RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Huawei P20 Pro triple-camera receives DxOMark score of 109, smashing the competition

28 Mar

There’s no other way to put it: at least according to DxOMark, the Huawei P20 Pro is far and away the most capable smartphone camera on the market. In fact, with a score of 109, the world’s first triple-cam smartphone ranks a full 10 points ahead of its nearest rival, the Samsung Galaxy S9. And it’s not just the P20 Pro; even the P20, which only has a dual-cam, broke into three digits with a score of 102. That makes the Huawei P20 Pro and P20 the two best smartphone cameras DxOMark has ever tested, and puts them right at the top of our must-review list.

You can read the full P20 Pro and P20 reviews by following those links, but the TL;DR is simple: Huawei cleaned up across the board. DxOMark put it simply enough it the conclusion to its Huawei P20 Pro review:

We are used to every new smartphone camera generation being slightly better than the previous one, but looking at the images and test results from the P20 Pro, it seems Huawei has skipped one or two generations. The results are simply that good. The P20 Pro’s triple camera setup is the biggest innovation we have seen in mobile imaging for quite some time and is a real game changer.

Terms like “game changer” tend to make me cringe, but in this case it might just fit. At least according to DxO’s scores, the P20 Pro leaves competitors in the dust “in virtually every category.” Even if you’re exclusively interested in stills (and not video), nobody even comes close to the Huawei smartphone’s Photo score of 114—its nearest competition comes from the Samsung Galaxy S9 (104) and the Apple iPhone X (101).

Check out the full review, test images, and score breakdown on DxOMark, and let us know what you think of this impressive new smartphone camera in the comments. And, of course, stay tuned for our own review of the Huawei P20 Pro, which we’re hoping to get from Huawei shortly.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Huawei P20 Pro triple-camera receives DxOMark score of 109, smashing the competition

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Lytro is officially shutting down

28 Mar
Photo: Lytro

Last week, industry sources told TechCrunch that Google would soon acquire light field camera maker Lytro for somewhere between $ 25 million and $ 40 million. And while Google’s part in all this hasn’t been confirmed, Lytro has now formally announce that it will be shutting down, and an anonymous source has shed more light on how Google is involved.

The official Lytro announcement was published earlier on the company’s blog, where Team Lytro bid a bittersweet farewell to the “Cinematic and VR Community.”

The statement—which you can see in full at the bottom of this post—reads in part:

It has been an honor and a pleasure to contribute to the cinema and Virtual Reality communities, but starting today we will not be taking on new productions or providing professional services as we prepare to wind down the company. We’re excited to see what new opportunities the future brings for the Lytro team as we go our separate ways.

According to The Verge, for many of the Lytro employees “separate ways” actually means “to Google.”

A person familiar with the matter confirmed the original TechCrunch report to The Verge, explaining that “a large fraction” of the employees at Lytro would take jobs at Google. However, those jobs won’t necessarily have anything to do with developing light field technology. The Verge’s source said the deal was more “hiring deal” than “company acquisition,” and that Google wasn’t so much buying Lytro as acquiring its talent and some of its assets, without any specific plans to integrate those assets into current light field projects.

Google has yet to (and may never) comment on this information, and Lytro didn’t specify how long it would take to “wind down,” but it seems we’ve seen the end of the Lytro brand—either as a consumer camera maker, or in the professional VR filmmaking market.

Full Lytro Statement

To the Cinematic and VR Community, Live Long and Prosper

At Lytro, we believe that Light Field will continue to shape the course of Virtual and Augmented Reality, and we’re incredibly proud of the role we’ve been able to play in pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. We’ve uncovered challenges we never dreamed of and made breakthroughs at a seemingly impossible pace. We’ve had some spectacular successes, and built entire systems that no one thought possible. More importantly, we built a team that was singularly unified in its focus and unrivaled in its dedication. It has been an honor and a pleasure to contribute to the cinema and Virtual Reality communities, but starting today we will not be taking on new productions or providing professional services as we prepare to wind down the company. We’re excited to see what new opportunities the future brings for the Lytro team as we go our separate ways. We would like to thank the various communities that have supported us and hope that our paths will cross in the future.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Lytro is officially shutting down

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Monolight Shootout: Profoto B1X vs Godox AD600 Pro vs Broncolor Siros 800 L

27 Mar

The Godox AD600 Pro, Broncolor Siros 800 L, and Profoto B1X all fall into the same category: they’re battery powered monolights that pack studio quality and power into a portable package you can take with you on location. So why would you purchase one over the others? In this video, photographer Robert Hall answers just that, breaking down all of these strobes’ pros and cons in glorious detail.

