RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Behind’

LG G6 scores 84 points in DxOMark testing, lags slightly behind closest rivals

11 Jul

DxOMark has published its image quality test results for LG’s current flagship smartphone, the LG G6. The G6 comes with a dual-camera setup that features two 13MP image sensors. In the main camera the sensor is coupled to an F1.8 image-stabilized lens. The secondary super-wide-angle camera comes with a slower F2.4 aperture and has to make do without optical image stabilization. In video mode the G6 can record up to 2160p/30fps footage.

As usual, DxOMark has tested the main camera only and with an overall score of 84 points the G6 is on the same level as last year’s Motorola Moto G Plus or the iPhone 6s. Thanks to excellent exposures, good white balance, vivid color, high levels of detail, and a fast autofocus in bright light the G6 achieves a photo sub-score of 85 points. Negative points include an increase in noise and a reduction in low-contrast detail in lower light.

In video mode the G6 scores 83 points, again thanks to a good performance in brighter conditions. Video footage shows accurate exposure, wide dynamic range, good detail and accurate white balance. Color shading is well under control and the testers liked the efficient stabilization system. You can read the full report on DxOMark.com or find our own comprehensive review of the LG G6 here.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on LG G6 scores 84 points in DxOMark testing, lags slightly behind closest rivals

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Behind the Curtain Wall: Theatrical Facade Rotates Around Cultural Center

28 Jun

[ By WebUrbanist in Architecture & Offices & Commercial. ]

This mesmerizing mobile facade is an aesthetic and engineering marvel, but one has to wonder: could the mechanisms behind it be appropriated for other architectural purposes, like: providing light and shade on demand or on a schedule?

The dynamic design wraps a new cultural center in Shanghai, part of a 190,000-square-meter development by Foster + Partners in collaboration with Heatherwick Studio (images by Laurian Ghinitoiu).

It was inspired by Chinese theaters with bamboo-like bronze tubes set in three layers around the perimeter, constituting what the designers describe as “a moving veil, which adapts to the changing use of the building, and reveals the stage on the balcony and views towards Pudong.” The effect is certainly stunning, but despite the description, it seems to be mostly for show — an novelty experience for visitors and viewers.

The same kinds of systems, however, could be deployed more strategically, using other kinds of semi-opaque screens, for instance, that could automatically position themselves throughout the day to provide layers of shade. Such an application would have practical benefits, reducing cooling costs inside structures and increasing human comfort.

Alternatively, a similar screen system could be controllable by occupants, allowing building users to block off sections for things like meetings or film screenings requiring different amounts of natural light. For now, it remains a fascinating one-off work, but hopefully architects will consider adding this as a tool in their kit, applying similar technical sophistication to solve other site-specific design problems.

Share on Facebook





[ By WebUrbanist in Architecture & Offices & Commercial. ]

[ WebUrbanist | Archives | Galleries | Privacy | TOS ]


WebUrbanist

 
Comments Off on Behind the Curtain Wall: Theatrical Facade Rotates Around Cultural Center

Posted in Creativity

 

TIME Lightbox tells the story behind a viral May Day photo

03 May

Photographer Zakaria Abdelkafi, a Syrian refugee, explains how he reacted to a Molotov cocktail thrown at police, and how the experience impacted him.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on TIME Lightbox tells the story behind a viral May Day photo

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Gcam: the story behind the Google Pixel camera software

28 Mar

Google’s now independent X research division, which calls itself ‘the moonshot factory,’ has been publishing a collection of stories about the group’s graduated projects and where they stand today. The latest article in the so-called Graduate Series offers a closer look at Gcam, the software behind the class-leading cameras in Google’s Pixel devices. 

The blog post outlines how the Gcam team was set up back in 2011 to find a solution for the Google Glasses smart goggles’ most pressing challenge: providing a high-quality camera in a very small device. As using bigger hardware wasn’t an option, the Gcam team developed a method called image fusion, which uses multi-frame-stacking techniques to create a single, higher quality image with lower noise levels, better detail and increased dynamic range. 

The technology, which is now called HDR+, quickly grew beyond Google Glass and made it into the Nexus 5 and Nexus 6 cameras and eventually became the default camera mode in the Google Pixel series. The Gcam team now works across a range of imaging-related technologies, including Android, YouTube, Google Photos 360?Virtual Reality projects. If you are interested in more detail you can read the full blog entry on the X blog or find our full Google Pixel XL camera review here.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Gcam: the story behind the Google Pixel camera software

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Behind the scenes: An interview with the heads of Canon’s L lens factory

22 Mar
From left to right, Mr Hayakawa, Mr Okada and Mr Izuki, the three men in charge of development and keeping things running smoothly at Canon’s Utsunomiya lens plant. 

Following the CP+ 2017 show in Japan, we headed to Canon’s Utsunomiya lens factory to take a tour (see what we found) and interview the gentlemen who oversee all operations and development. This included Kenichi Izuki, the Plant Manager, Masato Okada, Deputy Chief Executive of Image Communication and Products Operations and Shingo Hayakawa, Deputy Group Executive of Image Communication and Products Operations.

The Utsunomiya plant is where all Canon’s L series, cinema, and broadcast lenses are produced. It’s also where all Canon lenses are designed. Many of those designs can be attributed to the three men pictured above. In fact just before we started the interview Mr Izuki informed us that he had been lead designer of the EF 35mm F2 IS lens we’d chosen to document the factory tour. So there’s also a pretty good chance you have one of them to thank for your favorite Canon glass!

Please note that this interview was conducted through an interpreter, and has been edited slightly for clarity and flow.


The magic place where all Canon L lenses are born.

What percentage of L lenses are manufactured in the Utsunomiya lens plant?

Because this is the ‘mother’ factory, 100% of L lenses are made here.

How many different lenses can be manufactured simultaneously in this plant?

Basically, we create all lenses every day [including L-series EF, Cinema EOS and broadcast]. The only exception is some of the broadcast lenses.

Which lenses in particular are the most difficult to manufacture and why?

Any large super telephoto lenses because of the size of the glass elements. In terms of skill required for lens assembly: the TV broadcast lenses are most difficult.

How many lenses are produced at this lens plant every year, both in terms of types of lenses and total units?

We do not disclose total production for this plant. That said, Canon has produced a total of 120 million lenses over the years. Of course, many of those are kit lenses, which are not produced here, but in our facility in Taiwan.

Mr Izuki, the plant manager, teaching us about the lens production process. 

Tell us a little bit about the history of the plant.

The facility as a whole has been here for forty years, however prior to 2005, we were located in an older building on the other side of the property. And the land where the current plant sits was initially owned by the Du Pont family. When they returned it to the prefecture, we bought it.

