RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Commons’

Wikiview photo browser makes it easy to search through Wikimedia Commons images

09 Nov

A team with German university HTW Berlin has published a new project called Wikiview, a website that makes it easy to search for images in the Wikimedia Commons. With Wikiview, anyone can search for images related to a subject, then narrow down the results by adding other search terms, such as looking specifically for photos of old cars that are located outdoors.

Wikiview enables users to zoom in and out of the 2D image map used to present grid-based image results. When the user selects a particular image, it appears in a viewer sidebar alongside its title, the date it was taken, the license under which it was published, its author, and links to both its Wikimedia page and to similar image results. Users are able to directly download the image from Wikiview.

Wikiview is one of multiple sites that enables users to more easily find images shared under various licenses. Earlier this year, for example, Creative Commons launched an overhauled CC Search tool that serves as a portal to more than 300 million photos.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Wikiview photo browser makes it easy to search through Wikimedia Commons images

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Creative Commons launches improved CC Search tool with access to 300 million images

03 May

Creative Commons has fully launched its new CC Search tool following a beta period, the organization has announced. The tool provides rapid access to a library of more than 300 million images indexed from 19 different collections, including the Cleveland Museum of Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art, DeviantArt, Behance, Flickr, and Thingiverse

Users can search for images using keywords and filter the results based on the license type and/or the collection from which the content is sourced. The new search tool has a cleaner interface with improved navigation and direct access to attribution code and text.

The old search portal is still accessible online, but Creative Commons says the new CC Search tool has been given a number of changes that speed up loading times and also improve search phrase relevance. As well, CC Search implements a number of critical bug fixes that aren’t available on the old search portal.

Starting later this year, Creative Commons plans to start indexing open textbooks, audio, and other CC-licensed materials with CC Search.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Creative Commons launches improved CC Search tool with access to 300 million images

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Flickr says it will spare all Creative Commons photos, announces ‘in memoriam’ accounts

10 Mar

Last November, SmugMug announced a number of changes the photo-sharing site would be undergoing in the coming months as part of a clean-up operation of sorts to help streamline Flickr assets and unused accounts. One of those changes was the news that free accounts would be limited to 1,000 images and any images over that limit would be deleted.

Almost immediately, Flickr caught flack for the decision, especially surrounding the vast amounts of Creative Commons images hosted on the photo sharing site. Within a week, Flickr announced it was sparing Creative Commons and public domain images and also sparing non-profits from the 1,000 photo cap.

Now, Flickr is going a step further. In a blog post, Flickr says it will not be deleting any public, freely licensed images from its platform, regardless of who’s operating the account.

In this spirit, today we’re going further and now protecting all public, freely licensed images on Flickr, regardless of the date they were uploaded,’ reads the blog post. ‘We want to make sure we preserve these works and further the value of the licenses for our community and for anyone who might benefit from them.

Flickr isn’t just rolling over though. To combat accounts from simply switching all their photos to Creative Commons without understanding what all it entails in hopes of still hosting their photos on the site, Flickr has disabled the bulk license change tools in the Settings menu.

‘We’ve done this to prevent community members from flipping all their images to a new license without first understanding the significant implications of the various free licenses we support. Any member (Free or Pro) can still change the license of any of their photos on the photo page.’

Additionally, Flickr is introducing ‘in memoriam’ accounts. These accounts come after concern from users about what happens to their images after they pass away (or late photographers who still have images on Flickr).

Flickr says ‘in memoriam’ accounts ‘will preserve all public content in a deceased member’s account, even if their Pro subscription lapses […] The account’s username will be updated to reflect the “in memoriam” status and login for the account be locked, preventing anyone from signing in.

Flickr has created this dedicated form to help identify accounts in need of ‘in memoriam’ status.