First things first (even though Hall saved this for last), there is a big difference in price here. By Hall’s calculations, the Godox AD600 Pro will run you $ 968 for one light and one trigger, while the Broncolor Siros 800 L and Profoto B1X cost $ 2,349 and $ 2,514, respectively, for the same thing. So right away, you can spot the one question that most viewers want Hall to answer: can the Godox play with the more expensive name-brand lights?

And the answer, gladly, is absolutely it can. But that’s not to say the Godox is the best choice for everyone. Hall tested a ton of categories in impressive detail—everything from color accuracy and consistency, to battery life, to build quality, modeling lamps, trigger design, bust capability, and more—and no one strobe came out on top (or bottom) in every category.

In the ‘modifier’ category, the Profoto B1X gets Hall’s vote because of its ability to focus modifiers, and Profoto’s convenient OCF gels and grids.

When it comes to modifiers, Profoto’s OCF gels and grids get a nod from Hall; when it comes to sheer power output, the Siros L is the clear winner; when it comes to value, it’s impossible to beat the Godox. In the end, each strobe has its pros and cons, and the best way to make this decision is to look at your own use case, and see how each strobe’s strengths and weaknesses (cost included) factor into what you need.

Which is pretty much what Hall says in his “non-Conclusion.” He gives viewers the classic “it depends” answer, because that’s the only answer that makes sense:

I can’t peg any light as the best since they all win different categories that photographers will place emphasis on depending on their needs. If you value output the most the Siros is the best option. The controller experience or modifier control may have you choose the Profoto B1X. If you are trying to get very capable lighting without spending a ton, the Godox AD600 Pro fits the bill.

Hall’s test results for each of the three strobes. Click to enlarge.

Finally, beyond all of this, Hall is wise to point out that you must consider the system you’re buying into if any of these are your first strobe purchase. In other words: the AD600 Pro sits near the top of Godox’s lineup, while the B1X and Siros L sit close to the bottom of Profoto’s and Broncolor’s. They are very different companies that ultimately server a very different subset of photographers.

Keep all of this in mind as you watch the full review, which you should definitely do if you want to dive deep on each of the categories mentioned above and find out why you might want to buy into one system instead of the other two. And if you like Robert’s lighting breakdown, subscribe to his YouTube channel or head over to his website and education blog to see more of his reviews and work


Photos, video, and test results by Robert Hall and used with permission.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Monolight Shootout: Profoto B1X vs Godox AD600 Pro vs Broncolor Siros 800 L

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Huawei unveils the P20 Pro with triple camera and large 1/1.7-inch image sensor

27 Mar

Huawei has just unveiled its latest flagship smartphone: the P20 Pro. And just as the rumors and leaks that have been floating around the Web for weeks predicted, the new model is the first smartphone to feature a triple camera setup.

Like in previous Huawei models, the camera has been developed in cooperation with Leica, and a main RGB sensor is accompanied by a high-resolution monochrome imager that serves several purposes: it provides depth estimation for the simulated bokeh effect, improves detail and noise levels by merging multiple shots, and helps with digital zooming. New on the P20 Pro is a third, dedicated tele-camera.

