RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘mobile’

Floating Greenhouse: Mobile Barge to Grow Food & Cruise Danube

08 Jul

[ By WebUrbanist in Architecture & Cities & Urbanism. ]

eco barge

Designed to float down the Danube river in Europe, the Eco Barge is a solar-powered floating greenhouse illustrating the possibilities of offshoring urban food production.

floating eco barge concept

floating greenhouse model

In addition to growing usable organic produce on the water, the barge has educational components, aiming to host presentations and workshops for citizens of European cities along the river, starting in Belgrade. Growing on the water allows food production to remain local without taking up valuable urban land.

floating solar greenhouse

floating greenhouse design

An indoor office and presentation space brackets one end of the barge while the greenhouse is situated at the other, an open space with solar panels sitting in between. Sun and wind power systems generate renewable energy used to power the vessel as well as its on-board irrigation system.

floating hotel concept

floatel

Salt & Water, the architectural and yacht design firm behind the Eco Barge, are known for their floating projects, including a floating hotel concept made up of private yachts. These independent boats share common docks and community spaces, but can detach for explorations as well.

Share on Facebook





[ By WebUrbanist in Architecture & Cities & Urbanism. ]

[ WebUrbanist | Archives | Galleries | Privacy | TOS ]


WebUrbanist

 
Comments Off on Floating Greenhouse: Mobile Barge to Grow Food & Cruise Danube

Posted in Creativity

 

DxOMark Mobile Report added to our LG G5 review

15 Jun

We have added DxOMark’s Mobile Report to our camera review of the LG G5. The report includes DxO Lab’s usual industrial-quality scientific measurements. Its imaging experts have analyzed 14 aspects of mobile imaging including detailed image quality assessment, flash performance, autofocus reliability and more to calculate a final score. Click below to read our LG G5 review and go to page 9 for the DxO Mark mobile report.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on DxOMark Mobile Report added to our LG G5 review

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Mobile Museums: French Train Cars Filled with Impressionist Art

07 Jun

[ By SA Rogers in Art & Installation & Sound. ]

french train car musems 1

Commuters traveling from Gare Saint-Lazare to Vernon-Giverny in France get to gaze up at a selection of impressionist art from the Musée d’Orsay applied right onto the walls and ceilings of their train cars. The SNCF (French National Railway Company) collaborated with the adhesive experts at 3M for a summer-long installation that will make rail travel a lot more beautiful and relaxing. Three double-height cars on the RER line have been altered for the project, photographed by Christophe Recoura so the rest of the world can catch a glimpse, too.

french train car museums 2

An adhesive graphic film printed with impressionist scenes was carefully applied to immerse train travelers in these serene compositions starring the vague painterly brush strokes the movement is known for. Each car has its own theme: gardens and water, local landscapes or Paris industrialization.

french train car museums 3

french train car museums 4

french train car museums 5

This particular line serves visitors heading to Normandy, the birthplace of Impressionism and home of the annual Impressionist Festival. Sight-seers can gaze up at works by painters like Claude Monet as they travel to his former home in Giverny or to the André Malraux Museum (MuMa), which hosts the second-largest collection of Impressionist works in the world after the Musée d’Orsay in Paris.

french train car museums 6

french train car museums 7

15 juin 2013.Le "Train de l'impessionnisme-Musée d'Orsay/STIF/SNCF".

In fact, a long-serving steam train line direct from Paris to Normandy is credited with encouraging artists to travel to that lush, peaceful corner of France in the first place as Normandy became home to a new school of open-air painting. The trains carried the artists, their families and their aristocratic clientele back and forth between the two cities, delivering them from the modern metropolis to a countryside full of cliffs, meadows and Gothic cathedrals.

Share on Facebook





[ By SA Rogers in Art & Installation & Sound. ]

[ WebUrbanist | Archives | Galleries | Privacy | TOS ]


WebUrbanist

 
Comments Off on Mobile Museums: French Train Cars Filled with Impressionist Art

Posted in Creativity

 

DxOMark Mobile Report: Lenovo Moto G Plus

17 May

DxOMark Mobile Report: Lenovo Moto G Plus

Summary

The Moto G Plus is the newest arrival in the Moto G series of mid-range smartphones. With a 1/2.4-inch Omnivsion OV16860 16MP sensor with a large pixel size of 1.34um, F2.0 aperture, on-sensor phase detection and laser-assisted AF the camera specification would look right at home on a high-end device. You can read our first impressions review of the Moto G Plus here.