To help preserve the accounts of members who have already passed away, Flickr is asking for help to identify existing accounts that are deserving of ‘in memoriam’ status. A dedicated article has been added on Flickr’s Help Center to help explain the process.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Flickr says it will spare all Creative Commons photos, announces ‘in memoriam’ accounts

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Flickr confirms it’s sparing Creative Commons, non-profits from the new 1,000 image cap

08 Nov
A Grazing Encounter Between Two Spiral Galaxies — NASA on The Commons

Last week, Flickr announced it was removing the previously-required Yahoo login, adding new “Pro” features, and adding a 1,000 image limit on free accounts.

The news, particularly the 1,000 image limit on free accounts, hasn’t exactly gone over well, here on DPReview and other forums. One complaint in particular is what will happen to the hundreds of thousands of Creative Commons photos currently being hosted on Flickr.

Creative Commons CEO, Ryan Merkley, even got in on the topic, saying on a post on the Creative Commons blog, “Many users are concerned such a limit on free account capacity might cause millions of CC images to be deleted from the Commons. A lot of people have reached out to us directly and asked what we can do. I’m confident that together we can find solutions, if we assume goodwill and bring our collective creativity to the problem.”

He later added in the blog post, “I have confidence in Don and Ben and the SmugMug and Flickr teams: they want to do right for the Commons, and they understand how deeply CC and the photo Commons is integrated into the goodwill that Flickr has retained over all these years.”

Well, we now know the fate. In a post on the Flickr blog, SmugMug Co-Founder and CEO, Dan MacAskill, announced Flickr is sparing Creative Common photos from the 1,000 image limit. Flickr will also keep any photos in the Flickr Commons that have been uploaded by institutions, including NASA, The Smithsonian, The National Archives UK, and The British Library, and others, saying “all these organizations already were Pro or have received a free Pro account from us, so they have unlimited storage.”

The post also address non-profits who rely on Flickr for image hosting. He says SmugMug has worked hand-in-hand with 501(c)(3) organizations and International charities in the past to provide free, unlimited storage and will continue to do so going forward with Flickr. Flickr has even set up a dedicated page where non-profits can fill out a form to get started on getting a free Flickr Pro account set up.

MacAskill ends the article saying “Whatever changes come in the years going forward, the importance of these photos will always matter to us. We not only want to preserve the photos we have, we want to keep partnering with organizations such as libraries, museums, and government agencies to contribute to The Flickr Commons as well. And we will continue to work hard to keep these photos safe and available for the world to view and enjoy.”

You can read the post in its entirety on the Flickr blog.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Flickr confirms it’s sparing Creative Commons, non-profits from the new 1,000 image cap

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Photographers to Get (Small) Reward for Their Creative Commons Images

19 Jul

dotspin

Image courtesy: Dotspin

Someone is benefitting from your Creative Commons-licensed images, and it probably isn’t you. Sure, you might get a little thrill out of knowing that you’re helping a designer with a small budget (or a blogger with no budget) to use an attractive image. And if you’re able to see your pictures in use, the validation can be a fun boost. But that’s a big ‘if’ and it’s pretty much where the benefits end. One new company, though, believes that photographers willing to give away their pictures should receive more for their efforts. Dotspin is trying to line up gifts for photographers who apply Creative Commons licenses to their pictures and give them away on social media sites.

The company has been online since the beginning of May and is still in beta. Its aim, says co-founder Gastón Paladini, is to reward photographers for their contributions to the Internet.

“The idea come from a vision to have a more fair web for all. We think that social media users should be recognized for good content (photos) shared and to be protected in a legal way (copyrights).”

Dotspin is connected to both Instagram and Twitter. Having signed in using an account on either one of those services, Dotspin’s users can take a picture, apply their filters and upload it to their account, tagging the image with the hashtag #dotspin.

The hashtag ensures that the photo is also submitted to Dotspin where, by default, it is licensed as Creative Commons. A settings page, however, allows photographers to change the type of license applied. Rather than selecting one of the various Creative Commons licenses in use, they’re asked whether they’re willing to allow modifications and commercial usage in addition to personal use.