That said, Huawei hasn’t just stuck a third sensor and lens onto its existing dual-camera system, the P20 Pro is more innovative than that in several ways:

  • The main camera comes with an unusually large 1/1.7-inch sensor, which is approximately twice the size of the smaller sensors in most direct competitors. At F1.8 the aperture is not the largest, but thanks to the increase in sensor surface the P20 Pro’s main sensor is still capable of capturing around 20 percent more light than most rivals.
  • The main camera sensor also features a Quad Bayer structure with a total pixel count of 40MP. It outputs data binned in 2 × 2 pixel units, resulting in 10MP image output with better detail and lower noise levels.
  • The P20 Pro’s optically-stabilized tele-camera offers 3x zoom factor—approximately a 80mm equivalent focal length—significantly longer reach than the 2x tele-modules in the iPhone X, Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus, or similar high-end devices. Huawei has been able to implement this longer reach while the 20MP monochrome is already contributing to decent zoom quality at 2x, allowing the tele to focus on 3x and larger magnifications.
The Huawei P20 Pro triple camera: Main camera at the center, monochrome camera on the left, tele module on the right.

Huawei claims significantly better low-light capabilities of the large main sensor, with ISO values up to 102400 allowing for usable exposures in very dim conditions. Other imaging features include phase detection and laser assistance in the AF system, predictive focus, motion detection, and a zero shutter lag for minimal delay before capture.

The rest of the specifications are worthy of a high-end device as well. The P20 Pro is powered by Huawei’s Kirin 970 chipset and 6GB of RAM, it offers a 4,000 mAh battery with quick-charge, and features 128GB of internal storage. Images can be viewed and composed on a 6.1-inch Full View display with minimal bezels.

The P20 Pro will be available in Europe from April for 900 Euros (approximately $ 1120 USD)—no information on availability in other regions has been released yet. In addition to the P20 Pro, Huawei has also launched the P20 smartphone, which is powered by the same chipset but comes with a smaller 5.8-inch screen and a more conventional dual-camera module. It will retail for 650 Euros (approximately $ 800 USD).

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Huawei unveils the P20 Pro with triple camera and large 1/1.7-inch image sensor

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Leaked: GoPro to reveal entry-level ‘HERO’ action cam this week, will cost $200

27 Mar

A major leak earlier today confirmed what rumors have been claiming for over a week: GoPro is preparing to release an entry-level version of its HERO action cam. The new camera—ostensibly just called the GoPro HERO—will feature the same styling as its high-end HERO6 sibling but, thanks to some pared down specs, is allegedly priced between $ 180-$ 200.

According to this leaked PDF courtesy of Nokishita, the GoPro HERO will shoot 1080/60p and 1440/60p video as well as 10MP stills at up to 10fps, can capture timelapse video at 0.5 second intervals, is waterproof to 10m (~33 feet) out of the box, and features a 2-inch touchscreen on the back.

The PDF (which is in French) also specifies that the camera features WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity, voice control, and compatibility with GoPro’s one-touch Quik Stories highlight video creation in the GoPro app.

The leak does not cover price or release date; however, Photo Rumors is reporting that the new HERO camera—also seen in the leaked images above—will cost between $ 180 and $ 200, and Nokishita writes that the HERO will be announced on March 30th. If that turns out to be the case, be sure to check in with DPReview this Friday for the official details.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Leaked: GoPro to reveal entry-level ‘HERO’ action cam this week, will cost $200

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Lensrentals: Cheap Veydra Mini Prime lenses are ‘optically excellent’

27 Mar

Roger Cicala over at Lensrentals went on another OLAF testing spree, and this time the victim of his optical bench tests were the extremely affordable Veydra Mini Prime cinema lenses made for E-Mount and Micro Four Thirds sensors. These lenses are so inexpensive that Cicala has assumed (for some time) that they were also probably also ineffective. But as Roger put it:

[Today] we learned for the umpteenth time that doing scientific testing is a great way to shoot down Roger’s assumptions.

It turns out these lenses aren’t bad at all… in fact, Roger calls them “optically excellent.” And when he put them to the test against Zeiss CP.2 primes that cost 3x (or more) as much money, the Veydra Mini Primes (and here, again, we’re going to use his wording) “the Veydras just kick some serious resolution butt in this comparison.”

