RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Sony’

Is the Sony a6400 right for you?

16 May

Is the Sony a6400 right for you?

We’ve put the wraps on our full review of Sony a6400, where we look at its image quality, autofocus and more. But is it the right camera for you, and the style of photography you enjoy? Taking the a6400 into account as a whole, here’s how we think it stacks up for these common photographic use cases.

  • Family and moments
  • Travel
  • Video
  • Lifestyle and people
  • Sports and action
  • Landscape
  • Candid and street
  • Formal portraits

Family and moments

Sometimes, a killer new feature comes along that really changes the way you take photographs – in this case, that feature is Sony’s Real-time Tracking AF. Once you get the camera set up, all you really need to do is place an AF area over the subject you want to track, whether it’s a human or not. If it’s not a human, the system will track that object very tenaciously as you recompose the scene. If it is a human, the system will automatically switch to face or eye detection and reward you with incredibly accurate focus, almost regardless of lighting or subject movement, and even at wide apertures. It’s really something.

As a point-and-shoot family cam, the a6400 is hard to beat

There’s a lot else that the a6400 gets right for this use case, as well. First of all, with the proper prime or the 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 power zoom kit lens, it makes for a compact package that’s easy to toss into a bag or jacket pocket (the very nice 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 kit lens adds quite a bit of bulk, but a very flexible zoom range). There’s above-average battery life, and if you do happen to let the battery drain, the a6400 will charge over its micro USB port. Claimed weather-sealing means a little drizzle doesn’t need to dampen your photographic creativity, and the selfie screen will be handy for, well, selfies.

Marks against the a6400 include a complex menu system that could overwhelm more novice users, and we’ve found the auto white balance can ‘overcorrect’ daylight images, making them look a little cold for our tastes. But overall, as a ‘point and shoot’ family camera, the a6400 and its Real-time Tracking autofocus are hard to beat, especially at this price point.

Photo by Rishi Sanyal


Travel

Everyone travels differently, but we believe that the a6400 comes with some merits (and, of course, demerits) that will apply broadly to the type of people that like to bring a dedicated camera with them while traversing the globe.

First off, like all of Sony’s a6x00 cameras, the a6400 is compact and lightweight. Despite this, it still comes with claims of weather-sealing, which is a nice touch should you run into inclement weather. Wireless connectivity, including NFC, is a strong point, so it’s easy to get your photos up onto the web from anywhere, without needing a dedicated computer. There’s an awful lot of lenses in the E-mount ecosystem to choose from at this point, from the flexible 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 Sony kit zoom to Sigma’s excellent 16mm, 30mm and 56mm F1.4 primes. Add on the ability to charge the a6400 from the same power bank that you can use to charge your phone, and you have a strong proposition for a travel camera right here.

The a6400 is compelling option for you to pack into your carry-on for the next adventure

But there are a couple of things to consider. Unfortunately, Sony is one of the few remaining manufacturers to not allow in-camera Raw processing. This is a shame, because we’ve found the auto white balance can sometimes result in unpleasant colors in JPEGs, and JPEGs are harder to correct than Raw files. This means that, if you’re a power user and really like to fine-tune your photographs, you may actually find you want a laptop with you to give those Raw files a look. This could be mitigated if Sony’s Imaging Edge app allowed the transfer of Raw files to mobile devices, but at the time of this writing, it doesn’t.

Still – if you’re primarily a JPEG shooter and don’t mind taking some more control over your JPEG and white balance settings, the a6400 is a compelling option for you to pack into your carry-on for your next adventure.

Photo by Carey Rose


Video

The new screen mechanism on the a6400 tilts all the way up for selfies, yes, but that also opens a window of opportunity for those looking to ‘vlog.’ But aside from vlogging, there’s quite a bit to unpack here, so let’s start with the basics.

