Category: Uncategorized

  • Case dismissed against George Steinmetz, whose drone was confiscated for documenting mass burials

    Back in April, an award-winning National Geographic and New York Times photographer, George Steinmetz, had his DJI Phantom 4 Pro drone confiscated by the New York Police Department (NYPD) while documenting mass COVID-19 burials on Hart Island. Steinmetz was issued a desk ticket for violating NYC Administrative Code § 10–126, which prohibits the takeoff and landing of drones within New York City.

    A preliminary hearing was scheduled for early August. During that time, the NYPD held onto Steinmetz’ Phantom 4 Pro as ‘evidence.’ After an unsuccessful attempt to get it back, he went on to purchase two DJI Mavic 2 Pro drones. ‘I need to get back to work,’ Steinmetz explained. ‘The Mavic 2 Pro is in a real sweet spot for me. I prefer the optics and files from the big bird, the Inspire 2 with the X7 gimbal. But the Mav 2 flies really well, has a decent file…the compactness is quite revolutionary.’

    View this post on Instagram

    Preparing for burials of what appear to be more COVID-19 victims this morning on Hart Island, New York City. For over 150 years this island with no public access has been used to bury over a million souls who’s bodies were not claimed for private burial. With the morgues of NYC strained, the pace of burials on Hart Island has increased dramatically. I was cited by NYPD while taking this photo, and my drone was confiscated as evidence, for a court date tentatively scheduled for mid-August. #keepthememorycard

    A post shared by George Steinmetz (@geosteinmetz) on

    Steinmetz’ story has a happy ending, after all. ‘My case was spontaneously dismissed last week [the week of August 7th, 2020], so I went down to the Bronx Police HQ on Wednesday and recovered it. During the time it was confiscated I had to buy a replacement to keep working, and don’t know if I will pursue any further legal action,’ he tells DPReview.

    We will keep you updated if any new developments come about.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Slideshow: The ‘Best Images Entered So Far’ for the 2020 Comedy Pet Photo Awards

    Mars Petcare Comedy Pet Photo Awards

    The Mars Petcare Comedy Pet Photo Awards is still taking submissions through August 31, 2020 for its 2020 competition, but the organizers have already released a few of their favorite images submitted thus far, showcasing humorous photos of pets from around the world.

    ‘From the founders of the world-famous Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards, Paul Joynson-Hicks and Tom Sullam have created a fun photography competition calling on all pet and animal lovers to submit hilarious images of their funny furry friends for a chance of winning £3,000 and being named the 2020 Mars Petcare Comedy Pet Photographer of the Year,’ reads the press release for the ‘Best Images Entered So Far’ gallery.

    In addition to laughter, the competition also aims to raise awareness around homeless pets in the United Kingdom, with 10% of the sponsorship fees and 10% of all entry fees going to the Blue Cross, a ‘UK Pet charity to help with its work rehoming pets and providing veterinary treatment and care.’

    If you’re interested in submitting your own images to the competition, you can do so through August 31. Of the submitted images, 40 finalists will be announced on September 28 and the winning image will be announced on November 19th. For £5 you can enter five photos or videos; for £10 you can enter 15 photos or videos. There are multiple categories you can submit your photos into, including Dogs, Cats, The Mighty Horse and more.

    You can find out more by visiting the Comedy Pet Photo competition website.

    Maria Indurain — Intellectual Dog

    © Maria Indurain / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Maria Indurain

    Title: Intellectual Dog

    Animal Name: Newton

    Animal Type: Dog

    Location of shot: Barcelona, Spain

    Magdaléna Straková — Snow Monster

    © Magdaléna Straková / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Magdaléna Straková

    Title: Snow Monster

    Animal Name: Not Available

    Animal Type: Dog

    Location of shot: Czech Republic

    Magdaléna Straková — Gossip Girls

    © Magdaléna Straková / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Magdaléna Straková

    Title: Gossip Girls

    Animal Name: Not Available

    Animal Type: Dog

    Location of shot: Czech Republic

    Sally Billam — Ding Dong’ Can you spare a few mins of your time?

