prevent unstable exposure, particularly when sequential shooting indoors.
  • OM-Log400 movie-exclusive picture mode added, allowing the user to shoot movies without loss of details in shadows or highlight blowouts, delivery greater freedom over video creativity through color grading.
  • Frame Rate Priority added to Live View Boost/On2 display, displaying images at a comfortable brightness, even in especially dark locations, such as under a starlit sky without lowering the frame rate.
  • From 3 to 15 shots can be selected in Focus Stacking and guide lines have been added to the shooting area
  • Quick image selection added
  • Setting changes and playback display while writing to card now possible, facilitating quick operation.
  • Instant Film added to Art Filter
  • ISO L100 (ISO 100 equivalent) added

OM-D E-M1X Firmware Version 1.1? Main Features

Support for New Functions in Olympus Workspace

USB RAW Data Edit is now supported for much faster RAW processing in Olympus Workspace by connecting the camera to a computer to use the power of the OM-D E-M1X TruePic VIII image processor.

Olympus Workspace Image Editing Software Version 1.1: Main Features

Focus Stacking added for compositing images shot in Focus Bracketing[3]

Previously, when using Focus Stacking on a computer, it was necessary to use commercially available third party software to composite images. Now, t is possible to composite up to 999 images in Olympus Workspace.

Lighten Composite added

Lighten Composite is now supported by Olympus Workspace, making it possible to create images similar to Live Composite on the camera. Darken Composite has also been added.

Support for New Functions in Olympus Workspace

USB RAW Data Edit has been added for much faster RAW processing in Olympus Workspace by connecting the camera to a computer, using the power of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and OM-D E-M1X TruePic VIII image processor.

Function Support Chart

? reflects the functions that have been upgraded with the firmware.

Feature

E-M1X Ver. 1.1

E-M1 mark II Ver. 3.0

AF Group Target 25-point

Already available

?

Custom AF Target

Already available

C-AF Center Priority

Already available

?

C-AF Center Start

Already available

?

C-AF+MF

Already available

?

Intelligent Subject Detection AF

Already available

Anti-flicker shooting

Already available

?

OM-Log 400

Already available

?

ISO L100 (ISO 100 equivalent)

Already available

?

Frame Rate Priority on Live View Boost/On2

Already available

?

Focus Stacking: Select from 3 to 15 images

Already available

?

Focus Stacking: Guide line display

Already available

?

Art Filter: Instant Film

Already available

?

Low ISO Processing (Detail Priority)

Already available

?

Setting changes and playback display while writing to card

Already available

?

Quick image selection

Already available

?

USB RAW Data Edit

?

?

Live ND shooting

Already available

Handheld High Res Shot

Already available

High-speed shooting: 120 fps (1920×1080/ MOV)

Already available

Bluetooth® connection

Already available

UHS-II compatible dual card slots

Already available

GPS® / Field Sensor System

Already available

USB power supply/battery charging

Already available

Multi Selector

Already available

Please visit the following URL for access to Olympus software and Digital Camera Updater: https://www.getolympus.com/us/en/software

Pricing and Availability

Firmware Version 3.0 for the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II, Firmware Version 1.1 for the Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Firmware Version 1.1 for Olympus Workspace are available at no charge as an ongoing value demonstrating Olympus’ commitment to continuous product improvements.

[1] May affect the number of sequential shots in normal sequential shooting priority modes.

[2] This new function makes RAW processing much faster by using the TruePic VIII image processor on the camera via USB connection. Olympus Workspace and the supported camera must both be updated with required firmware. The available editing options from Olympus Workspace are limited to RAW editing options that can be handled internally in the camera. Compatible models are OM-D E-M1X and OM-D E-M1 Mark II, and images are saved in JPEG format.

[3] Images must be shot with a lens that supports Focus Stacking.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Firmware upgrade brings features from Olympus’s E-M1X to the E-M1 Mark II

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review: Full-Frame King?

14 Jun

Moving from the APS-C to the full-frame world can be a very intimidating thing to do. After all, you’re going to spend a significant amount of money; money you have most likely been saving up for quite some time. There are so many options out there, and we know you want to pick a camera that will give the most Continue Reading

The post Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review: Full-Frame King? appeared first on Photodoto.


Photodoto

 
Comments Off on Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review: Full-Frame King?

Posted in Photography

 

How Mark Rothko’s Paintings Can Inspire Your Photography

18 Mar

The post How Mark Rothko’s Paintings Can Inspire Your Photography appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Megan Kennedy.

