RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Mark’

Motorcycle photographer Mark ‘Kato’ Kariya talks gear

29 Jan

California native Mark ‘Kato’ Kariya has been shooting motorsports for more than 30 years, during which time he’s used countless cameras, lenses and bags. Recently he’s been working with Lowepro’s new range of ‘ProTactic AW II’ camera backpacks, designed for use in tough conditions. We spoke to him about his career, his gear, and his tips for successful motorsports photography.


What’s your background?

I grew up in rural Southern California, where my family grows oranges and avocados. I’ve been riding motorcycles since I was nine because that’s how we checked the sprinklers every morning and afternoon – a Honda 90 trail bike fits between the trees easily and it’s a lot faster than walking! I worked on the high school yearbook as a photographer in my junior and senior years, and I joined the Daily Trojan newspaper when I was at USC, where I got my BA in journalism.

After graduating, I figured I’d end up on a daily paper somewhere but instead I started covering local motocross races for Cycle News – a weekly publication centered heavily on race coverage. A year after graduating, Cycle News offered me a job as a staff editor, which was a dream melding of being in the motorcycle industry and using my degree.

After two years at CN, my former editor offered me a staff position at a new magazine he was starting called Dirt Rider. I accepted and stayed there for almost 15 years before going freelance in the late 90s, specializing in event coverage as well as photo shoots for various race teams and, on occasion, manufacturers.

How did you get your start in photography?

Upon graduating eighth grade we were asked what we wanted to do when we grew up. I had no idea! The first thing that popped into mind was photographer so I went with that. I took a basic photo class at a junior college one summer, but other than that, I learned by seeing what others were doing and figuring things out for myself.


Mark Kariya portfolio gallery

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_0363762435″,”galleryId”:”0363762435″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

What’s your ideal way of working?

It depends on the job. Even for race coverage, it varies. At some races, I can get by with hiking around to various shoot locations and get different types of shots. At other races, it really helps being able to ride to locations, usually on the course before the race starts, though this limits the equipment I can take. Then there are races like the Baja 1000 where there’s so much distance between locations that I drive my truck to various access points off the highway.

It just depends on what the client wants. If I’m shooting at a track or somewhere I don’t have to go too far, I can bring more equipment and hike around while sometimes the client wants a more remote location so I ride with a backpack to carry what I can.

What’s your perfect camera bag?

There’s no perfect bag. Each type of job seems to require a different bag depending on what equipment’s needed. I usually use one bag as a travel bag because it’ll carry most of the stuff I’ll need and fits underneath the seat in front of me or in the overhead of most larger commercial airliners (Boeing 737 Airbus A321 and larger, for the most part). For the smaller regional jets, it can get a little tricky; most of the time my travel bag will fit underneath the seat in front. The hard case/trunk for a 400mm F2.8 or 200-400mm F4 will fit in either spot on big and small jets.

What’s the most important factor for you, when it comes to gear?

As I cover a lot of desert races, dust is a huge issue so I try to stay upwind whenever possible. If it’s not dusty, then it’ll likely be muddy and rainy. Due to the harsh environments off-road motorcycle races are held in, I need my gear to be rugged as well as easily portable. I always use two of the same camera bodies and am currently running Nikon D5s as my primaries with a D4 as a third when required.

You don’t want to expose the sensor or other internals so I’ll typically leave lenses on the cameras all day, with the 17-35mm F2.8 on one body (always with a a Speedlight SB-900 or 910 on it for fill) and 70-200mm F2.8 on the other. If I think there’s going to be a situation where multiple lights might be called for, I’ll also carry two extra lights; the last of my SB-800s just died so I’m trying to get SB-5000s dialed in.


Mark’s top tips for motorsports photography:

  1. Know your equipment and what all the different buttons and settings are, something that only comes from reading the manual.

  2. Study the work of photographers you admire and figure out what makes their shots stand out for you.

  3. You’re not always going to be in a place with the best action so at least make sure the shots are technically excellent (in focus, properly exposed, composed well).

  4. Experiment with different settings, locations and equipment (one thing I’ve learned is my bodies produce the best color when I’m underexposing by anywhere from 0 to 1.7 EV depending on ambient light and where the sun is).

  5. Since everyone wears helmets you won’t be able to photograph the emotion associated with racing unless you shoot people shots (spectators, mechanics or racers after the event like on the podium or in their pit area).

How are you finding the LowePro ProTactic II bags?

I’m using the prototype BP 450 AW II that we used for the intro video and it is far superior to the kind of generic backpack I’d been using for 20 years. It’ll accept the two bodies with lenses attached that are my go-to’s with little more required than turning the lens hoods around. When I find a shoot location, I hop off the bike, take the ProTactic off, put it on the ground and unzip the rear panel. Easy! I haven’t needed to access gear through the side doors yet, though I appreciate their availability.