Here’s just one of those comparisons (more in the full test at Lensrentals), between the Zeiss Compact Prime CP.2 85mm T2.1 (average of 10 samples) and the Veydra Mini Prime 85mm T2.2 (average of 9 samples):

Zeiss on the Left, Veydra on the Right

Of course, this is a comparison on a single parameter: absolute resolution. But it’s also a comparison between a lens that costs $ 3,990 (the Zeiss CP.2) and $ 1,000 (the Veydra Mini Prime). Still, as Roger points out several times:

[These tests] won’t tell you a thing about how [the lens] focus breathes, how it handles, or whether it has that ‘film’ look. I will simply tell you how well it resolves (because you can roll your artsy eyes all you want; sometimes you have to make things look sharp).

The other factor to keep in mind is the image circle, because the Veydra Mini Primes are… well… mini. They’re only made for Micro Four Thirds and Super 35 image size and won’t cover a full-frame sensor. Still, the results of his test left Roger (and by extension, us) impressed.

Check out the full test over on Lensrentals, and if you’ve used them, drop a line in the comments about their real world performance.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Lensrentals: Cheap Veydra Mini Prime lenses are ‘optically excellent’

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Vivo V9 smartphone packs a 24MP front-facing camera and AI selfie software

27 Mar

Chinese phone manufacturer Vivo has launched a new flagship smartphone called the V9. This mid-tier model sports a design clearly inspired by the iPhone X, as well as one other very notable feature: a 24MP F2.0 front-facing camera. Whereas many smartphones still feature a low-resolution front camera, Vivo elected to put its higher-resolution camera on the front and pair it with its Face Access 2.0 security feature and AI-based Face Beauty selfie software.

As with previous Vivo models (and in case the front-facing camera resolution isn’t evidence enough), the V9 focuses on high-end selfies as a selling point. In this case, Vivo offers a feature called AI Face Beauty that is said to use machine learning determine things about the person featured in the selfie such as age and skin tone. That feature will ensure selfies “truly represent” the user’s beauty, according to The Verge.

The user will also have access to AR Stickers and will be able to unlock the phone using the front camera with Vivo’s Face Access feature.

On the back, dual 16MP + 5MP cameras, and inside there is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 SoC, 4GB RAM, and 64GB storage. Finally, you’ll use the phone through its 6.3-inch 2280 x 1080 19:9 FullView 2 display, complete with much-maligned iPhone X-like notch.

The phone has launched in India where it is priced at Rs 22,990 / $ 355 USD / 284 EUR. Availability and cost in other markets isn’t clear at this time.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Vivo V9 smartphone packs a 24MP front-facing camera and AI selfie software

Posted in Uncategorized

 

This NVIDIA algorithm copies the artistic style of one photo onto another

26 Mar

Struggling with stylistic consistency, or wanting to transpose the style of your best picture onto the rest of your Instagram feed? Thanks to a group of scientists at Cornell University, you can now do just that with surprisingly accurate and realistic results.

The team created an algorithm for graphics card company NVIDIA that lifts the stylistic characteristics of one picture and drops them onto a completely different image with startling precision. The algorithm is called FastPhotoStyle, and it’s capable of transferring the coloration, drama and atmosphere of one picture and making an entirely different frame look as though it was taken at the same time even if the subject matter is totally unrelated.

According to the developers, the goal of photorealistic image style transfer is:

…to change the style of a photo to resemble that of another one. For a faithful stylization, the content in the output photo should remain the same, while the style of the output photo should resemble the one of the reference photo. Furthermore, the output photo should look like a real photo captured by a camera.

There are programs already invented to do this, but the inventors of this algorithm claim that what already exists is slow, and doesn’t produce realistic results anyhow.

FastPhotoStyle is different, they say, because it uses a smoothing process after the initial whitening and Coloring Transfer step—or PhotoWCT step. This smoothing step tries to ensure that neighboring pixels receive similar styling and, by using what they call Matting Affinity, individual areas of the image can be subjected to slightly different treatment. This is what helps the algorithm produce such realistic looking results.

Another major difference is that this program reportedly operates as much as 60x faster than existing algorithms.

The code can be downloaded from NVIDIA’s GitHub for anyone to use under Creative Commons license (BY-NC-SA 4.0), and a user manual download is included on the page. If you’re brave, you can read the full technical paper as well.

