RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Market’

Ig Market Bitcoin Trading med 100euro Erfarenheter

17 Jul

Att välja Ig Market Bitcoin Trading med 100euro de bästa kryptosystem som finns på marknaden är en mycket viktig aspekt av handeln. Om du inte är medveten om detta kan det sluta med att du förlorar mycket pengar i det långa loppet. Om du vill göra mest vinst på kortast möjliga tid måste du göra din hemläxa väl. Här är några av de grunder som du bör känna till innan du väljer de bästa mynten att handla på marknaden med.

Ig Market Bitcoin Trading med 100euro

En av de första sakerna du måste titta efter i de bästa valutorna som finns på marknaden är deras inflationsgrad. För att förstå detta måste du först förstå vad inflation är. Inflation är helt enkelt en ökning av priserna utan att varor och tjänster minskar. Till exempel är en enårig dollar värd mycket mer om några månader, eller hur? Så om du väljer att investera i de bästa råvarorna för det här århundradet vore det klokt att hålla utkik efter de valutor som enligt prognoserna kommer att uppleva den högsta inflationen under de kommande tio åren.

Ett annat grundläggande övervägande när det gäller att investera i de bästa valutorna är deras historik när det gäller handel och gruvdrift. Man kan inte bara välja vilket gammalt system som helst att investera i idag. Det finns hundratusentals valutor som handlas på marknaden och endast ett fåtal utvalda är lönsamma. Därför är det nödvändigt att du forskar väl om de olika systemen som finns tillgängliga för att veta vilket av de tillgängliga kryptosystemen som är det bästa att investera i.

Ett av de enklaste sätten att avgöra vilken av de bästa valutorna att investera i är genom att titta på den underliggande tillgångens egenskaper. Detta kallas tillgångens egenskaper och de är kända som Ripples. Låt oss ta en titt på två exempel på de bästa valutorna att investera i under det kommande decenniet. Den första typen av tillgång är aktier. Ett index som följer värdet av olika typer av företag kallas aktier. Så om vi tittar på de tio främsta valutorna som kommer att styra aktiemarknadens värde i framtiden är det troligt att dollarn kommer att fortsätta sin uppgång eftersom värdet på aktier i USA och Europa förväntas stiga.

Den andra typen av tillgångar är guld. Det finns en stor sannolikhet för att guldpriset kommer att stiga under det kommande decenniet. Om du håller på med handel och inte har teknisk kunskap om vilken av de bästa valutorna du ska investera i bör du prova de bästa kryptovalutorna som sannolikt kommer att öka i värde under detta årtionde. Bland de möjliga valutorna att investera i Ig Market Bitcoin Trading med 100euro finns euron, den japanska yenen, den australiska dollarn, schweiziska francen, den kanadensiska dollarn och det brittiska pundet. Var och en av dessa valutor har sina egna för- och nackdelar och du bör noggrant studera dem innan du investerar i dem.

Även om det är lätt att bli lockad av de dåliga nyheterna om att investera i kryptovalutor finns det ingen dålig investering när det gäller mynt. Anledningen till detta är att de flesta investerare som är nya i den här branschen slutar med att förlora sina pengar eftersom de inte har rätt kunskap om vilka av de bästa valutorna de ska investera i. Så när du letar efter de bästa valutorna att investera i är det viktigt att du blir bekant med alla dessa. Detta beror på att endast genom att bli en registrerad användare av en onlinehandelsplats kan du få tillgång till alla de bästa kryptovalutorna som finns tillgängliga i världen idag.

Det finns många fördelar som är förknippade med att investera i de bästa kryptokurvorna, bland annat det faktum att de handlas på den globala marknaden. Därför är det lätt att handla med de bästa valutorna och du kan också förvänta dig god avkastning. Att investera i de bästa valutorna kräver dock att du lär dig hur systemet fungerar, grunderna i ekonomi och företagsledning. Om du till exempel är en investerare som är ny på att investera på altcoin-marknaden, är det bättre om du får hjälp av professionella personer som experter och handlare.

Det finns många fördelar som du kan njuta av när du investerar i de bästa valutorna i världen. En av dessa är att när du väljer de bästa kryptosurferna kan du vara säker på att värdet på din investering alltid kommer att vara stabilt. Eftersom värdet på varje mynt varierar beroende på utbud och efterfrågan är det viktigt att du investerar i de bästa valutorna och sedan handlar med dem enligt dina behov. När värdet på en valuta fluktuerar kan du alltså enkelt sälja dina tillgångar och investera i de nya.

Det bästa sättet att investera i de bästa kryptosurfarna är att se till att du är välinformerad om de olika faktorer som påverkar värdet på ett visst mynt och du har också en expert som kan lära dig hur du väljer de bästa valutorna att investera i. När du vill göra vinster från handeln med den bästa kryptosurf bör du alltså se till att du utbildar dig om marknadens ekonomi och affärsmodeller. Här är nästa intressanta blogginlägg: Bitcoin framgångsrika handelsstrategier.

The post Ig Market Bitcoin Trading med 100euro Erfarenheter first appeared on Hur man använder kryptovalutor på rätt sätt.


Hur man använder kryptovalutor på rätt sätt

 
Comments Off on Ig Market Bitcoin Trading med 100euro Erfarenheter

Posted in Photography

 

CIPA’s October report shows camera market has mostly recovered from its COVID-19 downturn

03 Dec
Top: Panasonic S1 (left) Canon EOS R (right) Bottom: Sony a7 III (left), Nikon Z6 (right)

It’s been a rather tumultuous year for camera sales atop a market already in decline, but the latest report from Camera & Imaging Products Association (CIPA) shows the market is back in business and nearly recovered from the COVID-19 downturn.

CIPA, an industry association that aggregates shipment and sales information from the leading camera manufacturers, has shared its October numbers, which show the September recovery of shipments wasn’t a fluke. According to the October report, total digital camera sales – which include both fixed-lens cameras and interchangeable lens cameras – saw a total of 1.13 million units shipped. That’s still 22.8% fewer units shipped compared to October 2019, but that’s a far better shipment rate than the past six months, which have seen shipments hover around 50% of what they were in 2019 in the same months.

A line graph showing the month-by-month shipment numbers of digital cameras — including compact, fixed-lens, DSLR and mirrorless — for the past three years. Click to enlarge.

And the numbers look even better for interchangeable lens cameras. CIPA’s report says a total of 754K units were shipped, a decrease of just 13.6% compared to October 2019. Despite shipping fewer units, the monetary value of those shipments is up half a percentage point year-over-year (YoY) as well, showing the cameras being sold are more expensive models.