The current lens facility opened in 2005. When we moved in we completely revamped our lens-making machines and devices. Not all, but the majority. This helped to push [us] to a higher standard of quality.

Over the past 40 years, lenses have changed a lot, with autofocus introduced, aspherics, etc., what was the largest paradigm shift in lens technology?

We are reaching the 30th anniversary of the introduction of the EOS line. It was at that time, in 1987, that we moved into autofocus. When we did that, I believe we were the first ones to go fully-electronic mount autofocus. Because the motors were built into the lens we had a significant competitive edge.

As DSLR resolution increases, it can be a challenge to achieve precise focus because AF errors are more noticeable. How do you reduce this risk in the manufacturing and quality control process?

Overall precision is something customers are increasingly requiring. In this factory, we have increased the level of precision of our machines so that lenses have more accurate autofocus.

A lens going through QC testing. Information from the test will be saved on a chip in the lens.

During the tour it was mentioned that Canon lenses now store their quality control test data using on-board memory. Can that data be used to improve autofocus reliability?

We do store data from final lens testing on each unit. I won’t be able to speak in greater detail other than saying, yes, in theory, that data could be used to achieve higher autofocus performance [better AF precision] with a DSLR.

How long does it take a lens like the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM to make its way from start to finish in the assembly line?

From raw material being polished, to the final tested product being boxed: about 24 hours of work, in theory. But the physical production would actually take longer. This is because we are producing parts in batches and there are machines that need to be fitted. These variables aside, if you take the actual time of labor, assembly and packaging, it is about 24 hours.

You mentioned you were looking to hit an 80% automation rate in this facility. What kind of efficiency gain does that represent?

It’s difficult to say in terms of time, but I can say it use to take about 70 people to make a lens like that prior to automation, now we need about 6 or 7.

As production becomes more automated will you require fewer skilled manual workers?

In one sense yes. But it’s not about firing the rest of these people, it’s about allowing them the time to build up their skills. This way they can face challenges and difficulties like increasing precision and performance. So we’ve essentially been able to allocate these workers to a different environment.

A lens in the final assembly process. It can take 25-30 years to become an Assembly Meister at Canon’s Utsunomiya plant. 

Typically how long does someone train before they attain the title of ‘Meister’?

In terms of the level of ‘Lens Meister,’ it would take 30-35 years. For ‘Assembly Meisters”, 25-30 years.

Now that the process for assembly, element polishing and quality control is so automated, we’re curious how many lenses pass QC the first time vs those that have to go back for re-calibration.

In terms of maintaining a level of quality before going into mass production, we do a lot of checking and scenario building [using a super computer] to make sure everything will go right. Once a lens goes into mass production we can safely say that we have seen no lenses returned for further calibration.

What impact did the 2011 have on this facility and how long did it take to recover?

A lot of the ceilings came down. We took a big hit in that regard. But, we were able to come back into operation within about 2 to 3 months.

While not the most exciting photo, if you look very carefully, you might see some minor impressions on the linoleum. This is (subtle) evidence of the 2011 earthquake, which caused some ceilings to collapse. The yellow tape line is used by computerized robots in the factory.

Did you implement any changes as a result of the earthquake?

We have fortified the building, so that it is more earthquake-proof. And the assembly tools we use are put together in such as way that they are shake-proof.

Are there major differences in how you QC test broadcast and cinema lenses vs EF lenses?

The concept for testing is basically the same. But, in terms of broadcast/cinema lenses there are some unique customizations that we offer depending on the particular cameraman or filmmaker. If they want to zoom by hand, for instance, we can accommodate the pressure of the mechanism to their requirements.

A lot of your users use EF lenses for video creation. Has that changed the way you design some EF lenses?

In terms of stills shooter, when it comes to autofocus, the faster the better. On the other hand, videographers tend to require a variance in autofocus speed. Sometimes they want a slow effect. So we had to create a motor that could actually do both fast and slow focus. This is why we introduced Nano-USM. It’s in both the 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS USM and the 70-300mm F4-5.6 IS II USM.

Will that kind of autofocus be used more in the future as video becomes more of a requirement for users?

Yes. 

At any given time, how many new lenses are in development at this facility?

I can not give you a number, unfortunately. But I can say that new lenses are in development as we speak. So I hope you look forward to them.

Results of a QC test.

Editors note (by Dan Bracaglia):

Let me begin by saying how grateful I was to be given access to Canon’s lens factory and what an honor and privilege it was to sit down and interview the creators of some of Canon’s most legendary glass. In my six and a half years writing about photography, this was one of my most memorable and rewarding experiences. 

As you might expect, there were nearly endless points of fascination. Some of which are covered in this interview, others in our factory tour slideshow. Something that particularly interested me is the fact that all the information from a lens’ final calibration and quality control check is saved on a chip within the lens itself. The idea here is this information can been used, in theory, when a lens comes back in for cleaning or recalibration. It also means that at some point, perhaps camera bodies will be able to access this information, which could lead to better AF precision. This is solid forward thinking on Canon’s part. 

I was also intrigued to find that Canon manufactures every L lens in the same factory. Not only that but every current lens in the L series is being made every day. As you might imagine, security at the facility is very tight. 

“Canon, it seems, recognizes just how important pushing lens development is”

Also hearing Canon put a concrete number on their automation goals (80%) was interesting. Of course you could read that as Canon displacing workers with machines, but throughout the tour and the interview, our guides made it clear that automation wasn’t about replacing workers, rather dedicating more workers to research and development. Canon, it seems, recognizes just how important pushing lens development is, all while maintaining a high level of quality control. Automation offers just this. 

And I’m not ordinarily one to be starstruck, but when Mr. Izuki told me he designed the Canon EF 35mm F2 IS, my jaw dropped a little. There’s nothing quite like standing of front of the creator of one of your favorite lenses. Speaking of favorites, we also asked Mr. Hayakawa, Mr Okada and Mr Izuki which Canon lens they’ve designed/worked on over the years they are most proud of. We got some great answers. We’ll be posting those in a separate article soon, so stay tuned!

Barney, just prior to entering the factory floor. We also went through a room that blasted us with air. Dust is the enemy in a lens factory. 

 

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Behind the scenes: An interview with the heads of Canon’s L lens factory

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Behind the scenes with Seattle PI photographers

06 Mar

Grant Hindsley and Genna Martin, the two staff photographers for the Seattle PI. The PI published its last print edition in 2009 and has been online-only ever since.