Technical Paper Abstract:

A Closed-Form Solution to Photorealistic Image Stylization

Photorealistic image style transfer algorithms aim at stylizing a content photo using the style of a reference photo with the constraint that the stylized photo should remains photorealistic.

While several methods exist for this task, they tend to generate spatially inconsistent stylizations with noticeable artifacts. In addition, these methods are computationally expensive, requiring several minutes to stylize a VGA photo. In this paper, we present a novel algorithm to address the limitations.

The proposed algorithm consists of a stylization step and a smoothing step. While the stylization step transfers the style of the reference photo to the content photo, the smoothing step encourages spatially consistent stylizations. Unlike existing algorithms that require iterative optimization, both steps in our algorithm have closed-form solutions.

Experimental results show that the stylized photos generated by our algorithm are twice more preferred by human subjects in average. Moreover, our method runs 60 times faster than the state-of-the-art approach.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on This NVIDIA algorithm copies the artistic style of one photo onto another

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Fujifilm interview: “We will work hard to keep our uniqueness”

26 Mar
Fujifilm executives (L-R) Shin Udono, Senior Manager, Sales & Marketing Group, Optical Device & Electronic Imaging Products Div., Toshihisa Iida, General Manager, Optical Device & Electronic Imaging Products Div. and Makoto Oishi, Manager, Sales & Marketing Group, Optical Device & Electronic Imaging Products Div. | Photo by Barney Britton

Recently we visited the 2018 CP+ show in Yokohama, Japan and booked interviews with senior executives from several major manufacturers, including Fujifilm. Among the topics covered were the runaway success of the GFX system, how the company is moving into video and, of course, Instax.

The following interview has been edited slightly for clarity and flow.


How well has the GFX 50S performed since it was released?

We’ve shipped more than we expected and planned for. Even more impressive is the lens attachment rate, as we’ve sold so many lenses as well. Overall, GFX sales have exceeded our predictions.

As far as customer feedback, we heard mostly good things concerning the image quality – especially for users that shoot landscapes that need more dynamic range compared to APS-C cameras. Something that we didn’t expect was the number of high-end amateurs buying the GFX system. According to our survey, 80% of users are non-professional, and 20% are professional. That was a surprise.

The Fujifilm GFX 50S comes with a large 43.8×32.9mm imaging sensor and uses the all-new GF lens mount.

Other feedback is that our customers need more lenses in the lineup, especially in the telephoto range. We’ve already put on the roadmap that we are developing a 250mm F4 [198mm equivalent focal length] lens to meet their demand. Many customers also want more speed from the cameras, so we’re continuously doing a lot of work to make our GFX system more responsive.

And another thing is that for many customers buying the camera, it’s not a direct replacement for everything in their system; more customers are buying the GFX in addition to their existing system. Many of these customers may want to use their existing lenses on a GFX body, so we support many third-party adapter manufacturers to provide lens adapters.

Each photographer, each customer, requires a different style of camera

Also, we introduced a new firmware upgrade this month which includes a new 35mm crop mode, allowing 30.5MP cropped images. So overall, I think the image quality is the key thing. We’re surprised too that we can find over 100 lens adapters in the market, with 28 types of mounts.

Are you mainly focused on prime lens development?

At the moment, yes, but we are aware of requests from customers for other zoom lenses.

Can you talk about how the X-H1 and its larger size fits into the overall Fujifilm lineup?

The recently announced Fujifilm X-H1 takes a lot of styling and ergonomic cues from the GFX 50S, but is based around a smaller APS-C sensor and Fujifilm’s X mount.

One purpose of us doing the X-H1 is that some customers actually requested a bigger grip and better handling, especially together with bigger lenses like the 100-400mm. And this year we’re committed to introduce the XF 200mm F2, so these kinds of lenses definitely need a bigger grip.

And of course, the X-H1 is just an additional line and we’re keeping smaller cameras. Last September, we went the opposite direction with the X-E3. We said, ‘this is a minimalism camera.’ Less is more. One reason for these lineups is that each photographer, each customer, requires a different style of camera. Landscape, sports, motorsports, travel, reportage, street, they all require a different style.

Are there other opportunities you see for Fujifilm?