I first encountered a painting by Mark Rothko when I was a uni student, perusing the National Gallery of Australia. Seeking the wisdom of abstract expressionists like Lee Krasner, Clyfford Still and Hans Hofmann, I was somehow completely unaware of Rothko’s renowned canvases. So when I came across #20,1957 I was instantly mesmerized. In the reverent light of the gallery, the cells of the painting seemed to shift under my gaze, bleeding and retracting at once. And when I looked away, the after-image formed a striking hollow into the gallery surrounds.

I felt meditation and calm, but I also felt something I couldn’t quite put my finger on. The ineffable. #20,1957 was like nothing I’d ever come across before.

My reaction to the Rothko painting wasn’t unique. Audiences around the world have reported a deep emotional experience when viewing Rothko’s work. Rothko hoped that in viewing his paintings, others would be drawn into a deep meditative state, a state of vulnerability and receptivity that he himself entered into while creating his artworks.

Today, Rothko’s motivations and techniques continue to inform not only painting but visual arts as a whole.

Mark Rothko

Born in Dvinsk, Russia (now Daugavpils, Latvia) on September 25, 1903, Mark Rothko (born Marcus Rothkowitz) immigrated to the USA with his family in his youth. Inspired to take up art in the autumn of 1923, he began his artistic career painting urban life, portraits, nudes and landscapes. His portrayal of architectural space leaned on abstract compositional techniques, exploring the relationship between the painting and the viewer, an aspect that would play a critical role in his future works.

In the early 1940’s, Rothko shifted from painting the figurative to the symbolic, exploring themes such as prophecy, ancient myths, archaic ritual and the unconscious. Inspired by the surrealist method of automatic drawing, Rothko began to delve into more abstracted imagery, graduating almost entirely to abstraction by the late 1940’s. Unimpeded by the figurative or symbolic, Rothko stained the canvas with diluted oil paint, rendering shapes and forms with soft, indistinct edges, some outlined by luminous white halos.

Mark Rothko, No. 3 No. 13 1949, MOMA
No. 3 No.13, 1949 photo credit: Sharon Mollerus on Flickr

Rothko’s arrived at his signature style in the 1950’s. His expanses of graduated tones and ethereal light seemed to suspend vibratious squares and rectangles upon active planes of color. Toward the end of the 1950’s, Rothko began to paint in an increasingly darker, more restricted pallet.

Mark Rothko (1903-1970)
No. 9 (Dark over Light Earth/Violet and Yellow in Rose), 1954 photo credit: G. Starke on Flickr

In 1964, Rothko received a commission for a series of paintings for a non-denominational chapel in Huston, Texas – a space that was ideal for immersion in his stark, contemplative canvases. Unveiled in 1971, the paintings took 6 years to complete. However, sadly, Rothko never saw the culmination of the space. He committed suicide in his studio on February 25, 1970. He was 66.

Mark Rothko (1903-1970)
Black on Dark Sienna on Purple, 1960 photo credit: G. Starke  on Flickr

Making photos inspired by the art of Mark Rothko

Painting and photography are two different mediums, I know. There is a significant separation between the paintbrush and the camera (although there are some commonalities too). Creating photographic work inspired by Rothko’s paintings isn’t about mimicry, it’s about trying out different styles and techniques. While this article discusses ways to approach photography that reflects Rothko’s paintings, you don’t have to end up with an exact copy of Black on Dark Sienna on Purple, 1960 (I sure didn’t!).

Through the elements and principals of art and design, Rothko created work that communicates beyond seeing. Using the same principals, photographers can create work inspired by Rothko that challenges the viewer and plays with the concept of photography and visual arts.

Using color

When described solely as a colorist Rothko said, “if you are only moved by color relationships, you are missing the point.” Rothko used color as a path to realizing the unseen. Looking beyond the event of color as an optical phenomenon, Rothko constructed oscillating visions driven by our innate conceptions of color.

Like Rothko, photographers use color as a tool to convey an image beyond seeing. Our associations with color stem from experience and instinct. Emphasizing color over literal subject matter doesn’t just convey color relationships; it communicates emotion and ineffability.

Capturing photography imbued with color is simple enough, but may require a little exploration. Look for flat planes of solid or graduated color. Seemingly dull urban surfaces like doors, walls or panels come to life within the camera frame. Try to include as little objective evidence as possible, articulating the emotional charge of color without the disturbance of other visual detritus.

