Blog

  • Using Photoshop Filters During Post-Processing to Correct and Enhance Images

    When you think of filters in photography, your first thought might be those specialized glass pieces you affix to the end of your lens. Most of these filters serve a specific purpose (e.g. a polarizing filter to reduce glare), although some are for artistic effects (e.g. colored filters).

    But if you want to apply artistic/special effects in post-processing, Photoshop has a number of filters you can apply during this stage of your workflow. They can also be used to clean up or retouch images.

    Recommendation

    When working with an image, it’s good practice to work non-destructively (i.e. you don’t change the pixels). Using Photoshop filters directly on a pixel layer will change the pixels, so wherever possible you should use Smart Filters.

    A Smart Filter is a filter that’s applied to a Smart Object – a layer that saves the image’s source information with its original characteristics and allows you to edit non-destructively. So before you start applying filters, convert the layer you’re working on to a Smart Object.

    Note: Depending on your version of Photoshop, you may not be able to apply some filters as Smart Filters.

    Filter Gallery

    The filter gallery in Photoshop gives you quick access to a number of filters. From the menu choose Filter, and then Filter Gallery to view them on the screen. It’s an easy way to see the effect a filter would have without changing the original image. Here you can apply one or a combination of filters to your image.

    The easiest way to understand what they all do is to select each one and look at the preview. It’s a simple artistic edit that can come in handy when used selectively.

    The Filter Gallery showing the options that can be applied.

    Adaptive Wide Angle Filter

    This is also available in the Filter menu and can be useful for correcting distortion issues resulting from wide-angle or fisheye lenses. These lenses sometimes introduce curves that weren’t actually there. You can also use the adaptive wide angle filter to straighten lines that appear curved in panoramic shots.

    To straighten a curved horizon, click and drag from the left side of the horizon to the right. This adds a blue line (called a constraint) around the area of distortion. The constraint marks the area and straightens it.

    An image taken with a fish-eye lens

    This filter has a number of correction types:

    • Fisheye corrects those extreme curves made with a fisheye lens
    • Perspective corrects converging lines resulting from your angle of view or camera tilt
    • Full Spherical corrects 360-degree panoramas with a 1:2 aspect ratio
    • Auto applies what Photoshop deems an appropriate correction

    Image adjusted using Adaptive Wide Angle filter

    Note: The Panorama correction type is also available if you apply this filter to a photomerged panorama.

    Lens Correction

    The Lens Correction filter fixes different kinds of distortions. Similar to the Adaptive Wide Angle filter, it remedies distortion created by wide-angle and fisheye lenses. It can also straighten images taken at an angle and make them appear as if shot straight on. One of the great things with this filter is you can choose to either manually correct the image or have Photoshop correct it automatically.

    Angled image.

    • Geometric Distortion is another easy way to remove a fish-eye effect.
    • Chromatic Aberration can remove any colored fringes around your subjects on high contrast edges.
    • Vignette does a good job of adding a vignette.
    • Transform gives you sliders to help you correct perspectives, with options for vertical and horizontal perspectives, as well as rotating to compensate for camera tilt.

    Edited with the Lens Correction filter.

    Liquify

    The Liquify filter can be used to push and pull pixels around and is one of the most powerful filters under the Filter menu. You may associate liquify with body transformations, but it can do much more than that.

    Within the liquify filter menu, the forward warp tool (at the top left) is the most popular. The key to using this tool successfully is to use a brush size slightly larger than you think you need. You should also use a lower pressure brush (for more subtlety) and increase your density (to affect a bigger area within your brush circle).

    The Liquify Tool used to reshape a piece of fruit.

    Vanishing Point

    The Vanishing Point filter brings an image in line with the perspective of another. For example, if you want to composite a picture frame into a room, this filter will help you match the perspective of the frame to any wall in the right perspective.

    Third-Party Filters

    Photoshop lets you easily add hundreds of third-party filters (available via plugins) to your arsenal.

