Blog

  • DPReview TV: ProRes Raw on the Nikon Z6

    We review Nikon’s ProRes Raw video upgrade for the Z6 and Z7 mirrorless cameras. In the process, Chris and Jordan explain the benefits of a Raw video workflow and why there’s no such thing as a free lunch.

    Subscribe to our YouTube channel to get new episodes of DPReview TV every week.

    • Introduction
    • What gear you need
    • Limitations when shooting ProRes Raw
    • ProRes Raw workflow
    • ProRes Raw image quality
    • When should you shoot Raw?
    • Conclusion

    Find out more about Nikon’s ProRes Raw upgrade and how to get it

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Fujifilm will discontinue its Fujicolor film-packs by the end of March

    On February 7, Fujifilm published an advisory warning that it will discontinue the sale of some film products due to [the] long-term decrease in demand’ it has experienced. According to FujiRumors, the decision will impact the Fujicolor 100 and Fujicolor Superia Premium 400 film products.

    Fujifilm will stop shipping its Fujicolor 100 and Fujicolor Superia Premium 400 film in three-packs by the end of March, according to the report. Single rolls of film will still be available to purchase through select retailers and distributors. Though the analog photography market has seen an uptick in demand, this hasn’t been enough to save some products.

    In October 2019, for example, Polaroid Originals announced that it was discontinuing its Spectra film because functional cameras that can support it have become increasingly hard to find. Fujifilm itself has discontinued other film products, including its ACROS 100 black and white film that it earmarked for discontinuation in 2018.


    Update (February 7, 2020): Article has been updated to clarify it’s the three-pack units Fujifilm will stop selling.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • RAW vs DNG: What’s the Difference and Why Does it Matter?

    The post RAW vs DNG: What’s the Difference and Why Does it Matter? appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Simon Ringsmuth.

    raw-vs-dng-files

    As a photographer, you have no doubt heard people talk about file formats, specifically RAW and JPG. Some people shoot only in RAW, others like JPG, and many photographers use both. Each format has benefits and drawbacks, but if you want the most amount of control over your pictures, you probably shoot in RAW. However, there is a third option you might not even know about: Digital Negative, or DNG. With this other format in the mix, the issue isn’t so much RAW vs JPG, but RAW vs DNG.

    Image: DNGs can speed up your Lightroom workflow, but there are some tradeoffs to be aware of.

    DNGs can speed up your Lightroom workflow, but there are some tradeoffs to be aware of.

    Understanding RAW

    RAW files, unlike JPG files, store all of the light and color data used to capture an image. That means you can recapture blown-out highlights, make better white balance corrections, and have a great deal of editing freedom you don’t get with JPG.

    Nikon, Canon, Sony, and others all let photographers shoot in RAW, but each of their RAW files is different. For example, the file extension for a Nikon RAW file is NEF, Canon is CRW, and Sony uses ARW.

    As a result of this, cameras from these manufacturers process and store RAW data a little differently. Third-party editing software has to interpolate and reverse-engineer the method used to create the RAW files.

    This is great for camera makers because they can tweak their hardware and software to work really well with their own RAW formats. However, it’s not always the best for photographers and editors.

    Image: RAW and DNG files give you plenty of editing room that JPG does not offer. Nikon D500, 85mm,...

    RAW and DNG files give you plenty of editing room that JPG does not offer. Nikon D500, 85mm, f/1.8, 1/4000 second, ISO 100

    Digital Negative

    Adobe developed the Digital Negative (DNG) format in 2004 as an open-source alternative to the proprietary RAW formats that most camera manufacturers used.

    What Adobe did was essentially level the playing field by giving everyone access to the same format for working with RAW files.

    DNG is open-source, which means anyone can use it without paying licensing fees. A few manufacturers like Pentax and Leica support DNG natively. However, for everyone else, there are easy ways to convert RAW files to DNG and get all the benefits of the latter without the hassles of the former.

    DNG is particularly useful if you use Adobe products, like Lightroom and Photoshop, but other editing software support it too.

    RAW vs DNG

    The photo information in each file is identical, but there might be some reasons to choose one over the other.

    When looking at the RAW vs DNG issue, there are some important benefits as well as drawbacks that you might want to consider before you switch.

    However, please don’t look at this as a matter of which format is better.

    Neither RAW nor DNG is objectively superior; both have advantages and disadvantages. The point is to give you enough information to make an informed choice about which format works for you.

    DNG benefits

    1. Faster workflow

    The main reason many people use DNG files is related to editing efficiency when using Lightroom. Since DNG and Lightroom are both made by Adobe, it stands to reason that they would work well together.

    If you have ever found doing some simple operations with RAW files in Lightroom frustrating, like switching photos or zooming in to check focus, you will be shocked at how fast things like this are when using DNG files.

    Switching from RAW to DNG has made a huge difference for me in speeding up my Lightroom workflow.

    Image: Nikon D750, 40mm, f/1.4, ISO 360, 1/180 second.

    Nikon D750, 40mm, f/1.4, ISO 360, 1/180 second.

    2. Smaller file sizes

    File size is another area where DNG has an edge in the RAW vs DNG debate. Although, it might not be quite as important now with storage so cheap compared to ten or twenty years ago.

    DNG files are typically about 20% smaller than a RAW file, which means you can store more of them on your computer. If you are limited in storage space, DNG just might be a good option for you.

    Image: I converted a folder of RAW files to DNG. Both contain the exact same data for each photo, bu...

    I converted a folder of RAW files to DNG. Both contain the exact same data for each photo, but the DNGs are much smaller. The entire folder of RAW files is 1.75GB, whereas the folder of DNG files is 1.5GB.

    3. Wide support

    Because DNG doesn’t require a proprietary decoding algorithm, like RAW files from major manufacturers do, there is wider support from a variety of editing software. Various archival organizations, such as the Library of Congress, even use this format. That means it should work just fine for most photographers too. Personally, knowing this helped settle the RAW vs DNG debate for me, but you might prefer another solution.