The a6400, like the a6300 and a6500 before it, offers oversampled (read: highly detailed) 4K video capture. Autofocus during video is another strong point, requiring a minimum of input from the user for most types of shooting. The microphone input makes it easy to get higher-quality audio recorded in-camera, and Log capture gives power users more flexible files for post-processing. Sony has also updated the processor in the a6400, and in room temperature conditions, the camera will record 4K continuously until the battery runs out, or the card fills – without fear of overheating.

The a6400 is a great B-cam for interviews, and decent for vlogging – but it’s worth checking out the competition

But the market hasn’t stood still. Against competitors like the Fujifilm X-T30, the a6400 has an awful lot of rolling shutter – which is that sort of jiggly, jello-y effect you can often see in shaky footage. And without a stabilized lens, you’ll have a lot of shaky footage, since the a6400 doesn’t include in-body image stabilization. Plus, in 4K/30p, you’ll have an additional crop factor, meaning it will be difficult to get wide-angle footage with standard zoom lenses. There isn’t a headphone jack to make sure your audio sounds alright during recording, and that flip-up screen can be blocked by any microphone you want to put in the hot shoe.

So thanks to its unlimited recording time, the a6400 makes a great B-cam for interviews, and with Sony’s 10-18mm F4 E-mount lens, which happens to be stabilized, you have a decent option for vlogging as well (just watch that crop if you shoot in 30p). It’s just that, at this point, it’s worth checking out the competition to see if other options have a more modern feature set that will work best for the kind of video work that you want to do.


Lifestyle and people

We again see Sony’s Real-time Tracking autofocus playing a major role here; even with a wide-aperture primes, like Sigma’s 56mm F1.4 or Sony’s 24mm F1.4 GM, the a6400 will reliably lock focus on a subject’s eye with incredible accuracy.

Not only that, but malleable files with plenty of dynamic range give you more flexibility for shooting in harsh lighting conditions, and good low light performance means you don’t necessarily have to stop shooting when the sun goes down. Good connectivity options will let you send those files off to your subjects quickly and easily, so long as you’re happy with the JPEGs – it’s probably best to dial in your white balance manually for best JPEG results.

Photo by Barney Britton


Landscape

The a6400’s 24MP sensor offers a solid amount of resolution for landscape work – and there aren’t many APS-C cameras out there to offer significantly more resolution at this time, anyway. And though it’s the exact same sensor as in the older a6300, it’s still a very good sensor in terms of dynamic range, and so you’ll be able to brighten shadows significantly in high-contrast scenes without introducing a ridiculous amount of noise.

If you’re a tripod shooter, the tilting LCD will be a help for working at lower angles, though if you like to shoot in the vertical orientation, you’re out of luck on that front – the LCD only tilts on its horizontal axis. There’s a strong selection of lenses, both from Sony and third parties, particularly wide-angle primes. The claimed weather-sealing is of course a welcome addition if you’re finding yourself out in the elements, as is USB charging if you’re operating off the grid for any period of time. There’s also a robust built-in intervalometer for time lapse work, if that’s your jam.

The inability to process Raw files in-camera or transfer them to your phone may be frustrating

But for those wanting to travel light, the inability to process Raw files in-camera or transfer Raw files to mobile devices may be frustrating. The a6400 is also one of the few APS-C cameras on the market to only offer lossy compressed Raw files, meaning that you might see some artifacts if you really push your high-contrast files, such as those taken at sunrise or sunset. Overall, though, the a6400 – with the right lenses – is a solid choice for landscape shooters looking to travel light.

Photo by Carey Rose


Sports and action

Sorry to sound like a broken record (do the kids know what records even are, these days?), but Sony’s Real-time Tracking AF is a revelation for sports and action photography, as well. Whether you’re photographing your child’s soccer game or a low light concert, the a6400’s autofocus system is capable of getting you an incredible number of in-focus ‘keepers’, even if you’re firing away at a maximum burst rate of 11 fps. And as stated earlier, the system doesn’t need an eye to latch onto for accuracy – the a6400 will tenaciously track any subject, whether it’s a race car or a helmet, as long as you’ve initiated tracking over that subject.