In its DxOMark test the Moto G Plus scores 84 points, which puts it on the same level as current flagship phones, such as the Apple iPhone 6s Plus, Google Nexus 6P or Motorola/Lenovo’s own Droid Turbo 2/Moto X Force. When shooting still images the testers liked the “very good detail preservation” in bright light, the “fast and accurate autofocus” and “good noise reduction in outdoor conditions”. They also noted the colors, which are “vivid and pleasant” in daylight and the good white balance in low and artificial light. On the downside, outdoor images show “some loss of detail in the shadow areas”, a “slightly bluish cast is sometimes visible in outdoor scenes” and “some irregularities in HDR activation and white balance are visible”. Some outdoor images also showed a “cyan shift close to sky saturation”.

In video mode the DxOMark team liked the “good stabilization both in bright light and indoor conditions, good color rendering and white balance, fast autofocus convergence and good noise reduction in outdoor conditions”. However, they also found that “from macro to infinity, some steps during the autofocus convergence are visible” and saw “occasional autofocus inaccuracies in low light”. “In low light some detail is lost and luminance noise is visible” and there are “visible steps in exposure adaptation”.

Still Photography

Color, Exposure and Contrast

The DxOMark team found the Lenovo Moto G Plus images to show “vivid and pleasant color”, with good white balance and without any color shading. Target exposure is generally good. However, in difficult light situations highlights are occasionally clipped, “some irregularities in HDR activation are visible” and a “slightly bluish cast” sometimes appears in daylight images. In low light “very slight color shading is visible.”

Overall DxOMark awarded the Lenovo Moto G Plus scores of:

  • 4.4 out of 5 for Exposure
  • 4.5 out of 5 for White Balance accuracy
  • 3.9 out of 5 for Color shading in low light*
  • 4.5 out of 5 for Color shading in bright light*
  • 3.0 out of 5 for Color Rendering in low light
  • 4.5 out of 5 for Color Rendering in bright light

*Color Shading is the nasty habit cellphone cameras have of rendering different areas of the frame with different color shifts, resulting in pictures with, for example, pinkish centers and greenish corners.

Noise and Details

DxOMark’s engineers reported that the Lenovo Moto G Plus images show “very good detail and good noise reduction in outdoor conditions”. However, there is also “some luminance noise and some loss of detail in low light”.

Texture Acutance

Texture acutance is a way of measuring the ability of a camera to capture images that preserve fine details, particularly the kind of low contrast detail (such as fine foliage, hair or fur) that can be blurred away by noise reduction or obliterated by excessive sharpening.

Sharpness is an important part of the quality of an image, but while it’s easy to look at an image and decide visually whether it’s sharp or not, the objective measurement of sharpness is less straightforward.

An image can be defined as ‘sharp’ if edges are sharp and if fine details are visible. In-camera processing means that it’s possible to have one of these (sharp edges) but not the other (fine details). Conventional MTF measurements tell us how sharp an edge is, but have drawbacks when it comes to measuring fine detail preservation. Image processing algorithms can detect edges and enhance their sharpness, but they can also find homogeneous areas and smooth them out to reduce noise.

Texture acutance, on the other hand, can qualify sharpness in terms of preservation of fine details, without being fooled by edge enhancement algorithms.

A dead leaf pattern is designed to measure texture acutance. It’s obtained by drawing random shapes that occlude each other in the plane, like dead leaves falling from a tree. The statistics of this model follow the distribution statistics in natural images.

In this example from a DSLR without edge enhancement, sharpness seems equal on edge and on texture. Many details are visible in the texture.

In this second example, edges have been digitally enhanced, and the edge looks over sharp, with visible processing halos (‘ringing’). On the texture part, many details have disappeared.

At first sight, the images from these two cameras may appear equally sharp. A sharpness measurement on edges will indeed confirm this impression, and will even show that the second camera is sharper. But a closer examination of low contrasted textures shows that the first camera has better preservation of fine details than the second. The purpose of the texture acutance measurement is to qualify this difference.