Interestingly, the increase in value from those shipments can be attributed only to mirrorless cameras. Globally, the monetary value of DSLR sales is down 22% YoY for October, aligned with overall unit shipments, while the monetary value of mirrorless shipments is up 11.9% YoY for October. In other words, the average revenue from global DSLR sales has more or less stayed the same while increasing for mirrorless camera sales. This backs up statements from multiple manufacturers – most notably Canon and Nikon in their investor reports – that higher-end, full-frame mirrorless models are selling better and will be the focus of their product lines.

A line graph showing the month-by-month shipment numbers of interchangeable lens cameras for the past three years. Click to enlarge.

The October report also confirms DSLR camera sales are on a far faster decline than mirrorless cameras, at least in most regions. Global DSLR shipments were at 338K units, down 21% YoY for October, while mirrorless camera shipments were 416K units, down just 6.4% YoY for October.

Where it gets interesting is when you look at shipments by region. The increase in monetary value of mirrorless camera shipments comes almost entirely down to China, which saw a 53.8% increase in value YoY for October. Also, Europe stands as an outlier in the DSLR market; according to CIPA’s report, while DSLR sales are down in volume and value to the United States, they’re only slightly down in volume and up substantially (30.5% YoY for October) in Europe. This could simply be due to the stock being sent to the respective regions (budget DSLRs vs higher-end DSLRs), but it’s an interesting discrepancy nonetheless.

A full breakdown of production and shipments of cameras aggregated by CIPA. Click to enlarge and click here for the PDF version.

The ratio between DSLR and mirrorless shipments to different region varies quite a bit as well. In Europe, DSLR and mirrorless shipments in terms of volume are roughly even, but in terms of value, mirrorless is nearly double. The United States, on the other hand, saw roughly 35K more DSLRs shipped to its shores compared to mirrorless cameras, but mirrorless still has double the value of those DSLRs.

It remains to be seen if volume and value return to their 2019 numbers over the holiday seasons, but things are looking up for an industry that’s seen a devastating decline.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on CIPA’s October report shows camera market has mostly recovered from its COVID-19 downturn

Posted in Uncategorized

 

BCN Retail shows Canon catching Sony in the Japanese full-frame MILC market, Nikon stagnant — for now

27 Oct

BCN Retail, a Japanese analyst firm that collects daily sales data of mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras from online and in-person points of sale in Japan, has published (translated) its latest numbers, showing the breakdown of Japanese domestic market share in the full-frame mirrorless interchangeable lens camera (MILC) market.

BCN Retail starts its report with partially encouraging news, noting the camera market, at least in Japan, has almost entirely recovered from the pandemic drop, with unit sales in the month of September being down just 2% and revenue from those sales down just 10% year-over-year (YoY). Lower numbers YoY is never a good thing, but considering the state of the camera market even pre-pandemic, these drops aren’t terrible.

According to BCN Retail’s latest numbers, Canon and Panasonic have seen a rise in market share over the past few months, while Nikon has more or less stayed even. Meanwhile, both Sony and Sigma have seen their market shares drop over the past few months.

Full-frame mirrorless market share numbers: Brown (Sony), Red (Canon), Yellow (Nikon), Blue (Panasonic), Grey (Sigma). The dark blue and red bars at the bottom show unit sales and revenue (as a percentage of overall interchangeable lens camera (ILC) camera sales), respectively.

BCN Retail says Canon’s rise in market share — now 34.7% — can be attributed to the release of its R5 and R6 mirrorless cameras, while Panasonic’s rise — now 5.8% — is attributed to the launch of its S5. Nikon’s market share saw a small increase in July, which could likely be attributed to the release of its entry-level Z5, but since August its market share has more or less stayed stagnant, sitting at roughly 13%. It’s possible its forthcoming Z6 II and Z7 II mirrorless cameras could give the company a boost, though.

Meanwhile, Sony has seen its market share drop from roughly 60% back in May to now just 43.9%, only 9% ahead of Canon who, at the start of the year, had just 15% of the market share. Sigma, too, has seen its market share drop to just 2.6% after once being ahead of both Nikon and Panasonic back in May when the FP sales were hot.

The Canon EOS R5 was the most popular full-frame mirrorless interchangeable lens camera (MILC) of September, according to BCN Retail.

It’s worth noting these market share numbers are specific to the Japanese market and greatly impacted by new cameras launched within a given month or quarter.

Back in the summer of 2018, Sony effectively had 100% of the full-frame MILC market share, as there were no other competitors. Within six months of both Canon and Nikon introducing their respective full-frame mirrorless cameras, Sony’s market share was effectively halved and since then, it’s been further chipped away at by Canon.

This doesn’t necessarily mean Canon or Nikon were eating into Sony sales at the beginning when the two first entered the market, as you can see unit volume also rose when Canon and Nikon introduced their mirrorless cameras, but now that sales have more or less returned to their pre-pandemic volume and Sony is further dropping in market share, it is possible we’re starting to see Canon starting to pull away some of Sony’s customers a bit.

Canon EOS RP (left), Nikon Z5 (right).

What should be interesting to see is whether Nikon’s new Z6 II and Z7 II take more market share from Canon or Sony or is simply converting more DSLR users and therefore adding to the sales volume rather than taking from elsewhere in the full-frame MILC market. In the past, it seems Canon’s numbers are more affected by the rise and fall of Nikon’s market share, whereas Sony’s are more affected by the rise and fall of Canon’s market share, but even with the charts, it’s difficult to get the full picture without knowing the precise number of units being sold and the price at which they’re selling for—two numbers that prove challenging to extrapolate from BCN Retail’s numbers or even CIPA.

BCN Retail also notes that full-frame sales have hit 10.7% of the overall interchangeable lens camera (ILC) market, marking the first time it’s been in double-digits. Revenue from full-frame MILC, as a percentage of the overall ILC market, also saw a dramatic jump to 25%. These are both the highest-ever numbers for the full-frame market, but BCN Retail does note this is because the average cost of a full-frame MILC tends to be 2.3x as much as a crop sensor ILC —¥230,000 (~$ 2,200) to ¥100,000 ($ 955), respectively.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on BCN Retail shows Canon catching Sony in the Japanese full-frame MILC market, Nikon stagnant — for now

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Leica announces 9 Portuguese-made lenses for the US market, bypassing import tariffs

28 Aug

In retaliation for allegedly illegal subsidies from the European Union to Airbus, giving the European airplane manufacturer an unfair advantage over US-based Boeing, the United States levied about $ 7.5B USD in tariffs against the EU. These tariffs, beginning last fall, have been applied to certain EU goods, as approved by the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Included in the new tariff regulations are selected imports from France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom, including a 25-percent tariff on ‘agricultural and other products.’ Under the umbrella of ‘other products’ are camera lenses. Leica has long been known for making many of its cameras and lenses in Germany, resulting in US customers being forced to pay more for already expensive Leica lenses.