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_9978621535″,”galleryId”:”9978621535″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

I like how the ProTactic is a dedicated camera bag so the internal dividers are movable, allowing me to arrange things as I need to, and its padding provides a bit more protection from the elements (dust and mud, usually) and crashes, which happen occasionally when I run out of talent.

What advice would you give someone who wants to get into motorsports photography?

it’s very difficult to get trackside access for auto races, at least in the US. Dirt bike races are easier, except for the professional Supercross or motocross Nationals, flat track and road races – those are treated like car races as far as credentialing is concerned. But accessing the course for off-road motorcycle races is much easier. Contact the promoter/organizer a week or two before the race to see what’s needed. Even if you can’t get trackside, you can usually still get some nice shots from the fence.

Watch the way the light changes throughout the day and don’t ignore what’s in the background. Use everything you can environmentally to enhance your shot. If you’re just getting into race shots, fast shutter speeds like 1/1000 and higher are ‘safer’ and will let you get a higher percentage of good shots. I’m old school so I still try to keep my ISO as low as possible.

Once you get fairly comfortable capturing good action, experiment with different settings, from shutter speeds to white balance (again, keeping an eye on environmental factors).

Learn more about the Lowepro ProTactic range of bags and accessories


This is sponsored content, created by Vitec. What does this mean?

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Motorcycle photographer Mark ‘Kato’ Kariya talks gear

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Olympus announces limited edition OM-D E-M1 Mark II camera to celebrate 100th anniversary

24 Jan

In addition to a barrage of other products launched earlier today, Olympus has also unveiled a limited edition Silver OM-D E-M1 Mark II to commemorate Olympus’ 100th anniversary.

As tends to be the case with many limited edition cameras, nothing changes on the inside. This special edition OM-D E-M1 Mark II still features the same 20.4-megapixel MOS sensor with Olympus’ TruePic VIII image processor to power it all. Also identical to the standard version is the 5-axis image stabilization.

The special edition OM-D E-M1 Mark II will be limited to only 2,000 units worldwide and is set to ship in February 2019 for $ 1.699.99 USD and $ 1,999.99 CAD.

OLYMPUS ANNOUNCES LIMITED EDITION

OM-D® E-M1 MARK II SILVER

2,000 Units Available Worldwide in Commemoration of Olympus’ 100th Anniversary

CENTER VALLEY, PA., January 24, 2019 – Olympus is pleased to announce a special edition of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II, the OM-D E-M1 Mark II Silver. This limited edition model, of which only 2,000 units will be available worldwide, will be available at the end of February 2019, in commemoration of Olympus’ 100th anniversary.

From Olympus President Hiroyuki Sasa:
We are sincerely grateful to all customers and other stakeholders who have supported Olympus since its founding 100 years ago. Being true to our purpose of “making people’s lives healthier, safer, and more fulfilling,” we shall continue to contribute to photographic culture and deliver the joy of capturing and expressing special moments to photography lovers worldwide.

TruePic VIII Image Processor and 20.4 Megapixel Live MOS Sensor
The OM-D E-M1 Mark II features the TruePic VIII Image Processor, which makes it possible to capture images with minimal noise while retaining details. Furthermore, the 20.4 Megapixel Live MOS sensor with 121 points of cross-type on-chip phase detection improves resolution without the need for a low-pass filter. This synergy maintains the full 20.4 Megapixel image while offering up to 18 fps high-speed sequential shooting performance in AF/AE tracking. It also enhances gradation through pixel characteristic improvement for a wide dynamic range that rivals that of cameras with larger sized APS-C sensors. Pro Capture Mode is also included and allows lag-free shooting of split-second moments as full resolution images, attaining both high-speed and excellent image quality.

In-Body 5-Axis Image Stabilization
The OM-D E-M1 Mark II is equipped with built-in 5-Axis Image Stabilization to compensate for camera shake. Through an optimized correction algorithm, this model boasts 5.5 shutter speed steps of compensation performance. Furthermore, when combined with an M.Zuiko lens containing in-lens image stabilization2, 5-Axis Sync IS provides up to 6.5 shutter speed steps of compensation performance for hand-held shooting capabilities.

A Compact, Lightweight, Durable System Offering Unparalleled Reliability
The OM-D E-M1 Mark II features sealing throughout the camera for a highly reliable dustproof, splashproof and freezeproof (14°F / -10°C) design so that the camera performs even in the harshest outdoor conditions, such as snow or rain.