We’re pleased with the deep buffer, but less pleased with the slow write-times

We’re pleased to find that the a6400 comes with a pretty deep buffer, but are less pleased to say that the card slot is only UHS-I. This means that write-times are on the slow side, and that the buffer will take a while to clear after a long burst. While you can still enter playback while images are being written to the card, some functions – like burst speed – cannot be changed until the buffer has finished clearing. Lastly, we’d recommend a grip extension of some sort for use with larger telephoto lenses, as the small grip on the a6400 will be uncomfortable with those lenses after extended use.

It’s worth adding that the touchscreen on the a6400 can be used for AF point placement, so you can move the area around if that makes it easier to initiate tracking on your given subject. We still prefer a joystick for AF area movement, however, but the touchscreen is better than the fiddly ‘click-click-click‘ of the rear four-way controller / dial.

Photo by Carey Rose


Candid and street

For candid and street, the a6400 is likewise a compelling option. With a tilting screen, shooting from the hip (and using the touchscreen for AF area placement) is a cinch. If you want to be able to react even faster to what’s happening around you, the ‘Wide’ AF area does a surprisingly good job of automatically deciding what to focus on without any intervention from the user. The compact size won’t be terribly intimidating or attract too much attention, and the a6400 comes with a silent electronic shutter for extra discretion.

The one caveat here, though, is that the scan rate of the electronic shutter is on the slow side. This means that if you’re using that electronic shutter and panning or photographing fast-moving subjects, you may see some odd distortion artifacts, and you may also see very pronounced banding if you’re capturing candids under artificial light.

Photo by Carey Rose


Formal portraits

Formal portraits are actually another situation in which the a6400 performs well. Again, the reliable Eye AF implementation ensures accurate focus, and though there’s no flash sync port, you can add any number of adapters to the camera’s hot shoe. The flash-sync speed of 1/160 sec isn’t great for outdoor use (though you can always use high-speed sync), but should be fine for use indoors. A nice bonus is that the a6400 can shoot tethered using Capture One software, and there’s a wide variety of excellent prime lenses available, including the excellent Sigma 56mm F1.4 that will give you a standard 85mm equivalent field of view on the a6400.

Photo by Carey Rose


The wrap-up

We wrote in our full review that the a6400 is ‘a near-universally capable midrange camera,’ a statement which is borne out through our examination of its merits across these use cases. It’s not a perfect camera – no camera is – but it’s hard to argue against the fact that Sony has created a remarkably flexible camera at an attainable price point for many people. That’s unequivocally a winning combination.

Whether you’re photographing your own family, stylized portraits, sports or looking for a photographic travel companion, the a6400 probably has just about all you need to get the shot in those situations. We have to admit, though, that some of the less tangible aspects of the camera – such as how engaging it is to use – are less impressive to us. But that doesn’t take away all that a photographer can do with the a6400, once they’ve wrapped their head around the controls and interface.

If you own or are looking into a Sony a6400, let us know in the comments what types of photography you’re into and how the camera is working for you.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Is the Sony a6400 right for you?

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Rokinon announces pricing, availability of its new 45mm F1.8 lens for Sony full-frame cameras

13 May

Rokinon, known in other markets as Samyang and Bowers, has announced the pricing and availability of its new AF 45mm F1.8 lens for Sony full-frame camera systems.

The lens, which Rokinon calls ‘tiny but premium’ is the latest in its ‘Tiny Series’ lens lineup. The optical construction consists of seven elements in six groups, including two aspherical elements and one extra-low dispersion element. Certain elements inside the design also feature Rokinon’s ‘Ultra Multi-Coating,’ which is said to reduct flaring and ghosting.

Inside, it features an autofocus motor for Sony camera systems, a nine-blade aperture diaphragm and an aperture range between F1.8 and F22.

While the lens was designed for full-frame Sony mirrorless cameras, it can also be used with Sony APS-C models where it ends up being a 67.5mm equivalent focal length lens. The lens measures in at 61.8mm (2.43in) by 56.1mm (2.21in) and weighs just 162g (5.7oz).