In order to bypass the US-issued tariff, Leica began work on establishing an alternative production line elsewhere in Europe. Building upon an existing presence in Portugal, Leica will now offer US-based customers nine different M-mount ‘Made in Portugal’ lenses for a reduced cost relative to their tariff-inflated ‘Made in Germany’ equivalents. Customers can still choose to pay extra for the same lenses made in Germany.

The nine lenses Leica is currently manufacturing in Portugal for the US market include the following, with Made in Portugal prices listed first and Made in Germany prices listed second:

• Summicron-M 28mm F2 ASPH (Black) – $ 4,395 (Portugal) – $ 4,895 (Germany)

• Elmarit-M 28mm F2.8 ASPH (Black) – $ 2,295 – $ 2,595

• Summaron-M 28mm F5.6 (Silver) – $ 2,595 – $ 2,895

• Summicron-M 35mm F2 ASPH (Black) – $ 3,295 – $ 3,695

• Summicron-M 35mm F2 ASPH (Silver) – $ 3,495 – $ 3,895

• Summilux-M 50mm F1.4 ASPH (Black) – $ 3,995 – $ 4,395

• Summilux-M 50mm F1.4 ASPH (Silver) – $ 4,195 – $ 4,695

• Summilux-M 50mm F1.4 ASPH (Black-Chrome) – $ 4,595 – $ 5,095

• Summicron-M 50mm F2 (Black) – $ 2,395 – $ 2,695

As you can see, the Made in Portugal lenses do not fully capture the 25 percent tariff levied against the imported German versions, but the relocated production does provide some relief to customers in the US. Presumably Leica incurred considerable cost to their business setting up a new production line. Of this, Leica says, ‘Leica Camera has made a large investment to establish a second production line in reaction to these global economic developments and market requirements.’

Image credit: Leica Store Miami

Leica continues, assuaging the fears of customers that Made in Portugal lenses will be inferior products, ‘With this new production line at Leica Camera’s state-of-the-art facility in Portugal, Leica has decided to offer USA consumers a choice to buy a selection of some of the most popular and essential Leica M-Lenses, stringent to the same quality and standards expected from Leica as our German-made products, Made in Portugal, at a much lower price than their Made in Germany counterparts. The price differential is a direct result of tariffs, and in no way indicative of quality standards.’

If you’d like to learn more about the Leica facility in Portugal, Film and Digital Times published a great tour in 2017.

The nine lenses Made in Portugal lenses Leica has announced will be released in staggered groups. The trio of Leica Summilux-M 50mm F1.4 ASPH lenses will be available this month. In September, the Leica Summicron-M 35mm F2 primes and the Summaron-M 28mm F5.6 will begin shipping. Finally, this December, the final three lenses, the Summicron-M 28mm F2, Summicron-M 50mm F2 and Elmarit-M 28mm F2.8, will become available.

Prospective customers can order any of the nine Portuguese-built lenses from US-based Leica stores, including Leica Store Miami.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Leica announces 9 Portuguese-made lenses for the US market, bypassing import tariffs

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Fujifilm X-T4 Review: The Best APS-C Camera on the Market (For a Price)

20 Jul

The post Fujifilm X-T4 Review: The Best APS-C Camera on the Market (For a Price) appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.

Fujifilm x-t4 review

If you’re trying to decide whether the Fujifilm X-T4 is the right camera for you, then this comprehensive Fujifilm X-T4 review is exactly what you need.

Fujifilm X-T4 review

For several weeks, I’ve been putting Fujifilm’s newest camera through its paces, with the goal of answering a few key questions:

  1. What does the X-T4 offer over the X-T3?
  2. How does the X-T4 compare to other options on the market?
  3. And, ultimately, is the X-T4 worth the price?

All these questions, and more, will be answered in this review.

So, without further ado, let’s dive right in!

Fujifilm X-T4 review
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 80mm | 1/250s | f/8 | ISO 200

The Fujifilm X-T4: Overview

The Fujifilm X-T4 comes as the latest addition to Fujifilm’s flagship lineup, previously headed by the Fujifilm X-T3. Note that Fujifilm explicitly indicated that the X-T4 does not replace the X-T3, but enters the lineup as a sister model.

In many ways, the X-T3 and the X-T4 are the same; the ergonomics and aesthetics are exceedingly similar, plus you get 26 MP X-trans sensors, dual card slots, and 4K/60p video.

Fujifilm X-T4 film simulation modes

But there are also some fundamental differences. While there’s certainly still room for the X-T3 in a Fujifilm lover’s gear bag, the truth is, the X-T4 is the better camera (though significantly pricier!).

In fact, I’d go so far to say that the X-T4 is one of the absolute best cameras I’ve ever used, and certainly one of my favorites, thanks to its Fujifilm retro charm, as well as its generally strong performance across the board.

Fujifilm X-T4 review
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 32.5 mm | 1/250s | f/8 | ISO 200

Fujifilm is in the business of making all-around cameras: Mirrorless models that can do pretty much anything at a high level, from action to landscape to video. The X-T4 is simply another level of this superb well-roundedness, giving a combination of top-notch handling, improved autofocus, blazing-fast continuous shooting speeds, high-powered video, and excellent image quality.

Here are a few key Fujifilm X-T4 specifications:

  • 26 MP APS-C sensor
  • 4K/60p video
  • Continuous shooting up to 20 fps with electronic shutter (15 fps with mechanical shutter)
  • 3.68M-dot electronic viewfinder
  • 500 shot-per-charge battery
  • Dual SD card slots
  • In-body image stabilization

Note that, in purchasing the X-T4, you also get access to Fujifilm’s very impressive array of lenses. Many of these are very reasonably priced, not to mention optically stellar, which is why I consider Fujifilm to be something of a dark horse in the photography world.

That said, there are some drawbacks to buying the X-T4.

While it’s a fantastic all-around camera, it has no particular specialties, which means that it’s probably not the right choice if you’re seeking to capture, say, high-level sports or nothing but detailed HDR landscape photos.

So to find out more about the X-T4, both the good and the bad, read on.

Fujifilm X-T4 review
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 16mm | 1/500s | f/8 | ISO 200

Build Quality

If you’re a long-time Fujifilm shooter, the design of the X-T4 will feel familiar to you. It’s very much in line with the X-T3’s thin, metallic form, though it’s gained a slight amount of bulk, presumably due to the inclusion of IBIS.

For non-Fujifilm shooters, however, holding the X-T4 for the first time may offer a bit of a shock.