Premium Silver Body
The OM-D E-M1 Mark II is a dependable camera that meets the needs of the professional photographer and is capable of shooting in the harshest of environments. The black body embraces functional beauty while the new silver body provides a classic, quality camera look.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Olympus announces limited edition OM-D E-M1 Mark II camera to celebrate 100th anniversary

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Kickstarter: ONDU Mark III pinhole cameras — all 19 — have magnetic shutter, filters

03 Nov

Pinhole photography might be one of the most primitive forms of photography, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be improved with the help of a little innovation. Pinhole camera company ONDU is back at it again with a new collection of third-generation pinhole cameras, including 135, 120, medium format, and large format options.

The pinhole camera collection, which consists of 19 individual cameras and is officially named the ONDU Mark III series, manages to pack in a slew of features and add-ons to take pinhole photography to the next level.

The cameras are constructed of precision milled parts, the most important of which are CNC milled. “The parts where most wear and tear happen are made either of CNC milled aluminium or steel,” says ONDU on its campaign page. The overall build quality has improved and the winding knobs in particular have become more robust and easier to turn.

The shutter on the ONDU Mark III series cameras has been completely redesigned as well. Deemed “the perfect shutter” by ONDU, the magnetic shutter has a smooth, shake-free sliding mechanism that makes it easy to capture quick exposures when needed. It even has a built-in clicking sound “for fidgeting sake.” A secondary shutter has also been added to the 120 format version so you can use the 135 converter kit to shoot 35mm film inside the medium format version, complete with sprocket exposure.

The most impressive feature is the integrated filter option. ONDU said it was one of the most requested features from past ONDU users and now it’s available. By integrating magnets inside the camera itself, ONDU has managed to create a simple snap-on filter that works with ND filters, IR film and color filters for black and white photography.

As previously mentioned, there are 19 different cameras that are part of the ONDU Mark III series. Pledges start at $ 98 for the basic 135 pocket version and go up to $ 250 for the incredible 6×17 120 format camera. To find out more information and to make your pledge, head on over to the Kickstarter campaign. There are 25 days to go and the campaign has already more than doubled its $ 20,000 goal.

Disclaimer: Remember to do your research with any crowdfunding project. DPReview does its best to share only the projects that look legitimate and come from reliable creators, but as with any crowdfunded campaign, there’s always the risk of the product or service never coming to fruition.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Kickstarter: ONDU Mark III pinhole cameras — all 19 — have magnetic shutter, filters

Posted in Uncategorized

 

LensRentals tears down Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 Mark III and Mark II

01 Sep

LensRentals Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 Mark III and Mark II teardown

When Canon announced the EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS III USM earlier this summer, the company was pretty open about the fact that it was a minor upgrade to its predecessor, featuring tweaked coatings and a new finish, but the same optical-mechanical formula.

Never ones to take a press release at face value (and since repairing lenses is a big part of their job) Roger Cicala and the team at LensRentals opened the lenses up to see whether Canon made any hidden changes. Not to spoil the surprise, but what they found… wasn’t a surprise.

All images courtesy of LensRentals, and used with permission.

LensRentals tears down Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 Mark III and Mark II

The new Mark III version of the 70-200mm F2.8 is indeed optically and mechanically identical to the older Mark II. In Roger’s words: “If you think there’s an optical or performance difference, please contact me about some Tennessee Beach-front property I have for sale.”

But that doesn’t mean that they’re not optically and mechanically interesting lenses. According to Roger, the various versions of the Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 are possibly the most popular lenses that the company has in their loan stock, but because they’re so complex, internally “the 70-200mm f/2.8 is […] one of the ugliest bits of engineering in the Canon fleet”

LensRentals tears down Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 Mark III and Mark II

If the containing tape in the last photograph didn’t give it away, the camera-side internals of the 70-200mm F2.8 II/III are something of a rats nest of fragile ribbon connectors, wires and PCBs. “Not much fun to work with” says Roger, and we believe him.

LensRentals tears down Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 Mark III and Mark II

This shot shows the rear group (being lifted off) connected by one remaining ribbon to the image stabilization unit. The rear group acts as a single centering element, making it “a bit of a pain to adjust”, requiring repeated adjustment, reassembly, more adjustment, reassembly (again) and so on, until it’s correctly aligned.

LensRentals tears down Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 Mark III and Mark II

Here’s the IS unit, removed from the main lens barrel. The tweezers indicate one of the four posts that stop the IS unit from moving around too much inside the lens. To avoid damage to the IS unit during travel or shipping, Roger recommends turning IS off when the lens is still on the camera. Otherwise the element won’t lock and these plastic posts are the only things stopping the lens from banging around freely inside the barrel.

LensRentals tears down Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 Mark III and Mark II

Two layers of weather-sealing tape (which the LensRentals team tells us is pretty much the same material as this stuff) protects the 70-200mm’s front group, and helps prevent water ingress. This is how the LensRentals team gets access to the front element of the 70-200mm, which they have to do a lot, to replace scratched front elements, get rid of dust and make optical adjustments.