The Rokinon AF 45mm F1.8 lens is available to pre-order for $ 399 on B&H and has a suggested retail price of £349.99 in the UK. Orders are expected to ship at the end of May 2019.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Rokinon announces pricing, availability of its new 45mm F1.8 lens for Sony full-frame cameras

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Canon Rebel SL3 (250D), Sony a6400 and Fujifilm X-T30 buying guides updated

10 May

We’ve updated a trio of buying guides, adding our final thoughts about the Sony a6400 and Fujifilm X-T30, along with our initial impressions of Canon’s EOS Rebel SL3 (EOS 250D).

While neither the a6400 or X-T30 came out on top in the guides below, we think they’re both well worth considering. Since the SL3 is yet to be reviewed, it’s not eligible for an award.

Best cameras under $ 1000

Best cameras for beginners

Look for more buying guide updates in the weeks ahead, including a look at the latest waterproof cameras.


View all buying guides

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Canon Rebel SL3 (250D), Sony a6400 and Fujifilm X-T30 buying guides updated

Posted in Uncategorized

 

On the trail of the best Texas BBQ with the Sony a7R III

07 May

Sony’s a7R III is a high-resolution flagship camera, and a showcase for some of the company’s most innovative imaging technologies. In addition to 42MP resolution and advanced on-sensor autofocus with face and eye tracking, the a7R III also offers 4K and high-speed HD video capture.

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_3448927577″,”galleryId”:”3448927577″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

Photographer Chad Wadsworth has been working with the a7R III and Sony’s FE 24mm F1.4 GM in Texas, on the hunt for the best barbecue in the state. From traditional family-run joints in Lockhart, to the trendy new generation pit-masters of Austin, Chad captured the experience every step of the way. Watch our video for a flavor of the experience, and check out a gallery of his images, above.


This is sponsored content, created with the support of Amazon and Sony. What does this mean?

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on On the trail of the best Texas BBQ with the Sony a7R III

Posted in Uncategorized

 

DPReview TV: Panasonic S1R vs. Nikon Z7 vs. Sony a7R III

04 May

This week Chris and Jordan do a side-by-side comparison between three high resolution mirrorless cameras: the Panasonic S1R, Nikon Z7, and Sony a7R III to see how they stack up. Which one is right for you?

Get new episodes of DPReview TV every week by subscribing to our YouTube channel!

  • Introduction
  • Handling
  • Displays
  • Batteries and media
  • Lenses
  • Autofocus
  • Video
  • Image quality
  • Wrap-up

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on DPReview TV: Panasonic S1R vs. Nikon Z7 vs. Sony a7R III

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Sony a7 III sales beat combined efforts of Canon and Nikon in Japan

03 May

Business information service BCN has released its latest data that shows Sony is so far ahead of the competition in Japan that in April its a7 III sold more than all the other top five full-frame mirrorless camera bodies combined. The growth of Sony a7 lll sales coincided with a dramatic drop in sales of the Canon EOS RP and only low volume sales for the EOS R and Nikon’s Z6. The Nikon Z7 doesn’t feature in the chart of the top five full frame mirrorless models, as the a7 ll takes the 5th spot.

The data shows the EOS RP performing well in the middle of March, but it declined quite quickly thereafter.

In some senses the results aren’t that surprising as Sony has a much more established user base and a much wider native lens selection than either Canon or Nikon for full frame mirrorless models; not to mention both Canon and Nikon are serving early adopters in this market. What might seem surprising though is that the a7 III is quite a bit more expensive than the EOS RP – proving that perhaps the market isn’t as price-sensitive as many expect.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Sony a7 III sales beat combined efforts of Canon and Nikon in Japan

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Sony a7 lll sales beat combined efforts of Canon and Nikon in Japan

03 May

Business information service BCN has released its latest data that shows Sony is so far ahead of the competition in Japan that in April its a7 lll sold more than all the other top five full-frame mirrorless camera bodies combined. The growth of Sony a7 lll sales coincided with a dramatic drop in sales of the Canon EOS RP and only low volume sales for the EOS R and Nikon’s Z6. The Nikon Z7 doesn’t feature in the chart of the top five full frame mirrorless models, as the a7 ll takes the 5th spot.