    4. Wide support

    One additional benefit of DNG has to do with editing metadata and how it is stored. Lightroom is non-destructive, meaning that any changes you make to an image, you can alter at any point in the future. The original file remains untouched, and a record of your edits is stored separately.

    When working with RAW files, these edits are written to a very small file called a sidecar. However, if you use DNG, all your edits are stored in the DNG file itself. Most people consider this an advantage since it requires fewer files to store and manage, but it can be a drawback which I explore later in this article.

    RAW vs DNG

    Nikon D750, 40mm, f/1.4, ISO 1000, 1/3000 second

    DNG Drawbacks

    1. File conversion

    Since most cameras don’t natively shoot in DNG format, you need to convert your RAW files if you want to use it.

    Lightroom can do this automatically for you when importing, but it does come with a drawback that may be significant. Depending on the speed of your computer and the number of RAW files you import, the conversion to DNG can take anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours.

    This could be problematic for some people in high-speed workflows such as sports and other action photography. Personally, I don’t mind. I just do the import/convert operation before dinner or at another time when I don’t need to start editing immediately.

    I like to think of this initial conversion time as the culmination of all the seconds I used to spend waiting for RAW files to render, but all rolled into one lump sum. It’s a tradeoff I’m happy to make, but some people might find this a dealbreaker and stick with traditional RAW formats.

    Image: Converting lots of RAW files to DNG can take a great deal of time. And this is time that some...

    Converting lots of RAW files to DNG can take a great deal of time. And this is time that some photographers don’t have.

    2. RAW metadata loss

    Another drawback to the DNG format is that some of the RAW metadata gets lost during conversion. All the usual metadata you would expect is intact such as exposure, camera information, focal length, and more. But some information like GPS data, copyright information, and exact focus point don’t always transfer over.

    Additionally, the built-in JPG preview gets discarded in favor of a smaller preview, which is another trick Adobe uses to bring down the size of DNG files.

    Whether this information matters is up to you. Personally, I find none of the lost metadata a dealbreaker.

    3. Multiple editors

    One other issue you might want to consider is whether your workflow involves having multiple editors work on the same RAW file.

    If that’s the case, then the lack of a sidecar file could be problematic. Essentially, the sidecar acts as a storage locker for all your edits. The RAW file is untouched, but the sidecar stores a record of your edits. This means that if you have two people working on the same RAW file, you can share your edits just by copying the sidecar files.

    RAW vs DNG

    Edits to RAW images get stored as sidecar files. You can send these sidecar files to other editors to share your RAW edits (as long as they have the original RAW files).

    If you use DNG, you have to share the entire DNG files, which can be problematic compared to the ease of copying a tiny sidecar file.

    For most people, this probably won’t matter, but for those who work in editing rooms or production houses that rely on sidecar files to store edits, DNG might not be the best option.

    Finally, if you research this issue long enough, you will hear some trepidation about the longevity of DNG since the biggest camera makers, like Canon, Nikon, and Sony, do not officially support it. Personally, I’m not too worried about this since DNG is a widely-adopted industry standard, and if it’s good enough for the Library of Congress, then it’s good enough for me.

    How to use DNG

    If you want to give DNG a try, you can start by converting some of your existing RAW files. In your Lightroom Library module, select the RAW files you want to convert and then choose Photo->Convert Photo to DNG.

    RAW vs DNG

    I recommend checking the values you see here, though if you are ready to go all-in, you can also select the option to delete originals. The “Embed Fast Load Data” option is what really speeds things up in Lightroom.

    Un-check the option to use lossy compression if you want to retain all the data from the RAW file instead of having Lightroom toss out some in favor of a smaller file size. Also, you don’t need to embed the RAW file since doing so will more than double the file size of your DNG.
    Another option is to use the Copy as DNG setting when importing photos from your memory card. This will add a great deal of time during the import process since Lightroom converts every one of your RAW files to DNG.

    However, for me, the tradeoff is worth it since DNGs are so much faster to work with in Lightroom compared to traditional RAW files.

    RAW vs DNG

    Conclusion

    As with many aspects of photography, the answer here isn’t black and white, and there is not a one-size-fits-all solution. The question of RAW vs DNG isn’t about which format is better, but which format suits your needs.

    There is no data loss when working with DNGs, but there are some issues compared to RAW files, and it’s important that you make an informed choice.

    If you have experience working with DNG files and would like to share your thoughts, I would love to have them in the comments below!

    The post RAW vs DNG: What’s the Difference and Why Does it Matter? appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Simon Ringsmuth.


    Digital Photography School

  • Weekly Photography Challenge – Street Photography

    The post Weekly Photography Challenge – Street Photography appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Caz Nowaczyk.

    This week’s photography challenge topic is STREET PHOTOGRAPHY!

    Learn How To Easily Improve Your Street Photography Portraits Market Shopping With Dad In Chiang Mai, Thailand © Kevin Landwer-Johan

    Photo by dPS writer, Kevin Landwer-Johan © Kevin Landwer-Johan

    Street photography can be a powerful genre of photography. It can also be one that many a shy photographer can struggle with. So, I challenge you to go out and give this genre a go this week and share your resulting images with us in the comments below.

    You can use a wide-angle lens, a telephoto or a prime lens – it depends if you want to get in amongst it or photograph unnoticed from afar.

    They can be color, or black and white. You can photograph from a low angle, high angle, wide angle or really close – the decision is yours! Try using negative space, or simply capture the action, emotion and atmosphere.

    So, check out these pics to give you some ideas, have fun, and I look forward to seeing what you come up with!