So is the new Mark III version worth upgrading to? We’re not convinced, and neither are Roger and his team. Both are excellent lenses, and if you can find a Mark II for a good price, go for it.

For more details – and a lot more images – read the full blog post at LensRentals.com.

Read the full tear-down at LensRentals

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on LensRentals tears down Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 Mark III and Mark II

Posted in Uncategorized

 

What you need to know about Panasonic’s LX100 Mark II

23 Aug

Hands-on with the Panasonic DC-LX100 II

Up until now, the Panasonic LX100 has been one of those cameras for which people have been long awaiting a successor – the Ricoh GR II is another example. While a GR III has yet to arrive, the LX100 II is here.

Panasonic hasn’t messed with success here, keeping the design, lens and trademark multi-aspect feature the same, while improving image quality and usability via a new sensor and touchscreen LCD, respectively.

Here’s a look at what’s changed – and what hasn’t – on Panasonic’s LX100 II enthusiast compact.

17MP from a 20MP Four Thirds sensor

The biggest improvement on the LX100 II is its new Four Thirds sensor, borrowed from the GX9 mirrorless camera. On the GX9 you get an effective resolution of 20.3MP, but on the LX100 II you only ever get to use a cropped region, giving you up to 17MP.

That’s because the LX100 II retains the hallmark feature that traces back to the DMC-LX3: the ability to shoot at multiple aspect ratios without changing the diagonal field of view. Whether you’re at 3:2, 16:9 or 4:3 ratio, the wide end of the lens will always be 24mm equiv. The aspect ratio can be quickly changed using a switch just behind the lens control ring, which makes it more likely that people will use this feature.

While we’re yet to test the LX100 II, you can get a feel for what its sensor can do by viewing the GX9 studio scene. Besides the increased resolution, Panasonic says that the LX100 II’s JPEG color rendering is improved, and based on some samples we’ve seen and our experience with the company’s recent models, that appears to be the case.

24-75mm equiv. F1.7-2.8 lens

Keeping with the ‘why mess with success’ theme, the lens on the LX100 II is the same as on its predecessor, and that’s good news. This is one of the fastest lenses on an enthusiast compact, with a maximum aperture range of F1.7-2.8 through its 24-75mm equiv. focal range. The lens has a total of 11 elements, including two aspherical ED and five ‘regular’ aspherical.

The advantage of having a large sensor and fast lens means that the LX100’s equivalent aperture is consistently 1/2 to 2/3-stop faster than its competitors. The benefits of that are more control over depth-of-field and less need to increase the ISO, since more light is reaching the sensor, helping to keep noise levels lower.

Direct controls

If you want a camera with traditional controls, the LX100 II is it. No more pressing buttons to change the aperture, shutter speed or exposure compensation – as with the original LX100, there are dedicated dials for each of those on the camera. The control ring around the lens can be used for adjusting other things besides focus, including zoom, ISO and white balance.

Panasonic has added more customizable buttons on the LX100 II, with a total of five physical and five on-screen. If you can think of the setting, you can probably assign to one of those buttons.

LCD and EVF

The electronic viewfinder on the LX100 II is the same as the one on the original model. It has an equivalent resolution of 2.76 million dots, which sounds high, but it isn’t really any better than a typical 2.36M-dot EVF, since it uses a field sequential system. Some people find field sequential displays irritating due to color tearing, which creates a ‘rainbow effect’ when you blink or pan the camera. The EVF has an equivalent magnification of 0.70x, which is quite large for an enthusiast compact.

The 3″ LCD has received some notable improvements. First, the resolution has been bumped from 0.92 million to 1.24 million dots. More importantly, it’s now a touchscreen, and Panasonic’s touch features are some of the best. They include touch-to-focus, menu navigation, image review, pinch-to-zoom and Touchpad AF. This last feature lets you use your thumb to adjust the focus point with your eye to the finder. A tab on the side of the screen holds five additional customizable ‘soft’ buttons.

4K video

As you might expect from a Panasonic, the LX100 II offers 4K video capture. This comes in the popular 16:9 UHD aspect ratio and shoots at up to 30 frames per second. A 43mm filter thread on the front of the lens allows the use of screw-on ND filters.

Sadly, the use of the processor from the GX9 means this footage is taken from a native 3840 x 2160 pixel crop of the sensor. This not only narrows the camera’s field-of-view to give a roughly 32-100mm equiv lens range, but also means using a slightly smaller sensor region than the 1″-type sensor found in rivals such as the RX100 V. Video quality, particularly in low light, will be reduced accordingly.

Video is limited to 15 minutes per clip to protect against overheating.