Photojournalism isn’t what it was. Gone are the days when newspapers and photo agencies employed armies of staffers and stringers, around the world, and gone too (sadly) are the days when newspapers and current affairs magazines could rely on newsstand sales and advertising to invest in their reporting. There are fewer magazines around now than there were, and fewer newspapers. Those publications that do still exist tend to operate on tighter budgets, with fewer full-time staff members. Many have stopped printing altogether, and exist now only online. The Seattle PI is one of them. 

‘Genna Martin and Grant Hindsley bring compassion and joy to their jobs and it shows in their work.’ (Sarah Rupp – Executive Producer, Seattle PI)

In this article, we go behind the scenes with Grant Hindsley and Genna Martin, staff photographers for the Seattle PI, following them on two assignments – the Seattle Women’s March, on January 21st, and the annual King County homelessness survey, a few days later. 


January 21st


Grant Hindsley has the flu.

‘I slept between every one of my assignments yesterday, I was so out of it’. One of those assignments was a protest at the University of Washington where a man was shot and badly wounded, in circumstances that remain unclear. Grant captured images leading up to the confrontation, and graphic images of the aftermath, most of which will remain unpublished.

‘I feel a bit better today, but as soon as I stand still or sit down I start coughing again’. As I am about to find out, Grant doesn’t stand still or sit down much. As one half of a two-person photography team at the Seattle PI, there’s not much opportunity for time off. 

A line line of people, numbering more than 100,000, march through Seattle downtown during the 2017 Women’s March. 

Photograph: Grant Hindsley for the Seattle PI. Used with permission.

Today, I’m tagging along with Grant as he covers the Women’s March, which is due to start in half an hour or so, from a park in Seattle’s Central District. In an early sign that the city’s attendance estimate of 50,000 people might be a little conservative, there are no cabs available, bus lines stretch for entire city blocks, and demand for ride-sharing services has sent Uber and Lyft prices sky-rocketing to more than $ 120 for the 2-mile trip.

Running late, we cram our gear into Grant’s girlfriend’s tiny car (‘it’s easier to park’) with the idea of jumping out as close as we can to the rally point, then walking the rest of the way. Hopefully, issuing parking tickets won’t prove to be a major law-enforcement priority for Seattle’s finest this Saturday.

‘Grant likes the slow photo, the in-between or off moments. He shoots the fringes of events, the stuff that people usually miss or overlook’ (Genna Martin)

As the first marchers join the route, photojournalists and camera-toting enthusiasts have formed a loose line at the vanguard of the group. They look a bit like a participants in a police search line, except that instead of having their eyes glued to the ground, the photographers have their lenses aimed at the marchers. And instead of walking forwards, they’re walking backwards.

An experienced photojournalist from another publication is attempting to corral the photographers to a traffic island a little further down the road, at a point where they can all get an unobstructed shot of the head of the march.

Police clear the route ahead of the women’s march, as it  begins.

Photograph: Grant Hindsley for the Seattle PI. Used with permission.

I ask Grant about working alongside other photographers at big events – is there some kind of honor code, when it comes to getting in the way of someone else’s shot, or lining up with them to take the same picture? ‘Not really, we tend to just work around each other, but it depends. If there are a lot of press at a relatively small event, then you’re all going to get the same picture anyway, that’s just the way it goes. Nobody has ever really gotten in my way when I’m working.’

‘Actually’ he says, after darting into the crowd and snapping a couple of shots, ‘that’s not true. Broadcast guys tend to shove you around a bit. If I ever have to throw an elbow out at anyone it’s usually at a broadcast guy’. 


What’s in Grant’s bag?

  • Canon EOS-1D X
  • Canon EOS 5D Mark III
  • Canon EF 35mm F2 IS (‘go-to’ lens)
  • Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 IS L II
  • Canon EF 85mm F1.8
  • Bag: Think Tank Shape Shifter (v1)

You must have shot a lot of protests at this point, I ask Grant – what kind of images do you try to capture?

‘My first internship was at the AP and one of the things I learned there was not to take pictures of signs. I mean, you can, and sometimes it just can’t be avoided, but signs are mostly just words, and if words were all we needed we’d just send writers to these things, not photographers’.

There’s no arguing with that logic, but signs are unavoidable at a march of this size. Almost everyone, from toddlers to wheelchair-bound pensioners is carrying some kind of a sign or banner. ‘What I try to do is avoid redundancy’, Grant tells me. But he’s not worrying about his employment prospects: ‘Images from protests can end up just all looking the same. I try to find pictures that will still make sense after the march is over, which put it in context. I shoot a lot more events than I used to so I look for something weird that tells the story.’

‘A lot of photographers lean back on the super wide at F16, and spray, but I never really shoot wider than 35mm.’ (Grant Hindsley)

‘The most meaningful encounters I’ve had come from intimate story telling. Sometimes that amounts to years of photographing the same subjects, sometimes it’s something quick that strikes deep’.

A father and son watch the progress of the march through Seattle’s downtown.

Photograph: Grant Hindsley for the Seattle PI. Used with permission.

Initially though, Grant admits, he’s just grabbing as many pictures as he can, as the march starts winding through Seattle’s Central District, en route to the Seattle Center three and a half miles away. ‘My approach is to take a lot of pictures early on, to cover myself, and start sending them in before things get too busy. Once I know I’ve got a few images in the bag, that’s when I slow down and start looking for more interesting scenes’. 

‘Anyone can take a pretty picture. It can be with a phone or with $ 100,000 of equipment, but everyone can do it with some practice. Photojournalists on the other hand, are trained in serendipity’ (Grant Hindsley)

Filing images on the go isn’t entirely straightforward. Grant plugs his battered iPhone directly into his Canon EOS 5D Mark III using a jerry-rigged USB cable and Lightning Port adapter, ingests images into his phone’s camera roll, then emails them back to the office. It’s slow, and the fragile wired connection breaks frequently. And literally. 

A participant in the march pauses to become the subject of a quick portrait. 

Photograph: Grant Hindsley for the Seattle PI. Used with permission.

With one camera plugged into his phone, and a CF card clamped between his teeth, Grant continues shooting with his second camera, a Canon EOS-1D X, with a 35mm F2 attached. Both cameras and lenses are owned by the PI, but remain in his possession as his everyday kit, and get used for everything from taking pictures of an unseasonal snowstorm to Seahawks games. Cameras and lenses alike are shiny and scuffed from use. 

Governer Jay Inslee speaks to one of the participants in the Women’s March, in Seattle.

Photograph: Genna Martin for the Seattle PI. Used with permission. 

Towards the end of the afternoon, Grant drops by the Seattle PI office to file some images. While he’s doing that, I meet up with Genna Martin – the other half of the PI photo team, who’s been covering the march too.