    © Sally Billam / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Sally Billam

    Title: Ding Dong’ Can you spare a few mins of your time?

    Animal Name: Freddie

    Animal Type: Dog

    Location of shot: East Yorkshire, UK

    Isabelle Merriman — Guinea Pigs Doing Tricks

    © Isabelle Merriman / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Isabelle Merriman

    Title: Guinea Pigs Doing Tricks

    Animal Name: Stigg & Minky

    Animal Type: Guinea Pigs

    Location of shot: Guildford, UK

    Iain McConnell — Overdramatic Cat

    © Iain McConnell / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Iain McConnell

    Title: Overdramatic Cat

    Animal Name: Edmund

    Animal Type: Cat

    Location of shot: Oswestry, UK

    Nicole Rayner — Smiley!

    © Nicole Rayner / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Nicole Rayner

    Title: Smiley!

    Animal Name: Mimi

    Animal Type: Dog

    Location of shot: Manchester, UK

    Alice Van Kempen — The Shepherd’s family road trip

    © Alice Van Kempen / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Alice Van Kempen

    Title: The Shepherd’s family road trip

    Animal Name: Not available

    Animal Type: Dog

    Location of shot: Netherlands

    Sarah Bub — Cat or Snail?

    © Sarah Bub / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Sarah Bub

    Title: Cat or Snail?

    Animal Name: Ron

    Animal Type: Cat

    Location of shot: Kreuztal, Germany

    Karen Hoglund — Hunting Dog Dropout

    © Karen Hoglund / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Karen Hoglund

    Title: Hunting Dog Dropout

    Animal Name: Murphy (The Turkey is a prop)

    Animal Type: Dog

    Location of shot: Colorado Mountains, USA

    Teun Veldman — Red Slippers? I don’t know anything about red slippers

    © Teun Veldman / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Teun Veldman

    Title: Red Slippers? I don’t know anything about red slippers

    Animal Name: Not Available

    Animal Type: Kitten

    Location of shot: Netherlands

    Mehmet Aslan — The Social Distance Meal Order

    © Mehmet Aslan / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Mehmet Aslan

    Title: The Social Distance Meal Order

    Animal Name: Not Available

    Animal Type: Cats

    Location of shot: Turkey

    Mehmet Aslan — Smile

    © Mehmet Aslan / Comedy Pet Photo Awards 2020

    Photographer: Mehmet Aslan

    Title: Smiley!

    Animal Name: Not Available

    Animal Type: Dog and Horse

    Location of shot: Turkey

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Pentax-D FA* 85mm F1.4 sample gallery

    $ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_7525589692″,”galleryId”:”7525589692″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

    The FA* 85mm F1.4 is the latest high-end optic Ricoh has released for Pentax full-frame and crop-sensor DSLR cameras. It’s ruggedly built and it joins the FA* 50mm F1.4 as one of the latest fast-aperture lenses for the Pentax K-mount. Peruse our gallery to get a sense of how it performs.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • DPReview TV: Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art review

    Sigma has been cranking out some fantastic lenses lately, and the new 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art joins the club. Find out why we like this fast, compact lens.

    Make sure to visit our updated sample gallery – now with more F1.4 images!

    Subscribe to our YouTube channel to get new episodes of DPReview TV every week.

    • Introduction
    • The competition
    • Size and weight
    • Controls and handling
    • Close focusing
    • Autofocus
    • Vineyard sample photos
    • Chromatic aberration
    • Bokeh
    • Garden sampl photos
    • Sharpness
    • Flare
    • Video performance
    • Who's it for?

    Sample gallery from this episode

    $ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_8484004248″,”galleryId”:”8484004248″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });
    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Photographer turned his front door into a large format camera to capture portraits during the pandemic

    The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has made social distancing critically important. While creating distance is good for our physical health, it is difficult for photographers, especially portrait photographers. To overcome this challenge, Kyle Roper, the producer behind The Skyscraper Camera Project, transformed the front door of his home into a large-format analog camera. This has allowed him to safely capture portraits and launch a new photo series, Door Frames.
    A look at the makeshift front door camera form inside Roper’s living room.

