RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘scene’

Fujifilm GFX 100 added to studio test scene

04 Jun

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-56783544″,”widgetId”:687,”initialStateId”:null}) })

Fujifilm’s GFX 100 is equipped with an all-new, 100MP backside-illuminated CMOS sensor with dual-gain architecture. Not only does this sensor offer outstanding resolution, it also promises to exceed the capabilities of today’s best full-frame cameras when it comes to high ISO image quality and Raw dynamic range.

We’ve been shooting with a pre-production GFX 100 with near-final firmware for a while now, and as part of our ongoing review we’ve updated our studio scene database so you can see how it compares. Please note that these images may be replaced when we have access to final firmware and / or a final shipping sample of the GFX 100 in the coming weeks.


Images shot using a pre-production Fujifilm GFX 100 and published with permission. Image quality may not exactly represent exactly the output from final shipping cameras but is likely to be extremely close.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Fujifilm GFX 100 added to studio test scene

Posted in Uncategorized

 

How to Use Scene Elements to Create Impactful Panoramas

13 May

The post How to Use Scene Elements to Create Impactful Panoramas appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Ian Johnson.

Close your eyes and let me take you to a scene that you have experienced before. You are standing in front of a wonderful vista. It is huge – a sunset, a mountain range, a canyon, a cityscape – and you are blown away by the grandeur of it. After admiring it for a bit you pull out your cell phone or camera to take an image. But alas, your phone cannot capture the image because it extends far out of your field of view. “Not to worry,” you think to yourself as you flip your device into panorama mode to create impactful panoramas.

A few seconds later and your newly stitched image captures the whole scene with one problem: all the things you loved about the scene have been reduced to tiny pixels making it hard to appreciate how beautiful it was out there. In my opinion, you’ve fallen victim to the “panorama trap.”

Paradoxically, wider is not always better for capturing a large vista!

Panorama, How-to, Foreground, Photography, Lessons, Northern Lights, Mountains, Cannery

This panoramic image illustrates the “Panorama Trap.” I wanted to photograph the mountains, but there is nothing compelling to draw me into the image or tell the story of that place (it happens to be the Denali Highway).

You can up your panorama photography game by carefully thinking about elements of the shot before making it. For instance, integrating close foreground elements using hyperfocal distance or switching to a longer lens can give you a more interesting shot. We’ll go through that and more in this article!

Why panoramas?

In order to capture a more interesting shot, it is useful to think about why you are using a particular technique. For instance, you might think of black and white photography for shadows and contrast, macro techniques for tiny things (although that’s a rule to be broken), and side-lighting for portrait photography. Each of these techniques or photography genres is meant to maximize the benefit and impact of the elements in the image.

So, why panoramic? Because you want to maximize and impress the viewer with grand-scale elements in the image which you cannot capture in one image alone. Using the mantra of “making a shot” and not “taking a shot” is good to keep in mind for panoramas. To make a more compelling panorama, envision what you want to accomplish and how you want the image to feel or influence your viewer before pressing the shutter button.

Panorama, How-to, Foreground, Photography, Lessons, Northern Lights, Mountains, Cannery

Some scenes are just too big for one image! This snow-covered landscape caught my attention during an afternoon of skiing. I like the framing of the trees on the left, but to my eye, this image still gets caught firmly in the panorama trap because it lacks compelling elements in the foreground.

Techniques

Integrate Close Foreground Elements using Hyperfocal Distance

Foreground elements are critical pieces to incorporate into your image to grab the viewer. Foreground elements help tell a story, give the image context, and make it more interesting to look at. Since many panoramas get taken with a mid-length (e.g., 50 mm) to ultra-wide lenses (e.g., 12mm), you must walk close enough to foreground elements to give them a presence in the image.  You can maximize the impact of a foreground element by using a photography technique called hyperfocal distance.

Panorama, How-to, Foreground, Photography, Lessons, Northern Lights, Mountains, Cannery

This image was made during a recent trip to Hawaii and shot on a Nikon D810 with a 24mm Sigma Art f/1.4. The Mamane Tree in the foreground was a compelling silhouette.  I am only about 10 feet from it, but HFD enabled me to keep the foreground and Milky Way sharp.