    Also, check out some of the articles below that give you tips on this week’s challenge.

    women in a bus stop in Thailand. Photo by Kevin Landwer-Johan (copyright)

    Photo by dPS writer, Kevin Landwer-Johan © Kevin Landwer-Johan

    Image: Photo by dPS writer, Glenn Harper © Glenn Harper

    Photo by dPS writer, Glenn Harper © Glenn Harper

    Image: Photo by dPS writer, James Maher © James Maher

    Photo by dPS writer, James Maher © James Maher

    Tips for Shooting STREET PHOTOGRAPHY

    The Ultimate Guide to Street Photography

    How to Avoid Distracting Backgrounds in Street Photography

    How To Easily Improve Your Street Photography Portraits

    6 Tips for Aiming Low and Going Unnoticed in Street Photography

    7 Steps to Improve Your Closeup Candid Street Photography

    7 Gritty Tips That Will Create the Foundation for Your Street Photography

    8 Advanced Street Photography Tips to Get You to the Next Level

     

    Simply upload your shot into the comment field (look for the little camera icon in the Disqus comments section) and they’ll get embedded for us all to see or if you’d prefer, upload them to your favorite photo-sharing site and leave the link to them. Show me your best images in this week’s challenge.

    Share in the dPS Facebook Group

    You can also share your images in the dPS Facebook group as the challenge is posted there each week as well.

    If you tag your photos on Flickr, Instagram, Twitter or other sites – tag them as #DPSstreetphotography to help others find them. Linking back to this page might also help others know what you’re doing so that they can share in the fun.

    The post Weekly Photography Challenge – Street Photography appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Caz Nowaczyk.


    Digital Photography School

  • Fujifilm says new 400MP ‘pixel shift’ mode is coming to its GFX 100 camera system

    At its 2020 X Summit in London earlier this week, Fujifilm announced it’s working on adding a 400 Megapixel ‘pixel shift’ mode for its GFX 100 medium format mirrorless camera system.

    The impending feature was teased as Fujifilm engineers talked about adding new functionality to its GFX 100 (around the 39:30 mark in the above video). According to the engineers, the ultra-resolution mode would use ‘sub-?m order control’ pixel pitch to create 400MP stills from the 100MP sensor inside its GFX100. Specifically, the engineers noted the new technology would be able to control pixel shift with 10x more precision than is currently available using the in-body image stabilization.

    Aside from the aforementioned details, no other information was given, as Fujifilm engineers progressed through the 2020 X Summit. So, until Fujifilm reveals more information, it’s just a matter of waiting to see how long it is until the new functionality finds its way to the company’s 100MP medium format mirrorless camera.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • DIY Lighting and Background Accessories for the Budget-Conscious Photographer

    The post DIY Lighting and Background Accessories for the Budget-Conscious Photographer appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Ana Mireles.

    diy-lighting-and-background-accessories

    Do you want to take your photography to the next level, but don’t have the budget for professional equipment? Just a few dollars and a trip to the stationery shop can do the trick. Keep reading for some DIY lighting and background accessories using paper.

    Professional photography studios have multiple lights and accessories to create their images. If you want to learn about them, here’s a great introduction guide.

    However, when there’s no budget at hand, it’s time to get creative.

    I’ll show you some ideas on how to create DIY lighting and background accessories using paper only. This has the intention of being a starting point to spark your creativity according to your needs and whatever you can find in your area.

    diy-lighting-and-background-accessories

    DIY lighting and background accessories

    DIY diffuser

    There are two types of light, hard and soft. Hard light is very bright and usually, a condensed light that casts well defined, intense shadows and contrasting hot points.

    It can be natural on very sunny days, or artificial from flash and strobes.

    This can be great for certain types of photos, but other times it can be very unflattering for the scene.

    Hard Light DIY Photography

    Hard light with no diffuser. 0.5 sec, f/2.8, ISO 200

    Soft light means that the subject is illuminated more evenly, the shadows become softer, and the entire mood is different.

    Professionally, hard light is turned soft by using umbrellas or softboxes.

    You can achieve a softbox effect using vellum paper as I did on the image below. In case you can’t find it, any type of tracing paper will do, or even oven paper from your kitchen.

    diy-lighting-and-background-accessories-SOft Light DIY diffuser

    Hard light turned soft with the use of DIY lighting accessories – vellum paper. You can also use tracing paper or oven paper. 0.5 sec, f/2.8, ISO 200

    DIY Reflector

    A light reflector bounces the existing light so that you don’t have to add a second source. This is very helpful to fill in shadows or darker areas of the image to bring out more detail.

    You can find these in different sizes and colors, but the DIY stationery solution I chose was a foam board. It’s very light, easy to cut, and has a glossy exterior that maximizes the reflection.

    Stationery Shop DIY Reflector

    1/5 sec. f2.8 ISO 200

    In the above example, see how much light I gained just by placing a piece of foam board opposite the flash. It’s so much that I even lost the contrasting effect I wanted. However, I wanted to show you how big the difference is.

    If you want less light, you can place it further away or change the angle. It takes some practice to learn how to use reflectors to light your subject, but it’s really worth it. If you need to block the light instead, you need to use flags, which you can achieve with black paper.

    Creative uses

    DIY Gels

    Other DIY lighting and background accessories you can create are gels. Gels are pieces of colored, semi-transparent material that you can use to modify your light. Professional gels are graded to exact colors and density. This is because you can then compensate for the exposure and white balance in your camera and different light sources. However, for creative lighting, you can use simple cellophane paper or plastic index dividers.

    Stationery Shop DIY Color Gel

    1 sec. f. 2.8 ISO 200

    Creating bokeh with wrapping paper or foil

    Bokeh is an effect created by the lens when you send the background out of focus. You can easily create it by using crumbled metallic wrapping paper or aluminum foil as a background. If you want to create colored bokeh, buy wrapping paper with iridescent designs.

    Stationery Shop DIY Bokeh

    You can create a great bokeh background simply by using crumbled metallic wrapping paper or aluminum foil as a background. 1/10 sec, f/8, ISO 200

    Once you place this background, light it from the side with any kind of lamp, flash or even window light. The most important thing though is to keep it out of focus. If you’re not sure how to achieve the shallow depth of field needed, check out this article.

    Using paper to create a textured backdrop

    Of course, you can make a backdrop with any kind of paper – that’s not news. However, I encourage you to add texture to it and see the difference. This, of course, makes a busier background, so it may not suit all subjects, but it can be a creative solution for many others.

    diy-lighting-and-background-accessories

    This background was created using crumpled tissue paper. 1/5 sec. f2.8 ISO 200

    I found that tissue paper is great because it’s cheap, light, easy to manipulate, and comes in multiple colors. You can just crumble it, cut it into pieces, and form patterns.

