Blog

  • Sony a7C initial review: Compact size, big sensor image quality

    $ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_5104195094″,”galleryId”:”5104195094″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

    The Sony a7C is the company’s latest and smallest full-frame interchangeable lens camera. It fits a 24MP full-frame sensor and image stabilization into a body more closely resembling the APS-C sensor a6600.

    A lot of work has clearly gone into making this one of the smallest full frame cameras available, whereas a lot of the features and capabilities are familiar. A new retractable kit zoom is being launched along with the a7C to help maintain those size savings.

    Out of camera JPEG.
    ISO 500 | 1/40 sec | F9 | Sony FE 35mm F1.8
    Photo by Carey Rose

    Key specifications

    • 24MP BSI CMOS full-frame sensor
    • Bionz X processor (same as in the a7 III)
    • ‘Real-time tracking’ AF system with human head, face, eye, and animal recognition
    • Oversampled 4K video at up to 30p, including 8-bit S-Log and HLG
    • Continuous bursts at up to 10 fps
    • Fully articulating 1.44M dot touchscreen
    • 921k dot EVF with 0.59x mag.
    • Mic and headphone sockets
    • Large ‘Z-type’ battery, rated to 740 shots per charge

    The Sony a7C will be available from October 2020 at a price of around $ 1799 USD ($ 2399 CAD) or with the new collapsible 28-60mm F4-5.6 kit zoom for around $ 2099 USD ($ 2699 CAD).


    Review contents

    From the camera’s controls to the image and video quality it’s capable of, find out what exactly what you want to know about the a7C right here.

    What’s new and how it compares

    The a7C fits almost all the capabilities of the a7 III into a body that has more in common with the a6000 series. This means a smaller viewfinder but few other compromises.

    Read more

    Body and handling

    The a7C has three dials, all controlled using your thumb. It still handles pretty well, though, with a solid body and a small but pretty comfortable grip.

    Read more

    Initial impressions

    The a7C’s main strengths are its size and convenience. This could make it a powerful travel or family camera. But there’s a price to be paid, and this isn’t necessarily a budget option.

    Read more

    Sample gallery

    We’ve been shooting the a7C with both its kit zoom and the sensibly compact FE 35mm F1.8, to see what the camera offers.

    See the gallery

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Canon is crowdfunding its monocular-style PowerShot Zoom concept camera in Japan

    Last year, at CP+ 2019, Canon showed off a number of concept cameras with new and unusual designs. While some of those concepts are still just that, at least one more is well on its way into the consumer market — in Japan, at least.

    The Canon PowerShot Zoom is a monocular-style point-and-shoot that’s being crowdfunded on Makuake, not unlike the approach Canon took with its Ivy Rec camera. Inside the almost cartoon-looking design is a 12.1-megapixel 1/3” CMOS sensor that works alongside a DIGIC 8 processor to capture stills and record Full HD video at 1080p.

    In front of the sensor is a zoom lens that can toggle between 100mm and 400mm (full-frame equivalent) focal lengths. You can also double that to an 800mm (full-frame equivalent) focal length when combined with the camera’s digital zoom.1 The device features built-in image stabilization, Canon’s Face AF technology, a USB-C port for charging and a microSDXC card slot.

    The camera features three buttons on the top: power, menu and zoom, as well as three on the bottom: a dial, a capture button for stills and a capture button for video. Photos and video can be transferred via the microSD card or wirelessly when paired with Canon’s accompanying smartphone app.

    The PowerShot Zoom is currently being crowdfunded in Japan through Majuake. The campaign has already raised over $ 280,000, far surpassing its initial goal. Japanese backers are able to secure the first units for around $ 300.

    There’s no mention of whether or not the PowerShot Zoom will become available outside the Japanese market at this time.


    Disclaimer: Remember to do your research with any crowdfunding project. DPReview does its best to share only the projects that look legitimate and come from reliable creators, but as with any crowdfunded campaign, there’s always the risk of the product or service never coming to fruition.

    1Canon had previously said it hoped to have intermediary focal lengths during zoom, but it appears that feature isn’t available at this time.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Nikon to Announce the 14-24mm f/2.8 and 50mm f/1.2 for Z Mount

    The post Nikon to Announce the 14-24mm f/2.8 and 50mm f/1.2 for Z Mount appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.