Special effects

The original LX100 has received the latest Photo Styles added on other modern Panasonic cameras. The one that stands out is L.Monochrome D, which is a high contrast black and white mode. If you wish, you can add a film grain effect that is quite convincing, as it uses a pseudo random pattern.

The 4K Photo feature has also been updated with the Auto Marking, Sequence Composition, Post Focus and Focus Stacking features.

For the first two, the camera captures a short video clip which is broken up into 8MP stills. Auto Marking looks for areas with a lot of motion, which it considers the interesting part of the burst. You can jump to those moments quickly using the touchscreen or dials. Sequence Composition lets you select stills from the 4K Photo burst and combine them into a single image, like so.

Post Focus and Focus Stacking work in a slightly different way. The camera again takes a short 4K video, this time scanning the entire focus range. Post Focus lets you pick the area that you want in focus, while Focus Stacking combines frames to bring the entire image into focus.

However, since these modes all come from the camera’s 4K capability, they’re all subject to the same significant crop (and consequent loss in quality).

Performance and Ports

Panasonic has provided the LX100 II with additional buffer memory, allowing it to take up to 33 Raws in a row, compared to 9 shots on the LX100. The burst rate remains the same: 11 fps with AE and AF locked, and 5.5 fps with continuous autofocus.

The LX100 II continues to use Depth from Defocus contrast-detect autofocus, which has proven itself to be responsive and reliable. We’ll see how it perform when we review the camera.

Despite having 4K video capability, the only two ports on the camera are for USB and HDMI. No external mic socket here, much less a headphone socket for monitoring audio.

Bluetooth and Batteries

The LX100 had Wi-Fi and the LX100 II offers Bluetooth as well, for a constant connection between smartphone and camera. The Panasonic Image App has an ‘Easy Remote Control’ which will wake up the camera for you, and it can also take advantage of Bluetooth to automatically transfer photos you’ve taken.

The DMW-BLG10 battery is the same on both the LX100 I/II. Battery life is up by about 10% compared to the original model to 340 shots/charge, which is good for an enthusiast compact.

Included external flash

There’s absolutely no room on the LX100 II for a built-in flash, so Panasonic includes a compact external flash. The flash has a guide number of 10 meters (33 feet) at the camera’s base ISO of 200 but cannot be redirected or bounced. If you want a more powerful or flexible flash, Panasonic has a couple of options available.

Wrap-up

The Panasonic DC-LX100 Mark II’s impressive combination of a large sensor and fast, 24-75mm equiv. lens makes it an appealing enthusiast compact. It’s not pocket-sized like the RX100 V and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II, but that’s the trade-off for the sensor and lens.

The LX100 II will be available in October at a price of $ 999. That’s the same price as the Sony RX100 V and $ 100 more than the MSRP of the original LX100, by the way.

Look for a full review of the LX100 II in the not-too-distant future.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on What you need to know about Panasonic’s LX100 Mark II

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Canon EOS 6D Mark II firmware 1.0.4 update fixes ‘rare’ operational bugs

12 Jul

Canon has released firmware update 1.0.4 for the EOS 6D Mark II, adding important bug fixes for “rare instances” of issues with the touch panel and operation buttons. The update, which is available from Canon’s support website here, is about 30MB in size and includes the following changelog:

Firmware Version 1.0.4 incorporates the following fixes:

1. Corrects a phenomenon in which in rare instances, the operation buttons and some touch panel functions do not respond.

Via: CanonRumors

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Canon EOS 6D Mark II firmware 1.0.4 update fixes ‘rare’ operational bugs

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Aurora Aperture doubles up on its new PowerXND Mark II VND filters

14 Jun

Back in 2016, Aurora Aperture took its first foray into the photography filter world with the launch of its PowerXND 2000 variable neutral density (ND) filter. Now, it’s back at it again on Kickstarter with the launch of a pair of updated PowerXND Mark II filters.

Unlike its first filter, the PowerXND Mark II comes in two varieties: the PowerXND-II 128, which covers one to seven stops of light, and the PowerXND-II 2000, which covers from five to eleven stops of light.

By splitting the coverage into two filters, you now have the entire range from one stop of light reduction, all the way up to eleven stops, with a bit of overlap in-between.

Profiles of the new (left) and original (right) filters.

At the request of users, Aurora Aperture has added more aggressive knurling to the rings, direct reading scales and hard stops to its PowerXND Mark II filters, both of which should help dial in the proper exposure every time. Despite the changes in design, the PowerXND Mark II filters still measure in at just 6mm deep.

4K video screen shot

The filters are constructed of Schott B270 glass and a polarization film from Nitto Denko, which are combined with a proprietary polishing process. Aurora Aperture also adds ‘multilayer nano coatings’ on the elements to protect the elements from debris and reduce color shifting. The frames are CNC-milled from ‘aerospace grade aluminum’ and anodized black for corrosion protection.