    Given ample time at home and the desire to continue creating images while observing social distancing restrictions, Roper converted his front door into a camera obscura using magnetic dry erase board, gaffer’s tape, cardboard boxes, a dark cloth, c-stand, clamps and sandbags. For photo paper and film, Roper uses Ilford RC IV Multigrade Photo Paper, Ilford Direct Positive Paper and Ilford Ortho 80 Plus. His lens of choice is a Nikkor-W 300mm F5.6 lens in a Copal shutter.

    An overview of all the elements of the front door camera.

    Roper states that he was inspired by his friend, Brendan Barry, an artist and camera builder we’ve featured many times before. Roper was also inspirited by the work of Dorothea Lange and Francesca Woodman. The former is a particularly interesting inspiration given Lange’s famous documentary and photojournalism work for the Farm Security Administration during the Great Depression.

    The conveniently-located window in Roper’s front door.

    Of Door Frames, Roper says, ‘When you have nothing but an abundance of time, you take the time and slow things down. You find that these antiquated processes can reveal and create such beauty.’ Below is a collection of portraits Roper captured with his front door camera:

    $ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_5564799738″,”galleryId”:”5564799738″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

    In order to communicate with his subjects outside, Roper speaks to them from inside his home using a speakerphone. Roper then affixes his photographic paper on the image box using the magnetic dry erase board and captures an image with his Nikkor lens wide open because his photo paper is ISO 3 or 6. Once an image is captured, Roper develops it in his bathroom, which he has converted into a darkroom.

    Prints in the process of being made in Roper’s makeshift darkroom.

    To view more Kyle Roper’s work, visit his website and follow him on Instagram.


    Image credits: All photos used with permission from Kyle Roper

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Hasselblad adds iPhone connectivity to its Phocus Mobile 2 application

    Hasselblad has announced a major upgrade to its Phocus Mobile 2 application. The mobile app, which had previously only offered Apple iPad support, is now compatible with iPhone, making it an even better option for Hasselblad photographers on the go.

    Phocus Mobile 2 offers photographers advanced remote control, live view, tethered image capture and importing, image conversion and exporting, image rating and filtering, and the ability to update the firmware of your camera and lenses directly in the app. On the iPad version, users can also edit their raw files and perform color correction. A video overview of a previous version of Phocus Mobile 2 can be seen below running on an iPad Pro.

    In addition to offering Live View on the new Phocus Mobile 2 app for iPhone, the latest version of the app allows users to update the Hasselblad X1D II 50C, 907X Special Edition and 907X 50C to firmware 1.3.0, adding Live View functionality to these cameras in Phocus Mobile 2 on iPad. When remotely shooting, the app offers a newly designed focus wheel for remote manual focus control. Further, the app now includes focus peaking, simulated exposure, depth-of-field preview and improved AF area position control.

    With respect to iPad models, Phocus Mobile 2 is compatible with iPad Air (2019 and newer) and iPad Pro (second generation and newer) models with a minimum of 3GB of RAM. On iPhone, Phocus Mobile 2 works on any iPhone model running iOS 12 or later. However, 100 percent magnification in the application requires an iPhone with at least 3GB of RAM (iPhone 7 Plus, 8 Plus and X models or later).

    You can learn more about Phocus Mobile 2 and download it for iPhone and iPad here.

    If you’d like to learn more about how to best utilize Phocus Mobile 2, Hasselblad aired a webinar in May, showing off how to use the app on an iPad Pro to process and share images. You can view the webinar below.

    Hasselblad has an active YouTube channel with many interesting webinars, including an hour-long one focused on lens design, another about Hasselblad’s history in space and many more. You can browse their videos by clicking here.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Meike’s 25mm F1.8 manual lens for Nikon Z-mount costs only $75

    It’s only been a few days since Meike introduced it’s 85mm F1.8 autofocus prime, but it’s already back with the announcement of another lens, a 25mm F1.8 manual focus prime for Nikon Z-mount cameras.

    The lens is constructed of seven elements in five groups, has an aperture range of F1.8 through F16, features a minimum focusing distance of 25cm (9.8”) and uses a nine-blade aperture diaphragm.