The data shows the EOS RP performing well in the middle of March, but it declined quite quickly thereafter.

In some senses the results aren’t that surprising as Sony has a much more established user base and a much wider native lens selection than either Canon or Nikon for full frame mirrorless models; not to mention both Canon and Nikon are serving early adopters in this market. What might seem surprising though is that the a7 lll is quite a bit more expensive than the EOS RP – proving that perhaps the market isn’t as price-sensitive as many expect.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Sony a7 lll sales beat combined efforts of Canon and Nikon in Japan

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Sony a6400 review

01 May

Introduction

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryStripV2({“galleryId”:”7539777292″,”isMobile”:false}) })

Sample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photo
Gold Award

85%
Overall score

Sony’s a6400 is a compact 24MP mirrorless interchangeable lens camera with an APS-C sensor that will serve plenty of photographers from family documentarians to pro shooters looking for a lightweight second body. The big news is that it has a new processor based on that used in Sony’s sports-shooting flagship a9 which enables ‘Real-Time Tracking’ autofocus, which is one of the most effective autofocus implementations we’ve yet seen. It’s also among the easiest to use, once you’ve gotten it set up.

Key specifications:

  • 24MP APS-C sensor
  • 425-pt phase detection AF system with Real-Time Tracking
  • Tilting screen, 180° up, 90° down
  • 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder
  • New Bionz X processor
  • ISO range from 100-32000
  • 11fps burst shooting (8fps with silent shutter)
  • Interval shooting option added
  • 4K/30p video capture
  • Mic input, no headphone output
  • 410 shots per battery charge (per CIPA)
  • Wi-Fi with NFC and Bluetooth

The Sony a6400 officially replaces the older a6300: it uses the same sensor but comes with some subtle enhancements aside from the impressive autofocus capabilities. It arrives in an increasingly crowded field, though, with cameras like the X-T30 from Fujifilm and the EOS M50 from Canon being similarly priced and with similar sized sensors. Do the enhancements make the a6400 the standout in this crowd? Find out its strengths – and weaknesses – in the pages to follow.

The a6400 is available now for $ 899 (€1049) body-only, $ 999 (€1149) with a 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 Power Zoom kit lens and $ 1299 (€1449) with an 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 zoom.


What’s new and how it compares

Sony’s a6400 has an awful lot of refinements on the inside – take a look.

Read more

Body, handling and controls

For better or for worse, the a6400 handles just like the a6300 before it. And the a6000 before that.

Read more

Image quality

The a6400 takes some fantastic photographs, and in particular, has some welcome tweaks to its JPEG engine.

Read more

First impressions

Sony’s new Real-Time Tracking is really impressive, but my goodness, can’t we get a front control dial?

Read more

Autofocus and performance

Let’s dive deep into the a6400’s revamped autofocus system, plus we’ll show you exactly how to set it up.

Read more

Video

The a6400 is pitched as a vlogging camera, but it has some video capture shortcomings.

Read more

Is the a6400 right for you?

We look at common photographic use-cases and see how the a6400 measures up.

Read more

Conclusion

The a6400 is easily one of the most capable cameras at its price point.

Read more

Sample gallery

Check out our extensive samples gallery from the Sony a6400.

Read more

Specifications

Want the full list of specifications for the a6400? We have you covered.

Read more

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Sony a6400 review

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Sony a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T30: Which is best for you?

28 Apr

Introduction

The Sony a6400 and Fujifilm X-T30 are the two company’s mid-priced mirrorless cameras. They’re 4K-capable cameras with similar resolution APS-C sensors: 24MP on the Sony, 26MP on the Fujifilm.

Both build on the legacies of Gold Award-winning predecessors, which helps establish them as presumed big hitters. And, having tested both cameras extensively, this is a fair assumption: they’re both class-leading cameras. Chris and Jordan from DPReview TV have already looked at their various strengths and weaknesses, so we’re going to look at how they compare for different types of photography.