First, it feels like a squashed brick; you get a very well-made body, compressed into a compact form. And while the X-T4 does offer a decent-sized handgrip, it’s not as large as what you might expect from a Nikon or Canon camera (and certainly not a Nikon or Canon DSLR), which might take some getting used to.

Fujifilm X-T4 review top view

The Fujifilm X-T4 is weather-sealed, and it feels it; honestly, the whole body just screams durability, which means that you can feel comfortable taking the X-T4 in inclement weather (always important for serious outdoor and nature shooters).

I know I mentioned it above, but I really am a huge fan of the Fujifilm retro aesthetic, which somehow makes the X-T4 feel like less of a finely-crafted tool and more of a camera that works with you.

Handling

Fujifilm X-T4 side view

As with all Fujifilm cameras, handling is excellent, assuming you don’t mind the old-school dials and switches.

Note that this old-school aesthetic manifests in the form of a dedicated aperture ring on Fujifilm’s lenses, which means that you have to select the aperture by turning the ring on the lens rather than turning a dial on your camera. Also part of the old-school aesthetic is the dedicated ISO, exposure compensation, and shutter speed dials on the top of the X-T4.

I can see how this very external, dial-based handling would annoy some photographers. It’s certainly not built for speed and muscle memory in split-second action, but there’s something really wonderful about setting your shutter speed and ISO via dials on the top of the camera, as opposed to through your camera knobs or touchscreen.

The X-T4’s buttons are well-placed, and I like the focus mode dial on the front (also present on other Fujifilm models); it’s much easier to access in the heat of the moment.

Fujifilm X-T4 review lamppost sample photo
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 80mm | 1/1000s | f/11 | ISO 200

A noticeable upgrade over the X-T3 here is the addition of in-body image stabilization, which allows you to get up to 6.5 extra stops of handholding. This is a huge deal for anyone who frequently shoots in low light, and is a fantastic addition to the X-T4 over the X-T3. In fact, if you haven’t used IBIS before, then you’re going to want to check the X-T4 out immediately. It’s a big help for handheld landscape photography, macro photography, walkaround photography, and much more, further increasing the X-T4’s versatility.

One last handling upgrade worth noting:

The X-T4 comes with a brand-new battery, one that’s rated at 500 images per charge. As with most battery ratings, this one seems to (happily!) undershoot reality. There were at least a few days when I shot over 500 images and still had significant charge left to work with.

For me, and for many shooters out there, this is a big deal. For one, if you’re shooting in adverse conditions, you want to swap batteries as infrequently as possible.

Plus, the better the battery life, the fewer batteries you need to take with you when traveling, for outdoor trips, etc.

Electronic Viewfinder and Rear LCD

Fujifilm X-T4 review
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 16mm | 1/125s | f/11 | ISO 200

The electronic viewfinder looks spectacularly life-like and features a 3.68M-dot resolution. Personally, I neither love nor hate EVFs (they can be great in some situations and terrible in others), but I do think that a minimum resolution of 3.68M-dots is required for good viewing, at least for me, personally, and the X-T4 brings that to the table.

There was never a time when I wished for an optical viewfinder while using the X-T4, and the clarity of the EVF was a huge benefit when working with Fujifilm’s Film Simulation modes (more on these later!).

Fujifilm X-T4 review

You also get a fully-articulating rear LCD. This is useful for anyone who prefers to shoot without the EVF to their eye, but it’s especially important for macro photographers, architectural photographers, and landscape photographers in particular; basically, anyone who sets up their camera at odd angles.

With the X-T4’s articulating screen, you can get down-low perspective shots without having to get dirty (and without having to hurt your neck!).

Fujifilm X-T4 review

Note that the X-T4’s screen does offer touch functionality, though it’s pretty much limited to setting the autofocus points. This is just fine in my book, because that’s really all I like to use touch screens for since it’s far faster than moving between points with the AF joystick.

Autofocus and Continuous Shooting

The Fujifilm X-T3 was a decent autofocus performer in its own right, but the X-T4 improves on this AF prowess, primarily in terms of tracking. Honestly, I’ve always been impressed by the X-T3’s focusing capabilities, which makes me all the more pleased with the X-T4.

Fujifilm X-T4 review street photo of a person walking
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 80mm | 1/250s | f/5.6 | ISO 200

Focusing on still subjects was extremely snappy, even in more difficult lighting situations.

In terms of tracking, I found the X-T4 able to follow predictably moving subjects with ease (e.g., cars), and while my keeper rate wasn’t 100 percent, I was very pleased with the results. Face and eye detection are a bit variable, especially in lower light, but are far from bad.

One of the great things about Fujifilm cameras is the continuous shooting speeds, which are blazing-fast by any metric. On the X-T4, you get 20 fps shooting using the electronic shutter, and this drops to a very respectable 15 fps using the mechanical shutter (up over the 11 fps mechanical shutter on the X-T3).

In fact, continuous shooting is one of the many reasons why the X-T4, and Fujifilm’s top cameras more generally, are such excellent all-around options. While they aren’t really designed as action cameras, you can certainly use them for fast-paced street photography, sports photography, and wildlife photography, assuming you can get the autofocus to work for you.

Fujifilm X-T4 review street photo
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 21mm | 1/125s | f/10 | ISO 200

Image Quality

Fujifilm X-T4 review
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 80mm | 1/250s | f/11 | ISO 200

The X-T4 packs a 26 MP, APS-C sensor, and while it doesn’t offer many changes over the X-T3, it’s still pretty darn powerful.

I tend to be conservative in terms of my tolerance of noise levels, but I feel comfortable pushing the X-T4 to at least ISO 800. Really, noise doesn’t start to become noticeable until around ISO 1600, and images can remain usable through ISO 6400 or so, depending on your purpose.

This is a good performance, especially for an APS-C camera; to my eye, it’s around a half-stop better than the Sony a6600 and pretty much on par with the Nikon Z50. And while the X-T4 can’t quite compete with the full-frame heavy hitters, it’s still plenty useful for photographers seeking a camera that can handle itself in low light.

Fujifilm X-T4 review black and white building
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 25mm | 1/250s | f/8 | ISO 200

As mentioned above, one of the benefits of a Fujifilm camera is the film simulation modes, and here the X-T4 doesn’t disappoint. You get 12 high-quality options; it’s a lot of fun to toggle between them, just to see how the world will look with different types of film.

I find these modes to be especially useful for types of shooting where noticeable color grading is acceptable, such as street photography and portrait photography. However, you always have the option of experimenting with film simulation and making changes in post-processing if you’re not pleased.

