RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘dispute’

Manfrotto and Benro settle 90 degree center column dispute

18 Aug

Tripod manufacturers Manfrotto and Benro have settled their patent dispute after Mamiya America Corporation (MAC Group) agreed not to market its GoClassic and GoTravel series of tripods in the USA. The battle between the two brands began when Benro began selling tripods that allow the center column to be lifted out of the collar and held at 90° to facilitate shooting directly downwards, an idea that Manfrotto claims is protected under a collection of patents it filed in December 2000.

Manfrotto said that the Benro design copied its own for ‘tripod camera supports wherein the column can be housed alternatively and removably either in a seat coaxial with the principal axis or in a second seat perpendicular to the principal axis’ that was first introduced in the Manfrotto Q90 range. Defendants MAC Group denied their products infringed Manfrotto’s protected designs and claimed that Manfrotto’s patent itself is invalid.

The case was resolved when Benro agreed not to sell the offending products in the USA, though Manfrotto has not agreed that this means Benro hasn’t infringed its rights. In the complaint Manfrotto claimed that MAC Group had achieved a great deal of success with its copied designs which had harmed Manfrotto’s income and market share. The company also accused MAC Group of poaching its employees, and demanded compensation not only for the infringement but also ‘treble damages’ as the Benro continued on its course even after Manfrotto filed its complaint.

For more information read the complaint and see Manfrotto’s original patent.

Press release:

Manfrotto Resolves Patent Infringement Lawsuit with MAC Group and Benro

Upper Saddle River, N.J. (August 16, 2016) – Manfrotto Distribution Inc., Lino Manfrotto +Co S.p.A., Mamiya America Corporation (MAC Group), and Benro Precision Industrial Co., Ltd. (“Benro”), announced today that they have resolved Manfrotto’s patent infringement lawsuit which has been pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Manfrotto and Lino Manfrotto had sued MAC Group and Benro contending that Benro’s GoClassic and GoTravel lines of tripods infringe Manfrotto’s U.S. Patent No. 6,164,843, for a photographic tripod providing support in various axes. MAC Group and Benro had denied that their products infringe and also contend that the patent was itself invalid.

Manfrotto is dismissing the litigation with prejudice and Benro and MAC Group have agreed not to import or sell the accused product in the United States until the expiration of the ’843 patent on November 12, 2018. The terms of the settlement are otherwise confidential.

Manfrotto Distribution Inc., and Lino Manfrotto +Co S.p.A., are Italian manufacturers of photographic equipment. Benro Precision Industrial Inc. is a Chinese-based manufacturer of photographic equipment. MAC Group is a New York-based distributor of photographic equipment.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Manfrotto and Benro settle 90 degree center column dispute

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Yosemite Trademark Dispute Name Changes – The Final Straw

26 Apr
"The Scenic Village Gallery" formerly "The Ansel Adams Gallery"

“The Scenic Village Gallery” formerly “The Ansel Adams Gallery”

Yosemite is a place that never ceases to amaze, often evoking a reflexive “Wow!” from my lips as I explore the national park. Indeed on my last visit that wow factor hit me again as snow fell in Yosemite Valley, but I was also wow’d in a way that could only make me facepalm in disgust and embarrassment. What could cause such a reaction? Seeing the recent name changes to much beloved landmarks that have swept across the park due to a heated trademark battle between the National Park Service and Delaware North. Curry Village is now Half Dome Village, Yosemite Lodge is now Yosemite Valley Lodge, The Ahwahnee is now the Majestic Yosemite Hotel, etc., but what pushed me over the edge on my visit was seeing the recent change to The Ansel Adams Gallery which is now The Scenic Village Gallery.  The absurdity of changing the name of a Historical Landmark such as the Ahwahnee is in itself silly especially given the Historical Landmark placards still stand outside & inside the building, but to see tradition further trounced upon by changing The Ansel Adams Gallery to something as generic as “Scenic Village” was mind blowing. Below are some photos of the signs reflecting the name changes I took on my visit. I will say though they got the name right on some buildings that have yet to get much press attention…

The Ahwahnee National Historical Landmark  Placard

The Ahwahnee National Historical Landmark Placard Outside the Majestic Yosemite Hotel

New Roadsigns in Yosemite Valley

New Roadsigns in Yosemite Valley Resulting from the Delaware North Trademark Dispute

Yosemite Valley Lodge Sign

Yosemite Valley Lodge Sign

Historical Landmark  Placard Inside the Majestic Yosemite Hotel - Formerly the Ahwahnee Hotel

The Partially Covered Ahwahnee National Historical Landmark Placard Inside the Majestic Yosemite Hotel – Formerly the Ahwahnee Hotel

The Majestic Yosemite Hotel Bus Stop

The Majestic Yosemite Hotel Bus Stop

Newly Named Yosemite Bathrooms - Delatrine Norths

Yosemite Bathrooms Now Aptly Named the Delatrine Norths

 

For more information on the Delaware North / National Park Service  trademark battle read the following articles:

  • A private company trademarked the phrase ‘Yosemite National Park.’ Should the U.S. pay to get it back? – New York Times
  • Op-Ed: Yosemite Is Losing to Corporate Greed – Outside Magazine
  • No Longer the Ahwahnee: new names for Yosemite landmark sites – SFGate.com

 

The post Yosemite Trademark Dispute Name Changes – The Final Straw appeared first on JMG-Galleries – Landscape, Nature & Travel Photography.


JMG-Galleries – Landscape, Nature & Travel Photography

 
Comments Off on Yosemite Trademark Dispute Name Changes – The Final Straw

Posted in Equipment

 

US Judge rules for Eggleston in dispute with collector

04 Apr

20130329eggleston-promo1.jpg

Celebrated American photographer William Eggleston won a legal victory when a US District Court judge dismissed a claim of fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation brought by collector Jonathan Sobel. Sobel, an avid Eggleston collector, argued that by creating a new set of large format inkjet prints beyond the 30-year old dye transfer print limited edition of the same image, Eggleston was diluting the value of the earlier prints, one of which Sobel owned. Read on for more details. (via ARTINFO)

News: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on US Judge rules for Eggleston in dispute with collector

Posted in Uncategorized