    These can help you make the most of your images or get super creative. Many simplify the steps Photoshop is capable of achieving so you can perform them in a shorter time. Some of these include the Nik Collection, Topaz and ON1.

    Above Image with two Nik filters applied: Paper Toner and Vignette

    Conclusion

    Using Photoshop Filters is an easy option if you want to get creative. Photoshop has a few standard ones you can experiment with, and stacking them can create a unique image.

    Which filters do you use? Share some of your results with us.

    The post Using Photoshop Filters During Post-Processing to Correct and Enhance Images appeared first on Digital Photography School.


    Digital Photography School

  • DPReview TV: Nikon Z6, Sony a7 III and Canon EOS R compared

    For several years Sony had the full frame mirrorless camera market all to itself, but recent introductions from Canon and Nikon have changed the landscape. This week, Chris and Jordan compare the current generation of entry-level full frame mirrorless models from each company: the Nikon Z6, Sony a7 III and Canon EOS R. Watch their analysis to find out where they think each model excels or has room to grow.

    Also, make sure to read our in-depth written reviews of the Canon EOS R and the Sony a7 III. (Our Nikon Z6 review is coming soon – we promise!)

    Get new episodes of DPReview TV every week by subscribing to our YouTube channel!

    Click links below to jump to a specific topic:

    • Introduction
    • Image Stabilization
    • Lens Selection
    • Autofocus
    • Video Performance
    • Ergonomics and Handling
    • Image Quality
    • Conclusions

    Canon EOS R review

    Sony a7 III review

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • DPReview Buying Guide: Best lenses for Canon, Nikon and Sony

    New this year, we’ve added lens recommendations to our range of buying guides. Take a look through this guide for our advice on the best lenses to pair with Canon, Nikon and Sony cameras.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • DPReview Buying Guide: Best cameras by use-case

    It’s almost the end of the year, and we’ve been updating our range of buying guides. Here, you’ll find our current recommendations for the best cameras for all kinds of photography, from portraiture to sports.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Weekly Photography Challenge – Abandoned

    This week’s photography topic for our weekly challenge is ABANDONED!

    Abandoned truck NZ by Caz Nowaczyk

    I have a fascination with things that are abandoned and left to decay. There is a sense of history that comes with things that are left behind.

    Think urban decay, abandoned buildings (interiors and exteriors), abandoned cars, or anything that has been discarded.

    Burnt out abandoned vehicle by Caz Nowaczyk

    Check out some of the articles below that give you tips on finding and shooting Abandoned pictures.

    How to Photograph Abandoned Places

    25 Dilapidated Images of Urban Decay and Grunge

    Urban Exploration Photography – Urbex

    Photography Weekly Challenge – Abandoned

    Simply upload your shot into the comment field (look for the little camera icon in the Disqus comments section) and they’ll be embedded for us all to see. Or if you’d prefer, upload them to your favorite photo-sharing site and leave the link to them. Show me your best images in this week’s challenge!

    Share in the dPS Facebook Group

    You can also share your images in the dPS Facebook group as the challenge is posted there each week as well.

    If you tag your photos on Flickr, Instagram, Twitter or other sites – tag them as #DPSABANDONED to help others find them. Linking back to this page might also help others know what you’re doing so that they can share in the fun.

    Dumped mattress in floodwaters by Caz Nowaczyk

    The post Weekly Photography Challenge – Abandoned appeared first on Digital Photography School.


    Digital Photography School

  • Review: Kodak Scanza film scanner is easy-to-use, but overpriced

    Kodak Scanza film scanner
    $ 169.99 | Kodak.com

    The Kodak Scanza is a simple, non-professional film scanner. It wears the Kodak logo, but has no affiliation with Kodak Alaris, the company bringing back Kodak T-Max P3200 and Ektachrome.

