RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘comparison’

Sony a7R III added to studio scene comparison

17 Nov

We’ve had our hands on the Sony a7R III for about a week now, and the camera has quickly impressed our reviewers both in the studio and on the road. Currently, a couple of our staffers are traipsing around Arizona capturing beautiful photos we’ll soon be adding to our a7R III sample gallery, but back in Seattle we wasted no time putting the camera in front of our standard studio test scene.

See how the Sony a7R III stacks up against its closest competitors by clicking the button below. And don’t forget to compare the a7R III’s Pixel Shift Multi Shooting mode against the Pentax K-1’s (both are available in the studio scene tool). Pentax debuted the first full-frame pixel-shift tech with the K-1 in February of 2016; has Sony managed to improve upon it with their version?

See the Sony a7R III in our studio scene comparison tool

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Sony a7R III added to studio scene comparison

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Video comparison: GoPro Hero6 ‘is what the Hero5 should have been’

03 Oct

GoPro announced the all-new Hero6 last week, and while it might look identical to the Hero5 on the outside, the camera’s capabilities have been vastly improved thanks largely to a new custom-designed image processor called the GP1. But does this fancy new processor deliver on its promises for better stabilization, improved dynamic range, and improved low light performance?

The folks at Vistek wanted to find out, so they pitted the Hero6 against its predecessor in a range of head-to-head tests that demonstrate one thing very clearly: The GoPro Hero6 definitely delivers on its promises.

From stabilization—which is now available all the way up to 4K/24p—to dynamic range and beyond, the Hero6 soundly beat the Hero5 in every test Vistek threw its way. Of course, you’d expect this from a new model of the same action camera, but for the most part, the improvements are not simply incremental… they’re obvious.

As with any small action camera there is still plenty of room for improvement; a small sensor is still a small sensor and there are plenty of things a tiny little action camera just doesn’t do particularly well no matter what. But as Vistek points out, GoPro seems to have listened to its consumers (and competition from companies like Yi) and built that action camera that ‘is what the Hero5 should have been.’

The question now becomes: is it too little too late? But you’re the only one who can answer that.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Video comparison: GoPro Hero6 ‘is what the Hero5 should have been’

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Leica M10 added to the studio comparison tool

01 Oct

Released early this year, the M10 is Leica’s latest digital rangefinder, offering a slimmer design and refined controls. We’ve just been given a reviewable sample unit, and set it up in front of our studio scene to see what it can do.

Of particular note is a newly developed 24MP full-frame sensor. It’s claimed to be unique to the M10, and has not been developed by Sony, as with many of its 24MP competitors. In our own shooting and preliminary testing, we can see that the M10 is a good performer: with the right lens and proper focus, it is capable of incredibly sharp results when shooting Raw. Be aware that when paired with a sharp lens, the M10’s combination of a fairly modest (for full frame) pixel count and no AA filter can lead to moiré in your images.

Also, particularly enthusiastic viewers will note a slight reduction in sharpness with shutter speeds of 1/60 – 1/125 sec., indicating a smidgen of shutter shock. But due to the inherent tolerances of rangefinder focusing mechanisms among other factors, this is unlikely to ever be the most significant source of softness in real world images.

In terms of JPEG quality, we continue to find that colors (skin tones in particular) could use some attention, with yellowish greens and blue-tinged reds. Sharpening could be more sophisticated too, considering the crispness of the Raw output. In terms of high ISO quality, the M10 performs very well indeed, but it is still slightly outmatched by the best of the competition above ISO 6400.

But don’t just take our words for all this – check out the M10 in our studio comparison tool for yourself.

Check out the Leica M10 in our studio comparison tool

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Leica M10 added to the studio comparison tool

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Nikon D850 added to studio scene comparison

29 Sep

We’ve had some time to get to know the Nikon D850 and so far it’s safe to say we’ve been really impressed. Its low ISO dynamic range is class-leading, and it has proven so far to be a versatile tool for shooting everything from wedding receptions to white water rapid kayaking. We’ve also had a chance to put it in front of our standard studio test scene for your viewing pleasure – see how its 46 megapixels look side-by-side with its peers.

See the Nikon D850 in our studio scene comparison tool

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Nikon D850 added to studio scene comparison

Posted in Uncategorized

 

The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography part 5: examples and comparison

17 Jun
The Holuhraun eruption in Iceland, taken from a helicopter. This remains one of my most rewarding photographic experiences.

So far in this series I have talked about the advantages of aerial photography and about shooting from a helicopter as opposed to shooting from a light plane. I have also talked about the right equipment for this kind of shoot, and about technique and parameter selection. In this final article in the series I want to discuss my experiences from 4 aerial photography sessions, compare them and analyze what I learned from them.