    Nikon announcement

    Nikon hasn’t managed to capture much airtime over the past few months, what with the Canon EOS R5 and R6 launch as well as the Sony a7S III announcement.

    But Nikon continues to produce top-notch kit, and we’ll see the fruits of the company’s labor later this week, with the official announcement for two new lenses:

    The Nikkor Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S.

    And the Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.2 S.

    Both lenses are designed for Nikon’s Z mount cameras, which means that they’ll be compatible with Nikon’s mirrorless bodies: the Nikon Z5, Nikon Z6, Nikon Z7, and Nikon Z50.

    Let’s take a closer look at what you can expect from these two lenses.

    The Nikkor Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S

    This lens will be a Z mount remake of a popular F-mount (DSLR) lens, the Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G.

    And, if the original lens is anything to go by, the Nikkor Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S will be an absolute powerhouse.

    At the very least, the Z mount 14-24mm will give Nikon users an ultra-wide zoom with an f/2.8 maximum aperture, which will be appreciated by many photographers, including astrophotographers and other low-light shooters. At present, Z mount f/2.8 zooms are limited to the 24-70mm f/2.8 and the 70-200mm f/2.8; while both of these are excellent lenses, they just don’t offer the perspective that you can get from a 14-24mm lens.

    According to Nikon Rumors, the Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8 will work with front filters (which is always a concern with ultra-wide lenses), but will also take rear filters. The 14-24mm will be relatively compact, and will feature “smooth and silent autofocus.”

    In other words:

    The Nikkor Z 14-24mm f/2.8 will likely be a lens that does a lot of things well, from landscapes and astrophotography to those ultra-wide travel and event shots that draw the viewer straight into the scene.

    The Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.2 S

    Nikon already offers a Z mount 50mm lens: the Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.8 S.

    But the new 50mm f/1.2 S will go beyond the 50mm f/1.8 S; that extra maximum aperture may not seem like much, but it’s critical for low-light shooters of all types, as well as anyone who’s after the best possible bokeh.

    That’s why, if you’re a portrait photographer or an event photographer, the Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.2 S should be at the top of your wish-list.

    While the 50mm f/1.2 S is likely to offer stellar image quality, such a wide maximum aperture comes with a serious price:

    The lens is going to be big and hefty. This certainly won’t be your easy-to-carry nifty fifty, so if that’s what you’re after, look elsewhere. But it will be a high-quality, well-built, weather-sealed lens that many professionals are after.

    Conclusion

    The Nikkor Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S and the Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.2 S lenses are bound to be impressive (even if they have a price tag to match!).

    So if either lens seemed appealing, I recommend you keep an eye out for Nikon announcements over the next few days.

    You won’t regret it!

    Now over to you:

    Are you excited for these two new lenses? And if you could pick one of them, which would you take? Share your thoughts in the comments!

    The post Nikon to Announce the 14-24mm f/2.8 and 50mm f/1.2 for Z Mount appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.


    Digital Photography School

  • Seeing change, with photographer Chloe Collyer and the Fujifilm X100V

    Small, lightweight and offering great image quality from its APS-C format sensor, the Fujifilm X100V is designed for street photography.

    In a season of unrest across the globe, Seattle-based photographer Chloe Collyer has been busy using the X100V to document the people – and the expressions of anger and creativity – which have made this summer unforgettable.

    Fujifilm X100V sample images by Chloe Collyer

    $ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_2778614290″,”galleryId”:”2778614290″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });


    This is sponsored content, created with the support of Amazon and Fujifilm. What does this mean?

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Pete Souza interview: ‘I have the right to speak out when I see wrong. And I see wrong’

    Pete Souza is one of the best-known names in photography. An experienced photojournalist, he has the distinction of having served as White House photographer for two presidents: Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Since leaving the White House in 2017, Pete has stepped out from behind the camera, and most recently he has been putting his images to work using Instagram to pointedly highlight the differences in style – and policy – between the last president and the current occupant of the White House.