    The lens measures in at 61mm (2.4”) in diameter, 41mm (1.6”) long and weighs approximately 170g (6oz). Meike notes that the lens is entirely manual to the point that you’ll need to set your camera to release the shutter without a lens, as it won’t recognize a lens is attached.

    Meike’s website makes mention of APS-C throughout the entire product page, but also shows the lens attached to the Nikon Z7 we have contacted Meike to confirm whether this lens is exclusively for APS-C or also full-frame

    The lens is available now for just $ 75 on Meike’s website. It comes with the lens, front/rear caps, a carry pouch and a microfiber cleaning cloth.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Film Friday: Photographing music legends of the 1970’s and 80’s

    Photo: Dan Cuny

    In this week’s edition of Film Fridays – brought to us by our friends at 35mmc.com – photographer Dan Cuny takes us on a trip back in time to an era of rock and roll when venues didn’t restrict cameras, tickets cost no more than $ 6, ISO 200 film was considered ‘fast’ and standing ten feet away from David Bowie’s thrusting hips was an ordinary Saturday night affair.

    Click the link for Cuny’s insights into the era and plenty more photographs of rock and roll legends including George Harrison, Blondie, Freddie Mercury and more.

    Read: Photographing concerts
    in the 1970’s and 80’s

    About Film Fridays: We recently launched an analog forum and in a continuing effort to promote the fun of the medium, we’ll be sharing film-related content on Fridays, including articles from our friends at 35mmc.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Opinion: Businesses, especially corporations, should pay to use your photos

    There are thousands of photos of this particular musician online, which is why I couldn’t command as much as I would have liked for this image. The publisher who purchased a similar photograph had plenty of options.

    In spite of the fact that we’re in the midst of a global pandemic, I’ve managed to sell three photos recently without putting forth any effort. All were discovered from my uploads to Instagram or Flickr. Brands and companies are always looking for fresh content and will continue to seek out images that complement their messaging. This is why it’s important to know your worth. Or, in this case, the worth of the images you create.

    Would you ever work for free? If the answer is a resounding ‘no’, and it should be, then it doesn’t make sense to allow those with financial means to display your images in exchange for ‘credit’. After talking with other photographers who receive similar requests, and negotiating on my own behalf, I’ve arrived at figures that I believe are fair for an organization to pay if they want to amplify their message with your unique talents.

    The first time someone requested to purchase a photo of mine, I was pleasantly surprised. It came in the form of a comment from a well-known hotel rewards program. What I can only assume was a social media manager for the hotel chain’s official Instagram account reached out and asked for permission to repost a photo from my feed. After the initial afterglow wore off, I was a bit taken aback.

    At minimum, you should charge $ 250 for your image if it’s going to be printed. $ 500 is more of a fair price.

    The rewards program in question is tied to an international chain of hotels that holds a current net worth exceeding $ 20 billion dollars. While I don’t know the exact figure of their marketing budget, I imagine it has to be millions of dollars annually. As a photographer, I have invested tens of thousands of hours, over the years, into my craft. I expect to be compensated accordingly.

    To give you a rough idea of my expenses, currently, as a professional drone photographer, I spend $ 2,000 a year, at the bare minimum, on a new drone and a few extra batteries. Insuring each drone costs at least $ 500 on an annual basis and I typically have three in my arsenal. I also invest in accessories including memory cards, additional propellers, and neutral density filters – which easily tack on several hundred more dollars each year. I should mention that these costs are on the lower end compared to most professional photographers.

    Brands are more than willing to pay ‘influencers’ to promote their products and services. They shouldn’t hesitate to compensate you for your work. Source: Mediakix

    Brands don’t have any qualms about paying influencers to promote their goods and services. So why should anyone expect photographers to give away their hard work and vision for free? It doesn’t make much sense but some people, especially those starting out, are so enticed by the concept of gaining exposure or credibility that they enthusiastically say yes.