The X-T4 includes useful film simulation modes

Price

Fujifilm X-T4 review american flag
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 16mm | 1/500s | f/10 | ISO 200

At the time of writing, the Fujifilm X-T4 costs $ 1700 USD, which is $ 500 USD more than its X-T3 sibling, and is nearly $ 1000 USD more than the X-T30.

And this is where things get a little tricky because while the X-T4 does offer some serious upgrades over the X-T3, I’m just not sure it’s enough to justify $ 500. If I were trying to decide between the X-T3 and the X-T4, I’d feel more tempted by the X-T3, unless I desperately needed the IBIS or autofocus improvements.

Another issue with the X-T4’s price point is that it puts the camera on par with full-frame options such as the Nikon Z6, and only a few hundred dollars cheaper than the Sony a7 III. This isn’t going to make the X-T4 compelling for DSLR photographers looking to make the leap to mirrorless, or non-Fujifilm mirrorless shooters looking for a more powerful camera.

That said, if you’re already a Fujifilm shooter, or you’re a photographer who appreciates the unique design and all-around capabilities of the X-T4, the $ 1700 may be worth it.

Fujifilm X-T4 review
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 16mm | 1/1000s | f/10 | ISO 200

Verdict

Fujifilm X-T4 review
Fujifilm X-T4 | Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 | 21mm | 1/125s | f/10 | ISO 200

I’m a huge fan of the X-T3.

But I’m an even bigger fan of the X-T4, mostly thanks to the addition of in-body image stabilization, which makes the camera even more impressive for low-light shooting. It’s the ultimate generalist camera for hobbyists and professionals, and it’s an excellent addition to any kit.

Is the X-T4 the best APS-C camera out there?

Fujifilm X-T4 review

Truthfully, I think it is. You get excellent image quality, blazing-fast continuous shooting, great handling, dual card slots, good autofocus, and more.

My only reservation is the price, which feels a bit high compared to the X-T3. But you do get in-body image stabilization, as well as improved autofocus, so if you have the extra money to spend, go for it!

You won’t be disappointed.

?????

The post Fujifilm X-T4 Review: The Best APS-C Camera on the Market (For a Price) appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.


Digital Photography School

 
Comments Off on Fujifilm X-T4 Review: The Best APS-C Camera on the Market (For a Price)

Posted in Photography

 

Does Olympus Still Have a Place in the Camera Market?

06 Apr

The post Does Olympus Still Have a Place in the Camera Market? appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.

pros and cons of olypmus cameras

These days, all the camera headlines seem to be dominated by Canon, Nikon, and Sony, with the occasional mention of Fujifilm thrown in.

Olympus, with its Micro Four-Thirds system, rarely makes the news. And popular resources frequently neglect Olympus in their recommendations, suggesting “Big Three” bodies for photographers selecting a mirrorless system.

But what is this about? Why doesn’t Olympus, a camera company with a history stretching back to the early 1900s, get any attention?

The Olympus mirrorless camera system

Is this a mistake?

Or does Olympus no longer have a place in today’s camera market?

That’s the question that this article will answer. I’m going to explain the benefits and drawbacks of Olympus cameras compared to other manufacturers.

And then I’m going to give a verdict:

Whether Olympus is a manufacturer that still makes sense in today’s world…

…or whether Olympus’s time is up.

Let’s get started.

Person holding an Olympus mirrorless camera.

The cons of Olympus

No camera system is perfect, which means that there are going to be some photographers that won’t be satisfied with Olympus’s products.

Here are the key issues that consistently come up with Olympus cameras, issues that help explain why Olympus hasn’t been getting much interest of late:

1. The micro-four-thirds sensor

In many ways, the lack of interest in Olympus stems from one thing:

The Micro-Four-Thirds sensor.

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II.

Olympus only produces Micro-Four-Thirds mirrorless cameras. The company offers zero full-frame options and zero APS-C options.

Canon, Nikon, and Sony all produce full-frame mirrorless cameras. Even Fujifilm, which ignores full-frame, offers APS-C sensors that push smaller sensor technology to its limits.

Why is this such a big deal?

Larger sensors offer two key qualities over smaller sensors:

Better high-ISO capabilities.

And better dynamic range.

So if you’re someone who requires either of these features, you’re going to feel compelled to buy a full-frame option over a more limited MFT body. For instance, you’ll be hard-pressed to find landscape shooters who don’t use a full-frame body. Landscape photographers frequently deal with high dynamic range scenes and need to maximize low-light image quality, which is why a full-frame camera is the tool of choice.

2. Resolution

A larger sensor doesn’t guarantee high resolution.

But it is closely correlated with it. All of the high-resolution camera models in the mirrorless market today are full-frame.

And when it comes to the megapixel race, Olympus hasn’t been doing so well. The company’s most professional bodies top out at about 20 MP, with some of their models only coming to 16 MP.

Olympus's bodies just don't compete on megapixels.

Here’s the thing about megapixel counts:

While they often don’t much affect the average photographer…

…they are real attention grabbers.

A big portion of camera headlines is dominated by the latest megapixel marvels, which means that Olympus, with its 16 and 20 MP sensors, just doesn’t get much coverage.

The E-M10 Mark III is a low-resolution camera.
Olympus’s OM-D E-M10 III only offers 16 MP.

And resolution is talked about so frequently that the need for a high megapixel count is burned into the mind of almost every beginner photographer.

Don’t get me wrong:

Megapixels do matter.

But they only matter to some photographers – those that need to maximize detail, printing sizes, or cropping potential.

For others, more megapixels are just a comforting spec, but not a feature that’s truly necessary.

3. Crop factor

Here’s the final issue with Micro Four-Thirds cameras:

You get a huge, 2x crop factor.

And this makes basic wide-angle lenses (e.g., in the 20-30mm range) become standard focal lengths.

Several Olympus mirrorless cameras.

For landscape photographers, this is a huge issue. For sweeping scenic shots, you’re going to need a system that can offer true wide-angle coverage.

Though this 2x crop factor can be a benefit for photographers requiring a lot of reach, such as those who shoot sports or wildlife.

4. Electronic viewfinder quality

It’s a fact:

Olympus’s electronic viewfinders just aren’t that great.

Their best cameras offer a 2.36M-dot resolution, and it just doesn’t look that good compared to many Sony, Canon, Nikon, and Fujifilm options.

So for photographers coming from DSLRs and requiring a clear, sharp EVF experience, Olympus’s options don’t cut it.

The pros of Olympus

Though Olympus doesn’t get much attention, there are things that Olympus is doing better than pretty much every other camera manufacturer out there:

1. Camera and lens size

One thing that Olympus does really, really well:

Camera system compactness.

Compact Olympus camera

This is where the micro-four-thirds sensor really starts to pay dividends, keeping camera body size way down and keeping lens size equally small.