    Key features

    • Tilting 3.5″ LCD
    • SD card slot
    • Video out, HDMI and USB connectivity
    • Works with: 35mm, 126, 110, Super 8 and 8mm formats

    What’s included

    Opening the box you’re greeted with HDMI, USB and video out cables, an AC adapter, user manual, the scanner itself (in bubble wrap below), a toothbrush shaped surface cleaner and a handful of plastic film holders. Pretty much everything is plastic and feels a little cheap in its construction quality.

    Format compatibility

    In terms of film format flexibility, the Scanza is… okay. There’s no option for medium format, though you can scan 35mm, 110, and 126 formats as well as 8mm/Super 8. The 8mm/Super 8 option is misleading, though. This is not for scanning a whole reel of 8mm film, this is specifically for scanning individual frames of 8mm or Super 8 slides.

    One of the plastic film holders with 35mm slide.

    In use

    The biggest thing the Scanza has going for it is ease-of-use. Even if you’ve never scanned film before, you can expect to be up and running in around 10 minutes.

    To operate it, plug in the power (the scanner uses a widely available micro-USB to USB cable for power) either to an AC outlet or your computer, insert an SD card (this is where scans are saved), press the power button, select your film type, load the holder with your film, insert it and press the capture button. Done. Scanning takes only a couple of seconds per negative/slide.

    Despite some gripes with the Scanza, the usability of this thing is awesome and for those intimidated by the more technical conundrums of photography/scanning, it is super freeing.

    If you’re plugged into the wall and the 3.5″ LCD feels too small to view your images, don’t fear: In addition to the Micro-USB, you’ve got Video-out and HDMI-mini ports (cables included for both) so you can view your scans on a TV or monitor screen. This additional connectivity feels like a bit of an unnecessary feature, but I’m not going to count it against the Scanza because connecting it to a TV reminded me of using a slide projector and that is the most Kodak thing about this product.

    A 35mm Elite Chrome slide scanned at 22MP with no corrections or cropping.

    The scanner is 14MP but offers a 22MP scan option that interpolates the images and ups the resolution from 4320×2880 pixels to 5728×3824 pixels. In use, we found the 22MP mode entirely unnecessary. There’s no option for TIFFs or DNG, only JPEG. (Prosumer scanners like the Nikon CoolScan 9000 and Epson V-series accommodate TIFF and DNG workflows, giving your film scans a lot of editing flexibility). Also, the scanning area ends up slightly cropping your photos, mostly horizontally – if you’re a perfectionist, this may bother you.

    The biggest thing the Scanza has going for it is ease-of-use

    When scanning you’ve got the option to perform color adjustments which includes Brightness, Red, Green, and Blue levels, all on an arbitrary scale of -3 to +3. In testing, just +1/-1 on any of these scales was too drastic a change to be used effectively. Unless your film is severely expired and has a significant color shift, I’d stay away from these settings to keep your scans as accurate as possible.

    Scan quality

    $ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_6424137580″,”galleryId”:”6424137580″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

    The scans in the gallery above are from a 35mm roll of Fujifilm Natura 1600. Below is an example of an image scanned using the Scanza (left) next to the same image scanned by a local photo lab here in Seattle (right). For what it’s worth, said lab charges $ 18 for processing and scanning a roll of 35mm color film.

    Scanned in Scanza. Scanned by lab.

    Scan quality isn’t terrible, but a quick comparison to a professional lab scan shows the limits of the Scanza. For simply preserving memories, or scanning to share on social media, the Scanza’s quality should be good enough.

    Bottom Line

    This is not a bad product, it’s just an overpriced one for what it is. For similar cash, you can invest in a decent flatbed scanner with film trays – like the Epson V550 – which offers higher-quality scans and greater versatility, but at the cost of speed and ease-of-use.

    For those simply wishing to painlessly make digital copies of years of photos, the Scanza is a decent option. But we have a hard time believing it is much better than this similar option with no Kodak label, priced half as much.