Filters can be purchased for the following filter thread sizes: 37mm, 39mm, 40.5mm, 43mm, 46mm, 49mm, 52mm, 55mm, 58mm, 62mm, 67mm, 72mm, 77mm, 82mm, 86mm, 95mm, 105mm and 150mm.

The Kickstarter has already surpassed its $ 15,000 goal. Pledges start at $ 45, which will get you one small (37-46mm) 128 or 2000 filter and go up incrementally from there depending on the size and quantity of filters you need. Aurora Aperture expects the first filters to ship by September 2018.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Aurora Aperture doubles up on its new PowerXND Mark II VND filters

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Letter from the reviews editor: Pentax K-1 Mark II studio scene re-shoot

01 Jun

Introduction

Back on May 7, we published our review of the Pentax K-1 Mark II. For our studio scene analysis we used the SMC Pentax-D FA 50mm F2.8 Macro lens, rather than the SMC Pentax-FA 77mm F1.8 Limited that we’d used for the original K-1 review. This isn’t ideal (we try to shoot our studio scene as close to 85mm as we can, on full-frame bodies) but we did this because after some comparison tests, we found that the 50mm F2.8 was slightly sharper than our copy of the 77mm in the central portion of the frame, and that’s where we’re looking when we draw our conclusions.

While the center looked better, as many of you noticed, the top right corner of the scene shot with the 50mm F2.8 was soft; softer than the same area in images shot with the K-1. However, given the sharper central area (and the lack of a better sample of the 77mm at the time), we opted to publish the review regardless, since we don’t draw any sharpness or resolution conclusions from the edges of our studio scene.

Unfortunately, after the review was published we discovered a processing error with one of the K-1 II’s studio files, taken at ISO 12,800. This was swapped out, with an editors’ note added as soon as we became aware of it. More seriously, we also discovered that the K-1 Mark II’s JPEG profile had been incorrectly set to ‘Auto’. This resulted in differences in color and saturation compared to the K-1, which had been set correctly to the default: ‘Bright’.

See the updated K-1 Mark II
image quality page

Upon considering the cumulative effect of these differences, we spoke to Ricoh, who were kind enough to send us a second K-1 II, a K-1 and a hand-picked 77mm F1.8 Limited, so that we could re-shoot. Now that we’ve had a chance to compare the results of both cameras with the new 77mm F1.8 (which is noticeably sharper than the lens with which we originally tested the K-1), I wanted to share our findings with you.

The re-shoot and the results

First and most notably, it’s still clear that the accelerator unit in the K-1 Mark II is applying noise reduction to Raw files that the user cannot disable or remove. At high ISO values this still results in a loss of detail and contrast and the introduction of artifacts, but we have to acknowledge that a portion of our assessments were based on the incorrectly processed ISO 12,800 file. Our impression of JPEG color has also improved markedly as a result of using the correct ‘Bright’ profile.

As a result, we have adjusted both our scoring and some of the wording throughout the review to reflect this. It’s important to note that scoring and our overall assessment of the camera are not significantly changed, though; here’s why.

Most notably, it’s still clear the K-1 Mark II is applying noise reduction to Raw files

Despite the two-year gap between them, the K-1 Mark II still represents a minor upgrade over the K-1. Yes, you can now choose ISO 819,200, but the quality and therefore the utility of this setting is questionable. Autofocus tracking is improved, but still uncompetitive. Noise reduction in Raw does reduce visible grain at high ISO values, but its value to demanding users of such a high-end, high-res camera who are likely to want complete control over their images strikes us as suspect. The K-1 II’s lagging video capabilities look increasingly amiss in today’s market, and lastly, the Dynamic (hand held) Pixel Shift does not actually align images moved by a single pixel, instead approximating a super resolution technique that’s been around for years.

Read the full Pentax K-1 II review

All of this is certainly not to say the K-1 Mark II is a bad camera. Both the K-1 II and its predecessor are built like tanks, come with a bevy of unique features and are capable of absolutely outstanding image quality. We aim to give credit where credit is due, but as always, our first obligation is to help photographers spend their hard-earned money wisely. The fact remains that, despite our reassessment of the K-1 II’s image quality and JPEG color in particular, there are many ways in which the K-1 Mark II is simply outclassed by the competition.

Because of this, it’s still difficult for us to recommend the K-1 Mark II over competing models, and still difficult to recommend existing K-1 users pay $ 500 for the upgrade.

The final word

In the end, we are beholden to our readers and endeavor to hold all information that we publish on DPReview to the highest standards of accuracy. We fell short of that goal in this instance, and I apologize wholeheartedly for that. I hope that in fixing our mistakes with the K-1 Mark II, we’ve provided some additional and useful value to our review. We will take what we’ve learned from this experience to improve our future reviews in the hopes that we can continue to provide the most detailed and useful photography content on the internet.