The image will appear in Dotspin’s galleries watermarked with a colored dot, but not before the community has voted on it. Users are presented with two random pictures and asked which they prefer. Images that receive a large number of votes receive “dotcredits,” points which they can redeem for rewards.

At the moment those rewards come from Dotspin, based on “some agreements with Amazon.”

“But we think that soon the suppliers and brands will come to us to offer their products on the Dotspin catalogue,” says Gastón.

Put Your Ads in Front of… Picture-Takers

He may be right.  Instagram currently has more than 100 million users, offering a massive potential market for sellers looking to promote their goods. It’s likely that Dotspin will be able to find some companies who are willing to offer vouchers or freebies in the hope of turning the winners, as well as the site’s users, into future customers.

But the site will face a number of challenges too.

The first is the lack of demographic data. Awarding points that users can redeem means that suppliers can’t target their advertising. They’ll have to settle for offering their products to a demographic made up of roughly of people who like taking pictures. That’s a broad category.

The voting system, too, leaves much to be desired. At the moment, two images are placed against each other at random, forcing users to choose between a picturesque sunset and a mirror-shot selfie, for example. A voting system that pitched two images showing similar topics or that were shot in similar styles against each other might be a more serious way of judging talent.

But a bigger problem is the site’s goal itself. Gastón’s aim to reward people willing to give away their images may be fair and reasonable, but the lack of rewards on offer so far hasn’t stopped people from sharing their pictures. Flickr alone has more than a quarter of a billion photos available under one form of Creative Commons license or another. Donors of those images have made them available with no hope of reward. Gastón wouldn’t say how many photographers have signed up since the site’s beta launch but he did indicate that the numbers are “much more than we thought.”

That could be a good sign but it will be interesting to see whether Dotspin is able to capture a good chunk of the photographers willing to allow people to use their images.

Creative Commons Users Want Tracking for Their Photos, Not Thanks

The most likely outcome is that some photographers currently sharing their images through Instagram and Twitter will sign up to Dotspin and start adding the hashtag. They’ll enjoy the extra feedback provided by the voting system, especially if it’s enhanced. And if the site is able to bring in donors, they might feel a rush if they’re able to win enough credits to pick up a free app download or a discount from a printing service.

But none of those rewards is likely to have an impact on photo-sharing as a whole. They aren’t likely to encourage it and the odd prize isn’t going to come close to rewarding photographers for giving away for free an asset that costs other photographers a great deal to produce.

That’s because when photographers add a Creative Commons license they aren’t doing it for the reward. They’re doing it because they want people to use their images — even the images that few people are ever likely to use. And most of all they want to see their pictures in use.

That would have been a much more powerful reward than goodies redeemable against voted credits. If a platform were produced that highlighted the best of the most recent Creative Commons-licensed images, helped publishers, bloggers and editors to find them, and informed the photographers each time an image was downloaded and told them where it was going to be used, that would be much more rewarding.

And if that service also gave the photographers a share of the page’s revenues, then photographers who applied Creative Commons licenses to their images would really start to feel the benefits.


Photopreneur – Make Money Selling Your Photos

 
Comments Off on Photographers to Get (Small) Reward for Their Creative Commons Images

Posted in Equipment

 

Flickr Wall Art removes Creative Commons prints

20 Dec

Flickr has apologized to users upset over its Creative Commons-licensed print options. Effective immediately, all CC images have been removed from its Wall Art printing service. Users are still able to order prints of their own images, photos provided by Flickr’s own licensed artists and photographers who have requested their images be included. Read more

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Flickr Wall Art removes Creative Commons prints

Posted in Uncategorized

 

The Controversy Around Flickr Selling Creative Commons Licensed Photos

25 Nov

Douglas MacMillan has an article out in the Wall Street Journal today about the controversy surrounding Flickr selling prints of Creative Commons photos and not paying contributors for these images. It should be stressed that Flickr is only doing this on Creative Commons licensed photos where free commercial use is permitted by the license. If you license your photos Creative Commons Non-Commercial, this does not include you.