Genna was named 2015’s Best New Journalist by the regional chapter of the Society for Professional Journalists, and today, she’s filing images from inside the nearby Komo News Plaza, alongside Bettina Hansen from the PI’s main rival, The Seattle Times. They’re discussing an image shot earlier by another Seattle Times staffer, veteran photojournalist Alan Berner. Grant and I bumped into him on the march, posted up on a busy corner, standing on a step stool to get shots of the participants snaking along 4th Avenue.

Photograph by Alan Berner, Seattle Times.

Used with permission (see the full Seattle Times gallery here)

In Bettina’s opinion ‘it’s the shot of the day’. Taken from a slightly elevated position (probably the step-stool), the picture shows the march receding to infinity. A relatively shallow depth of field highlights four figures standing side by side, wearing the pink ‘pussy hats’ that have become emblematic of the event. Walking into the sun, all four figures are also wearing sunglasses. There’s plenty of signage in the photograph, but the signs aren’t the main focal point of the image, and they’re mostly outside of the zone of focus.

So why is this such a good image? ‘It has everything’, Genna explains. ‘The symmetry, and the central positioning of the four main subjects. It has everything you’d want from a picture of a march. And it’s not a sign picture’.

‘I hate sign shots. I hate protest photos that are just about the sign, and not about the person holding it.’ (Genna Martin)

Another Seattle Times photographer, Erika Schultz, is also here covering the march. Between them, Erika and Bettina have almost 25 years of professional experience, and have been recognized with several major awards. Alan Berner adds another 30+ years of experience, and even more awards, including the title of NPPA Regional Press Photographer of the Year seven times. The two publications might be rivals, but the only rivalries in this group are friendly. Every year, the PI’s ‘Photographs of the Year’ slideshow is hosted in a bar run by Bettina’s fiancé. 

The march ends around sunset, when the final participants arrive at Seattle’s iconic Space Needle. Genna and I join up with Grant, and together we shoot a few pictures of the crowds before heading off to find some dinner. The last of the day’s images are filed by 7pm, over slices of pizza in Grant’s apartment.  

See Grant and Genna’s images from the march


January 27th


A few days after the Women’s March, on January 27th, I join Genna for a very different assignment – shooting the annual King County Point in Time (PIT) Count. This is a survey of homelessness, which takes place all over King County on a single night (in fact a very early morning) in January.

Volunteers gather in the early hours of the morning, before embarking on Seattle’s annual ‘Point in Time’ homelessness count. 

Photograph: Genna Martin for the Seattle PI. Used with permission.

Tonight, between 2-6am, volunteers will comb through Seattle, counting sleeping bags, tents, occupied vehicles and encampments. Once collated, the results of the count will become one of the metrics used to determine public policy around homelessness. Grant shot last year’s count, and when it came up in conversation a few days ago he offered me the kind of cheery ‘well, I hope you have fun!’ that strongly suggests that he thinks I won’t.

‘Genna is a marvelous, classic photojournalist but with a fresh twist. So often she sees things I just glance over. Her eye is always on the story and the people and she really feels for the people she photographs.’ (Grant Hindsley)

Volunteers gather at a center on Alaska Way at 2am. When we arrive, the center is packed with volunteers, guides, and puffy-eyed journalists. Across the crowded main room, several boom microphones are visible, arcing over the assembly like construction cranes. Local broadcast news crews are doing the rounds, alongside several photographers – including Erika Schultz of the Seattle Times.

There’s another crew here, too. A big one, made up of strikingly similar-looking men carrying new and very expensive equipment. They’re doing their best, pushing through the crowded room with stabilized Sonys held aloft, attempting overhead tracking shots with pivoted carbon-fiber stabilizing rigs that resemble hip-bones from some prototype killer robot. They’re wearing secret service-style earpieces, and won’t say who they’re shooting for.


What’s in Genna’s Bag?

  • Canon EOS-1D X
  • Canon EOS 5D Mark III
  • Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8 II
  • Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 II
  • Canon EF 35mm F1.4 II
  • Canon EF 50mm F1.8
  • Safety glasses and mask (for protest coverage)
  • Duct tape.

There’s a rumor that the mayor is going to address the media before the groups of volunteers leave for their search areas, but he’s running late. He might not turn up at all, but should we wait, I ask Genna, to see if he shows up? It’s already close to 3am and she’d rather get going. ‘I’ve seen the mayor plenty of times, and I’ve not seen him even more times than that’.

A group of volunteers consults a map. 

Photograph: Genna Martin for the Seattle PI. Used with permission.

Our group is assigned to a relatively affluent area of Seattle, near the University of Washington. Mostly made up of members of a UW ‘Service Sorority’, our group is impressively perky for 3am, and apparently they’re planning on attending class in a few hours. As we start walking, I’m at the opposite end of the stamina scale, and I get the sense that Genna is somewhere in the middle.

One of several tents under a bridge in our search area. This is a non-invasive survey, so all photographs must be taken using only natural light. 

Photograph: Genna Martin for the Seattle PI. Used with permission.

Most of our search area is residential, and even though it’s a clear, relatively mild night, very few people are sleeping outdoors. Despite the lack of activity, Genna and I are quite enjoying ourselves, combing through the bushes with by the light of our iPhone screens, and peering into alleyways.

It is, we decide, a bit like a scavenger hunt. Albeit one which, we shamefully concede, ‘you shouldn’t really want to win’.

‘Realising that you don’t have to shoot everything is the first step. And from there, being able to calm down and focus in on particular moments, and good photos, rather than just photos that show what’s happening’ (Genna Martin)

Inevitably, the few times when we do come across a huddled figure, or a tent, are occasions for muted celebration. The volunteers get to put a checkmark in a box on their list, and Genna gets to take pictures of something actually happening. The survey is meant to be non-invasive. The aim is to observe and report, not engage or disturb. I hope we didn’t wake anyone up.

Compared to the women’s march, Genna takes relatively few images. As we were trudging through the darkened streets, she shared some good advice, from Dan Bates, one of her former colleagues at the Everett Herald: ‘Look for hundred dollar bills rather than a bunch of quarters’ I.e. it’s better to get one good picture than lots of mediocre ones.

Volunteers record the location of a tent found during the survey.

Photograph: Genna Martin for the Seattle PI. Used with permission.

Genna got her start at the Everett Herald in 2011. I asked her why she decided to take up photojournalism: ‘When I was in 8th grade, my class went on a trip to Washington D.C. We went to the Newseum and there was an exhibit there on Pulitzer Prize winning photos and the stories behind how they were made. I was enthralled and from that moment on I was set on having a career as a photojournalist’.