As always, thanks for reading.

Carey

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Letter from the reviews editor: Pentax K-1 Mark II studio scene re-shoot

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Review of Metabones Adapter Mark V – Canon EF to Sony E-Mount

25 Apr

For Canon shooters thinking about switching to Sony mirrorless cameras, the Metabones adapter is often suggested to help with the transition. Lens mount adapters are often frowned upon as they historically have had limited functionality, such as no autofocus and simply not working well or consistently.

But this latest generation of lens adapters is pretty impressive, offering nearly all of the same features that you would get with a native Sony lens. Here’s my take on the Metabones Adapter Mark V, as used with select Canon EF lenses and a Sony A7rIII and Sony a6300.

Review of Metabones Adapter Mark V - Canon EF to Sony E-Mount

Product Specifications

The Metabones Canon EF to Sony E Mount Smart Adapter Mark V officially debuted in July 2017. It’s all black and made of metal. Compared to previous generation adapters, the Mark V adds three key features:

  1. A dedicated on/off switch for SteadyShot (IBIS)
  2. Rubber gasket weather seals to protect the E-mount connection
  3. An indicator light for basic/advanced modes

Other features offered by the Metabones V include:

  • Fast contrast-detection and phase-detect autofocus
  • Eye autofocus (!!)
  • Powered by camera body (no external power source needed)
  • Support of image stabilization lenses
  • Auto “APS-C Size Capture” on full-frame cameras

Currently, theMetabones Adapter Mark V can be purchased for $ 399 USD.

Review of Metabones Adapter Mark V - Canon EF to Sony E-Mount

Here you see the adapter mounting a Canon EF lens onto a Sony body.

Metabones V Compatibility

Since there are lots of different cameras and lenses out there, so it’s difficult to verify that the Metabones V adapter will work in every case. The Metabones website has a long list of cameras and lenses that should be compatible with this adapter. In this case, the Metabones V adapter worked with the following setups:

  • Sony A7rIII and Sony A6300 camera bodies
  • Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 II
  • Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 II
  • Canon 16-35mm f/1.8 II
  • Canon 50mm f/1.8
  • Canon 35mm f/1.4
  • Canon 85mm f/1.8
  • Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro

Metabones V Canon EF Sony E-Mount adapter

What works well

It works as advertised

I tested the Metabones V adapter primarily with the Sony A7rIII and Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 II, as this is my preferred shooting setup. For comparison with how autofocus would function on a native Sony lens, I also shot with the Zeiss 55mm f/1.8 and Sony 24-240mm lenses.

While testing the adapter, I was blown away by the autofocus system’s speed and accuracy when using my Canon 24-70mm. Not only could I use most of the autofocus settings on the camera (with the exception of Zone area focus), but eye autofocus also worked extremely well. Even when shooting in continuous burst mode at 10 frames per second, there was no lag when using a Canon lens and the adapter.

Metabones V Canon EF Sony E-Mount adapter - 70-200mm lens mounted

Generally speaking, it felt nearly the same as using a native Sony lens on the A7rIII. The same can’t be said for the cheaper FotodioX lens adapter that I was using previously. This other adapter worked with only half of my lenses and had inconsistent and slow autofocus. In that sense, you truly get what you pay for when it comes to camera gear (the FotodioX is $ 99 compared to the Metabones at $ 399).

Small and compact

Weighing in at 5.3 ounces (150g) and measuring 2.6 x 1.4 x 3 inches (6.6 x 3.6 x 7.6 cm), this slick adapter is compact and easy to stash in a camera bag. It feels about equivalent in size to the Canon 1.4X EF Extender. The Metabones V adapter comes in a plastic box that can you use for long-term storage, but unfortunately, there is no carrying case.

Metabones V Adapter

You can easily receive firmware updates

Besides a couple of buttons and indicator lights, there’s also a micro-USB port that can connect the adapter to a computer for firmware upgrades.

Metabones V Canon EF Sony E-Mount adapter

What needs improving

For all of the excellent qualities of the Metabones V adapter, there are two shortcomings worth mentioning.

First is the occasional freezing of the camera screen while trying to autofocus. You can fix the problem by simply turning the camera off and on. However, this lag slows down your workflow and makes you question reliability. This problem happens sporadically, mostly with my Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 II, but it never happens when using native Sony lenses.

Another shortcoming is the loss of touchscreen autofocus when using a Canon lens and the Metabones V adapter. One of the biggest selling points of new Sony cameras such as the A7rIII is touchscreen autofocus. While it’s a bit laggy and imperfect even when using Sony lenses, touchscreen autofocus seems to disappear altogether when using adapted lenses. Hopefully, this will be fixed with future a firmware update.