Spec comparison

From a specs point of view the a6400 and X-T30 look pretty similar: they’re both 4K-capable APS-C mirrorless cameras with very similar price tags. Both cameras offer similar resolution (24MP on the Sony, 26MP on the Fujifilm), both have 2.36M-dot viewfinders and both can shoot at an impressive frame rate 11 fps with autofocus on the Sony, 20 or 8 fps on the Fujifilm (depending on whether you’re in a situation that allows the use of electronic shutter).

The moment you pick them up, it becomes apparent that they’re very different creatures

And yet, the moment you pick them up, it becomes apparent that they’re very different creatures. Differences in performance and radically distinct design philosophies mean picking between the two becomes much more complex than simply ‘which feels more comfortable’ or ‘which has the lenses that I need?’

Handling comparison

The difference in design philosophy is immediately apparent just by looking at them: the Fujifilm is studded (perhaps overwhelmed) with direct control points, including a mixture of dedicated dials and customizable function wheels. By contrast, the Sony has fewer buttons and only the two control dials, which point to a camera that doesn’t invite (or, perhaps, require) such a degree of engagement with its settings.

The Fujifilm is studded (perhaps overwhelmed) with direct control points, the Sony has the more complex menu system

Conversely, the Sony has the more complex menu system, with vast numbers of options lodged in a structure that relies on user memory more than most (though, once configured, your need to delve into the menus can be minimized). The Fujifilm’s menus are crowded but they’re better laid-out and have more indication of where each setting is likely to be found. Both have customizable ‘My Menu’ tabs if you find yourself needing regular access to menu-only options.

The other major difference is in autofocus. Not so much in terms of performance (though the Sony is, as good or better across the board), but in terms of complexity and usability. The Fujifilm has a series of different AF modes that you’re likely to swap between, depending on what you’re trying to shoot, and the choice of using the AF joystick or touchscreen to choose a subject. The Sony also has a wide range of AF area modes but, for most shooting situations, can be left in one mode, pointed at your subject and trusted to follow it, requiring little user input or mode-changing.

Other contenders

The most direct video/stills competitor to the Sony/Fujifilm duo is probably the Panasonic Lumix DC-G95 (G90 or G91 outside North America). It’s also a 4K-capable stills/video camera, but one that brings an image-stabilized 20MP Four Thirds sensor to the table, rather than the unstabilized APS-C chips of the other two. We wouldn’t rule it out just yet, but our initial impressions are that its video and autofocus aren’t up to the same high standards as the pair we’re discussing here.

Canon appears to have retreated from this section of the market for now: it’s more enthusiast-friendly M5 and M6 models now looking rather long in the tooth and lacking 4K video. Olympus’s OM-D E-M10 III is a less-expensive alternative and lacks the AF performance of the more recent APS-C models.

Sports and wildlife

Processed and cropped in Adobe Camera Raw 11
Sony a6400 | ISO 640 | 1/640 sec | F4

Sports and wildlife is a relatively comfortable win for the Sony. The Fujifilm’s AF system is more than up to the job of shooting sports (especially if you tune the AF behavior, manually follow the action and keep your subject under a Zone AF region), but the Sony system does well without the need for so much intervention, and is especially good at subject tracking.

Lens choice may be the deciding factor here. Both systems offer fairly expensive 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 lenses if you need a lot of reach, but Fujifilm’s APS-C-only version is both smaller and less expensive. Fujifilm offers a 50-140mm F2.8 zoom whose 70-200mm F4-like equivalent behavior is arguably more useful than Sony’s similarly-sized 70-200mm F4 (which ends up behaving more like a full-frame 105-400mm F6 if you mount it on the a6400).

Family and moments

Out-of-camera JPEG
Sony a6400 | ISO 1000 | 1/125 sec | F1.4

The Sony is the clear winner here, primarily for how easy its autofocus is to use and how well it understands human subjects (focusing on an eye if it can see one, but reliably keeping focus on the same person if they look or turn away). The tenacity with which the a6400 will maintains focus on the person you’ve chosen is simply unequaled.