    In this example, I cut it into squares and then twisted the center to create the ruffles, then pasted it all together with alternating shades of green.

    Conclusion

    So there you have it – some incredibly simple, and affordable DIY lighting and background accessories that you can buy on a small budget from almost any stationery store. Try these out, and if you have any other tips to add, please share them with us in the comments!

    And for more photography DIY ideas, check out the following articles:

    • How to Make a DIY Lens Hood to Eliminate Lens Flare
    • How to Use Ordinary Items to Make DIY Photo Filters
    • DIY Photography: How to Make Your Own DIY Lightstick for Cool Photos!
    • DIY Photography Backdrops for Still Life and Product Photography
    • How to Make a DIY Photography Softbox (video)
    • Try this DIY Neutral Density Filter for Long Exposure Photos
    • DIY Food Photography Props on a Budget

    The post DIY Lighting and Background Accessories for the Budget-Conscious Photographer appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Ana Mireles.


    Digital Photography School

  • The importance of emotion in landscape photography

    A land that time forgot: Iceland.

    When you think about landscape photography you may not immediately connect it with emotion in the same way as if you see a portrait, documentary photo, wildlife photo or indeed pet photo (that emotion is why my dog, Pebbles, gets more love than me on YouTube!). But as with all art forms, landscape photography should connect with the viewer in a way that means something, and it has the potential to be more than just a gorgeous scene.

    I remember when I started photography 35 years ago, a mentor at that time, when I was definitely the youngest in the camera club, 13 years old, said to me, “You photograph how you see and not what you see.” At that point I didn’t really get it but I never forgot it.

    It’s interesting as there are thousands of videos and articles on technique, cameras and settings, but the photos that stick in your mind don’t get there because they were really sharp, had good bokeh or were shot on a certain camera. Have you ever looked at Van Gogh and said, “He must have had a good paint brush?” However, there aren’t as many on emotion and feelings in photography.

    “A great photograph is one that fully expresses what one feels, in the deepest sense, about what is being photographed.” –Ansel Adams

    I think there are two forms of emotion in a photo: the one that the photographer has when they captured the image and the one the viewer has when they look at it.

    They don’t have to be the same, but I believe that when you have an emotional response to the landscape that translates into a photo, it’s more likely to create an emotional response in the viewer. It’s why I don’t believe you can create a photo out of nothing. Too often, people say that you can add light and create dramatic impact with Lightroom and Photoshop. But they should be there to enhance what you saw and not create something that didn’t exist. After all how can you ask a viewer to connect with something you didn’t first observe?

    What emotions do you feel with landscape photography though?

    Sometimes a photo makes you stop in your tracks and look deep into it. It isn’t just perfect exposure or a beautiful scene. It has instant impact and creates a quick emotional response. Take the next image for example:

    Kalsoy Lighthouse, Faroe Islands

    Other times, you can pass by an image many times and eventually grow to love it and have an increased emotional attachment to it as you see new things and explore the intricacies of the scene.

    Winter Colour, Lake District

    Unfortunately modern social media favors the first of these two emotional responses. Instagram is all about that five second impact. Take the following photo from my Instagram feed. It got 50% more views than my average photo but it doesn’t really have any long lasting emotional response.

    It’s why I love printed media so much and feel that having an image printed out and on a wall offers so much more value to the photographer and viewer alike. If I show my prints on a workshop or to other photographers then they spend a lot longer looking at each image than they would if I gave them an iPad to view the same shots.

    Let’s look at the photographer’s and viewer’s emotion in more detail.

    The photographer’s emotion

    For me, getting out in the landscape is one of the most relaxing and fulfilling things to do. I love observing the scenes around me and just staying in the moment. Nothing is better than arriving at a location, finding a rock, pouring a coffee and taking in the surroundings.

    Taking photographs is part of what I find relaxing. This process of taking in the scene around me, then taking out my camera, setting it up, visualizing the scene and capturing that emotion I have at that time.

    “I think that emotional content is an image’s most important element, regardless of the photographic technique. Much of the work I see these days lacks the emotional impact to draw a reaction from viewers, or remain in their hearts.” Anne Geddes

    But emotion in photographs is a personal thing and if I look back at my photos a lot have stories associated with them that others wouldn’t know. I believe this helps to create a better and more emotional response. It is very interesting for me as when I spend longer in a location I find I almost always produce a more interesting photograph.

    The viewer’s emotion

    Emotional response is regarded as a critical element to experiencing all forms of art. Various research such as this by Cupchik et al , ‘Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience’, show that the brain regions involved in emotion experience activation when seeing art compared to objects.

    But, how do you go about creating something that invokes strong emotion in the landscape? It’s all about connecting with the viewer. Maybe it is through the changing weather or the patterns in the scene. Or maybe a photo leaves something out and the viewer has to get more involved in the image to understand it.

    “I like photographs that leave something to the imagination.” –Fay Goodwin

    This quote holds a really important element of landscape photography that people often miss out, and that is imagination. We all have amazing imagination, and a landscape photograph that shows less is often more powerful than one that shows the whole scene. It is something that I often say in workshops, leave more out than you put in.

    The Power of Imagination

    I am dyslexic and reading is difficult, so words have never meant a lot to me and photos have said so much.

    “A true photograph need not be explained, nor can it be contained in words.” –Ansel Adams

    So I thought it would be interesting to see if people would think differently when they looked at an image with a title compared to without.

    The results were really interesting. Here they are for Passing Storm (below) when the title was shown. This was based on 1000 responses (500 had each image / title / no title)

    Passing Storm

    Response with title shown:

    And response when no title was shown:

    First of all, people are different and think differently about a scene. In fact it probably isn’t just about a person but the current circumstances that person is going through. A powerful photo is like a conduit to tapping into that emotion. You can see from above that the title has little impact on the emotion felt by the image.

    Watch my video on emotion in landscape photography to see more survey results and detail how to provoke emotion in your art.

