24 responses to “Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX Lens Review (Now in HD!)”
hamsterpoop
I disliked and left at “I’ve shot parties…”
Brady O’Brien
Priorities 🙂 – Gotta sacrifice the clothing for the cameras lol.
BittersweetEuphoria1
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
YOUR NOT A BOSS
BREDANS A BOSSSS
LOLFAG
BittersweetEuphoria1
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
ROFLCOPTOR
YOU THINK YOUR A BOSSS???
BRENDANS A BOSS
tony77tony77
is this better then the 35mm f1.8?
Flyelskeren
i mean, I’m 17 and got both a 70-200 and a 100-400 on a 40D… With my native prices it’s crazy. But I guess his a good photographer who can earn cash on his photos 😉 Or has a job or two as me 🙂
Reinier Bonis
Well, he has a hole in his jeans… So??
turdferguson0010
Do you not know your own country? Canada is a socialist country. Everything cost more, while America is capitalistic.
dzvsk39
u r a faget.
sasktank
this lens is$700 +tax in Canada , and our dollar is at par with usa —?——- it’s only $439 in usa –WTF is up with that ? — are we being punished for living up here ,you’dd think our winter’s are punishment enough—//—another par dollar example–a 8×10 print at walmart canada is $3.28+tax —- usa walmart$1.47 —-???
chasemcevers
im 17 and have that camera. i baught it myself. but when you love something it doesnt matter how much it costs.
sacredgeometry
? i allready stated i didnt see the previous post i know bokeh means blur. i thought you where saying there i no point making any definition between good and bad bokeh….because the only defining feature is the amount…and that would be stupid 😛
peace
brian
d4n131M3j14
Hahahaha you are dumb as shit man. That is exactly what I mean, that dumb people think that word means more than it does. Just like idiots call “prime lens” to a fixed focal lengh lens, what a bunch of retards…
sacredgeometry
its pronounced bo-keh
sacredgeometry
whoops sorry didnt see what you where replying to yeah that guy was talking crap and i misunderstood your comment from it being out of context.
peace
brian
sacredgeometry
actually thats bollocks there is beautiful bokeh and awful bokeh its based on more than just the amount of blur. for example harsh specular highlights are horrible…angular (non spherical) highlights are not appealing the transition between in focus and out of focus areas the blurs ability to keep colour contrast the list is huge
peace
brian
thebedtimestory
He knows his shit, so you have no place to say anything.
exe163
Jealous?
Dahoef2
Take it easy on him. He’s trying to help you. He seems like a very well rounded, intelligent person with a passion for photography. Thanks for the review!
Mario Almanza
How old are you, with a d300?? Rich folks huh…
d4n131M3j14
Actually bokeh means out of focus, so “beautiful out of focus” means -nothing- the same as “lots of out of focus”
darkernights
if i wanted to do very tight portrait work i’d go for the 85 1.8, or if i had more money i’d buy the 85 1.4 which has just about the creamiest bokeh ever. I use the 30mm for everyday shooting in low light or group/half body portrait work.
kiewas
i also like very much this lens. using it most the time. great videos.
BTW. What camcorder you using now?
DavidTheDivine
Bokeh refers to the quality of the out of focus rendering not the amount… “beautiful bokeh” would be correct, “lots of bokeh” makes no sense. I think you’re looking for “it’s good for shallow depth of field”.
Comments
24 responses to “Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX Lens Review (Now in HD!)”
I disliked and left at “I’ve shot parties…”
Priorities 🙂 – Gotta sacrifice the clothing for the cameras lol.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
YOUR NOT A BOSS
BREDANS A BOSSSS
LOLFAG
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
ROFLCOPTOR
YOU THINK YOUR A BOSSS???
BRENDANS A BOSS
is this better then the 35mm f1.8?
i mean, I’m 17 and got both a 70-200 and a 100-400 on a 40D… With my native prices it’s crazy. But I guess his a good photographer who can earn cash on his photos 😉 Or has a job or two as me 🙂
Well, he has a hole in his jeans… So??
Do you not know your own country? Canada is a socialist country. Everything cost more, while America is capitalistic.
u r a faget.
this lens is$700 +tax in Canada , and our dollar is at par with usa —?——- it’s only $439 in usa –WTF is up with that ? — are we being punished for living up here ,you’dd think our winter’s are punishment enough—//—another par dollar example–a 8×10 print at walmart canada is $3.28+tax —- usa walmart$1.47 —-???
im 17 and have that camera. i baught it myself. but when you love something it doesnt matter how much it costs.
? i allready stated i didnt see the previous post i know bokeh means blur. i thought you where saying there i no point making any definition between good and bad bokeh….because the only defining feature is the amount…and that would be stupid 😛
peace
brian
Hahahaha you are dumb as shit man. That is exactly what I mean, that dumb people think that word means more than it does. Just like idiots call “prime lens” to a fixed focal lengh lens, what a bunch of retards…
its pronounced bo-keh
whoops sorry didnt see what you where replying to yeah that guy was talking crap and i misunderstood your comment from it being out of context.
peace
brian
actually thats bollocks there is beautiful bokeh and awful bokeh its based on more than just the amount of blur. for example harsh specular highlights are horrible…angular (non spherical) highlights are not appealing the transition between in focus and out of focus areas the blurs ability to keep colour contrast the list is huge
peace
brian
He knows his shit, so you have no place to say anything.
Jealous?
Take it easy on him. He’s trying to help you. He seems like a very well rounded, intelligent person with a passion for photography. Thanks for the review!
How old are you, with a d300?? Rich folks huh…
Actually bokeh means out of focus, so “beautiful out of focus” means -nothing- the same as “lots of out of focus”
if i wanted to do very tight portrait work i’d go for the 85 1.8, or if i had more money i’d buy the 85 1.4 which has just about the creamiest bokeh ever. I use the 30mm for everyday shooting in low light or group/half body portrait work.
i also like very much this lens. using it most the time. great videos.
BTW. What camcorder you using now?
Bokeh refers to the quality of the out of focus rendering not the amount… “beautiful bokeh” would be correct, “lots of bokeh” makes no sense. I think you’re looking for “it’s good for shallow depth of field”.