In fact, while cameras by Sony and Fujifilm, in particular, are often very compact, these systems will often come back to bite you when buying lenses. Mirrorless glass is often as big as DSLR glass, and this can be a problem. For one thing, bigger and heavier is just a pain to deal with, plus big lenses feel unbalanced when mounted on a compact camera.

So if you’re a travel photographer, you’ll love how easy it is to pack Olympus kit.

If you’re a street photographer, you’ll love how small and unobtrusive Olympus systems really are.

And if you’re a wildlife photographer who spends days hiking in the field, having a light, small body can be a real lifesaver.

2. Shooting speeds

If you take a close look at Olympus specifications, you’ll see that a number of their cameras offer shooting up to 60 frames per second.

And I’m talking still photography, not video.

Some of Olympus's cameras offer truly incredible continuous shooting speeds.

Let me clarify:

You can shoot at 60 fps with no caveats, no cropped sensor, no drawbacks (though it is with the electronic sensor, rather than the mechanical one).

This is a huge benefit for anybody doing high-speed or action photography. Of course, you’re going to fill up your memory cards pretty quickly if you use the 60 fps option all the time, but this high-speed option is dead useful in certain situations where you just can’t miss the shot.

And by the way, you also have an option to shoot in Pro Capture mode, which ensures that the camera starts taking photos when you press the shutter button halfway. Then, when you finally press the shutter button down all the way, the last dozen or so images are saved to your memory card (along with any images taken after you fully hit the shutter button). This is fantastic for getting unanticipated shots, be it in sports or wildlife or event photography.

So if you’re the type that wishes for serious high-speed shooting capabilities, the Olympus cameras are definitely worth a look.

3. Image stabilization

Here’s the final key benefit of Olympus cameras:

They offer the best in-body image stabilization of any mirrorless camera system.

Some Olympus cameras offer seven or more stops of stabilization when including a stabilized lens, which allows for handholding down to 1s and longer (depending on the focal length and the steadiness of your hands).

If you’re the type of photographer who prefers to work without a tripod, this is the absolute best possible way to do it. You can capture gorgeous scenics using narrow apertures and not have to worry about camera shake.

Plus, even for the tripod-happy photographer, there are going to be times when carrying such support just isn’t feasible. But if you have an IBIS-equipped Olympus camera with you, you’ll be able to get a similar range of shots without a tripod.

So does Olympus still have a place in the 2020 camera market?

Absolutely.

Lenses that mount on Olympus bodies

Though Olympus systems do come with a few drawbacks, they also include characteristics that no other camera manufacturer can match. Characteristics such as:

  • Camera and lens compactness
  • High-speed continuous shooting
  • In-body stabilization

Are these benefits worth it for everyone?

No. If you’re a landscape photographer who plans to make huge, wall-sized prints, you’re going to want to pick a different system. If you’re a sports photographer who requires the best autofocus system that money can buy, Olympus probably isn’t your best bet either. And if you’re an event photographer who consistently shoots with four or five-digit ISOs, then I doubt that Olympus is for you.

But if you’re a photographer who prizes a compact system over everything else, someone who:

  • Travels frequently
  • Goes on long hiking trips
  • Needs blazing-fast continuous shooting
  • Needs an unobtrusive system for street photography
  • Just hates being weighed down by heavy equipment
  • Doesn’t like carrying a tripod

…then Olympus is going to be just what you need.

So before you buy a Sony, Canon, Nikon, or Fujifilm body, ask yourself:

Might Olympus be the better choice?

Maybe it’s not. You might do better with another system.

But it’s at least worth considering!

What are your thoughts on this? Do you have anything you could add? Please do so in the comments!

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post’s poll.

The post Does Olympus Still Have a Place in the Camera Market? appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey.


Digital Photography School

 
Comments Off on Does Olympus Still Have a Place in the Camera Market?

Posted in Photography

 

Olympus TG-6 review: the best waterproof camera on the market

20 Mar

Introduction

The Olympus Tough TG-6 is the company’s sixth-generation premium underwater camera. It features a 12 Megapixel sensor, 4X optical zoom lens, numerous sensors and, of course, serious protection against the elements.

Key specifications

  • 12MP, 1/2.3″ BSI-CMOS sensor
  • 25-100mm equivalent F2.0-4.9 stabilized lens
  • Waterproof to 15m (45ft), shockproof from 2.1m (7ft), crushproof to 100kgf (220lbf), freezeproof to -10°C (14°F), dustproof
  • 3″, 1.04M-dot display (non-touch)
  • Raw support
  • 1cm (0.4″) minimum focusing distance
  • 20 fps burst shooting
  • Pro Capture mode saves photos before and after the shutter release is pressed, to help you capture the right moment
  • 4K/30p video
  • Built-in GPS, altimeter, compass, thermometer and accelerometer
  • Optional conversion lenses and flash accessories

The TG-6 comes in black or red and is priced at $ 379.

What is it?

The TG-6 is a pocketable, ultra-rugged camera with a blend of features that will appeal to many different audiences:

  • Everyday shooters and parents who want something that can be dropped or get wet, unlike their smartphone
  • Serious underwater photographers who want to dive deeper and use off-camera flashes
  • Hikers and other outdoorsy folks who want to track their progress and incorporate things like location and altitude into the metadata of their photos

For those in the first group, the TG-6’s auto mode can handle just about every situation, and its numerous scene modes are well organized. Going underwater? Just choose the ‘fish’ spot on the mode dial, where you’ll find five choices that match the situation you’re in. It is a shame that Olympus did not create a simplified version of its menu system for more novice users, who are likely to be overwhelmed by the options and organization.

Out of camera JPEG. ISO 100 | 1/800 sec | F5 | 58mm equiv.
Photo by Jeff Keller

For the enthusiast, the TG-6 offers some manual controls, but not the full suite you’d expect on a higher-end camera. While you can adjust the aperture, there are only three choices at any one time. This is also why there aren’t shutter priority or manual exposure modes on the camera. It’s worth mentioning that you cannot adjust exposure compensation in auto mode, so you’ll need to switch to program or aperture priority mode to do so.

Olympus offers a huge number of accessories, including an underwater housing that lets the camera go 15 meters (50 feet) deeper, wide-angle and fisheye conversion lenses, the ability to wirelessly fire Olympus’s flashes (which need to be in housings too, of course) and much more.

Conversion lenses, lens caps and a ring flash adapter for the TG-6

Hikers and other adventurers can take advantage of the camera’s sensors and tracking abilities so they can see exactly where they were on their journey when they took a photo. The environmental sensors include a GPS, altimeter/depth gauge, compass, accelerometer and thermometer (which wasn’t close to accurate on the camera we tested, but the other sensors were fine). When you’re out and about, pressing the ‘info’ button displays all of the data the camera is capturing.