    How do you react to a image? Do you feel an emotion when you see certain images? Let me know in the comments below.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Fujifilm releases X100V with new sensor, new lens and tilting touchscreen

    $ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_0340325977″,”galleryId”:”0340325977″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

    The Fujifilm X100V has arrived and represents that biggest re-working of the camera since the series arrived nearly ten years ago. While the additions and updates are a little bigger than before, Fujifilm hasn’t messed too much with the basic formula that’s made the X100 so popular.

    We still have an APS-C sensor, a 35mm-equivalent F2 lens and a hybrid optical-and-electronic viewfinder, but all of those have been updated. The sensor is Fujifilm’s latest 26MP X-Trans unit we first saw on the X-T3 and X-Pro3 interchangeable lens cameras, the lens has been redesigned to improve close-up and corner performance, and the viewfinder is all-new and has an OLED panel instead of the LCD panel on older models.

    Beyond that, a new tilting screen mechanism doesn’t add much bulk to the camera, but makes it much easier to shoot from the hip. The addition of 4K video with F-log internal recording, alongside various capture aids and Fujifilm’s ‘Movie Silent Control’ system give the camera some serious video chops. Burst speeds of up to 20 fps with the electronic shutter, improved battery life and claimed weather-sealing (provided you attach the AR-X100 filter ring and a filter to the front of the lens) complete the package.

    Put all of this together, and you get the most well-rounded and capable fixed-lens compact camera on the market today. Fujifilm says the X100V will be available in late February 2020 at a price of $ 1399, or $ 1799 CAD.

    Press release:

    INTRODUCING THE FUJIFILM X100V: MAKE EVERYDAY REMARKABLE

    Valhalla, New York – February 4, 2020 – FUJIFILM North America Corporation is pleased to announce the launch of the FUJIFILM X100V (X100V), the latest model in a long line of iconic, portable, and fun X100 premium compact digital cameras.

    The fifth iteration in Fujifilm’s X100 Series, the X100V is a significant upgrade over previous X100 line models. Featuring a new 23mmF2 lens, advanced hybrid viewfinder, optional weather resistance*, and 2-way tilting rear LCD screen, among a host of other product line updates, the X100V also uses the latest generation X-Trans CMOS 4 sensor and X-Processor 4 to provide all creatives from professionals to everyday image makers with an easy to use, fully capable, and sophisticated tool that provides incredible image quality when shooting both stills and video.

    Key features and improvements of X100V include:

    Sophisticated appearance, advanced operability and classical design

    X100V’s timeless body has top and bottom plates milled from single pieces of aluminum, which results in a refined and classic camera body with clean edges. Finished with a beautiful satin coating, slight enhancements have also been made to the camera’s grip, ISO dial, and lens barrel to make it incredibly comfortable to hold and operate. Weather resistance appears for the first time in the X100 line when the optional AR-X100 adapter ring and the PRF-49 protection filter are attached. Additionally, a new two-way tilting touchscreen LCD screen fits flush at the back of the camera and provides intuitive touch controls, unlocking even more possibilities for image-makers to see, frame, and create images.

    A new lens to make the most out of any image

    X100V features a new 23mmF2.0 lens to ensure that every detail from its X-TRANSTM CMOS 4 Sensor is resolved beautifully. Designed for higher resolution, lower distortion and improved close focus performance, this lens is a significant upgrade from the design used on previous X100 cameras, while maintaining the same overall size and compatibility with legacy WCL/TCL conversion lenses, and retaining its internal ND filter that now features 4 stops.

    At the heart of X100V is the state-of-the-art X-Trans CMOS 4 sensor and X-Processor 4 combination. The exceptional 26.1MP sensor uses a back-illuminated design to maximize quality and dynamic range, while its unique color filter array controls moire? and false color without the need for an optical low pass filter. Such outstanding imaging capability is complemented by the quad-core X-Processor 4. This powerful CPU not

    only ensures images are quickly and smoothly processed, but also, thanks to a new algorithm, boosts AF performance with precision face and eye detection down to -5EV.

    Two ways to see an image

    X100V’s vastly improved hybrid viewfinder enables image-makers to quickly and easily choose between the 0.52x magnification optical viewfinder (OVF) or the 3.69M dot OLED electronic viewfinder to make their images. Offering 95% frame coverage, the OVF provides parallax-correcting frame lines to provide an uninterrupted view of the world, while the camera’s EVF delivers a real-time representation of the image as it is being made. The Electronic Rangefinder (ERF) function can also be selected to display a small EVF at the bottom right corner of the OVF, which gives image-makers another helpful tool as they frame and make their images.

    More than just a still camera

    X100V offers the ability to record 4K video at up to 30 frames per second or capture 120 frames per second at 1080p to create super slow motion effects. Filmmakers needing extreme color fidelity can record 10-bit, 4:2:2 color externally via the HDMI port and leverage Fujifilm’s advanced color reproduction technology, to apply film simulations, like “Eterna”, to their video footage. Additionally, image makers can also incorporate numerous shooting functions, such as “Monochrome Adjustments” and “Color Chrome” to extend their creative visions directly to the footage being recorded.

    Optional accessories

    Use the wide conversion lens (WCL-X100 II) or tele-conversion lens (TCL-X100 II) to extend X100V’s fixed 23mm focal length to a 28mm equivalent (0.8x) or 50mm (1.4x) equivalent lens on a 35mm format system.

    Add a premium, genuine leather case (LC-X100V) to X100V to complement its classic design, while giving complete access to the camera’s battery and memory card without removing the X100V from its case.

    X100V will be available in both black and silver and is expected to be available for sale in late February 2020 at a manufacturer’s suggested retail price of $ 1,399.95 USD and $ 1,799.99 CAD. For more information, please visit https://fujifilm-x.com/en-us/X100V.