    ‘The Way I See It’, a new documentary film based on Pete’s books ‘Obama: An Intimate Portrait’ and ‘Shade: A Tale of Two Presidents’ , opens soon. Ahead of its premier on September 18th, I had the chance to speak to Pete about his work in the White House, what makes a good presidential photographer and why he’s no longer content to let the pictures do the talking.

    The following interview has been edited lightly for clarity and flow.


    What kind of people make good White House photographers?

    It’s helpful to have a background in photojournalism. And I think it’s also helpful to have the ability to disappear, if you will, in terms of going about the job with a small footprint. That’s things like not carrying loud cameras, not using motor-drive, remembering that you’re an observer, not a participant. Learning how to move about in those circumstances.

    I think depending on the president, the [desired] qualities may vary a little bit, but that’s my approach anyway. It worked for me.

    Do you think that photographs of an administration can help shape the way that history sees it?

    For sure. To quote Michelle Obama, someone I respect a lot, she says that the presidency doesn’t change who you are, it reveals who you are. I think the same is true of the photographs. The behind the scenes photographs of a president reveal the character of that person. I think that’s pretty clear, and has been basically since we’ve had that position of White House photographer, since the Kennedy administration. We’ve had a pretty good idea of what presidents are like, and their true character, based on the behind the scenes photographs.

    President Barack Obama walks along the West Colonnade of the White House with Chief White House Photographer Pete Souza Feb. 18, 2016. (Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson)

    Photo by Lawrence Jackson / The White House

    You mention LBJ’s photographer Yoichi Okamoto in the film – are there any other photographers who have been a major influence on your work?

    Oh probably three or four dozen, from Bill Allard and David Allen Harvey at National Geographic, to Henri Cartier-Bresson, W. Eugene Smith, the old Life Magazine photographers, and tons of the newer-generation photographers, too. I still look at photography every day, and that’s one of the great things about Instagram for me.

    I still look at photography every day, and that’s one of the great things about instagram for me

    In terms of the White House photographers, David Hume Kennerly under President Ford, and Eric Draper with George W Bush. They both did a great job. One of my great memories of election night in 2008, in Grant Park, was of David Kennerly, in fact. The ultimate professional, he was in tears because he was able to witness that moment. I’ll never forget that.

    Were there times in the White House where you put your camera down and opted not to take a photograph?

    My job was to document what happened. But especially in family situations you certainly have to learn when you need to give the president some space. You’re trying to capture these family moments, but if he’s having a one-on-one talk with one of his daughters, you might take a few photographs and then back away. It’s just an intuitive sense of when the man needs a little space. And [with Obama] it usually involved his family.

    President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama wait in the Map Room before the State Arrival ceremony to welcome President Felipe Calderon of Mexico and his wife Mrs. Margarita Zavala on the South Lawn of the White House, May 19, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

    Photo by Pete Souza / The White House

    You say in the film that the job took a lot out of you, mentally. Can you explain how?

    Look at it this way – on day one you’re issued with a Blackberry. I kept my Blackberry all eight years. It was either attached to my belt or on my nightstand, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for eight years. That was the way I communicated with people in my office, it was how I communicated with people in the administration, and it was the way that those people communicated with me.

    To have that device with you, at all times, is really mentally draining. Just the kind of ‘all-in’ reality of the job, after doing it for eight years it really does take a lot out of you.

    Presumably you were also witness to some things that you had to keep confidential?

    That’s the nature of the job. And some of that involves national security. There are some things I can never reveal unless they were to be declassified. But one of the things about classified information is that most of it is written down. It’s documents. And I wasn’t privy to those documents, I didn’t get copies of that material. But I was in the room when classified information was being talked about.

    President Reagan meeting to receive the report of Special Review Board for the National Security Council, Tower Commission, with John Tower and Edmund Muskie in the Cabinet Room on February 26, 1987.(Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

    Photo by Pete Souza / The White House

    A good example would be when we opened relations with Cuba. I probably knew about that a year in advance, because the two main negotiators would report to the president every month or two, and I would be in those meetings. Those are the kinds of things you keep in confidence – negotiations which are going on which aren’t yet public.

    From your perspective as someone who has worked under two administrations as White House photographer, who were you serving? Who were you doing it for?