The color in this image breaks up space, conveying meaning through our inherent associations

Unfocused photography

Another way to exemplify color is through unfocused photography. Rothko created a visual vibration within his paintings by blurring the edges of his colors and forms. This effect can be re-imagined by unfocusing your camera lens (turn off Auto Focus first) before taking a photograph. Unfocused photography creates a painterly quality that emphasizes color over subject matter. Rather than taking pin-sharp photos, unfocused photography frees the edges of the components that make up a scene, creating a unique movement throughout the image.

Unfocused photography emphasizes color, creating a unique movement throughout the image

Rothko’s abstract expressionism

Although Rothko himself shrugged off classifications, his work is generally categorized as abstract expressionist. Developed in New York in the 1940’s, abstract expressionism refers to a movement of predominantly non-representative painters. Neither completely abstract nor completely expressionist, abstract expressionism encompassed a wide variety of styles and techniques. Overall however, the practitioners of abstract expressionism stood united in their desire to reinvent the nature of painting.

Abstract expressionism is understood today to be divided into two camps – the action painters and the color field painters. Considered a member of the latter, Rothko prioritized austere beds of color over the wild, diacritic mark. Rothko’s serene blocks generate an emotional aura predominately through shape, form, color and line. It’s these basic precepts that have translated into abstract photography.

Like abstract painting, abstract photography operates independently from depicting the objective. As a result, abstract photographers emphasize the non-objective, peeling back the literal to expose the bare bones of an image. Beyond language, abstraction investigates the visual, discards the literal and charges an image with potentiality.

Aerial photography cultivates abstraction through distance. Abstract macro photography closes in on a subject to reveal often unseen planes. Like Rothko’s paintings, what you exclude from a photograph is just as important as what you include. Turning your lens to strong shapes, forms, colors, textures and lines cultivates imagery that cuts through to the essence of visual language.

Abstract photography operates independently from depicting the objective

Movement

Through extensive layering, blending and blurring, Rothko manipulated hard-edged structures of color into stark, yet softly transcendent forms.

Intentional camera movement (ICM) uses the same principals of movement within a photograph. Through motion, ICM reduces a subject to shape, form, color, and line, creating an abstracted study of movement and light. Similar to painting, ICM involves the physical movement of the camera during an exposure. Also, like Rothko’s actions documented in the strokes of a brush, ICM creates an artwork that is visibly, inextricably linked to the experience of the photographer.

To take an ICM photograph, first, turn off autofocus and, if you have it, image stabilization. Set your camera to Shutter Priority, adjust your exposure time to around 1/2 of a second and turn your ISO down to the lowest setting on your camera. The longer your shutter speed, the more a subject will blur.

Point your camera at a subject, depress the shutter and physically move the camera. Once the shutter closes, review the result on your LCD screen. Your movement will register as blurred lines within the image.

The nature of ICM is that it is both simple and experimental – it takes some adjustment to perfect. Explore different combinations of subject matter, time of day, focus, shutter speed, aperture, and movement to create an image you’re happy with. Moreover, don’t forget to wear your camera strap!

Conclusion

Saying once that “the most interesting painting is one that expresses more of what one thinks than of what one sees,” Rothko shifted the way art is made and observed. Now, with the advent of digital photography, we have new ways to communicate visually.

However, Rothko’s reflections on the human spirit continue to resonate as a vital pause amongst visual loudness. Through his use of color, abstract expressionism and movement, Rothko’s work transcend artistic mediums, informing and inspiring contemporary practice today.

The post How Mark Rothko’s Paintings Can Inspire Your Photography appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Megan Kennedy.


Digital Photography School

 
Comments Off on How Mark Rothko’s Paintings Can Inspire Your Photography

Posted in Photography

 

Canon EOS RP vs EOS 6D Mark II: Which is right for you?

10 Mar

Introduction

Years back, Canon released the EOS 6D as its basic, ‘entry-level’ full frame DSLR to sit below the pro-oriented 5D-series. Not surprisingly, that was a recipe for success, with the 6D and follow-up 6D Mark II proving to be quite popular with all kinds of photographers.

But now we have the EOS RP, a new entry-level offering that is even more affordable and portable than the 6D’s that came before it. So how do they compare for various kinds of shooting? Here’s what we’ll be covering – click the link to hop straight to the section of your choice.