In conclusion

If you’re transitioning from Canon to Sony, the Metabones Adapter Mark V is a must-have addition to your photography kit. It’s not perfect, but it is a solution that seems to get better over time. At $ 399, the Metabones V adapter isn’t cheap, but it seems to work more consistently than cheaper options such as the Sigma MC-11.

Have you tried the Metabones lens adapter before? What was your experience like? Let me know in the comments below!

Sample Photos Taken with Sony A7rIII, Metabones V adapter, and Canon lenses:

Metabones V Canon EF Sony E-Mount adapter

Metabones V Canon EF Sony E-Mount adapter

Metabones V Canon EF Sony E-Mount adapter

Metabones V Canon EF Sony E-Mount adapter

Metabones V Canon EF Sony E-Mount adapter

The post Review of Metabones Adapter Mark V – Canon EF to Sony E-Mount appeared first on Digital Photography School.


Digital Photography School

 
Comments Off on Review of Metabones Adapter Mark V – Canon EF to Sony E-Mount

Posted in Photography

 

CP+ 2018: Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

04 Mar

Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

Although the changes separating the K-1 Mark II from its predecessor are small in number, the new model occupies a big chunk of the Ricoh-Pentax booth at this year’s CP+ show in Japan. We were able not only to get our hands on the camera, but also the company’s upcoming D FA* 50mm F1.4 SDM AW that we’d only previously seen behind glass.

And though we couldn’t save any pictures taken with the camera, we got a chance to quickly try out the maximum ISO value of 819,200 and hand-held Pixel Shift mode – read on to find our impressions.

Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

Ergonomically, the K-1 Mark II is to all intents and purposes identical to the K-1, and the control scheme is identical its predecessor. With a UI that’s well-sorted and an impressive amount of direct controls, this isn’t a bad thing.

Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

Indeed, the only noticeable physical change to the body is the name on the front of the camera, and existing K-1 users that send their cameras in for the $ 550 upgrade will have the new name painted on their older models. Functionally, we’re told that an upgraded K-1 and a factory-fresh K-1 Mark II will be identical.

Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

Thanks to the new ‘accelerator’ in the imaging pipeline, the K-1 Mark II is able to shoot at ISO 819200, which is an increase of two stops compared with the original K-1’s previous maximum value of 204800. As you might expect, the one sample shot we took at this value showed a very high amount of noise, but it’s entirely possible that more moderately high values will show improvement over the original K-1. This is something we’ll be looking at very closely when we get a production K-1 II in for testing.

Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

The really big change for the K-1 II is the hand-held Pixel Shift mode, with the menu option shown here. We did a trial shot with the D FA* 50mm F1.4, and were pleasantly surprised by the sharpness of the result – despite shooting at a moderate focal length, there wasn’t any blur from hand-shake to be seen.

Unfortunately, your valuable time is the price your pay for this functionality; while the actual exposures are captured rapidly, the camera takes roughly 20-25 seconds to process the final image, during which time it is effectively locked. Still, we’re impressed by the possibilities of this new Pixel Shift implementation.

Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

And now, on to the HD Pentax-D FA* 50mm F1.4 SDM AW lens. This is Pentax’s first new prime lens to be developed since the introduction of the K-1 two years ago, and it feels like a really premium piece of kit. The nitty gritty details on the lens are still thin – we still don’t know the optical formula, for instance – but this pre-production model appeared fully functional.

Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

The ‘D FA*’ label designates this as a flagship lens for Pentax, and it certainly feels like it. It’s quite heavy and solid-feeling, but it balances well on the K-1 II thanks to the camera’s good-sized grip.

Focusing is taken care of internally and with a silent motor, and though it isn’t what we’d call ‘lightning fast,’ we would say it’s on par with other manufacturers’ wide-aperture prime lens offerings.

Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

The 50mm F1.4’s ‘WR’ label stands for ‘weather resistant,’ which is made most visible by the bright red gasket on the rear of the lens. Although we don’t know the full extent of the sealing, we’d surmise there are a number of other seals against both dust and moisture incursion throughout the rest of the lens.

Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

Handling on the D FA* 50mm F1.4 is straightforward, with only an autofocus switch and a broad, well-textured manual focus ring. The distance scale is likely to be appreciated by users preferring manual focus, and the lens can focus down to 0.4m or 15.75 inches.

Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

We’re really excited to get both the new D FA* 50mm F1.4 and the K-1 II into the DPReview offices to see what this combination can do. The K-1 II will be available in April, 2018 for $ 1999.95 body-only.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on CP+ 2018: Hands-on with the Pentax K-1 Mark II and D FA* 50mm F1.4

Posted in Uncategorized