Her work has made a difference, too. In 2014, when Oso resident Tim Ward lost his wife and his home in a landslide, Genna’s work on a profile on Ward lead to hundreds of donations from members of the public, to help him get back on his feet. Ward recently re-married and moved to Florida.

‘I think most of the photos we take will make a difference to someone at some point. Whether its the person in the photo who gets to feel special because they’re in the news for a day, or a historian 50 years from now’ (Genna Martin)

Of all the assignments that Genna has done since joining the PI, tonight’s is probably among the least eventful. As well as the Oso landslide, she photographed the horrific collision of an amphibious ‘Duck’ tour vehicle on Seattle’s Aurora Bridge in 2015, and she’s been in harm’s way a number of times, covering natural disasters, protests and violent incidents. Her forearm still bears a vivid scar caused by a police stun grenade deployed during Seattle’s May Day protests in 2016, and a couple of nights after the homelessness count, she’ll be ‘lightly pepper-sprayed’ (her words) while covering a sit-in at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. 

Protesters occupy an area of Sea-Tac airport, following the overnight imposition of a travel ban by the Trump Administration.

Photograph: Genna Martin for the Seattle PI. Used with permission.

For his part, over the course of a 7-year career, Grant has survived his fair share of protests too, outrun some ‘wicked storm fronts’ and been chased with a machete. 

Tonight is quiet by comparison. At 5am we decide we’ve done enough and head home, leaving our group to complete the survey. On the way back to Genna’s car, we spot another group of volunteers at the end of a road, the outline of a robot-like stabilizing camera rig clearly visible in the early morning mist, silhouetted under a street light. Good luck to them.

I’m fast asleep by the time Genna has her images processed and uploaded to the PI’s servers.


The Seattle PI has a proud tradition of high-quality photojournalism and despite tight budgets and a small staff, both photographers turn in high-quality work, day after day and week after week.  

Genna offered her thoughts on why their job matters:  

‘Photojournalists are the witnesses of history. They go to things so you (the public) don’t have to. They provide a living record. A photo of a person or event is always going to provide a better connection to the reader than words will’. 

In Grant’s words: ‘a photograph is one, single powerful moment in time. Writing is an analysis after the fact. Video is wonderful, but it is not timeless and it is harder to take in than a photograph.’

Oh the glamor. Grant rests his back while Genna organizes images from the Seattle Center lawn, at the end of the women’s march. 

As Genna told me, ‘seeing is believing’ might be a cliche, but there’s a reason for that. Just recently, her photographs of the protest at Sea-Tac airport were used to prove that Port of Seattle police pepper-sprayed protesters – something they initially denied.

Following Grant and Genna was an amazing experience. Although I was shooting literally alongside them, both photographers captured images which I simply didn’t see. Grant describes it as ‘a learned ability to be in the right place at the right time’, to which I would add ‘and point your camera at the right place, at the right time, too’. 


Our thanks to Genna Martin, Grant Hindsley and Sarah Rupp of the Seattle PI. Also Alan Berner, Bettina Hansen and Erika Schultz of the Seattle Times for their help in putting together this article.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Behind the scenes with Seattle PI photographers

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Architectural Relics: When Demolition Leaves Behind Nonsensical Structures

19 Jan

[ By SA Rogers in Architecture & Cities & Urbanism. ]

thomasson-2

Steps that go nowhere, pedestrian walkways that dead-end into elevated bridges, doors that open out into mid-air: these so-called ‘Thomassons’ are what happens when workers demolishing an outdated structure leave part of it behind, whether out of necessity or laziness. Ultimately, they become almost sculptural in their absurdity, visual ties to the past of a particular place. Walking up one of those staircases to nowhere almost seems like it could be the key to time travel.

thomasson-10

thomasson-3

Japanese artist Akasegawa Genpei named these nonfunctional structures ‘thomassons’ or ‘hyperart thomassons’ in the ’80s in reference to a baseball player with a ‘useless position’ on his team. He noted one such structure in Tokyo in 1972, a staircase that had no entranceway once you reach the top. Discovering more around the city, Akasegawa began giving them names like “the useless window of Ekoda,” building a collection that was published as a book called Chogeijutsu Tomason.

thomasson-5

thomasson-6

thomasson-7

???????? #???? #????? #?????

A photo posted by ???? ?????????Y????? (@ytanet) on

 

 

These days, images of such relics are collected via Instagram tags, on the Hyperart: Thomasson tumblr and on Reddit. There’s even a Thomasson Observation Center on Facebook, accepting public submissions and curating them into new visual references.

???????? ?????? #????#??#??????? #?????#

A photo posted by uu_architects (@uu_architects) on

?????? #????

A photo posted by ??????/masataka matsuoka (@masatakamatsuoka) on

thomasson-wikimedia-1

thomasson-wikimedia-2

Like the human appendix, these vestigial structures have long since ceased to be useful, yet somehow they’re still around, even as the world constantly shifts and changes. That in itself is pretty strange and incredible.

(images: Mathieu C, Matthew Fargo, Seng Chen and mindbomb via hyperart thomasson tumblr; reddit; wikimedia commons)

Share on Facebook





[ By SA Rogers in Architecture & Cities & Urbanism. ]

[ WebUrbanist | Archives | Galleries | Privacy | TOS ]


WebUrbanist

 
Comments Off on Architectural Relics: When Demolition Leaves Behind Nonsensical Structures

Posted in Creativity

 

Shooting the moon: behind the shot with Peter Alessandria

14 Jan

Shooting the moon: behind the shot with Peter Alessandria

I planned this shot out two weeks in advance. I knew I wanted the moon to encompass Lady Liberty’s crown and torch. I love the ferry passing in front. This is a single exposure.

Peter Alessandria is not only an award winning, full-time professional photographer but he also happens to be a resident DPReview community member. He recently submitted an image of the moon aligned with the Statue of Liberty, which we selected as a Top 10 image for our 2016 Reader’s Best Shots (Places), that garnered quite a bit of praise – as well as some skepticism. Many people wanted to know just how he could accomplish such a shot and if it was indeed the ‘real deal’.

With that in mind, Peter got in touch with us and we worked with him to create a ‘behind the shot’ guide to shooting the moon. As you can imagine, quite a bit of planning and dedication goes into getting any of the shots that are presented here in this how to guide.

To see more of Peter’s work check out his Instagram and the following websites:

www.greatproductshots.com
www.superstarheadshots.com
www.peteralessandriaphotography.com

What kind of equipment do you use to get those incredible moon photos?

Strawberry Moon rising above the World Trade Center. Shooting just after sunset left plenty of light in the sky for this single exposure. Taken from about five miles out.