  • Travel
  • Video
  • Family and moments
  • Landscape
  • Candid and street
  • Sports

Travel

Canon EOS RP with EF 24mm F2.8 IS USM | ISO 100 |1/500sec | F7.1

Both cameras offer Wi-Fi and good JPEG image quality with pleasing color rendition right out of the box, a great combination for someone looking to share images on the fly. In-camera Raw processing is also offered by both cameras, making it easy to share photos from the road – no laptop required. GPS is offered in some form by both cameras (though we prefer the 6D II’s in-camera implementation over the RP’s use of smartphone location data) and selfie-takers can safely choose either camera as they both offer a screen that flips forward.

However, where battery life is concerned, the 6D II looks like the stronger option. There’s no getting around it – the RP is a mirrorless camera that draws a lot of power for constant Live View use, so its 250 shot CIPA rating is dwarfed by the 6D II’s rating of 1200 shots per charge. On the other hand, it’s not much of a burden to carry a couple of spare batteries for the RP as they’re smaller and lighter, and the camera supports USB charging where the 6D II doesn’t. Tack on the fact that the 6D II is weather-sealed whereas the RP offers no official claim of weather resistance and the 6D II keeps looking better and better.

Things swing back in the RP’s favor when you consider its incredibly compact size, even compared to the relatively light weight 6D II. But that advantage is somewhat reduced when you consider the RP’s native lens selection – right now the RF 35mm F1.8 is the best native option to keep size down. Adding an adapter and a smaller lens like the 50mm F1.8 STM or 24mm F2.8 IS doesn’t tack on too much extra bulk, but it’s not nothing. The RP still wins on compactness, but unless you’re happy shooting at 35mm until some more RF lenses come out, the camera’s small size isn’t as much of an advantage as it seems.

Video

See our full Canon EOS 6D Mark II sample reel

As far as headline video specifications go, the EOS RP stands ahead of the 6D II with 4K video recording (the 6D II tops out at 1080/60p). To be sure the RP’s 4K is heavily cropped, but it is 4K. The mirrorless camera also comes up with a headphone jack as well as a mic jack – the 6D II only offers a mic jack. It also comes with the inherent mirrorless advantage of offering video recording while using the EVF, which can be handy in bright light or for a little extra stabilization in a pinch. The RP’s 4K mode is also the only place you’ll find “cinematic” 24p recording between the two cameras.

Using a stabilized lens with either camera will yield the best results, as neither offers in-body stabilization. While digital IS creates smooth footage, it also sacrifices some detail. The 6D II and EOS RP also both provide fully articulated screens with face detection autofocus, a benefit for vloggers.

The 6D II does provide the advantage of more control over autofocus while recording video, offering adjustments to Movie Servo AF speed and tracking sensitivity – both missing from the RP.

Family and moments

Canon EOS RP with RF 35mm F1.8 IS STM | ISO 1000 | 1/80sec | F1.8

The EOS RP introduces a new feature for Canon that will be particularly handy for photographers looking to capture candid moments: Pupil Detection in Servo AF. In our experience so far it’s not quite as impressive as Sony’s freaky-good Eye AF, but will do a good job of identifying and focusing on an eye without intervention from the user.

The RP’s compact size could be another benefit to family photographers who tend to chuck their camera into a packed bag or purse. As we saw when looking at using these cameras for travel, the size advantage of the RP is compromised once you attach an adapter and any sort of zoom lens to the camera. The RF 35mm F1.8 does keep things more compact, but you’ve really got to like 35mm if that’s the deciding factor for you.

Canon’s great JPEG image quality and color is a real bonus

The RP’s much lower battery life is another significant drawback here, since you’ll be more likely to run out of juice at an inconvenient time. But the good news is that its USB charging means you can re-charge it in the car, or top up the battery with the same kind of portable battery you may already carry for your phone.

Both cameras provide handy ‘tap to track’ functionality in live view, making it easier to focus on what you want. And we’ll say it again – Canon’s great JPEG image quality and color is a real bonus if you don’t want to fuss with photos too much before sending them out to the world.

Landscapes

Canon EOS RP with EF 24mm F2.8 IS USM | ISO 100 | 1/400sec | F7.1

We can’t say that the either the 6D II or the RP would be among our top recommendations for landscape shooters. Other options with more resolution and dynamic range will likely suit serious landscape photographers better. If that’s not your sole priority, both of these cameras would serve the casual landscape shooter just fine on travels or hikes, and their image quality will be roughly the same.

The 6D II’s robust battery life is a big plus in this category if you plan to spend a good deal of time away from a power source and don’t fancy carrying extra batteries. Another point in favor of the DSLR: weather-sealing. The 6D II is designed to handle the elements better than the RP, and that can make a big difference when you’re halfway into a hike and the weather rolls in.