Note: Acutance is a single value metric calculated from a MTF result. Acutance is used to assess the sharpness of an image as viewed by the human visual system, and is dependent on the viewing conditions (size of image, size of screen or print, viewing distance). Only the values of texture acutance are given here. The measurements are expressed as a percentage of the theoretical maximum for the chosen viewing condition. The higher the score, the more details can be seen in an image. 
 
For all DxOMark Mobile data presented on connect.dpreview.com we’re only showing 8MP equivalent values, which gives us a level playing field for comparison between smartphone cameras with different megapixel values by normalizing all to 8MP (suitable for fairly large prints). DxOMark also offers this data for lower resolution use-cases (web and onscreen). For more information on DxOMark’s testing methodology and acutance measurements please visit the website at www.dxomark.com.
 Texture acutance is a touch higher under daylight than tungsten light. 
In bright light the Moto G Plus is up with the best but drops off a little at lower light levels.

Edge Acutance

Edge acutance is a measure of edge sharpness in images captured by the phone’s camera. Again we’re only looking at the most demanding of the three viewing conditions that DxOMark reports on – the 8MP equivalent.
 In terms of edge acutance the Moto G Plus is performing on flagship level. 
 Edge acutance is very consistent across all light levels. 

Visual Noise

Visual noise is a value designed to assess the noise in an image as perceived by the human visual system, depending on the viewing condition (size of image, size of screen or print, viewing distance). The measurements have no units and can be simply viewed as the weighted average of noise standard deviation for each channel in the CIE L*a*b* color space. The lower the measurement, the less noise in the image.

 The Moto G Plus noise levels compare well to the competition at all light levels
 Measured noise levels only increase moderately in lower light.

Noise and Detail Perceptual scoring

DxOMark engineers don’t just point camera phones at charts, they also take and analyze plenty of real-world shots and score them accordingly. Their findings for the Lenovo Moto G Plus are:

Natural scene

  • Texture (bright light): 4.8 out of 5
  • Texture (low light): 3.7 out of 5
  • Noise (bright light): 4.1 out of 5
  • Noise (low light) 3.9 out of 5
 Bright light sample shot
 100% crop: good noise reduction  100% crop: good detail preservation
 Low light (20 Lux) studio shot
100% crop: some luminance noise in areas of plain color 100% crop: some very fine detail is being lost

Artifacts

Phone cameras, like entry-level compact cameras, tend to suffer from artifacts such as sharpening halos, color fringing, vignetting (shading) and distortion, which can have an impact on the visual appeal of the end result. DxOMark engineers measure and analyze a range of artifacts. Their findings after testing the Lenovo Moto G Plus are shown below:

  • Cyan shift close to sky saturation visible in outdoor shots
  • Some color fringing noticeable in backlit scenes
  • Moiré is occasionally visible

Perceptual Scores

  • Sharpness 4.5 out of 5
  • Color fringing 3.6 out of 5

Measured findings

  • Ringing center 7.6%
  • Ringing corner 4.9%
  • Max geometric distortion -0.4%
  • Luminance shading 9.4%

Distortion and Chromatic Aberrations

The graph shows the magnification from center to edge (with the center normalized to 1). The Lenovo Moto G Plus shows a very slight pincushion distortion, which you are not going to notice in normal photography.
 Chromatic aberrations are well under control.

Autofocus

DxOMark also tests autofocus accuracy and reliability by measuring how much the acutance – or sharpness – varies with each shot over a series of 30 exposures (defocusing then using the autofocus for each one). As with other tests these results are dependent on the viewing conditions (a little bit out of focus matters a lot less with a small web image than a full 8MP shot viewed at 100%). Using the 8MP equivalent setting, the Lenovo Moto G Plus performs very well in all light conditions. The overall score is 95/100 in bright light and 87/100 in low light.

Pros: 

  • Accurate and repeatable autofocus in all conditions

Cons:

  • Strong instabilities and overshoots in preview mode, particularly in low light
  • Slow convergence, particularly in low light
Autofocus repeatability – average acutance difference with best focus: low light 3.26%, bright light 1.63%

Flash

The Lenovo Moto G Plus offers a dual-LED flash for illumination in very low light. DxOMark scored the camera a 77/100 overall for its flash performance. 