    The people of the United States. I made almost two million photographs in the eight years of the Obama administration. And I don’t know if people realize this but every single photograph ends up at the National Archive. There will be time when everything will be made public – every single frame. On the day of the Bin Laden raid I think I made more than a thousand pictures and eventually people will be able to see every single one of them, if they want to.

    Right now in fact, because a certain number of years has passed, you can see every single picture I made during the Reagan administration. You can see the proof sheets, they’re all online.

    President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden, along with members of the national security team, receive an update on the mission against Osama bin Laden in the Situation Room of the White House, May 1, 2011. Please note: a classified document seen in this photograph has been obscured. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

    Photo by Pete Souza / The White House

    Ultimately, the job is to document the presidency for history. And I took that really seriously. We were talking about Okamoto earlier, and I remember I used to tell people that in fifty years time people will be able to go through all of my photographs and have a good idea of what the presidency was like, and what president Obama was like. And then I saw an old presentation by Okamoto, and he made the exact same point. Except he didn’t say fifty years he said “five hundred years”.

    That really threw me, and made me realize how truly important this job is. It really is for history. Can you imagine the pictures that I made during the Obama administration, if we had a set of pictures like that taken during the Lincoln administration?

    With America perhaps more divided now than ever before, what gives you hope?

    The country is divided, but there have always been two sides. It’s young people that give me hope. It’s the younger generation, primarily, have been the ones out there protesting peacefully. And not just the Black Lives Matter [movement]. The fact that a bunch of high-school kids in Florida really brought the issue of gun safety to a nationwide audience – these are 16, 17-year-old kids – and one of the largest rallies ever – they did it. Young kids. That generation gives me hope. Being out there, speaking out and letting their views be known.

    And even some of the congressmen and women who were elected in 2018. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gets a lot of attention, but I’m also thinking of people like Katie Porter (D-Calif) who has used her time in Congress in such an effective way.

    President Barack Obama holds a meeting in the Oval Office to prep for a Quad Secure Video Teleconference (SVTC) in the Situation Room of the White House, Feb. 23, 2016. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

    Photo by Pete Souza / The White House

    This may be viewed as quite a political film – how would you respond to people who say they wish you’d focused on the photography and kept the politics out of it?

    I don’t think I’m bringing politics into it at all. I am not currently photographing the president of the United States. And I haven’t, other than on inauguration day [in 2017]. I’m just comparing and contrasting the two presidents that I have photographed from the inside, how they upheld the dignity of the office and comparing that to what we have today.

    I have the right to speak out when I see wrong. And I see wrong, so I’m speaking out

    It’s not a political thing. I wouldn’t be doing this if Jeb Bush, or John Kasich, or John McCain or Mitt Romney was president. I may still disagree with their policies, but they understand what it means to be empathetic and compassionate, and what it means to do the best job you can on behalf of all people – including the ones who didn’t vote for them.

    It’s as simple as that. I’m an American citizen, and I have the right to speak out when I see wrong. And I see wrong, so I’m speaking out. I think Trump is damaging the country and its people, and to those who say I shouldn’t be speaking out, well, I think they’re wrong. I’m going to be on the right side of history and I believe in the institution of the presidency, and that the person in that office needs to uphold the dignity of the institution, and that [Trump] isn’t doing it.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Best video cameras for photographers

    Most modern cameras will shoot video to one degree or another, but these are the ones we’d look at if you plan to shoot some video alongside your photos. We’ve chosen cameras that can take great photos and make it easy to get great looking video, rather than being the ones you’d choose as a committed videographer.


    Focused on photos: Nikon Z6

    The Nikon Z6 is an excellent stills camera that also does a good job of shooting video. The Sony a7 III is also a credible contender and has a bigger battery, but we tend to find the Nikon’s autofocus performs slightly better in video mode and that it offers better separation between stills and video settings, making it easier to jump back and forth between the two styles of shooting.

    Another camera worth considering is the Canon EOS R6, which has great image and video quality, an excellent image stabilization system and very good ergonomics. Rolling shutter can be an issue though, and video record times can be unpredictable if you’re shooting stills as well.