I won’t be presenting any new info, but I think it’s important to do a comparison since I learned a lot from these short sessions, and if you can learn from my experience and mainly from my mistakes, I will have done what I set out to do with this series of articles.

My first ‘serious’ photography flight was in Namibia, in March of 2014. I flew over Sossusvlei to capture the dunes of the Namib Desert in morning light. It was in a Robinson R44, mentioned earlier as a great helicopter for photography flights, and both doors were taken off. I flew around for 1:15 hours and the hourly rate was about $ 850, which is quite good. I took one Canon EOS 5D Mark III with a Tamron 24-70mm F2.8 stabilized lens on it, plus a 70-300mm which I never actually used. This was the flight on which I understood the need for 2 bodies, but I really did fine with the 24-70mm as most of the beauty was in the larger-scaled structures, mainly the shapes of the dunes.

About half an hour into the flight the pilot noticed mist between the dunes ahead, and it was an easy decision to carry on flying and shoot the dunes shrouded in mist. Overall the flight was a huge success, and it triggered my love for aerial photography. I highly recommend flying in Sossusvlei. The fact that the pilot was flexible and had enough insight to suggest flying further above the dunes made a huge difference. Where possible, you should always opt for a pilot with experience of photographers, and make sure you listen to their suggestions.

The second flight was during a very special event: the Holuhraun volcanic eruption in Iceland. I had come back to the hostel after shooting the eruption from the land three days before the flight, and I encountered several days of harsh winds and sand storms. Then finally the weather improved and I secured my spot on a sunset flight. We had an unbelievable flight over the volcano with a pink sunset in the background, and even today, that flight ranks among my favorite photography experiences

I took two bodies, a Canon EOS 5D Mark II and a 5D Mark III, with 24-70mm and 70-300mm zoom lenses. I used the telephoto lens quite a bit to shoot the details of the eruption, and in this case it was a good decision to opt for a telephoto instead of an ultra wide.

The flight was very costly. For 1:45 hours I paid 2600 Euros, at a rate of almost 1500 Euros an hour. Ouch. Helicopter flights in Iceland are more expensive than in other countries, so make sure it’s really worth it if you intend to fly there. These are some of my favorite shots from this flight. You can decide for yourself if it was worth it or not, but note that unique images such as these are the key to getting noticed: thanks to this shoot alone, I sealed an ongoing postcard deal in Iceland (which alone paid back for the trip), an interview with Iceland’s largest news website, several new private clients and a share by National Geographic on Facebook, hitting over 124,000 likes.

My third photography flight was in Disko Bay, Greenland. Unfortunately, this was also my most disappointing experience. I flew in a small airplane with a tiny hatch to shoot from, which both made it very hard to achieve a decent composition, and caused the lens to vibrate violently, rendering many of my shots blurry.

On top of that, communication with the pilot wasn’t good enough, and he didn’t understand that I needed more room on my right to shoot from. I paid way too much, over a thousand Euros for a flight I could have definitely done without. It was a bad experience, but at least I learned a great deal about what not to do.

My fourth and most recent photography flight was above the Lofoten Islands in Arctic Norway. It was an amazing flight, and it reinforced my belief in light planes. The pilot was highly experienced and understood exactly what I needed, even without words. It comes to show how important a good pilot who understand photography actually is. The flight was affordable at about $ 300 per hour, and the conditions were excellent.

Due to their relatively small size, the Lofoten Islands are a perfect place for photography flights. You can get from place to place very quickly, and the mountainous landscape is incredible from above. The famous shooting spots are easily recognizable, too, which is a wonderful bonus.

Aerial photography is amazing. I doubt that anyone who tries it will not like it, but it comes at a cost. I hope this series has helped you understand the benefits of shooting from the air, the different options and the importance of being prepared. Enjoy your flight!


Erez Marom is a professional nature photographer, photography guide and traveler based in Israel. You can follow Erez’s work on Instagram, Facebook and 500px, and subscribe to his mailing list for updates.