We think our current product line mostly covers the purposes and styles of any kind of photography. So at the moment, we don’t feel that there’s anything we need to add, but we do want to focus on APS-C cameras. We think that’s a good format for the best balance between size, speed, quality, and now we have the GFX [for even greater quality].

The compact camera market is difficult right now. Though ‘tough’ cameras continue to sell well, do you still see room for a high-end compact like the X70, or an X70 successor?

Yes, we are considering it.

Do you know how many of your customers buy X Series cameras for video?

The Fujifilm X-H1 offers a touchscreen interface to more easily (and quietly) take control of your movie shooting parameters.

The amount is definitely growing. Yesterday, we met a photographer we’ve known for many years, and he started in still photography with the X-series, and now he’s taking more and more videos.

Would you like to move more into high-end video?

Yes.

Could you expand on where you see your strongest ability to attract new videographers, or emerging videographers, to the Fujifilm brand?

I think our strength is seen, in stills photography, as image quality straight-out-of-camera. Currently, many videographers spend a lot of time for post processing. We introduced a new film simulation called Eterna that is intended for video purposes, and many videographers that have already tested X-H1 said to us that it dramatically reduced their workflow because of the image quality from the camera.

I think we will see more users transition from stills to video rather than the other way around

The X-H1 also comes with autofocus enhancements, are these something that could come to the X-T2?

Yes, that’s technically possible. We continue to be committed to firmware upgrades, but we need to decide which cameras really require new functionality.

How do you see the X-H1 customer? Some video shooters, some stills shooters or people doing a bit of both?

Fujifilm’x MKX series of professional yet relatively affordable cinema lenses now comes in X-mount for use on the company’s own cameras, and not just in E-mount (shown here).

I think that our main customers are stills photographers, but we will see more users transition from stills to video rather than the other way around. One thing that might be interesting to users is the MKX lens lineup. These are dedicated cinema lenses, so there may be some customers who want to use them and that’s why they would buy the X-H1.

We’re interested in where Fujifilm is headed in the next 18 months. Is there anything where you see a broader opportunity for the company?

All we can say is that there is much room to improve stills photography functionality for the X Series. Of course, our firmware is one way we can improve, but there are always some limitations and we keep making innovations for the hardware as well. So, together, we can make much faster and more accurate autofocus and [improve] video functionality.

We will see more competition with Canon and Nikon as well as Sony, but we will work hard to keep our uniqueness

You had mentioned that you were surprised by the sales of the GFX, so at the high end, things are going well. How do you think about the average Fujifilm customer, and where do you see likelihoods for expansion in the coming year?

It depends on which country and which region we’re talking about. For the US market, we definitely have focused on the high-end side, and that has been successful. But if you look at the Asian market, the X-A series are really popular mirrorless cameras. In Thailand, our market share for mirrorless is over 40%. The number of young people that are buying these cameras is amazing.

We don’t have an old legacy. That is our strength, and also our weakness

So, in terms of creating a new market and appealing to new customers – these customers are used to smartphones, and they’re switching to mirrorless. For the Asian market, we want to continue this market creation. For the Western market, high-end and professional use is our main focus.

With continuing emphasis on mirrorless cameras, and the possibility of Canon and Nikon getting into full-frame mirrorless soon, it’s getting harder to stand out in the marketplace. What will continue to differentiate Fujifilm from its competitors in the coming years?

One of the good things about our products is that we don’t have an old legacy. We just started our mirrorless system six years ago, so we are not sticking to the 35mm format or legacy lenses. That is our strength, and also our weakness. But over the past six years, we’ve worked hard and now our lens lineup has over 30 lenses.

Fujifilm’s comprehensive lens lineup looks even more impressive when you consider that the mount has only existed for six years.
Image credit: Fujifilm

I’ve also been asked many times, ‘how do you feel about Canon and Nikon getting into mirrorless?’ My answer was always, ‘welcome.’ Because having those strong brands in the mirrorless marketplace increases general awareness of mirrorless, and that’s a good thing for the whole industry. And if the whole industry is growing, then we have a greater chance to grow as well.