    A balance of both: Fujifilm X-T4

    The Fujifilm X-T4 has a smaller sensor than the Nikon but offers a more extensive set of video features, if you’re equally interested in both disciplines. It can capture 10-bit video internally in a choice of modes including Log, HLG or the attractive and flexible ‘Eterna’ color profile. Built-in image stabilization and the option to totally de-couple stills and video settings make the X-T4 a great lightweight stills and video package.


    We considered the cameras below when picking our winner, and even though we think the Nikon Z6 and Fujifilm X-T4 are the best choices overall, the cameras on our short list are also worth considering.

    • Focused on photos: Nikon Z6
    • A balance of both: Fujifilm X-T4

    Also consider:

    • Canon EOS M6 II
    • Canon EOS R6
    • Olympus OM-D E-M5 III
    • Panasonic Lumix DC-G9
    • Sony a7 III
    • Sony a6600
    • Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
    • Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • 5 Tips for Setting the Focus in Your Landscape Photography

    The post 5 Tips for Setting the Focus in Your Landscape Photography appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jim Hamel.

    For many types of photography, the question of where you should set your focus is pretty simple. For example, in portrait photography, there is one simple rule: focus on the eyes. When the eyes aren’t on the same plane of focus, focus on the near eye. End of story.

    It is pretty simple with other types of photography, as well. In wildlife photography, you focus on the animal. In fact, in any type of photography where there is a clear subject, you always focus on that subject. That’s not to say it is always easy, but at least it isn’t difficult to figure out.

    Mullaghmore

    Foreground sharpness is paramount in many landscape photos.

    But what about landscape photography, where you are generally capturing more of a scene than a solitary subject? Where do you focus to ensure that everything in the scene is as sharp as possible? The answer isn’t always so clear.

    Therefore, in this article, we’ll cover some tips for helping you know where to set the focus.

    Tip 1: Don’t just set the focus at infinity

    Again, oftentimes in landscape photography, you are trying to capture a scene rather than a solitary thing. Many times, the scene you are trying to capture is far away from you.

    Most lenses have a range of focus values, and once you get beyond a certain distance (often 20-30 feet, or 8-10 meters) the focus is set at infinity. Everything beyond that point will just be infinity. Therefore, if you are taking a picture where most things in the frame are far away, it might seem that you should just set the focus at infinity. If you are using autofocus (and most of us are), you might be inclined to set the focus using something that is very far away from you.

    If everything in the frame is truly at infinity, then setting the focus at its maximum distance is not a horrible idea. If there is nothing close to you, then there is just no need to do anything else; you don’t need to overly complicate things. But more commonly there are aspects of the scene that are closer to you than infinity. Where do you set the focus then?

    Derryclare

    You can get into hyperfocal distance (we’ll talk more about that in a minute) and make this as technical as you want. But often your time is precious when you’re out shooting. The light is changing and things are moving. You can get a pretty good sense of things without resorting to calculations.

    As a result, consider this rule of thumb: Set the focus at infinity and then just turn it back a little bit. But there’s an obvious question: How do you define a little bit?

    I’m afraid I don’t have a good answer for you. It will vary from lens to lens, but will usually be about a 5-10° turn or just to the highest distance number printed on the lens (if your lens has these numbers).

    focus-ring-distance-600px

    Why would you want to do that?

    Because of the depth of field that will be in your picture (more on depth of field below). Since you are taking an outdoor photo, you will probably not be shooting wide open, or even with a large aperture. So there will likely be some depth depth of field involved. It doesn’t necessarily have to be a large depth of field, but the point is that it gives you some leeway. By pulling the focus forward, that leeway will still get everything out to infinity in focus. It will also get things a little closer in focus, as well.

    Tip 2: Try focusing a third of the way into the picture

    Many pictures are ruined because the foreground is not sharp. It happens all the time. Therefore, if you have something in your scene that is close to the camera, focus on it. If the ground is prominent in your picture, set your focus close to you. Make sure that foreground is in focus. Often you will set the focus only a few feet in front of you.

    But wait a second, you might ask, what about my background? Won’t it be out of focus or blurry?