    *With the combined use of the optional AR-X100 Adapter ring and the PRF-49 protection filter (sold separately)

    Fujifilm X100V specifications

    Price
    MSRP $ 1399
    Body type
    Body type Large sensor compact
    Body material Magnesium alloy, aluminum
    Sensor
    Max resolution 6240 x 4160
    Image ratio w:h 1:1, 3:2, 16:9
    Effective pixels 26 megapixels
    Sensor size APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm)
    Sensor type BSI-CMOS
    Processor X-Processor Pro 4
    Color space sRGB, Adobe RGB
    Color filter array X-Trans
    Image
    ISO Auto, 160-12800 (expands to 80-51200)
    Boosted ISO (minimum) 80
    Boosted ISO (maximum) 51200
    White balance presets 7
    Custom white balance Yes (3 slots)
    Image stabilization No
    Uncompressed format RAW
    JPEG quality levels Fine, normal
    File format
    • JPEG
    • Raw (Fujifilm RAF, 14-bit)
    Optics & Focus
    Focal length (equiv.) 35 mm
    Maximum aperture F2–16
    Autofocus
    • Contrast Detect (sensor)
    • Phase Detect
    • Multi-area
    • Center
    • Selective single-point
    • Tracking
    • Single
    • Continuous
    • Touch
    • Face Detection
    • Live View
    Autofocus assist lamp Yes
    Manual focus Yes
    Normal focus range 10 cm (3.94)
    Number of focus points 425
    Screen / viewfinder
    Articulated LCD Tilting
    Screen size 3
    Screen dots 1,620,000
    Touch screen Yes
    Screen type TFT LCD
    Live view Yes
    Viewfinder type Electronic and Optical (tunnel)
    Viewfinder coverage 95%
    Viewfinder magnification 0.52×
    Viewfinder resolution 3,690,000
    Photography features
    Minimum shutter speed 30 sec
    Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 sec
    Maximum shutter speed (electronic) 1/32000 sec
    Exposure modes
    • Program
    • Shutter priority
    • Aperture priority
    • Manual
    Built-in flash Yes
    External flash Yes (via hot shoe)
    Flash modes Auto, Standard, Slow Sync, Manual, Commander, off
    Flash X sync speed 1/4000 sec
    Continuous drive 11.0 fps
    Self-timer Yes
    Metering modes
    • Multi
    • Center-weighted
    • Average
    • Spot
    Exposure compensation ±5 (at 1/3 EV steps)
    AE Bracketing ±5 (2, 3, 5, 7 frames at 1/3 EV steps)
    WB Bracketing Yes
    Videography features
    Format MPEG-4, H.264
    Modes
    • 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
    • 1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
    Microphone Stereo
    Speaker Mono
    Storage
    Storage types SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported)
    Connectivity
    USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
    USB charging Yes
    HDMI Yes (micro HDMI)
    Microphone port Yes
    Headphone port No
    Wireless Built-In
    Wireless notes 802.11b/g/n + Bluetooth
    Remote control Yes (via cable release or smartphone)
    Physical
    Environmentally sealed Yes (with optional filter holder and filter)
    Battery Battery Pack
    Battery description NP-W126S lithium-ion battery & charger
    Battery Life (CIPA) 420
    Weight (inc. batteries) 478 g (1.05 lb / 16.86 oz)
    Dimensions 128 x 75 x 53 mm (5.04 x 2.95 x 2.09)
    Other features
    Orientation sensor Yes
    Timelapse recording Yes
    GPS None

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Hasselblad XCD 45mm F4 sample gallery

    $ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_1600733718″,”galleryId”:”1600733718″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

    Hasselblad’s new X-series 45mm F4 claims to be the smallest and lightest lens ever developed for digital medium-format cameras. Equally compelling is the fact that at $ 1100 it’s less than half the cost of the existing $ 2700 XCD 45mm F3.5. So what does that loss of a stop look like in use? Take a look through our sample images.

    See our Hasselblad XCD 45mm F4
    sample gallery

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Made in the Shade – Why Taking Portraits in the Shade Can be Ideal

    The post Made in the Shade – Why Taking Portraits in the Shade Can be Ideal appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Rick Ohnsman.

    dps-taking-portraits-in-the-shade-pinterest

    You’re taking portraits, and it’s time for your subjects’ “moment in the sun.” If you really want them to shine, let’s look at why taking portraits in the shade is the way to go.

    I can remember when the recommendation to photographers was to “always photograph your subject with the sun at your back, so the light is on their face.”

    I think I read that many years ago on an insert in a box of film. Perhaps the idea was not to wind up with a silhouette with the bright sky tricking the camera into an underexposed subject.

    There are no doubt circumstances where you might do it this way, but I’m ready to teach you why the shade is your friend and that of your subject as well.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Unshaded_and_Shaded

    Make a bad location with your subject squinting into the sun work by shading them. 1/160 sec. f/5 ISO 100. White reflector fill.

    Why not to shoot portraits in the sun

    Let’s list some reasons you probably don’t want to shoot portraits in the sun:

    • The light will be bright, contrasty, and the shadows will be hard and distinct.
    • Your subject will probably squint.
    • On a hot day, your subject will get hot, and cranky and both you and the subject won’t have much fun.  The photos will suffer.
    • The extremes of the exposure range between highlights and shadows will make getting a good exposure difficult.
    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Mixed_Light

    Mixed, speckled, uneven shade…don’t do this!

    Why taking portraits in the shade is better

    • The light will be diffuse, less contrasty, and the shadows will be minimal
    • Your subject will relax and open their eyes.
    • On a hot day you and your subject will be more comfortable, have more fun, and the photos will show it.
    • Getting a good exposure will be far easier and you will have less editing later to create a nice image.

    Light direction

    Obviously, when discussing taking portraits in the shade, we’re talking about working outdoors with the sun as your primary light source. Depending on the position of your subject relative to the position of the sun in the sky, the light can come from these basic directions:

    Overhead

    Most photographers know that the worst time for photos is mid-day when the light is directly overhead. This is especially true for portraits and even more so if you make the shot in direct sunlight.

    Working in the shade has the advantage of allowing you to make portraits during midday since the overhead light is diffused.