Both systems include the option of 18-135mm lenses, which provide huge amounts of flexibility

The Fujifilm still makes a handy family camera, though. It requires a little more patience and more user input, but can be paired with lenses such as the 18-55mm F2.8-4.0 OIS, which is a much better and more flexible zoom than the Sony 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 power zoom.

Both systems include the option of 18-135mm lenses, which provide huge amounts of flexibility, though their F3.5-5.6 maximum apertures may not give the shallow depth-of-field or low light advantages over using a good smartphone. Of course, if you don’t regularly zoom-in on your smartphone, it’s worth looking at the available prime lenses for both systems.

Landscape

Processed and cropped to taste in Adobe Camera Raw 11
Fujifilm X-T30 | ISO 160 | 1/100 sec | F4

There’s not a huge amount to choose between the two cameras in terms of landscape shooting. The Fujifilm lens lineup includes a series of nice zooms and a good choice of high-quality F1.4 prime lenses, which might just tip the balance in its favor.

They’re fairly evenly balanced in terms of battery life and portability, and both have rear screens that tilt up for tripod use. There’s not much to choose between the cameras in terms of Raw performance: not all Raw converters do a great job with Fujifilm’s X-Trans sensor pattern, but conversely Sony insists on applying damaging compression to its files, which slightly reduces their flexibility.

Neither camera is especially easy to operate with gloves, though if you deactivated the command dials, the Fujifilm’s dedicated shutter speed, aperture and exposure comp dials are easier to use than the Sony’s rear dial, which is fiddly at the best of times.

Lifestyle and social

Out-of-camera JPEG
Sony a6400 | ISO 100 | 1/320 sec | F1.8

The Fujifilm’s attractive JPEG output and selection of lenses makes it a very credible choice for lifestyle and social photography. It has face and eye detection and can offer shallow depth-of-field images if you pair it with the right lens. A wide selection of prime lenses (with a choice of F2 or F1.4 in several focal lengths), makes this pairing easier.

The Sony comes out in front, for us, though, especially on the ‘social’ side of things. Its AF system is more responsive and easier to use when trying to shoot spontaneous photos, particularly of photos with people in them. Added to this, Sigma’s trio of F1.4 lenses may well include a focal length that works for your style of photography.

With its screen that flips all the way up, the Sony is also the clear winner if you want to take selfies.

Formal portraits

Processed in Adobe Camera Raw 11
Pre-production Fujifilm X-T30 | ISO 320 | 1/200 sec | F2

When it comes to posed portraiture, again it’s probably a slight win to the Sony. Its uncannily sticky eye-detection system can be entirely relied upon, freeing up the photographer to concentrate on their lighting, their composition and engaging with their subject. Stick the comparatively affordable Sigma 56mm F1.4 on the front and the camera will do much of the rest.

It’s only a slight win, though. Fujifilm’s 56mm F1.2 APD is a lovely portrait lens, as is its 135mm-equiv. 90mm F2 (though neither comes cheap). Eye detection works well, especially with a single subject and the X-T30’s choice of film-mimicking color modes makes it easy to deliver attractive results.

Sony has stronger native flash options, with a radio-frequency remote flash system, but both are well supported by third-party makers, making it easy to find flash heads that can be remotely triggered.

Candid and street

Processed in Adobe Camera Raw 11
Pre-production Fujifilm X-T30 | ISO 640 | 1/125 sec | F4

Both the Sony and Fujifilm are pretty small cameras, and can be paired with fairly small lenses (though it’s worth checking whether there’s a small prime lens available in your favored focal length). Both have rear touchscreens that tilt upwards for from-the-hip shooting and both have relatively quiet shutter mechanisms. They both offer completely silent electronic shutter modes, with the Fujifilm exhibiting less rolling shutter distortion in that mode.

Both cameras make it pretty simple to transfer your images to a smartphone, with the Sony offering NFC in addition to Bluetooth, which makes it a little quicker to use with Android devices.