Both cameras offer fully articulated screens to facilitate composing shots from low angles or working on a tripod

For obvious reasons, size and weight are real concerns for photographers who will carry gear along on hikes or all-day excursions. Again, the RP would seem to have an advantage here but current native RF lenses are quite large and few in number. Adding an adapter to the kit isn’t a huge amount of extra weight or bulk, but if every bit of space in your bag counts, it’s something to consider.

Both cameras offer fully articulated screens to facilitate composing shots from low angles or working on a tripod. Both cameras also provide a means of recording your location via GPS – the 6D II offers it in camera while the RP requires use of Canon’s smartphone app.

Overall, both cameras supply features that will certainly be appreciated by photographers who shoot landscapes among other things, but we’d hesitate to recommend either just for that purpose.

Candid and street

Canon EOS 6D Mark II with EF 24-105mm F4L IS II USM | ISO 1000 | 1/500sec | F8

Both the RP and 6D II offer a number of features that would appeal to a street photographer looking to keep a low profile and capture the decisive moment. Both offer great-looking JPEGs and a flip-out screen to aid shooting from the hip (paired with Canon’s excellent Dual Pixel AF). Unfortunately, neither camera truly offers silent shooting – it’s not available on the 6D II and the RP offers it as a scene mode without exposure controls.

There’s not much between the two cameras in terms of size either, once you account for the adapter you’ll almost certainly need (for now) on the RP. Both of these options also offer wireless connectivity for easy image sharing.

As we cautioned landscape-oriented folks, the limited dynamic range that the RP and 6D II offer may be of concern to some street photographers. If you’d like some flexibility in pushing shadows then you may want to look elsewhere, but between the two cameras neither presents a significantly better feature set for street photographers.

Sports and action

Canon EOS 6D II and 70-200mm F4L @ 200mm | ISO 1250 | 1/1250 sec | F4

For sports and other fast-moving subjects, the 6D II and EOS RP trade punches back and forth. Generally speaking, mid-to-low-end EOS cameras with Dual Pixel autofocus haven’t handled fast-moving distant subjects very well. The 6D II offers an advantage here with its optical viewfinder and traditional AF system, which does a better job on distant subjects if you choose your own AF point, and you may find it easier to follow your subjects with the optical viewfinder than the EVF on the RP.

On the other hand, the RP offers the better subject tracking experience with viewfinder shooting, considering that it can use Dual Pixel with the EVF. Canon’s optical viewfinder tracking AF experience leaves something to be desired. On the other other hand, you get faster viewfinder burst rates with the 6D II (though you get faster Live View burst speeds on the RP). To the RP’s credit, it has a bigger buffer and offers CRaw to save you some storage space if you’re shooting Raw in burst mode.

One important point that you won’t find any spec sheet is how comfortable the camera will be in the hand for long periods of time. In our opinion, the 6D II is way ahead of the RP in this department. The DSLR will be better balanced with heavier lenses and offers a bigger, more comfortable grip. An add-on grip can be purchased for the RP to help things somewhat, but for our money, the 6D II is the one we’d rather hold on to for hours at a time.

Which one is right for you?

The Canon EOS RP and 6D Mark II share much of the same DNA when it comes to image quality, but their feature sets and implementations are still quite different. The 6D II provides the familiar comforts of a DSLR: robust battery life, a comfortable grip and plentiful lens options.

The RP brings many of the trappings of a modern mirrorless camera, including (decent) 4K video and use of Canon’s very good Dual Pixel AF system with the built-in viewfinder. But as it often does, the choice may come down to the lenses. It’s very early days for the RF mount, and the first lenses available for it are some real stunners, but they don’t seem particularly well matched the RP’s price point and target audience unless you really love shooting 35mm.

But even given the lack of native lenses, we tend to recommend the EOS RP over the 6D II for most use-cases. Experienced photographers may scoff, but for amateurs and even enthusiasts, the ability to see your exposure, white balance and get a better idea of critical focus with the RP’s full-time Live View on the rear screen or EVF will help you get more keepers more often. Plus, the RP’s full-time touchscreen controls are among the best in the business, and make up somewhat for the lesser amount of buttons compared to the 6D II.

Only you can choose what is best for you; the 6D II is the undisputed winner regarding its build quality, battery life and beefy grip. But for most people, we think the RP will be a better – and, dare we say, more ‘fun’ – photographic companion.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Canon EOS RP vs EOS 6D Mark II: Which is right for you?

Posted in Uncategorized