Pros: 

  • Good exposure and vivid colors
  • Pleasant colors when flash is mixed with tungsten light

Cons:

  • Some focus and exposure irregularities
  • Noticeable hue non-uniformity in the field
  • Noise and attenuation visible in the corners

Overall DxOMark Mobile Score for Photo: 84 / 100


Video Capture

DxOMark engineers put phone cameras through a similarly grueling set of video tests, and you can read their full findings on the DxOMark website here. Overall, DxOMark found the Lenovo Moto G Plus video mode to perform very well, with fast autofocus, good stabilization and good color. On the downside, some stepping can be visible when the AF is adjusting and luminance noise is visible in low light footage.

Pros: 

  • Good stabilization
  • Good color rendering and white balance
  • Fast autofocus convergence
  • Good noise reduction in outdoor conditions

Cons: 

  • Some steps are visible during autofocus convergence in bright light
  • Occasional autofocus inaccuracies in low light
  • In low light some detail is lost and luminance noise is visible
  • Visible steps in exposure adaptation

Overall DxOMark Mobile Score for Video: 81 / 100

DXOMark Mobile Score
84

DXOMark Image Quality Assessment

With a DxOMark Mobile score of 84 the Lenovo Moto G Plus performs on the same level as flagship models, such as the Apple iPhone 6s Plus, Google Nexus 6P or Motorola’s own Moto X Force / Droid Turbo 2, in the DxOMark smartphone rankings.  The test team liked the good detail in bright light, good color, low noise levels and reliable AF in bright light. However, they also found some loss of detail in the shadows and an occasional slightly cool color cast.  

In video mode the Moto G Plus has efficient stabilization, good color and very decent noise reduction in bright light. However, testers also found some AF inaccuracies and luminance noise in low light. For a more detailed analysis, visit www.dxomark.com.

Photo Mobile Score 85   Video Mobile Score 81
Exposure and Contrast 84   Exposure and Contrast 84
Color 85   Color 81
Autofocus 91   Autofocus 75
Texture 85   Texture 83
Noise 86   Noise 85
Photo Artifacts 85   Video Artifacts 80
Flash 77   Stabilization 81

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on DxOMark Mobile Report: Lenovo Moto G Plus

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Padcaster VERSE is a mobile media case for iOS and Android devices

05 May

A few days ago we wrote about the Helium Core Kickstarter project which aims to turn your iPhone into a full-blown imaging rig with a large number of accessory ports and mounting options. The Padcaster VERSE is the subject of another Kickstarter project and presents a very similar concept. However, it differs from the Helium in some fundamental ways. The original Padcaster was designed a couple of years ago for the iPad Mini but thanks to a universal bracket that is compatible with any phone or tablet up to 5.31 inches, the VERSE is much more (you guessed it) versatile. It works with both Apple iOS and Android devices.

While the Helium Core is made from aluminum the Padcaster VERSE is polycarbonate plastic. It comes with twelve ¼-inch threads and five cold shoe mounts, allowing you to mount it to any type of camera support and attach an abundance of accessories such as lights, microphones or teleprompters. Like the Helium Core the Padcaster Verse is targeted at filmmakers, video bloggers, mobile journalists, photographers and other such creatives. Its adjustable mount makes it look like an ideal solution for those who use more than one device or want to be prepared for eventual upgrades. You can secure yourself an early-bird Padcaster VERSE by pledging $ 50 on the project’s Kickstarter page where you’ll also find additional information.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Padcaster VERSE is a mobile media case for iOS and Android devices

Posted in Uncategorized

 

DxOMark Mobile report: Nextbit Robin

26 Apr

The Nextbit Robin looks like your standard smartphone, but its cool blue exterior houses the first real cloud-based phone. It’s an innovative device, but unfortunately its camera falls short of the best in its class. DxOMark has put the Robin through its standard mobile tests, awarding it 81 points and putting it in 18th place in DxO’s mobile rankings. While image testers liked the Robin’s good detail preservation and fast AF, unusually high noise levels kept NextBit’s smartphone out of the higher echelon’s of the DxO rankings.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on DxOMark Mobile report: Nextbit Robin

Posted in Uncategorized

 

DxOMark Mobile report: Nextbit Robin

22 Apr

The Nextbit Robin looks like your standard smartphone, but its cool blue exterior houses the first real cloud-based phone. It’s an innovative device, but unfortunately its camera falls short of the best in its class. DxOMark has put the Robin through its standard mobile tests, awarding it 81 points and putting it in 18th place in DxO’s mobile rankings. While image testers liked the Robin’s good detail preservation and fast AF, unusually high noise levels kept NextBit’s smartphone out of the higher echelon’s of the DxO rankings.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on DxOMark Mobile report: Nextbit Robin