Pressing the Info button when the camera is off lets you see all of the data the TG’s environmental sensors are picking up.

Lastly, the TG-6’s host of close-up features not only allow for capturing subjects 1cm (0.4″) away: the ‘digital microscope’ mode lets you zoom in up to four times more, though with a reduction in image quality. Olympus sells a ring light and flash diffuser to add flexibility to your macro photography.

Out of camera JPEG. ISO 160 | 1/125 sec | F2.3 | 30mm equiv.
Photo by Jeff Keller

What’s new?

These days, updates to compact cameras are very minor, and that includes the TG-6. Very little has changed compared to the TG-5, with the main things being a higher resolution LCD, additional macro and underwater modes, and focus bracketing. Improvements have also been made to reduce ghosting and flare.

The higher resolution LCD is certainly nice, though Olympus did not address the most frustrating thing about the screen on the TG-5: it scratches way too easily. Buying a screen protector is highly recommended. It’s worth mentioning that the screen isn’t touch-enabled, but keep in mind this feature is all-but-useless when screens (or your hands) get wet.

A TG-6 with a tempered glass screen protector

Where the TG-5 only had one underwater white balance mode, the TG-6 has three, for shallow, mid-depth and deep water. Two additional underwater shooting modes were added: macro and microscope.

What stands out?

What really separates the TG-6 from its peers is its ability to capture data from its environmental sensors and attach it to photos, as described earlier in this review. Some other rugged cameras have some sensors, but nobody does it better than Olympus. Having GPS data in your photos lets you search for photos by location in software like Lightroom and Apple Photos.

Having the tracking feature on (which is how you can create the map like the one below) does drain the battery, which is why I kept the camera plugged into a car charger while driving around.

A map created with the OI Track app shows you where you took each photo.

The TG-6 is a bit of an outlier in that Olympus continues to use a 12 Megapixel sensor, rather than the 16 or 20 Megapixel sensors found on its competitors. On a chip this small, the TG-6’s lower pixel count might help its performance at higher ISOs, but the much bigger benefit is its lens’ ability to go to F2.0 at its widest-angle setting, letting in twice as much light as its closest rivals will. And, for most purposes, a 12 Megapixel sensor is more than enough.

The build quality of the TG-6 is still the best-in-class. Its chassis is solid enough that you’d think it could chop wood, though that would probably void the warranty. Both of the doors (one for the I/O ports, the other for the battery and memory card) have dual locks, a feature which has disappeared from its competitors. The camera’s dials are pretty plasticky though, and the buttons are mushy (the movie recording button is the worst offender), but this is likely due to the extensive sealing.

Note the dual locks on the battery/memory card compartment door. The same as true for the door that protects the USB and HDMI ports.

While the TG-6’s rugged specs are very impressive, when it comes to going underwater, several of its peers can go quite a bit deeper, with the Nikon Coolpix W300 (arguably the TG-6’s closest competitor) able to function down to 30 meters (100 feet). If you’re a snorkeler, that’s no big deal, but for scuba it’s a very desirable trait.

While the lens on the camera doesn’t have as much telephoto power as many of its peers (many of which reach 140mm equivalent at their long end), it is the widest available, which is really helpful when underwater. The lens is also the fastest in this class, which will keep noise levels down as light levels drop.

The TG-6 gets mixed reviews in terms of usability. As mentioned earlier, its auto mode works well and shortcut menu is fairly sensible, but the main menu is far too confusing. The lack of exposure compensation in the auto and scene modes is also a bummer, since it’s a commonly used, easy-to-understand feature.

The camera’s 25-point autofocus system works well, both above and below sea level. It can detect faces, though the subject needs to be looking straight at the camera. While the TG-6 has an AF tracking mode, it takes too many button presses to activate, and we recommend avoiding it.

One feature that no other rugged camera on the market has is Raw support. While the small sensor doesn’t have the dynamic range of enthusiast cameras, you can still brighten shadows with decent results, fine-tune white balance (critical for underwater shooting), and get more detail than JPEGs provide. While the TG-6 has in-camera Raw conversion, it’s poorly implemented. You have to set the camera’s shooting settings to what you want and then apply the edits to the Raw file, as opposed to adjusting them for each Raw image individually.

Heavy noise reduction in the TG-6’s JPEGs obliterates fine detail, like the trees and grass in this photo. If you’re comfortable with editing Raw files, you can get some of that detail back.

Download out-of-camera JPEG | Download converted Raw file

While the image quality from the TG-6 is fine, modern smartphones will surpass it in most situations, though once downsized to social media resolutions, it’s less noticeable. But, remember, your phone isn’t exactly rugged. While out-of-camera JPEGs have pleasant colors*, the lens just isn’t very sharp and too much noise reduction is applied. Turning down the ‘noise filter’ option helps a bit, but if you’re up to the challenge of processing the results, shooting Raw is the way to get the most out of the TG-6.

* Tip: Try to shoot in ‘P’ mode if you can, as the ‘i-Enhance’ color profile in Auto mode is over-the-top, to say the least.

We found the TG’s white balance was accurate, even underwater, which is always challenging. The camera tends to overexpose, so you may find yourself needing to use exposure compensation fairly often. As mentioned earlier, you can’t use exposure compensation in most modes (including Auto), so you’ll need to P or A mode to adjust it.

Out of camera JPEG. ISO 200 | 1/30 sec | F2 | 25mm equiv.
Photo by Dan Bracaglia

The camera’s 4K video is fine though, again, no better than that from a smartphone. The ‘movie IS’ does a good job of stabilizing things, though there is a noticeable crop when it’s on. Audio levels are adjustable, and a wind filter is also available. The TG-6 can shoot (silent) Full HD video at 120 fps, with even faster frame rates available if you drop the resolution.

The TG-6 uses the Li-92B lithium-ion battery, which turns in a respectable 340 shots per charge (CIPA rated), though you’ll probably do even better than that in most situations. That’s assuming you’re not using the GPS, though, so a spare battery is a must if you’re using it or the logging function. The camera can be charged over its USB 2.0 connector. There’s no external charger included in the box, but Olympus would be happy to sell you one for a whopping $ 70.

Despite all of its cool tracking features, the TG-6’s wireless implementation isn’t great. There’s no Bluetooth, so you have to put the camera into a smartphone connection mode and then manually find the network it’s created on your phone (a QR code is used for initial set-up, but that’s it). Olympus’s OI Share app is simple to use, though not always reliable. To get tracking data and put it on a map, you must use another app, OI Track, which downloads log files that sync with up with photos that you’ve already downloaded via OI Share.