    My friend Dino Kuznik, who has been approached by the likes of Tesla and an another major auto manufacturer, not only demands top dollar for his work, he also makes it a point to contact brands and insist they remove his photos if they’ve posted them without his permission. He also recommends that creatives use this licensing calculator to arrive at an appropriate fee, especially if providing a high-resolution file is required. If you don’t negotiate properly, or have terms clearly laid out in a contract, you could lose out on compensation.

    Brands don’t have any qualms about paying influencers to promote their goods and services. So why should anyone expect photographers to give away their hard work for free?

    ‘Imagine coming to Times Square and seeing your photo on a billboard screen and realizing a company has been using it for a big campaign. But you couldn’t do anything about it [because you didn’t bother with a written agreement]. Now, if there was a contract, you could probably get a considerable amount because of the breach of contract/damages/etc,’ Kuznik explains. Typically, the client or company will provide the terms including a schedule detailing how, where, and when the image will be used. If the terms seem ambiguous, ask for clarification. Otherwise you may not have any legal recourse.

    If a brand wishes to license your image, they should provide a contract explicitly stating how it intends to use it for promotional purposes. Unless you are directly hired for a campaign or are paid a hefty amount for an image, you should retain the rights to use your work in any manner and at any time gong forward.

    It’s wise, outside of calculating a fair price, to thoroughly research a brand before agreeing to an amount for the rights to use your image. Find out what type of advertising they’re running, if any, and what the company is worth – if that information is available. So, what should you charge if someone approaches you to request a photo of yours for their own marketing or branding purposes? Well, that depends on a variety of factors.

    Kuznik was approached by an auto manufacturer (unnamed due to a non-disclosure agreement), to create a 3×3 grid of curated photos for Instagram. Because it’s a major automotive company, it compensates photographers on the higher end of the pay scale for their work. Kuznik had another engagement that prevented him from taking on the assignment but, had he made the trip, he would have been paid between $ 7,000 – $ 10,000.

    Tesla offered photographer Dino Kuznik $ 400 per image for Instagram and Twitter use. He negotiated the use of one of their vehicles for a road trip instead.

    Tesla offered him a rate of $ 400 per photo, strictly to be featured on its Instagram and Twitter accounts. Kuznik thought that was a bit low for a company of that magnitude. Instead, he negotiated a deal where he could borrow one of their cars for eight days. Between not needing to purchase gas or pay a car rental fee, it was worth his while to get free access to a Tesla for a road trip.

    My last three sales have been for either strict Instagram use or for a small outdoor exhibition, the latter given that we’re in the midst of a major pandemic. Here is what I charged:

    • I sold a photo I took of artist Jamie XX at a music festival several years back to a major publishing house in New Zealand. The photographer that sent me in her place never signs contracts, so the copyright remained in my name instead of the organizer’s. I agreed to $ 100 for the following reasons: there are close to 7,000 other images of the artist on Flickr, the platform where my image was discovered, and the contract expressed the wish to use it one time only on the publisher’s Instagram account.
    • A small, local construction company purchased a drone photo of one of their buildings for $ 200. They will only use it on their website. I had taken the photo for fun and had allowed a friend to repost it to their account, otherwise I would have charged $ 250–$ 300.
    • An international exhibition asked for permission to display a photo of mine and include it in a brochure that would be distributed to 1,000+ visitors. I gave the organizers the option of $ 250 for the display photo and brochure or $ 100 for rights to only display it from June 18th – 27th. The exhibition chose the latter since COVID has impacted its business.

    Research a brand before agreeing to an amount for the rights to use your image. Find out what type of advertising they’re running, if any, and what the company is worth.

    Social media and photography platforms are wonderful tools for building your portfolio and generating leads. There are times where it makes sense to partner with certain accounts and share your content instead of selling it for profit. An example is an Instagram takeover I did for Awesome Mitten. Since I sell aerial photography prints of destinations around Michigan to people who live in the state, it made sense to promote some of my offerings to potential customers during the Holiday season. My efforts generated a dozen-plus sales.

    There are times when it makes sense to use hashtags or share your images on relevant social accounts. This regional promotion made sense for my business.