    What we like:

    • Extremely easy to use
    • Fast at scanning
    • No computer needed

    What we don’t:

    • Similar products available for much less cash
    • Limited scanning resolution
    • Can only save JPEGs
    • Scanza sometimes crops images
    • No option for scanning medium format

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • DPReview recommends: Best digital cameras and lenses

    We test and try a lot of digital cameras and lenses here at DPReview, and with holiday season finally here, we’ve been updating our range of buying guides. Click through for our recommendations.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • Report: Reuters to merge photography, video teams under unified ‘visual journalist’ team

    A report from The Baron, an independent website dedicated to sharing news and information about Reuters, says Reuters is speeding up the process of merging its picture and video news departments into a single team of ‘visual journalists’ while at the same time making cuts to the number of jobs within the organization.

    According to The Baron report, in an internal message to Reuters staff, John Pullman, global head of visuals at Reuters, said ‘In Visuals we will accelerate the moves already underway to create a single unified team of visual journalists […] Many of our photographers already shoot video – and videographers produce pictures. This mode of working is becoming normal throughout the industry as video and photo technologies grow closer. We will be taking a structured approach to merge our pictures and video teams. We will look at technology, training and workflow – and introduce single leadership where appropriate.’

    The Baron reports the internal memo goes on to say ‘We aim to align our teams with the needs of our customers by extending our footprint, improving our efficiency and increasing our flexibility.’

    According to the referenced memo, Pullman said the changes, which come as part of the reorganization as a separate business under the Thomson Reuters umbrella, will take place over the coming months. Unsurprisingly, the homogenization isn’t going over to well with Reuters staff.

    A Reuters employee, who spoke under the condition of anonymity to The Baron, said ‘This is essentially the end of Reuters Pictures, going down the tubes in a very sad way. Pix has won a score of Pulitzers and other prestigious awards under Reuters but it seems that is not enough to save it from what appears to be the terrible end of what was a great run over more than 30 years which brought the world some of the best photojournalism it has ever seen.’

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • ISO drafts the first worldwide drone standards, expected to be adopted later next year

    The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has published a draft set of standards for drone operations. The drafts will be open for public consultation until January 21, 2019 and are expected to be adopted globally later next year.

    This is the first set of four drone-related sets of standards. An additional three sets will look into technical specifications, manufacturing quality, and traffic management.

    Most of the proposed standards are line with already existing drone legislation and regulations as well as common sense. The draft includes no-fly zones around airports and other sensitive locations. Geo-fencing technology is suggested to prevent drone flying over restricted areas. Other suggestions include flight logging, operator training as well as maintenance requirements.

    There are also rules around privacy and data protection for operators and the draft standard suggests there should be a mandatory means of human intervention for all drone flights.

    With drone traffic increasing substantially and drones frequently involved in air traffic incidents, more standards for both technology and operation procedures should be a step into the right direction and can help drive drone adoption further. More information is available on the ISO website.

    Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

  • $400 Camera VS $4,000 Camera – Can a Professional Photographer Spot the Difference?

    In this video, Peter McKinnon asks the question “Can a professional photographer tell the difference between a $ 400 camera and a $ 4,000 one just by looking at the pictures?”

    ?

    Watch the video, and take a look at the images shot with the Canon Rebel and the Canon EOS R. Can you tell which is which?

    Can you really take professional photos with an entry level camera? Can you be a professional photographer on a budget or do you need to spend thousands of dollars on professional gear?

    You may also find these articles helpful:

    Shooting Portraits Like a Pro on a Tight Budget

    A Look Inside the Bag of a Hobby Photographer on a Budget

    10 Tips for Creating a Photography Kit on a Budget

    Small Budget Photography: Lenses

    Beginners Guide to Different Types of Digital Cameras

     

    What cameras do you use for your photography work? Are you achieving great photos with less expensive gear? Share with us in the comments below.

     

    The post $ 400 Camera VS $ 4,000 Camera – Can a Professional Photographer Spot the Difference? appeared first on Digital Photography School.


    Digital Photography School