Hyperfocal distance (HFD) is not a “hyper-difficult” subject. By definition, it is the closest thing your lens can focus on while keeping the horizon at infinity. HFD is influenced by your lens focal length, by your camera’s sensor size, and by your aperture. As a rule of thumb, wider lenses have a shorter HFD than longer lenses, and the larger your sensor is, the shorter the HFD is. Creating a smaller aperture (e.g., f/16 instead of f/2.8) will also decrease the HFD.

Depending on your system and camera settings you may be able to have foreground elements 2.0 feet (0.6m) away and have all elements beyond that in focus! There are many resources to learn HFD from and to calculate it for your camera system. I recommend starting with this article to learn more. As you use HFD more, you will begin to have an intuitive sense of how far objects have to be from your camera to be in focus.

Panorama, How-to, Foreground, Photography, Lessons, Northern Lights, Mountains, Cannery

This image incorporates HFD to frame the image. The closest spruce is about 8 feet in front of me. I made the image with a Nikon D810 and a 12mm, ultra-wide lens

Hopefully, you have made the connection of why HFD will help you integrate interesting foreground elements into your panoramic image. Here’s how you can achieve intriguing panoramas in three generic steps:

  1. find a compelling scene,
  2. locate an interesting foreground element, and
  3. walk to the HFD in front of the foreground element and begin shooting.

I recommend stopping your lens down to f/8, so it is at its sharpest and shooting with a panning tripod head to keep your horizon straight and level. It will make the stitch and final image cleaner. However, don’t be overwhelmed – these techniques take time and patience.

Panorama, How-to, Foreground, Photography, Lessons, Northern Lights, Mountains, Cannery

This image was made on an Olympus OMD Em5 with a 12mm lens adapted with a Metabones speed booster. The foreground silhouette tree was about 8 feet away. I got as close as HFD would allow to make it impactful in the image.

 

Panorama, How-to, Foreground, Photography, Lessons, Northern Lights, Mountains, Cannery

This image is not utilizing HFD, but I had to consciously know how close to stand to these spruces to give them impact in the image. I intentionally balanced their silhouette against the glow of the Northern Lights.

Now that you have learned briefly about HFD, I’m going to tell you to keep in mind that rules are made to be broken! The foreground of your image may be far more important to the telling of that story than the horizon. Having an in-focus foreground element and out-of-focus background is okay too.

The image below has many compelling elements. However, my goal was to bring you into the winter scene by ensuring the hoar-frost-covered Black Spruce in the foreground was tack-sharp.

Panorama, How-to, Foreground, Photography, Lessons, Northern Lights, Mountains, Cannery

Rules are made to be broken! In this image, I knew my background and stars were going to be out of focus. That did not matter to me because they were only accents to the foreground trees and their beauty.

Use long lenses to bring the scene to you

You may be thinking to yourself “I can’t always get closer to my subject, so what then?” Not to worry – you can make compelling panoramic images by using long lenses to bring the landscape closer to you. When using a long lens of 150mm or more, it is critical that you use a tripod with a panning head. Use a cable release to remove shake in the lens and shoot at a large aperture (e.g., f/20) to get sharp elements.

Panorama, How-to, Foreground, Photography, Lessons, Northern Lights, Mountains, Cannery

This image of Denali was made with an Olympus OMD Em5ii at 100mm. I isolated the mountain and its foothills to create a panorama full of layers, colors, and textures.

You can use a telephoto lens to isolate and photograph your favorite part of a scene. Above, I used one to isolate Denali, and below, I used it to isolate a cannery against the large mountains of the Juneau Range.

The steps for making a panoramic image with a telephoto lens are similar to using HFD. You need to:

  1. Identify a scene,
  2.  identify which part of the scene to isolate with the telephoto, and
  3. shoot the scene with the telephoto and cable release.
Panorama, How-to, Foreground, Photography, Lessons, Northern Lights, Mountains, Cannery

I made this image from a boat and shot it at 330mm to isolate the cannery. The effect of “compression” from the telephoto lens made the mountains feel very close to the cannery. In reality, they are over 18 miles (350km) away!

Practice makes perfect

Experimenting with HFD and long lenses is going to result in some images that you “could have done better on.” Expect to learn from your mistakes!

I’ll share an image that illustrates when my HFD distance estimating was off. I did not achieve a sharp foreground and background. However, I like how the sharp part of the image draws your eyes through the snow-covered trees. So, this image is not a total flop.

As I always say, “pixels are cheap.”

I hope you make tons of pixels while experimenting with panoramic images!