    Probably not. If you’re using your wide-angle lens (and if you are taking an outdoor photo that has a discrete foreground, then you probably are) you will have a wide depth of field, even at moderate to large apertures.

    Connemara

    A sharp foregound focus furthers the viewer’s sense that they can walk into the picture.

    Tip 3: Focus on the subject matter

    Let’s not lose sight of the obvious, though. When you have a definite subject or center of interest in your photo, just focus on that. It is the most important part of your picture, and you absolutely need it in focus.

    Don’t worry about your foreground, and don’t worry about your background. Just make sure the subject is in focus. Frankly, if there is a little fall-off in sharpness from your subject, that will probably not be such a bad thing.

    Dingle-Sheep

    Sometimes you just want a definite subject in focus, and having the background start to blur out is just fine, as in this image of a sheep.

    Tip 4: Watch the aperture

    There are no free lunches in photography. You probably already know that by using a smaller aperture to get a larger depth of field, it will cost you light. The smaller aperture lets in less light, so you will have to use a longer shutter speed (risking blur if you aren’t using a tripod) or raise the ISO (risking digital noise in your picture).

    But the smaller aperture will also lead to something called diffraction, particularly in cameras with smaller digital sensors. Therefore, just using the smallest aperture possible isn’t always the answer. You cannot just set your focus anywhere and rely on a super-wide depth of field to save you.

    There are two ways around this issue though, which we’ll talk about next.

    Kinbane-Head

    With everything in the shot at a distance of infinity (30 feet or more), I did not need a wide depth of field to keep everything in focus.

    Tip 5: Know Your hyperfocal distance

    Hyperfocal distance is just a fancy name for determining how close you can set your focus and still keep your background acceptably sharp. There are apps and calculators that will tell you this distance depending on your aperture, sensor size, and focal length.

    For a full explanation of hyperfocal distance along with some charts and links to apps that will calculate it for you, check out this article: How to Find and Use Hyperfocal Distance for Sharp Backgrounds .

    An example will illustrate the point made above about backgrounds tending to remain sharp when you are using wide-angle lenses. If you’re using a 16mm lens on a full frame camera and shooting at f/11, your hyperfocal distance is only 2.5 feet. That means you can set the focus on a point just in front of you, and keep everything behind that point sharp.

    Knowing the hyperfocal distance will often liberate you to set the focus point quite close, in order to maintain sharp foregrounds in your picture. It also means you often don’t need to use the smallest aperture your lens offers, so you can avoid the effects of diffraction.

    Ballintoy-Arch

    Tip 6: Consider focus stacking

    When the methods above won’t work for you, or you just need to make sure absolutely everything in the photo from front to back is tack-sharp, you may want to consider focus stacking. Here you take multiple pictures of the same scene using different focus points.

    Start by setting the aperture of your lens where it is sharpest (also called the sweet spot; if you don’t know, that is usually in the range of f/5.6 – f/8). Take a shot with the focus set close to you, then repeat the process, gradually setting the focus point farther and farther away with each shot. Later you blend your pictures in Photoshop (for more about how to do that check out this article: Maximizing Depth of Field Without Diffraction).

    This method is not a cure-all. It obviously won’t work with moving subject matter. In addition, it can be tedious, and you risk slightly moving the camera since you have to twist the focus ring between shots. Still it can be a powerful tool for maintaining focus and sharpness throughout your entire picture.

    Setting the focus in landscape photography: Summary

    No rule is going to cover every situation when it comes to focus. As with many aspects of photography, you’ll just have to use your own judgment in the field. Hopefully, as you do so, these tips will help you nail the focus and keep the picture tack sharp where it matters.

    This week we are doing a series of articles to help you do better nature photography. See previous articles here:

    • 3 Habits Every Outdoor Photographer Should Develop to Avoid Missing Shots
    • 5 Tips for Better Nature Photography
    • 27 Serene Images of the Natural World
    • Weekly Photography Challenge – Nature
    • 10 Ideas for Photographing Nature in your Backyard
    • 6 Tips for Capturing Character and Personality in Wildlife Photography

    The post 5 Tips for Setting the Focus in Your Landscape Photography appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jim Hamel.


