~30 sec 720p 50fps footages played back at 25p. ISO 160 lens: Meyer-Optik Orestor 100/2.8 at 5.6 edius 6
Video Rating: 4 / 5
~30 sec 720p 50fps footages played back at 25p. ISO 160 lens: Meyer-Optik Orestor 100/2.8 at 5.6 edius 6
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Comments
14 responses to “EOS 60D CBR test – Magic Lantern unified”
ps – in all seriousness, brilliant to use the turntable method to compare codecs. Motion, repeatability, light variation, it’s all there.
Will you get the same results using a box of Verbatim 3.5″ floppies? How can you call this a thorough test using just one brand?
😉
Good to know there is no difference at all !
lol…..0.3 has less noise than 3.0x……..lol
Have in mind that youtube ruins it even more
I thought 3x was impossible to record at, what is the highest you were able to record at consistently?
Dear unholydevil2! I think it’s a ‘bad’ compression – details vanished due to the higher compression ratio…
Dear unholydevil2! I think it’s a ‘bad’ compression – details vanished due to the higher compression ratio…
Dear unholydevil2! I think it’s a ‘bad’ compression – details vanished due to the higher compression ratio…
hi, you can significantly decrease the file size using ML…
hi, i’m using a 16 GB SanDisk Extreme Pro 45MB/s UHS-I Memory Card, but i
could ca. 30 seconds to record at extremely high bitrates… recording stops
over 70 Mbit/s
What card are you using? I can’t get exceed CBR 1.4 without overflowing the buffer.
i just see when the iso noise like been smooth out, and got line, hmm i think is ok right? or this is call bad quality for 0.3X?
does any difference actually.?