If you’d like to experience and shoot some of the most fascinating landscapes on earth with Erez as your guide, you’re welcome to take a look at his unique photography workshops around the world:

Land of Ice – Southern Iceland
Winter Paradise – Northern Iceland
Northern Spirits – The Lofoten Islands
Giants of the Andes and Fitz Roy Hiking Annex – Patagonia
Tales of Arctic Nights – Greenland
Saga of the Seas and The Far Reaches Annex – The Faroe Islands
Desert Storm – Namibia

More in This Series:

  • The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography – Part 1: Why shoot aerials?
  • The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography – Part 2: Aircraft
  • The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography – Part 3: Equipment
  • The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography – Part 4: Technique

Selected Articles by Erez Marom:

  • Parallelism in Landscape Photography
  • Behind the Shot: Dark Matter
  • Mountain Magic: Shooting in the Lofoten Islands
  • Behind the Shot: Nautilus
  • Behind the Shot: Lost in Space
  • Behind the Shot: Spot the Shark
  • Quick Look: The Art of the Unforeground
  • Whatever it Doesn’t Take
  • Winds of Change: Shooting changing landscapes
  • On the Importance of Naming Images
  • On Causality in Landscape Photography

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography part 5: examples and comparison

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Fujifilm X-A3 added to studio scene comparison

10 Jun

The Fujifilm X-A3 sits on the low-end of their mirrorless lineup, with only the X-A10 carrying a lower MSRP. Where the X-A3 really differentiates itself, though, is that it comes with the latest 24MP sensor from higher-end Fujifilm cameras, but with a traditional Bayer filter array instead of X-Trans. What does that mean in terms of image quality? Well, see for yourself.

See the Fujifilm X-A3 on our studio scene

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Fujifilm X-A3 added to studio scene comparison

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Side by Side Drone Comparison – DJI Mavic Pro Versus the Phantom Pro 4

22 May

Drones are becoming more and more popular and there is more competition on the market now. Phantom isn’t the only game in town anymore. But does the DJI Mavic match up?

DJI Mavic Pro Versus the Phantom Pro 4 – Drone Comparison

In this video, Colin Smith from PhotoshopCAFE shows you footage from each drone and a summary of his points. Each has their pros and cons, and ultimately it comes down to your needs.

Do you have a drone? Which one? What was the deciding factor for you in choosing yours?

Shop for the DJI Mavic Pro or the Phantom 4 Pro on Amazon.com.

The post Side by Side Drone Comparison – DJI Mavic Pro Versus the Phantom Pro 4 by Darlene Hildebrandt appeared first on Digital Photography School.


Digital Photography School

 
Comments Off on Side by Side Drone Comparison – DJI Mavic Pro Versus the Phantom Pro 4

Posted in Photography

 

Canon EOS M5 added to studio scene comparison tool

08 Dec

The EOS M5 is Canon’s current enthusiast-grade mirrorless camera. With a 24.2MP APS-C sensor, Dual Pixel autofocus and a pleasant-to-use interface, the M5 is the most competitive EF-M camera Canon has released.

We’ve put a production EOS M5 through our studio scene so you can see how it compares with its peers. Note that we’ve used a different lens on the M5 compared with the M3; we may re-shoot the scene in the future for the sake of consistency.

View the Canon EOS M5 in our studio scene comparison tool

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Canon EOS M5 added to studio scene comparison tool

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II added to studio comparison scene

17 Nov

The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II raised a lot of eyebrows when it was released. It comes with an all-new 121-point autofocus system, 20MP sensor and 60fps Raw + JPEG shooting. Oh, and a $ 2000 MSRP. Can’t forget that.

Nonetheless, Olympus’ new flagship is here, and it is seriously capable. We’re in the home stretch on our full review, but in the meantime, check out how it stacks up against the competition in our studio comparison scene.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II added to studio comparison scene

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Google Pixel XL added to mobile studio test scene comparison

26 Oct

Google’s Pixel and Pixel XL have garnered plenty of interest for their imaging capabilities since they were launched in the beginning of October. They each offer a 12.3MP camera with an F2.0 lens and a 1/2.3″ sensor – the same size used in yesteryear’s compact cameras – sporting 1.55µm sized pixels. The Pixel phones also utilize gyroscope-based stabilization for some seriously smooth video recording.

We got our hands on a Pixel XL review unit, and while we wait for the clouds to part outside for some real-world samples, we put it in front of our studio test scene. Take a look below at its JPEG and Raw performance in daylight and low light. It’s quite impressive: the lens is relatively sharp across the frame, and our low light Raw shots show that despite receiving 1.33 EV less light than the iPhone 7, the Pixel shows only slightly more noise, meaning it comfortably outperforms the iPhone camera in low light.*

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-20506681″,”widgetId”:423,”initialStateId”:null}) })

Related: Google’s Pixel phones: what you need to know

*Multi-frame noise reduction – used in low light by both the Pixel and iPhone 7 – may skew results in either direction for either camera, providing better performance for static subjects, or potentially blurry images for moving ones.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Google Pixel XL added to mobile studio test scene comparison

Posted in Uncategorized