    It’s important to keep in mind that this is passive income for me. I charge significantly more to perform on-site aerial photography and videography work for clients. I also sell my images to stock photo services and as art prints. Speaking of print, any publication should pay you $ 250, minimum, to print an image. Depending on circulation, you could get up to $ 1,500 per photo. The purpose of writing this article is to remind creatives that they shouldn’t give away their work in exchange for credit when approached by a business, brand or individual.

    On a final note, it’s imperative to develop your own signature style. Make it a point to actively look for new subjects, lesser known locales, and unique perspectives. While I enjoyed capturing musical artists performing live when starting out with photography, a lot of my images looked similar to those of my peers. I quickly hit my creative apex and found a new passion with drone photography. Consistently honing your craft and experimenting with new techniques and technology will help you attract the attention of those who have the means to support your endeavors, and allow you to command top dollar for your work.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Russell Kirsch, inventor of the pixel, dies in his Portland home at age 91

    Computer scientist Russell Kirsch, best known for inventing the pixel, passed away August 11 at his home in Portland, Oregon. He was 91-years-old.

    Kirsch, who was of Jewish descent and the son of immigrants from Russia and Hungary, was born to in Manhattan, New York City, in 1929. It was there in New York City he would go on to graduate in 1946 from the Bronx High School of Science before heading off to New York University in 1950, followed by Harvard University in 1952 and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

    In 1951, While still in school, Kirsch joined the National Bureau of Standards as a member of the Standards Eastern Automatic Computer (SEAC) team, which was in charge of handling the U.S.’s first programmable computer, which was created just a year prior.

    This image measured just 179 pixels by 179 pixels for a total of 32,041 pixels.

    It was in 1957 though that Kirsch would forever make his mark on the world when he, alongside a team of researchers, developed a small 5cm by 5cm digital image scanner for the SEAC that went on to capture the first digital images, including a now-iconic image of Kirsch’s three-month-old son, Walden.

    As explained in this archived post from the National Institute of Standards and Technology Museum, ‘the scanner used a rotating drum and a photomultiplier to sense reflections from a small image mounted on the drum […] a mask interposed between the picture and the photomultiplier tessellated the image into discrete pixels.’ Initially, the images were binary, capturing only black or white, but Kirsch and his team discovered that by scanning the image multiple times at different thresholds they could create a grayscale image by stacking multiple scans.

    This technology allowed Kirsch and his team to develop algorithms that laid the foundations for image processing and image pattern recognition. Kirsch’s invention also helped NASA with its earliest space explorations, including the Apollo Moon landings, and paved the way for future imaging technologies, such as satellite imagery and Sir Godfrey Hounsfield’s CAT scan.

    Even after Kirsch retired in 2001, he never stopped improving upon his inventions. As detailed in a 2010 WIRED article, Kirsch also sought to rid the world of square pixels, a design decision that has shaped the world of technology since its discovery in 1957. In speaking with WIRED, Kirsch said ‘Square [pixels] was the logical thing to do [but] of course, the logical thing was not the only possibility […] It was something very foolish that everyone in the world has been suffering from ever since.” And rather than ‘just complaining about what [he] did,’ Kirsch decided ‘to do something about it.’

    Kirsch’s variable-shaped pixel technology smooths out pixellated images by eschewing square pixels for more organic shapes.

    The program Kirsch had developed at the time of the WIRED article analyzes a square-pixel images and attempts to rid them of obvious pixellation through clever masking. WIRED details the process here:

    Kirsch’s method assesses a square-pixel picture with masks that are 6 by 6 pixels each and looks for the best way to divide this larger pixel cleanly into two areas of the greatest contrast. The program tries two different masks over each area — in one, a seam divides the mask into two rough triangles, and in the other a seam creates two rough rectangles. Each mask is then rotated until the program finds the configuration that splits the 6-by-6 area into sections that contrast the most. Then, similar pixels on either side of the seam are fused.

    Kirsch also talks about the variable-shaped pixel technology in the following video from 2011:

    Kirsch passed away in his Portland, Oregon home from a form of Alzheimer’s disease. He is survived by Joan, his wife of 65 years, his children Walden, Peter, Lindsey and Kara, and his four grandchildren. You can read his obituary and sign the guest book on the Legacy tribute page.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)