    Side

    If the sun is lower in the sky, you can position your subject, so the light comes from either side. There might be circumstances where you’d want one side of the subject to brightly lit while the other side is in shadow, but generally not. Again, taking portraits in the shade is the answer.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Fill_Flash_1

    Taken in an alley, the light in this shot was from camera right and above. A fill flash helped fill the shadows and put a nice catchlight in the subject’s eyes.

    Front

    With the sun lower in the sky, you could position your subject, so, as the film insert I mentioned suggested, the sun was at your back and on the face of your subject. Occasionally this works if the sun is not intense, you have the right background, and you don’t mind a more contrasty look.

    Most often you’d still be better, that’s right…in the shade.

    Back

    If the sun is lower in the sky, sometimes you can make backlighting your subject work. With their back to the sun, their face will be shaded. Now it’s you and your camera that will be looking into the sun.

    You will need to be careful with your exposure so as not to make your subject a silhouette or totally blow out the background. Sun flare can also be a problem.

    This could be a time for spot metering. You may also wish to use a reflector or fill-flash (we’ll cover that in a minute). Properly done, however, you may get a nice rim-light look.

    Open vs closed shade

    You will hear the terms “open shade” and “closed shade.”  Let’s define those.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Open_Shade

    The subjects are in a shaded area looking toward a brighter lit area. This is “Open Shade.” 1/250 sec. f/6.7 ISO 400

    Open shade

    Even with your subject in the shade, the light will still usually come more from one direction than the other. Your subject will be in “open shade” when in the shade, but the ambient light is strongest on their face.

    If you can’t determine which direction this is, walk around your subject. Ask them to turn as you walk so as to keep facing you. The position when the light is at your back (and on their face) is the most “open shade” position.

    One advantage of shooting in this position is the light will be brighter on their face, and the catchlights in their eyes will usually be most dominant.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Closed_Shade

    The predominant light is from behind and the subject is looking into a more shaded area. Fill-flash is used to fill the shadows. This is “Closed Shade.” 1/200 sec. f/8 ISO 200

    Closed shade

    This is pretty much the opposite of open shade. Your subject is in the shade, but looking into a darker area.

    An extreme example of this might be a subject standing just inside a doorway where they are in the shade, but looking inside toward a darker room or area.

    Usually, this will not be as good because the background will be brighter than the subject, and the eye catchlights will be minimal if they are there at all.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Closed_Shade_2

    This is “closed shade” where the predominant ambient light is behind the subject and she is looking into a darker area. Fill-flash brightened her face and filled the shadows. 1/180 sec. f/7.1 ISO 100

    Making it all work

    It might be a fine idea to suggest you always take portraits in the shade. Usually, though, you also want to consider:

    • your location,
    • what you want in the shot other than just your subject 
    • your background
    • where you and the subject can position yourselves
    • camera angle
    • and many other factors other than just where a shady spot might be. 

    If you want to pose your subject in front of that iconic landmark, and you’re there during the middle of the day, you may not have much choice where you position them. 

    So let’s discuss ways to use shade where you find it, make shade when you need it, and enhance the light you find while still making the portrait you want. 

    Let’s take a look at some examples.

    Under the trees

    It’s often pleasant in the shade of a tree, and sometimes even the tree itself works well in the shot. Depending on where the light may be coming from, you might be working with open or closed shade, and light coming from various directions.

    We’ll cover enhancing the light you might find there in a minute, but here’s a couple of things to keep in mind when working in the shade of a tree or other foliage.

    1. Light color

    The leaves on most foliage are green (though perhaps other colors at different times of the year). Sometimes the translucent leaves will cast their color on your subject.

    Kermit the Frog will tell you, “it ain’t easy being green.”

    Green light and skin tones usually won’t be a good mix. Keep this in mind.

    Shoot in Raw mode, and if necessary, be ready to tweak your white balance and tint slightly in post-production to back off the green color if it appears.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Going_Green

    With green foliage above and green grass reflecting from below, your subject may go green – not a good look. Shoot in Raw format, and you can tweak the white balance when editing. 1/60 sec. f/5 ISO 400 with fill flash.

    2. Dappled light

    When making portraits, deep shade is good. Dappled light, the kind where the leaves put a pattern of light and shadow on your subject is bad – very bad.

    You can rarely fix this in editing. So when taking portraits in the shade, always look to be sure the shade is complete, and the light is not dappled and patchy on your subject.

    This can be especially tricky with group photos where some subjects may be in the shade and others in the sun. See what you can do to have everyone in total shade or, if that’s not possible, find a spot where you can have the light coming from behind them so at least their faces are shaded.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Find_Shady_Spots

    Take advantage of shady spots that work with your composition. The object making the shade can sometimes work with your shot. 1/125 sec. f/5.6 ISO 200 with pop-up fill flash.

    Other shady spots

    Depending on where you’re photographing, there might not be trees but other ways to put your subject in the shade.

    Buildings, structures, rocks and cliffs – whatever you might find that works with your shot and vision can be useful.

    Something to keep in mind is that other structures or objects might be reflecting light into your shady spot. Your subject might be in the shade, but whatever else that is close by, even the nearby sunlit ground, could reflect light into the scene.

    Sometimes you can make this work for you. Other times, particularly if the reflecting object has a strong color, it will reflect colored light onto your subject.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Color_Cast_Reflections

    With the surroundings painted in warm colors, as well as the opposite red brick, the reflected light is going to be warm as well. Shot in Raw mode, I could adjust as desired later in post-processing. 1/30 sec. f/4 ISO 100

    Throwing shade

    Most people don’t like it when you “throw shade” on them. However, in photography, this can be a good thing, especially when you want to photograph them in the shade, but the place where you want them to stand isn’t shady.

    What to do?

    Make your own shade!

    Anything you can put between the light source and your subject is going to put shade, aka a “shadow” on your subject.

    This could be a piece of cardboard, a 5-in-1 reflector (which we’ll discuss in a minute), an umbrella – you name it. If the object lends itself to the theme of your image, you can even include it in the shot. Just be sure whatever you use is large enough to shade the area you need completely.