Peter Alessandria: I currently shoot with a Canon EOS 6D and 70D. I like the 6D for its relatively low noise, high ISO files and the 70D for the swivel screen and the extra reach (at a given focal length) the APS-C sensor gives. My current lens of choice for most of my moon shots is the Sigma 150-600mm F5-6.3 | C.

You also need a sturdy tripod and cable release. Since you’re shooting at night, a head lamp or flashlight can also be helpful if there’s no ambient light. And of course depending on the time of year, weather protection for you and your camera may be necessary.

Do you have any apps or websites that you use to plan out where the moon will rise or set?

This photo (single exposure) was taken during the Super Moon we had in Nov. 2016. The moonrise came just after sunset meaning there was still a lot of light in the sky and on the Statue.

The main app I use to get my moon shots is The Photographer’s Ephemeris (TPE). The web browser version is free to use on your phone or computer while the app for Android and iOS is $ 4.99. Two additional apps that track the moon are “PhotoPills” (iOS) and “PlanIt!” (Android), these two Apps are also useful for shooting the Milky Way which I do a lot of.

TPE works by showing me where and when the moon (and sun) will rise and set based on my location. It includes moon phases and other useful information and allows me to plot the trajectory of the moon as it moves through the night sky. This is helpful since I want to identify where the moon’s path will intersect with my target. Lining the moon up with iconic landmarks such as the Empire State Building or Statue of Liberty, makes for dramatic and unusual photos.

Editor’s note: Star Walk is another excellent App that can be used to help plan shots of this nature.

Apps and gear aside, how do you go about planning to get to a prime vantage point or location to get the shot?

Moonrise Empire State Building (single exposure). This shot was taken last summer from seven miles out and required setting up in an old abandoned landfill in New Jersey.

Planning a shot with TPE is only the first half of the process. The second part is to find accessible locations on the ground that have clear lines of sight. This is where Google Map’s Street View comes in. Once I find the trajectory line I want, I use Street View to go to potential locations and see if there are any obstructions on the ground. This part can take hours since my optimal location is often to be as far away from my landmark as possible.

A couple of things to keep in mind when using Street View: images may be several years old so even though it looks good on the computer, when you arrive it may not end up being a good location. And Street View obviously only provides info on streets which Google has photographed. Sometimes when making these shots, the best location isn’t on a public street. Thus I sometimes end up in places I am not supposed to be, and as a result I was stopped by law enforcement eight times in 2016. Thankfully, the police have always been reasonable – and even helpful – once they found out what I was up to.

Once you’ve found out the time and the approximate position in which the moon will rise, what steps do you need to take to make sure that you nail the shot?

This is a photo (single exposure) of the full moon rising behind the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor took a couple of weeks of planning.

The moon rises and sets at different times every night. Over the course of the month, rise/set times progress about 45-50 mins per day. This means you’ll need to check your charts carefully to make sure you aren’t late. You usually only have a few seconds to capture the exact moment of perfect alignment so it pays to be ready. Also, due to fluctuations in the Earth’s rotation and the Moon’s orbit, the spot on the horizon where the moon appears to rise/set also changes every night. In the long term certain locations repeat, but in the short term this means I have to make a new plan for almost every shoot.

Next, the moon doesn’t travel in a straight line (relative to the rise and set points) as it passes overhead. In the Northern Hemisphere the moon arcs to the south as it rises and then arcs back to the north as it sets. The arc is more dramatic the farther north you go and it arcs in the opposite direction in the Southern Hemisphere. This means to get my shots, I have to anticipate the path of the moon along its arc relative to the height of my landmark (TPE does give elevation and angle information but I’ve never quite figured out how to use it).

So if I want a shot of the moon atop the spire of the Empire State Building, I need to anticipate the moon’s path and how long it will take to reach that point. I often end up ‘leading’ the moon (like a skeet shooter does with a clay target) since I have very limited time to reposition if my calculations are off.

Of course none of this matters if clouds or rain are in the forecast, so make sure to check the weather ahead of time.

Since camera settings are often a topic of discussion when it comes to photos like these; what settings do you find yourself using most often?

Living in New Jersey means seeing the Statue of Liberty from behind. To see her face means traveling to Red Hook, Brooklyn and paying as much as $ 30 in tolls from NJ!

There are lots of factors that determine the proper exposure for these shots. Generally speaking, I try to keep my shutter to less than 2 seconds – and closer to 1 second or less if possible – to avoid motion blur of the moon (a sharp landmark is more important than a sharp moon but you still need to be conscious of this). My aperture is usually wide open (F5.6-6.3) on the Sigma 150-600. Even at 600mm, the lens is sharp enough to get good shots. My ISO is generally in the 160–320 (or occasionally higher) range.

One advantage of shooting the moon when it’s low on the horizon is that it is easier to get everything properly exposed in one shot. The general rule is the higher the moon gets the brighter it gets (assuming clear skies). Even though my NYC landmarks are usually pretty well lit, they are no match for the moon once it gets above 30-40 degrees on the horizon. Since the moon is reflecting sunlight, it is by far the brightest thing in the scene which exceeds the dynamic range of most cameras. Therefore, once it gets above a certain point, you will probably need to bracket your shots and combine them later in post. This is also why I prefer shooting the moon around sunrise or sunset. The ambient light in the sky makes it easier to capture everything in one exposure.”

The moon looks unusually large and colorful in your images, why is that?

Moonrise behind the World Trade Center (single exposure). This is an extreme example of how distance affects the relative size of the moon. This photo was taken from 23 miles away making the moon appear huge.

There are three factors that determine the size of the moon:

  • Most of my photos are shot when the moon is low on the horizon and the moon appears larger when it is on the horizon than when it is overhead.
  • I am often at 300-600mm FF equivalent on these shots. The telephoto compression enhances the apparent size of the moon.
  • I try to find locations as far away from my landmarks as I can. This is because the greater the distance I am from the landmark, the larger the moon appears relative to the landmark. Of course the farther away you are the more difficult it becomes to find a clear line of sight. I usually look for elevated locations for this reason.

When it is low on the horizon the moon appears red or yellow for the same reason the sun does: its light has more atmosphere to travel through than when it is directly overhead. Particles in the atmosphere (moisture, dust, pollution) tend to scatter the blue (shorter) wavelength of light while allowing the longer red wavelength light to pass through to our eyes. As the moon rises there is less atmosphere to contend with so the light we see becomes more white.

Anything else you’d like to say?

New Year’s Day 2017 Crescent Moonset – taken from Brooklyn, NY.

First I want to give a shout out to the readers and staff of DPReview. Back in 2002, when I was new to photography and had a question, it was the amazing DPReview forum members that helped me out. And for the last 15 years I’ve relied on the great, in-depth news and reviews the DPReview staff provides. I still visit here several times per week to stay up to date on the world of photography. Thank you DPReview for being such an important part of my photography career! (Editor’s note: Thanks Peter, your check is in the mail.)