In the article he quotes Flickr founder Stewart Butterfield: “Yahoo’s plan to sell the images appears “a little shortsighted,” said Flickr co-founder Stewart Butterfield, who left the company in 2008. “It’s hard to imagine the revenue from selling the prints will cover the cost of lost goodwill.”

In addition to the Creative Commons photos that Flickr is selling and not paying photographers for use (legally), they are also handpicking other photos for this sales effort and here they are offering photographers 51% of the revenue on sales of these images who have agreed to participate.

My two cents:

I think it’s important that each photographer fully understand how the license that they are using with their photos online works. It is first and foremost the photographer’s responsibility to understand licensing. Creative Commons is a wonderful and liberal way to share your photos. It’s not for everyone though. You choose how your photos are licensed on Flickr though. By default Flickr licenses images “all rights reserved,” the most restrictive license available. So only photographers who have gone in and changed their license to a more liberal license would be affected by this.

I license my images Creative Commons Non-Commercial. This is one of several variations of the Creative Commons license. This means that people can use my images for personal use or non-profit organizations can use them, but folks like Yahoo/Flickr and others can’t sell them commercially without my permission.

If you are going to license your photos Creative Commons with no restriction, then you ought to be prepared for this type of use. If it’s not Flickr selling them, anyone else can, legally. If you are uncomfortable with this idea, then you should not use Creative Commons without any sort of restriction. If you like the idea of Creative Commons but are uncomfortable with commercial use without being compensated, then consider changing your license to Creative Commons Non-Commercial like I license mine.

I think a lot of people though don’t consider the full implications of the license that they choose and like Stewart I wonder if the revenue is worth potential lost goodwill in this case. Some people will inevitably be put off when they see that the community (and Flickr is as much a community as a company) that is hosting their photos for them is now selling them without sharing the profit or asking for permission. Reminding people to read the fine print of their photo license that they chose without really considering it thoughtfully might not be the best answer to that complaint. People on Flickr LOVE to complain about anything and everything.

I think Flickr does have to figure out how to pay for a free terabyte of storage for every user and maybe this is one way to do that.

I haven’t been asked to participate in the online print marketplace, but if I was and was offered a 51% payout, I’d probably say yes. Anything 50% or better feels pretty fair to me. I create the image, but Flickr is driving the traffic to it for sale and handling fulfillment, etc. If I were to have a physical gallery sell my works, I’d probably be looking for a similar cut.

The idea of selling Creative Commons images and getting to keep all of the money is interesting to Yahoo I’m sure, but maybe Flickr would be better off instead focusing on more of a total revenue share model for the entire effort and treating CC images like they treat CCNC and all rights reserved images. I bet people who license their work CC would be pleased if their images too were handpicked for inclusion and they got paid for use. Even if it were a small amount, it would be a positive affirmation to them about their photography and that would feel good.


Thomas Hawk Digital Connection

 
Comments Off on The Controversy Around Flickr Selling Creative Commons Licensed Photos

Posted in Photography

 

Flickr Wall Art expands to include Creative Commons images

23 Nov

Flickr Wall Art now allows users to order prints from more than 50 million photographs, the service has announced. This follows Wall Art’s arrival in October, and moves to include all applicable freely-licensed Creative Commons images, licensed artists images, and a curated selection of content from NASA. Read more

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Flickr Wall Art expands to include Creative Commons images

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Flickr Commons marks 5-year anniversary with galleries of most-viewed pics

17 Jan

flickr-logo-5221212.png

Flickr Commons is five years old, and to celebrate, Flickr has created galleries of the most viewed, ‘favorited’ and commented-upon images. Commons was launched in 2008 with 1500 photos, in partnership with the US Library of Congress. Five years later, the collection of public domain photographs boasts more than 250,000 images. Click through for more information, and links to the galleries of most popular images in the growing collection. 

News: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Flickr Commons marks 5-year anniversary with galleries of most-viewed pics

Posted in Uncategorized