Posted in Uncategorized

 

DxOMark Mobile report: HTC 10 rises to the top

15 Apr

Announced earlier this week, the HTC 10 is the Taiwanese manufacturer’s latest flagship model and comes with a top-end camera specification. A 1/2.3-inch 12MP sensor is combined with a fast F1.8 aperture and optical image stabilization. The attention to camera spec detail has evidently served the device well, as it shoots to the top of DxOMark’s mobile rankings to share the first spot with the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on DxOMark Mobile report: HTC 10 rises to the top

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Samsung Galaxy S7 edge takes top spot in DxO Mobile rankings

19 Mar

DxOMark has put the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge through its testing, and with a score of 88 the device moves into the top spot in DxO’s mobile rankings. The S7 edge and slightly smaller S7 use a 12MP sensor with on-chip phase detection and an F1.7 lens with optical image stabilization. By taking the top position in the mobile rankings, the S7 edge relegates its Galaxy S6 edge plus and the Sony Xperia Z5 to a joint number two spot.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Samsung Galaxy S7 edge takes top spot in DxO Mobile rankings

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 First Impressions Review

17 Mar

The Sony a6300 is the company’s latest mid-range mirrorless camera. Like the a6000 it still offers 24MP resolution but the autofocus ability, video capability, build quality, viewfinder resolution and price have all been increased.

The most exciting change from our perspective is the a6300’s new sensor. Although the pixel count remains the same, the a6300’s sensor has a whopping 425 phase-detection AF points ranged across the sensor. The a6000 already offered one of the best AF systems in its class, when it comes to identifying and tracking subjects, so an upgrade in this area sounds extremely promising. The sensor is also built using newer fabrication processes that use copper wiring to help improve the sensor’s performance and possibly contributing to the camera’s slightly enhanced battery life.

The a6000 has been a huge success and has dominated its field to the extent that its combination of capability and price still looks impressive even as it enters the twilight of its career (Sony says it will live on, alongside the a6300*). That model represented a dip down-market for the series, with a drop in build-quality and spec relative to the NEX-6 that preceded it. The a6300 corrects that course, and sees the model regain the high-resolution viewfinder and magnesium alloy build offered by the older NEX-6.

Key features:

  • 24MP Exmor CMOS sensor
  • 425 phase detection points to give ‘4D Focus’ Hybrid AF
  • 4K (UHD) video – 25/24p from full width, 30p from smaller crop
  • 2.36m dot OLED finder with 120fps mode
  • Dust and moisture resisitant magnesium alloy body
  • Built-in Wi-Fi with NFC connection option
  • Built-in microphone socket

As with the previous 6-series E-mount cameras, the a6300 features a flip up/down 16:9 ratio screen. The shape of this screen hints at the 6300’s intended uses: video shooting as well as stills. The a6300’s movie features have been considerably uprated. It not only shoots 4K (UHD) at 24p or 25p from its full sensor width (or 30p from a tighter crop). It also gains a mic socket, the video-focused Picture Profile system (which includes the flat S-Log2 and S-Log3 gamma curves), and the ability to record time code.

This added emphasis on video makes absolute sense, since the camera’s stills performance is likely to be competitive with the best on the market but its video capabilities trounce most of its current rivals. The a6300 not only includes focus peaking and zebra stripes but, if its on-sensor phase detection works well, the ability to re-focus as you shoot with minimal risk of focus wobble and hunting, should make it easier to shoot great-looking footage.

All this makes it hard to overstate how promising the a6300 looks. A latest-generation sensor can only mean good things for the camera’s image quality and an autofocus system that moves beyond the performance of one of our benchmark cameras is an enticing prospect. Add to that excellent, well-supported video specifications, a better viewfinder and weather-sealed build, and it’s tempting to start planning for the camera’s coronation as King of the APS-C ILCs. Perhaps with only the price tag floating over proceedings, threatening just a little rain on that particular parade.