Again the Sony’s simpler, more precise AF system may give it a bit of an edge, particularly for candid people pics. It’s also a little smaller and more discreet.

Video

The Sony a6300 was one of the first sub-$ 1000 cameras to offer really detailed 4K capture, but video performance (and our expectations of it) have been one of the areas of greatest improvement since then. It’s much easier to spot the rather poor rolling shutter performance now that a range of cameras can offer the level of detail capture that once rather dazzled us.

Fujifilm matches the Sony for detail capture but with much less rolling shutter and no crop (as the a6400 does when shooting 30p). And that’s before you consider the Fujifilm’s array of attractive and useful Film Simulation modes (including the flexible Eterna mode and the option of Log capture with a downloadable LUT to make processing easier). Unlike the Sony, the Fujifilm can offer headphone monitoring via a USB-C adapter.

The a6400’s video is easier to point-and-shoot: again thanks to its impressive tap-to-track autofocus, though the X-T30 can track human subjects fairly well. The Fujifilm is the better video tool overall, if you’re serious about videography and are willing to manual focus. There’s even the option to output 10-bit footage if you get serious enough to buy an external recorder.

Conclusion

Looking at these two cameras through the lens of specific photographic applications is an interesting exercise, with the importance of the simplicity and reliability of the a6400’s AF system shining through (when assessing them in general terms we concluded there wasn’t a lot to choose between them).

The a6400’s updated AF system is genuinely phenomenal

We’re still not big fans of the experience of shooting with the Sony: its two command dials are undermined by the need to stop and adjust your grip every time you want to use the lower one. Its menus are still difficult to navigate and its touchscreen is poorly utilized. That said, its updated AF system is genuinely phenomenal, removing, at a stroke, one of the things you previously would have had to mess around with. If your photography benefits from fast, precise focus (particularly for human subjects), the Sony is the stronger choice.

Both these cameras are significantly better than the already good cameras they replace, so there’s no wrong choice here

We still really like the X-T30, though. It looks pretty, is engaging to use and produces attractive JPEGs and consistently better video than the Sony. It’s not without its own usability flaws: the joystick and Q buttons are awkwardly placed and the pressable command dials are fiddly and easily knocked. Overall there are arguably too many control points for such a small camera, but it’s a camera that can be set up to be really enjoyable to use.

Both these cameras are significantly better than the already good cameras they replace, so there’s no wrong choice here. So which is more important to you: the experience of photography or the certainty of getting the shot?

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Sony a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T30: Which is best for you?

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Viltrox announces 85mm F1.8 autofocus lens for Sony E-mount cameras

27 Apr

Chinese camera accessory manufacturer Viltrox has announced a new 85mm F1.8 autofocus lens for Sony E-mount camera systems.

The lens, which has an aperture range of F1.8 to F16, is designed for full-frame Sony cameras, but also works as a 127.5mm equivalent on APS-C cameras. It’s constructed of ten elements in seven groups, including one extra-low dispersion element and four specialty elements made from ‘highly transparent glass,’ which Viltrox says reduces aberrations and improves color rendering. Viltrox also uses an ‘HD Nano’ multi-layer coating on individual elements to minimize ghosting and flares.

A stepping motor (STM) is used to drive the autofocus and the lens features a minimum focusing distance of 80cm (2.62ft). The front filter size is 72mm and integrated contacts power the aperture mechanism and deliver EXIF data to compatible Sony cameras.

Viltrox doesn’t provide the dimensions of the lens, but it weighs 636g (1.4lbs). One of the more interesting elements of the lens is an integrated microUSB port located on the rear metal mount of the lens. This connector is used to upgrade the lens’ firmware, which is currently listed as version 1.01 at launch.

B&H currently has the Viltrox 85mm F1.8 STM Lens for Sony E-mount available to pre-order for $ 379. The expected shipping date is May 6, 2019.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Viltrox announces 85mm F1.8 autofocus lens for Sony E-mount cameras

Posted in Uncategorized