Panorama, How-to, Foreground, Photography, Lessons, Northern Lights, Mountains, Cannery

Even images that are not perfect can have qualities you like! The air glow on this night was spectacular and I like how the distant spruces are in focus drawing your eye through the tunnel of snow-covered trees.

The post How to Use Scene Elements to Create Impactful Panoramas appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Ian Johnson.


Digital Photography School

 
Comments Off on How to Use Scene Elements to Create Impactful Panoramas

Posted in Photography

 

Panasonic Lumix S1R studio scene with high-res mode published

23 Apr

We’ve been working through our full review of Panasonic’s high-megapixel, full-frame flagship, the Lumix S1R, and have published our studio test scene images from it – including the 187MP high-res mode. It’s, well, quite something. Take a look for yourself and prepare to get well acquainted with every detail of our studio test scene.

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-44664544″,”widgetId”:674,”initialStateId”:null}) })
Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Panasonic Lumix S1R studio scene with high-res mode published

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Ricoh GR III studio scene published

14 Apr

We’ve been eager to test the Ricoh GR III since it arrived, so in addition to a sample gallery and a thorough analysis from the guys at DPReview TV, it’s also been added to our studio test scene comparison tool. Take a look at how it compares to its peers.

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-57418233″,”widgetId”:673,”initialStateId”:null}) })
Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Ricoh GR III studio scene published

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Fujifilm X-T30, Sony a6400 added to studio test scene

29 Mar

Fujifilm’s X-T30 and Sony’s a6400 are both highly capable midrange cameras, with APS-C sensors, similar resolution, excellent autofocus systems and similar pricing. So how do they stack up in our standard studio test scene? Take a look for yourself while we continue working through our full reviews.

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-1084047″,”widgetId”:670,”initialStateId”:null}) })
Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Fujifilm X-T30, Sony a6400 added to studio test scene

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Canon EOS RP added to studio test scene comparison, sample gallery updated

07 Mar

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_0019055356″,”galleryId”:”0019055356″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

The Canon EOS RP is an impressively small camera considering the large full-frame sensor inside. That sensor gives you 26MP of resolution, and is closely related to the unit in Canon’s existing EOS 6D II DSLR. We’ve had it out and about for some sunshine and soul music in Seattle, and have also put it in front of our test scene to see what it can do. Take a peek through our updated sample gallery and around our studio scene to see how Canon’s new baby full framer fares.

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-56016112″,”widgetId”:661,”initialStateId”:null}) })
Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Canon EOS RP added to studio test scene comparison, sample gallery updated

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Nikon Z7 added to studio comparison scene

29 Sep

Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors and detail types you’ll encounter in the real world. It also has two illumination modes to see the effects of different lighting conditions.

The Nikon Z7 has a sensor said to be very similar to the one in the D850 DSLR. We’ve found a few differences, which we’ll be discussing soon, but we wanted to let you have a look straight away. See what you think:

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-126309″,”widgetId”:629,”initialStateId”:null}) })

Click here to read our Nikon Z7 First Impressions Review

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Nikon Z7 added to studio comparison scene

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Fujifilm X-T3 added to studio test scene comparison

19 Sep

Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors and detail types you’ll encounter in the real world. It also has two illumination modes to see the effects of different lighting conditions.

The X-T3 boasts a brand-new 26MP BSI image sensor, which is likely to appear in the next generation of Fujifilm cameras. We’ve added the X-T3 to our studio test scene comparison to take a first look at how the new sensor compares to the competition.

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-64598286″,”widgetId”:628,”initialStateId”:null}) })

Read our Fujifilm X-T3
First Impressions Review

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Fujifilm X-T3 added to studio test scene comparison

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 added to studio scene comparison

20 Jul

Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors and detail types you’ll encounter in the real world. It also has two illumination modes to see the effects of different lighting conditions.