    Digital Photography School

  • Slideshow: Finalists for the 2020 Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards

    Finalists for the 2020 Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards

    The Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards recently announced its 44 top images for 2020. Finalists include a smiley fish, a fox in negotiations with a mouse, and a photobombing giraffe. Founded by photographers and conservationists Paul Joynson-Hicks and Tom Sullam, the global competition is free to enter and aims to showcase the funniest takes on animals in the wild.

    The top prize includes a week-long safari in Kenya. There is also a People’s Choice Award that anyone can vote for by clicking on their favorite image. Category and Overall Winners, chosen by a panel of judges including the competition founders, along with the Telegraph’s online travel editor, Oliver Smith, will be announced October 22nd.

    Finalist: ‘Smiley’ by Arthur Telle Thiemenn

    Animal: Sparisoma cretense

    Location of Shot: El Hierro, Canary Islands

    Finalist: ‘Tough Negotiations’ by Ayala Fishaimer

    Animal: Fox

    Location of Shot: Israel

    Finalist: ‘Spreading the Wildlife Gossip’ by Bernhard Esterer

    Animal: Lions

    Location of Shot: Kalahari Desert

    Finalist: ‘Crashing into the Picture’ by Brigitte Alcalay Marcon

    Animal: Giraffe

    Location of Shot: Etosha National Park, Nambia

    Finalist: ‘I Could Puke’ by Christina Holfelder

    Animal: Gentoo penguin

    Location of Shot: Falkland Islands

    Finalist: ‘The Inside Joke’ by Femke van Willigen

    Animal: Eurasian red squirrel

    Location of Shot: Espelo, the Netherlands

    Finalist: ‘Lamentation!’ by Jacques Poulard

    Animal: Polar bear

    Location of Shot: Spitzberg, Germany

    Finalist: ‘Like Mother, Like Daughter’ by Jagdeep Rajput

    Animal: Asian elephant

    Location of Shot: Corbett National Park, India

    Finalist: ‘Just Chillin” by Jill Neff

    Animal: Racoon

    Location of Shot: Jackson, Ohio, USA

    Finalist: ‘I Think this Tyre’s Gonna be Flat’ by Kay Kotzian

    Animal: Grizzly bears

    Location of Shot: Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, USA

    Finalist: ‘Having a Laugh’ by Ken Crossan

    Animal: Common seal

    Location of Shot: Caithness, Scotland

    Finalist: ‘Wait up Mommy, Look What I Got for You!’ by Kunal Gupta

    Animal: Elephant

    Location of Shot: Kaziranga, India

    Finalist: ‘Terry the Turtle Flipping the Bird’ by Mark Fitzpatrick

    Animal: Turtle

    Location of Shot: Lady Elliot Island, Queensland Australia

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • DPReview TV: We compare two dedicated vlogging cameras to an iPhone, find out which is best

    Vlogging is more popular than ever. In response, manufacturers have introduced specialty cameras for vloggers. But do you really need a dedicated camera to vlog? We compared the Sony ZV-1 and Panasonic G100 to an iPhone to find out.

    Subscribe to our YouTube channel to get new episodes of DPReview TV every week.

    • Introduction
    • Audio quality
    • Video quality
    • Autofocus
    • Lenses
    • Stabilization
    • Who wins?

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Film Fridays: How to get started developing B&W film on a tight budget

    Photo: Sroyon Mukherjee

    The two responses we most often hear when citing the virtues of developing B&W film at home are ‘Isn’t it hard?’ and ‘Isn’t expensive?’. We’ve covered the first question extensively in our guide Developing film at home: everything you need to know to get started (the answer is a resounding, ‘No!’).

    As for the second, our friends over at 35mmc have proof that with just a little bit of cash and by making use of common household items, you too can begin your journey into home development without breaking the bank. For around $ 30, you can pick up the core equipment you’ll need, plus around another $ 25 to get set up with chemistry. That’s about the cost of lab developing 4 rolls so… you do the math.

    Read: How to get started developing B&W film at home for £25 (or less)

    About Film Fridays: We recently launched an analog forum and in a continuing effort to promote the fun of the medium, we’ll be sharing film-related content on Fridays, including articles from our friends at KosmoFoto and 35mmc.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)