Specifications compared:

As well as comparing the a6300 with the a6000 as its predecessor/sister model, we’ll also look at what you get if you save up a bit more money and opt for full frame, rather than APS-C. We think at least some enthusiast users will find themselves making this decision, so are highlighting the differences.

  Sony a6000 Sony a6300 Sony a7 II
MSRP (Body Only) $ 650 $ 1000 $ 1700
Sensor size APS-C (23.5 x 15.6mm) APS-C (23.5 x 15.6mm) Full Frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm)
Pixel count 24MP 24MP 24MP
AF system Hybrid AF
(with 179 PDAF points)
Hybrid AF
(with 425 PDAF points)
Hybrid AF
(with 117 PDAF points)
Continuous shooting rate 11.0 fps 11.0 fps 5.0 fps
Screen 3″ tilting 921k dot LCD 3″ tilting 921k dot LCD 3″ tilting 1.23m dot LCD
Viewfinder OLED 1.44m dots OLED 2.36m dots 120fps refresh option OLED 2.36m dots
Movie Resolution 1920 x 1080 / 60p 4K 3840 x 2160 / 30p, 1920 x 1080 / 120p, 60p 1920 x 1080 / 60p
Image stabilization In-lens only In-lens only In-body 5-axis
Number of dials Two Two Three (plus Exp Comp.)
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000sec 1/4000sec 1/8000sec
Built-in flash  Yes Yes No
Hot shoe Yes Yes Yes
Flash sync speed 1/160sec 1/160sec 1/250sec
Battery life
(with EVF)
360 shots
(310 shots)
400 shots
(350 shots)
350 shots
(270 shots)
Weight (w/battery) 344 g (12.1 oz) 404 g (14.3 oz) 599 g (21.1 oz)
Dimensions 120 x 67 x 45 mm (4.7 x 2.6 x 1.8″) 120 x 67 x 49 mm (4.7 x 2.6 x 1.9″) 127 x 96 x 60 mm (5 x 3.8 x 2.4″)

A hit-for-six, slam-dunk, home-run?

If it’s successful in its attempts to step up from the performance of the a6000 then the a6300 could be sensational. However, there are three questions that we’d like to see addressed. The first relates to handling: why does a camera costing this much only have one dial that you can access without changing the position of your grip? The rear dial isn’t the worst we’ve encountered, but at this price point, we’d usually expect to find a dial under the forefinger and another under the thumb while maintaining a shooting grip.

The second relates to lenses. Sony is bundling the a6300 with the 16-50mm power zoom that’s far more notable for its convenience than its optical consistency, a move that’s likely to raise the question of what other lenses to fit. Sony offers a handful of reasonably-priced APS-C specific prime lenses as well as some more expensive FE-compatible full frame primes. However, in terms of standard zooms, you’re currently limited to the inexpensive 16-50mm or the considerably better 16-70mm F4 Zeiss that costs around the same amount as the camera again. The success of Sony’s full frame a7 cameras is only likely to improve third-party lens availability but there’s a risk that Sony’s focus will be on those full frame users for the foreseeable future.

Our final concern is the lack of joystick or touchscreen to reposition the AF point. This may be mitigated during stills shooting if the lock-on AF system works well enough (starting AF tracking and then recompose your shot in the knowledge that the AF point will stay where you want it), but it appears to be a real omission for refocusing while shooting video. We’ll see how significant all these concerns turn out to be, as the review unfolds.

Price and kit options

 The 16-50mm power zoom is far more notable for its convenience than its optical consistency.

The a6300 will sell for around $ 1000/£1000/€1,250, with a 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 power zoom kit commanding an MSRP of $ 1,150/£1,100/€1,400. This is a significant step up from the a6000’s $ 650/$ 800 launch price and even an increase compared to the similarly well-built NEX-6’s $ 750/$ 900 MSRP.

 Review History
17 March 2016 Intro, Specs, Body and Handling, Operations and Control and Studio Comparison published

*Unusually, the manufacturer’s claim that it’ll live on, alongside its apparent replacement model seems plausible. The differences in spec and price could allow them to sit fairly comfortably alongside one another, rather than the claim simply meaning ‘we’ll keep saying it’s a current model until most of the unsold stock has gone, to avoid angering retailers.’


If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).

Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.

We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X, Y, and Z and ideally A, B, and C.

This article is Copyright 1998 – 2016 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 First Impressions Review

Posted in Uncategorized