$ (document).ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({“containerId”:”reviewImageComparisonWidget-53603617″,”widgetId”:625,”initialStateId”:null}) })

Our technical evaluation of the Panasonic GX9 has included a trip to the studio, where we put its 20MP Four Thirds sensor in front of our standard test scene. We’ve seen solid image quality from this sensor before, but Panasonic says that it has gone one step further and improved color rendition compared to both the 20MP GX8 and 16MP GX85. Take a closer look at its performance against its predecessors as well as its peers.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 added to studio scene comparison

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Letter from the reviews editor: Pentax K-1 Mark II studio scene re-shoot

01 Jun

Introduction

Back on May 7, we published our review of the Pentax K-1 Mark II. For our studio scene analysis we used the SMC Pentax-D FA 50mm F2.8 Macro lens, rather than the SMC Pentax-FA 77mm F1.8 Limited that we’d used for the original K-1 review. This isn’t ideal (we try to shoot our studio scene as close to 85mm as we can, on full-frame bodies) but we did this because after some comparison tests, we found that the 50mm F2.8 was slightly sharper than our copy of the 77mm in the central portion of the frame, and that’s where we’re looking when we draw our conclusions.

While the center looked better, as many of you noticed, the top right corner of the scene shot with the 50mm F2.8 was soft; softer than the same area in images shot with the K-1. However, given the sharper central area (and the lack of a better sample of the 77mm at the time), we opted to publish the review regardless, since we don’t draw any sharpness or resolution conclusions from the edges of our studio scene.

Unfortunately, after the review was published we discovered a processing error with one of the K-1 II’s studio files, taken at ISO 12,800. This was swapped out, with an editors’ note added as soon as we became aware of it. More seriously, we also discovered that the K-1 Mark II’s JPEG profile had been incorrectly set to ‘Auto’. This resulted in differences in color and saturation compared to the K-1, which had been set correctly to the default: ‘Bright’.

See the updated K-1 Mark II
image quality page

Upon considering the cumulative effect of these differences, we spoke to Ricoh, who were kind enough to send us a second K-1 II, a K-1 and a hand-picked 77mm F1.8 Limited, so that we could re-shoot. Now that we’ve had a chance to compare the results of both cameras with the new 77mm F1.8 (which is noticeably sharper than the lens with which we originally tested the K-1), I wanted to share our findings with you.

The re-shoot and the results

First and most notably, it’s still clear that the accelerator unit in the K-1 Mark II is applying noise reduction to Raw files that the user cannot disable or remove. At high ISO values this still results in a loss of detail and contrast and the introduction of artifacts, but we have to acknowledge that a portion of our assessments were based on the incorrectly processed ISO 12,800 file. Our impression of JPEG color has also improved markedly as a result of using the correct ‘Bright’ profile.

As a result, we have adjusted both our scoring and some of the wording throughout the review to reflect this. It’s important to note that scoring and our overall assessment of the camera are not significantly changed, though; here’s why.

Most notably, it’s still clear the K-1 Mark II is applying noise reduction to Raw files

Despite the two-year gap between them, the K-1 Mark II still represents a minor upgrade over the K-1. Yes, you can now choose ISO 819,200, but the quality and therefore the utility of this setting is questionable. Autofocus tracking is improved, but still uncompetitive. Noise reduction in Raw does reduce visible grain at high ISO values, but its value to demanding users of such a high-end, high-res camera who are likely to want complete control over their images strikes us as suspect. The K-1 II’s lagging video capabilities look increasingly amiss in today’s market, and lastly, the Dynamic (hand held) Pixel Shift does not actually align images moved by a single pixel, instead approximating a super resolution technique that’s been around for years.

Read the full Pentax K-1 II review

All of this is certainly not to say the K-1 Mark II is a bad camera. Both the K-1 II and its predecessor are built like tanks, come with a bevy of unique features and are capable of absolutely outstanding image quality. We aim to give credit where credit is due, but as always, our first obligation is to help photographers spend their hard-earned money wisely. The fact remains that, despite our reassessment of the K-1 II’s image quality and JPEG color in particular, there are many ways in which the K-1 Mark II is simply outclassed by the competition.

Because of this, it’s still difficult for us to recommend the K-1 Mark II over competing models, and still difficult to recommend existing K-1 users pay $ 500 for the upgrade.

The final word

In the end, we are beholden to our readers and endeavor to hold all information that we publish on DPReview to the highest standards of accuracy. We fell short of that goal in this instance, and I apologize wholeheartedly for that. I hope that in fixing our mistakes with the K-1 Mark II, we’ve provided some additional and useful value to our review. We will take what we’ve learned from this experience to improve our future reviews in the hopes that we can continue to provide the most detailed and useful photography content on the internet.

As always, thanks for reading.

Carey

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Letter from the reviews editor: Pentax K-1 Mark II studio scene re-shoot

Posted in Uncategorized