I also want to thank my friend and colleague Jen Khordi. Jen founded the New Jersey Photographers Facebook group (closed – 1,600+ members) and brought myself and Jo Hendly on as co-admins. Jen introduced the TPE app to the group and was one of the first to see its potential in connection with NYC landmarks. If you live in the NJ/NY/PA area send us a Facebook request so we can add you to the group.

I’ll close by saying you don’t need to live near New York City to capture cool moon photos. Look for familiar landmarks in your own town or city and then plan your shot the next time the lunar cycle allows it. Your friends and neighbors will love it!”

To see more of Peter’s work check out be sure to check out his website and to find out just how Peter got his start as a professional photographer check out this video and give his about me section a read on his website. 

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Shooting the moon: behind the shot with Peter Alessandria

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Company behind Lily drone shuts down despite $34m worth of pre-orders

13 Jan

When the Lily camera drone was announced in May 2015 it garnered a lot of attention for being one of the first drones capable of flying itself and tracking a user while capturing video footage for up to 20 minutes. As a consequence the company managed to secure $ 15 million in investment and an additional $ 34 million in pre-orders.

However, today the founders of Lily have announced in a letter and email to customers that the start-up is shutting down operations because it failed to raise additional funding to start production of its drone. The founders promise to reimburse all pre-order customers within the next 60 days.

“We have been racing against a clock of ever-diminishing funds,” wrote the company’s co-founders, Henry Bradlow and Antoine Balaresque. “Over the past few months, we have tried to secure financing in order to unlock our manufacturing line and ship our first units – but have been unable to do this. As a result, we are deeply saddened to say that we are planning to wind down the company and offer refunds to customers.” 

The Lily drone was launched with a pre-order price tag of $ 499 and scheduled to ship in February 2016. Shipping was later delayed until summer and then again to early 2017. In the same time frame tracking drones from DJI, Zero Zero Robotics and Yuneec have all been brought to market successfully.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Company behind Lily drone shuts down despite $34m worth of pre-orders

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Greatest hits: Behind the scenes with Ben Liebenberg, lead photographer for the NFL

24 Dec

Behind the scenes at the NFL with Ben Liebenberg

NFL Senior Photo Editor and Lead Photographer Ben Liebenberg and Seattle Seahawks’ Richard Sherman ©Ric Tapia/NFL

You may see Ben Liebenberg running down the field trying to out pace the Seattle Seahawks’ Richard Sherman after a game to grab a shot (above photo) or photo bombing the annual NFL draft ceremony from backstage. As Senior Photo Editor and lead photographer for the NFL, Liebenberg’s responsibilities range from coordinating all aspects of the photo department, curating images for the NFL Network and NFL.com, as well as photographing games, events and capturing portraits of players throughout the year.

What started as a hobby in high school evolved into a degree in photojournalism once Liebenberg realized he could turn his interest in photography into a career. While in college, Liebenberg worked as an assistant to Sports Illustrator photographers. ‘SI didn’t have staffers in the Bay Area,’ Liebenberg explains, ‘so they would fly people in and I did a lot of assisting for them. That’s where my sports background came from.’

After graduating college, Liebenberg interned for a number of small newspapers, but in the early 2000’s nobody was hiring. By chance, he made some connections in the music world and began traveling internationally and in the U.S. to photograph various artists and tours. In 2005, he began working at Wire Image, handling the NFL archives, and continued there for several years until Getty—which had its own sports department—purchased Wire Image.

As Liebenberg was winding down his time a Wire Image, the NFL called him about working for the new NFL.com. He interviewed and got the job the same day in 2007. Almost ten years later, the NFL.com’s team has grown from a handful of people to a staff of hundreds in Los Angles, with additional offices in New York and, for NFL films, New Jersey.

For a fascinating glimpse behind the scenes preparing for and shooting the Super Bowl, as well as what keeps Liebenberg busy shooting and planning between games, read on.

Behind the scenes at the NFL with Ben Liebenberg

Super Bowl LI football at the famous La Carafe Bar in Houston; © Ben Liebenberg

The Super Bowl is coming up in February. How far in advance do you start preparing for the game?

The location of the Super Bowl is decided several years in advance, so we have a lot of lead time. I took the first photos for Super Bowl LI, which will be played on February 5 at NRG Stadium in Houston, back in August 2015.

This is the third year we’ve done a style guide, where I’ll photograph a football with the Super Bowl logo for that year on location in the host city. Last year, I photographed the Super Bowl 50 ball in some of San Francisco’s iconic locations like the Golden Gate Bridge. One of the locations for the Super Bowl LI style guide shoot was La Carafe—believed to be the oldest bar in Houston. The building’s on the National Register of Historic Places and has a wooden bar that’s rich with history from the carvings made by patrons. I really liked the texture the carvings provided as a background for the shot.

Behind the scenes at the NFL with Ben Liebenberg

Liebenberg scoped out the NRG Stadium in Houston to make plans for the Super Bowl months ahead of the big game. ©Ben Liebenberg

You traveled to Houston again this past September/October to make preparations for your team at the game. How did you spend your time?

I went out there to shoot a game because I’ve never been to the stadium. I looked at the lighting, the sidelines, etc.

This was the first meeting I went to, although there were several other meetings earlier in the year. But now that we know where things are happening, we can plan around it. We went to all the venues for opening night, NFL Honors, the game.

We went through a lot of logistics like where is the photo workroom going to be in the stadium, where is the media center during the week, what’s backstage like for the NFL Honors ceremony so we can plan to do a series of portraits there. We had three packed days of meetings, site surveys and walkthroughs.

Behind the scenes at the NFL with Ben Liebenberg

Shooting with a 70-200mm lens, Liebenberg captured Kevin Benjamin’s game winning touchdown against the background of a crowded stadium. ©Ben Liebenberg

What gear do you shoot with?

I have a pretty standard set of equipment that I bring. Usually three cameras (Canon EOS-1D X Mark II), 400mm, 70-200mm, 24-70mm, 50mm, 16-35mm and 15mm lenses. That’s my standard setup that I take to almost every football game—it’s what I know and what I’m comfortable with. The upcoming Super Bowl is inside and it’s going to be at night but if it was a day game, I would consider bringing a 600mm but with a little less light, I’ll probably leave that at home. I shot the Rams earlier this year in LA—it was 1:00 and sunny, so I took a 300mm and 600mm instead of the 400mm.