    If you’re making a full-length image of a person and your 5-in-1 can only shade their upper body while their legs are still in the sun, that won’t look good. You’ll either have to restrict your shot to the shaded area or find something bigger to shade them with.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Throwing_Shade

    Bad light where you want to make your shot? Throw some shade on your subject! Here, I’ve used the black side of a 5-in-1 to shade the subject. A fill-flash nicely evens out the light, also putting a catchlight in her eyes. 1/60 sec. f/6.3 ISO 100

    A Scrim shot

    The reason you will usually want to put your subject in the shade is that the direct sun is bright, harsh, and produces hard shadows. In the studio, photographers use diffusion to soften the quality of light. Photo umbrellas and softboxes use a translucent material, which scatters and diffuses the light. It also makes the light source “larger” relative to the subject.

    This can work outdoors with the sun as well. Rather than use the pinpoint of intense light that is the sun, instead, put the translucent panel of a 5-in-1 between the sun and subject to make the light source larger relative to the subject. It will also make the light more diffuse.

    Need something bigger? A translucent shower curtain or piece of white nylon cloth can work well if you have a frame or helpers to hold it.

    Of course, there are commercial versions of this if you will be doing a lot of outdoor portrait photography and have the budget.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Reflected_Fill

    On a sunny day, you might be surprised on how much fill the silver side of a 5-in-1 will throw.

    How about some fill?

    So you put your subject in the shade, they’re happy, their eyes are open, you like the composition, but now you see the subject is darker than you’d like. What can you do?

    It’s time for a little fill light.

    There are several ways you can (and often should) add additional light to your subject.

    Let’s cover a few.

    Reflectors

    I mentioned a 5-in-1 reflector above. This is a portable, and usually collapsible, disk typically covered with translucent fabric. Use it alone as a scrim, as we just discussed.

    It then has a zip-on cover that is black on one side, white on the other, and turned inside out, silver on the inside and gold on the reverse of that.

    Variations exist. So, 1) Scrim, 2) Black, 3) White, 4) Silver, 5) Gold = a 5-in-1.

    You can use the colored side to reflect light onto your subject. Black is the side to use when you want to shade the subject. The white will give a softer, less intense light while neutral in color. Silver is the most intense and can be a slightly cooler light, while the gold will warm your subject.

    For photographers doing outdoor portraits, I’d almost consider a 5-in-1 reflector mandatory. It is that useful. There are many brands, styles, and sizes. I have a 42″ (106cm) Interfit brand as well as a little 23″ (59 cm) version that, when collapsed, is just 9-inches (23 cm) and fits nicely in my photo bag.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade-5_in_1

    One device, 5 ways to use it – a 5-in-1 reflector. I think all outdoor portrait photographers should own one, or even a few of these in different sizes.

    Doing it “on-the-cheap” you can also use a piece of white poster board or foamcore.  It has the disadvantage of being less portable, but the advantage of being available in very large sheets if you need that big of a reflective panel.

    Fill-Flash

    If the only time you use a flash is indoors, at night, or in dimly lit situations, you’re missing a real use of this lighting tool.

    Shooting subjects in the shade and then filling the shadows with a touch of flash works exceptionally well, especially with most cameras doing a great job of balancing the fill light using ETTL (Evaluative Through-the-Lens) exposure control.

    If you are a new photographer just getting into outdoor portraiture and have a camera with a pop-up flash, I’d strongly encourage you to shoot in the shade and use the pop-up flash for every shot.

    Even on sunny days with plenty of light, that little extra flash will fill shadows and put a nice catch-light in your subject’s eyes.

    Your portrait photography will improve tremendously. As you advance, a Speedlight is the next step, and beyond that, a fill-flash you can use off-camera.

    Backlit/Golden hour/Rim light

    Photographers love the “golden hour,” that time in the morning or evening when the sun gets low, and the light is warm. You can make beautiful portraits in such light.

    Often you can pose your subject with the light behind them, and the golden glow will rim-light their hair with a beautiful look. (Visualize a model on the beach with the setting sun behind them).

    To get some light on your model’s face and better balance the exposure between them and the background, it’s time for some fill light. A reflector or fill-flash will do the trick.

    One advantage of the reflector is that you’ll be bouncing the same warm light back onto their face and so your white balance will be consistent.

    If you use a flash, consider putting a warming gel on it to better match the color of the background light.

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Backlit_and_Filled

    Here the subject is standing in full sun. With the light from behind, her face is shaded. I used the bright silver side of the reflector for fill. You may need to “feather” the reflection slightly by adjusting the reflector position as it can easily become too bright and make your subject squint. 1/160 sec. f/5 ISO 100

    Nature’s Softbox

    The average person would think a “nice day for portraits” would be that beautiful, sunny, cloudless “bluebird day.”

    They’d be wrong.

    On such days you’ll really need the tricks we’ve explored here and should be taking portraits in the shade.

    If, however, the day you’ve scheduled to do that outdoor portrait shoot should be overcast, consider yourself blessed, especially if you need to shoot at midday. Now, instead of that harsh, pinpoint light source of the sun with associated hard shadows, the entire sky becomes your light source – “nature’s softbox.”

    Taking_Portraits_in_the_Shade_Full_Shade

    Made in the shade…This one was done in full shade and filled with flash. Note the catchlight in her eyes. 1/40 sec. f/4 ISO 100

    Now the challenge might become working with light that is too flat. The effect of your reflector will be much less on a day like this, but your portable flash could perhaps now become your key light. It can give you just enough contrast to make your portrait more dimensional and interesting.

    I’ve also just started exploring the use of portable LED lights for portraiture and purchased a Lume Cube.

    This small and intense little light doesn’t immediately strike me as something I’d use for the standard portrait, but when taking portraits in the shade or on overcast days, perhaps it could work into the mix.

    After I’ve had more experience with it, perhaps I’ll cover how you can use such a device in a later article.

    Go do it and show us your work

    It’s always great to see photographers putting new knowledge to work, so we’d love to see the images you make when taking portraits in the shade.

    Post your images in the comments below and tell us a little about what you did.  Best wishes!

    The post Made in the Shade – Why Taking Portraits in the Shade Can be Ideal appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Rick Ohnsman.


    Digital Photography School