So yes, we will see more competition with Canon and Nikon as well as Sony, but we will work hard to keep our uniqueness in design and usability; [one big way] we differentiate is by our analog controls. And of course, we need to keep innovating inside our cameras as well, improving the sensor, processor, and also by introducing new lenses.

Speaking of analog, a big point of success for Fujifilm is Instax cameras and printers. How does that affect your vision for digital cameras when you see such a successful product line in your business which is somewhat unrelated to all of the latest technology that you’re developing?

What do all of these cameras have in common? They all use Fujifilm Instax film.

Our philosophy is that the camera is a tool for photography. At the end of the day, the customer wants great images whether they’re on a digital display, or in print; it’s the customer’s choice. The good thing about Instax is that customers, especially younger generations, realize the value of print photography and we want to encourage that. For example, our cameras can easily print directly on Instax, so we really want to promote the value of the print.

Do you see people making Instax prints from high-end cameras?

In Asia, we actually sell a camera and printer bundle. Even for high-end photographers who use the X Series, there are good opportunities especially for street photography; take a picture, make a print, and give it to your subject.


Editor’s note:

As expected from previous meetings with Mr. Iida and his colleagues, our conversation at CP+ 2018 was both honest and candid. The unexpected success of the GFX 50S is a great thing for both Fujifilm and photographers alike. Not only does this validate the development and manufacture of the camera in the first place, but it highlights how Fujifilm’s bypass of the 35mm full-frame format was a good call. It will be interesting to see to what extent – and how quickly – the system grows in the coming years.

Certainly, Mr. Iida made the point that the X Series has only been around for six years, and now boasts a lens and camera lineup that is impressively comprehensive. While I don’t necessarily expect that level of rapidity with more niche medium-format products, there’s no denying the company’s excellent track record of system-building.

The possibility of an X70 follow-up is intriguing, but the rest of the APS-C lineup does look awfully full. In covering everything from the entry-level X-A series to the new pro-oriented X-H series, I get the sense that Fujifilm will be focusing on the refining of existing products for the near future, as opposed to introducing something entirely new (though I’d love to be proven wrong here). And with possible full-frame mirrorless cameras from the likes of Canon and Nikon appearing on the horizon, Fujifilm’s continued emphasis on improving their autofocus and video capabilities is going to be key as the competition heats up.

Fujifilm’s take on video is certainly unique. The X-H1’s excellent out-of-camera video quality has the benefit of appealing to both beginners and experienced users that grow tired of a lengthy workflow. And while that camera’s video feature set is comparatively limited at this time, I fully expect that to be addressed in future models – particularly in light of the new MKX cine lenses.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Fujifilm interview: “We will work hard to keep our uniqueness”

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Frozen Warriors: Capturing the mighty musk ox in its natural habitat

25 Mar

Wildlife photographer Chris Schmid recently travelled to Norway’s Dovrefjell-Sunndalsfjella National Park—which contains some of the most punishing-yet-beautiful landscapes on Earth—to shoot an ambitious documentary photography and filmmaking project. His goal was to capture the mammoth-like musk ox in their natural arctic habitat, and the result is the short film The Frozen Warriors.

Using RED cameras for video, DJI drones for aerial shots, and the Sony a9 and a7R III for stills photography, Schmid sought to capture footage that would foster some sort of connection between his audience and the musk oxen, whose already dwindling numbers are increasingly threatened by climate change. This, despite being one of the most resilient animals on Earth, having survived the last ice age without breaking a sweat.

As Chris explains:

What fascinates me about the musk ox is the strength it has to adapt to the most hostile of environments. In the winter, they feed on roots, mosses and lichens buried under the snow and spend over four months without sunshine, in total darkness, surviving in temperatures reaching as low as -60°C

Check out the film at the top of this post and scroll through Schmid’s photographs from the project below to get to know these Frozen Warriors for yourself. And if you want to learn more about the project (and help raise awareness), visit (and share) the Frozen Warriors project page here.

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_3466407533″,”galleryId”:”3466407533″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Frozen Warriors: Capturing the mighty musk ox in its natural habitat

Posted in Uncategorized