Canon Professional Services (CPS) will be on site and Canon’s very helpful if we need something—an extra camera or lens. They’ll also send us long lenses and extra cameras if we need them.

Behind the scenes at the NFL with Ben Liebenberg

Liebenberg captured this image of Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton throwing the ball at last year’s Super Bowl 50.

How many people will you have shooting at the Super Bowl? Where will they be positioned?

My team will consist of eight photographers: six on the field and two overhead. I’ll be on the field. We have four positions on the field that are stationary—one in each corner of the end zone. Two of the field positions are roaming, one on each sideline.

We have two photographers shooting overhead for a different perspective. We generally have one in the end zone and one at the 40-50 yard line. They usually have a seat so they can get up and roam around a bit but are always sensitive to not block the fans’ view.

During the game last year, I was on the Panthers sideline. I would move back and forth along the sideline shooting action. A lot of times I was behind the line of scrimmage, which is good for capturing the quarterback throwing. Then when the team gets ready to score, I’ll go down to the goal line. We’ll have two people in the end zone at either end, so if there’s an interception and the action moves back to the other side, we’ll have people there for the touchdowns.

Before we get to game day, we’ll have a photographers’ meeting and everyone will get their game assignments. Everybody has a specific role, especially for post game. We may have the photographers shooting overhead change position, especially for half time or post game.

Behind the scenes at the NFL with Ben Liebenberg

Beyonce performs at halftime of Super Bowl XLVII between the Baltimore Ravens and the San Francisco 49ers. © Ben Liebenberg

What’s it like shooting the half-time show? Has your experience shooting music helped when covering the half-time show?

My experience was shooting in small venues and having access backstage, so shooting halftime is really different. It’s tricky since it’s a kind of a free for all and we never know where we’ll get to shoot. We always ask the artist if we can get backstage and whether we can be with them when they come out but a lot of times we get shut down. We do the best that we can to get into the best positions.

For half-time there are about 150 photographers, some of them are only credentialed to shoot half-time—you may have entertainment photographers from Getty and other agencies. It’s not a little pit—you have the whole sideline behind the bench and while it’s 100 yards long, obviously the center is going to be more crowded.

I usually shoot with a 400mm or a 70-200mm lens. I’ll always use a wide angle to get a general stadium shot to photograph what’s going on. It’s a real spectacle with things going on in the stands and the light shows, so I try to capture a bit of everything.

I carry three cameras at all times but usually have an assistant. At half-time, for example, the assistant might be holding a camera with a 400mm lens attached; the other two cameras are always attached to me with F2.8 lenses or faster. We might bring step stools to shoot the half-time show to get a better angle.

Fortunately, there are no restrictions at half-time. You can shoot as much as you want and none of the artists make you sign a contract that they own the images or anything like that.

Behind the scenes at the NFL with Ben Liebenberg

Denver Broncos quarterback Peyton Manning after the Broncos won the NFL Super Bowl 50. ©Ben Liebenberg

What kinds of images are you looking for post-game?

Everybody has specific assignments—to shoot the quarterbacks post game or shoot the coaches shaking hands. We’ll also have photographers assigned to shoot the losing team, others to photograph the general celebration. We generally have a couple of people on the winning quarterback and someone to photograph the losing quarterback. I’m usually roaming but will break off and get into position to shoot the trophy presentation.

Behind the scenes at the NFL with Ben Liebenberg

Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton is under pressure from the Denver Broncos defense during Super Bowl 50. ©Ben Liebenberg

Obviously you want to get images published as quickly as possible throughout the game. Tell us a little about how image files are transmitted and edited.

I don’t do any of the photo editing at the Super Bowl. We have five editors on site and probably four editors back at the office. We try to do as much editing on site as possible and try to assign no more than two photographers to each on site editor. Even then, you could be looking at close to 10,000 photographs per editor.

We hardwire Cat 5 and fiber optics to the four stationary positions on the field (one in each corner of the end zone), so we can have two cameras connected at once. If the photographer likes the image, they press a button and the image goes to the editor in seconds. From the field to NFL.com takes about a minute or two. The only lag time is how fast the photo can be cropped and uploaded into the system. There are times when you can have something on the website before they’re done showing the replay.

The two positions on the sidelines have runners but we’re looking into ways to wirelessly transfer those photos. But when you’re talking Wi-Fi , that’s a little more difficult to work out because there’s a limited amount of bandwidth. We’re not using Wi-Fi at the Super Bowl but have been testing the technology to work towards sending images wirelessly. It’s okay but not as foolproof as being hardwired since a lot of things can go wrong.

We tested it earlier this year at several stadiums around the league and found a couple of dead zones. About 25% of the time we got no signal, which isn’t surprising if you figure there were about 50,000 people on their cell phones. We’d like to get technology that’s foolproof because you don’t want those issues at the Super Bowl.

Behind the scenes at the NFL with Ben Liebenberg

Headshot of Alabama running back Derrick Henry at the 2016 NFL Combine ©Ben Liebenberg

What are the other major events on your calendar?

Of course, the Super Bowl is our marquee event but there are plenty of other events that we cover including the Hall of Fame, the kickoff game for each season and the Draft Combine. For the Combine, I’ll shoot about 20-25 portraits in two days, along with about 350 headshots over the course of 5 days.

Last year for the portraits, we used a specially designed metallic background and varied the lighting set up a little—we’d turn one of the lights on or off. We used strip banks and Chimera collapsible beauty dishes and switched up the diffusers for variation.

For the headshots, we use a four-foot wide seamless and two softboxes to keep the images fairly consistent. The headshots are particularly important and are used for the scouting Combine app that coaches and scouts reference as sort of a fact book for all the players. They’ll also be posted on NFL.com and included in the Madden video game. It’s not a huge setup but we try to keep it simple.

Behind the scenes at the NFL with Ben Liebenberg

Denver Broncos defensive end DeMarcus Ware poses for a portrait in the NFL Studio in Culver City, California. ©Ben Liebenberg

Do you ever get any downtime?

Very little. We don’t slow down until the middle of June to the middle of July when the teams shut down until training camp. That’s when everybody takes a vacation.

Even when I’m not traveling, I’ll work in the office planning—a lot of work goes into getting ready for the season. And I do a lot of portrait work. I can do 2-3 portraits a day here [at the office] if players are coming into town. Although we don’t have a dedicated photo studio, we have two very large sound stages with various open spaces for shoots. I’ve taken portraits against a cement wall, in green rooms and we have built different flat backgrounds that we can use. I’ve shot in pretty much anyplace on the property that you can imagine. We’ve gotten pretty creative!

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Greatest hits: Behind the scenes with Ben Liebenberg, lead photographer for the NFL

Posted in Uncategorized