Conclusion

Out of camera JPEG. ISO 100 | 1/80 sec | F2 | 25mm equiv.
Photo by Jeff Keller

The Olympus Tough TG-6 continues to be the top waterproof camera on the market. We like its ruggedness, expandability, tracking features, and Raw support. Its lens is faster at the wide-angle end than its peers, and its macro capabilities are top-notch. Battery life is very good, assuming that you’re not hitting the GPS too hard.

The TG-6’s main negative is pretty much the same as for any small-sensor compact camera these days: image quality just isn’t that great, especially compared to best-in-class smartphones that seamlessly combine multiple images to boost image quality. Having Raw support gives TG-6 users more flexibility to squeeze the most out of the camera, but you can only do so much with a 1/2.3″ sensor. Compared to its peers, we wish the TG-6 had a bit more range at its telephoto end (but you are getting F2 at the wide end in exchange), and the lack of Bluetooth is disappointing.

There have been several references to smartphones throughout this review, and to be clear, the TG-6 isn’t meant to replace one. Rather, it’s designed to withstand exactly what you don’t want happening to your smartphone: being dropped, stepped on, or dunked in water.

Out of camera JPEG. ISO 100 | 1/320 sec | F9 | 28mm equiv.
Photo by Jeff Keller

In the course of writing this review I took the TG-6 to Olympic National Park in Washington State. With its combination of rock-strewn beaches, temperate rainforests and snowy mountain peaks, the park is exactly the kind of place where you want to stuff your phone in a pocket, get out the TG-6, and not worry about what it may smash into. And being able to see where you took a photo isn’t just interesting: it makes organizing photos easier, as well.

Sample gallery

$ (document).ready(function() { SampleGalleryV2({“containerId”:”embeddedSampleGallery_3691961761″,”galleryId”:”3691961761″,”isEmbeddedWidget”:true,”selectedImageIndex”:0,”isMobile”:false}) });

Scoring

Olympus Tough TG-6
Category: Waterproof / Rugged Compact Camera
Build quality
Ergonomics & handling
Features
Exposure and focus accuracy
Image quality (raw)
Image quality (jpeg)
Flash performance
Low light / high ISO performance
Optics
Performance (speed)
Movie / video mode
Connectivity
Value
PoorExcellent
Conclusion
The Olympus Tough TG-6 is a well-designed rugged camera with a broad feature set, good image quality for its class and a host of environment sensors that store everything from location to temperature in your photos.

Good for
Divers, hikers, parents who don't want their smartphone broken

Not so good for
Those who desire smartphone (or better) image quality
76%
Overall score

RegularScoreCompareWidget({“mainElementId”:”scoringWidget”,”mainProduct”:”olympus_tg6″,”scoringSchema”:{“id”:”Compacts”,”variables”:[{“id”:”BuildQuality”},{“id”:”ErgonomicsAndHandling”},{“id”:”Features”},{“id”:”ExposureAndFocusAccuracy”},{“id”:”QualityRaw”},{“id”:”QualityJpeg”},{“id”:”Flash”},{“id”:”LowLightHighISO”},{“id”:”Optics”},{“id”:”Performance”},{“id”:”Movie”},{“id”:”Connectivity”},{“id”:”Value”}],”categories”:[{“id”:”Enthusiast”,”label”:”Premium Enthusiast Compact Camera”,”shortLabel”:”Premium Enthusiast”},{“id”:”TravelZoom”,”label”:”Travel Zoom Compact Camera”,”shortLabel”:”Travel Zoom”},{“id”:”WaterproofRugged”,”label”:”Waterproof / Rugged Compact Camera”,”shortLabel”:”Waterproof / Rugged”},{“id”:”Compact”,”label”:”Compact Camera”,”shortLabel”:”Compact Camera”},{“id”:”SuperZoom”,”label”:”Super-zoom Compact Camera”,”shortLabel”:”Super-zoom”}]},”helpText”:”Choose one or more cameras from the drop-down menu, then roll your mouse over the names to see how their scores compare to the camera on review.”})
Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Olympus TG-6 review: the best waterproof camera on the market

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Research firm claims Sony had nearly half of the image sensor market share in 2019

18 Feb

Sony held nearly half of the image sensor market share in 2019, according to Japanese research firm Techno Systems Research (TSR). The detail was spied by PulseNews, which points out that Sony’s 49.1% market share greatly eclipsed the second biggest market share, 17.9%, held by Samsung. The South Korean company recently launched its 108MP Nonacell image sensor with its new Galaxy S20 Ultra smartphone.

The news isn’t surprising. In December, Sony revealed that its semiconductor business was working 24/7 through the holidays in an effort to keep up with the demand for its image sensors. The company is building a new facility in Nagasaki in order to boost production capacity due to this demand; it is expected to go online in April 2021.

Samsung remains the biggest competitor to Sony’s image sensor business. In 2018, the South Korean company announced that it would expand the production capacity of its own image sensor business and that its ultimate goal was to overtake Sony. Based on the TSR data, the company still has a long way to go toward reaching that milestone.

Still, Sony’s image sensor business may have a rocky future. Earlier this month, Sony expressed concerns about the ongoing novel coronavirus outbreak in China where the company has four large factories. According to Sony CFO Hiroko Totoki via the Nikkei Asian Review, the impact of the coronavirus on the company’s supply chains could potentially cause enormous disruption to Sony’s image sensor business.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Research firm claims Sony had nearly half of the image sensor market share in 2019

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Canon Europe confirms its focus is on RF, not EF lenses unless the ‘market demand[s] it’

09 Jan

Although Canon’s flagship 1DX Mark III DSLR is still on the horizon, it seems as though Canon has stopped research and development efforts for new EF lenses.

In an interview with Digital Camera World, Canon Europe pro product marketing senior manager, Richard Shepherd, said that while Canon will continue to support EF lenses, the plan is to focus on RF lenses, unless the ‘market demand[s] it.’ Below is the full quote, shared by Digital Camera World:

‘As you know, last year we launched the RF mount and EOS R system […] To date we’ve launched ten critically acclaimed lenses, and as it’s a new system we plan to continue this, launching more RF lenses while still fully supporting the EF lens system. And of course, should the market demand it, we are ready to create new EF lenses. But for now, our focus is on RF.’

While this is the first time we’ve seen detailed confirmation about Canon ceasing development of new EF lenses, it shouldn’t come as a surprise. Canon’s EF mount was released 33 years ago when it replaced the FD mount in 1987. Since then, we’ve seen the rise of digital cameras, the fall of point-and-shoot cameras and now the rise of mirrorless cameras. Canon’s RF system is clearly the future for the company and as such it makes sense Canon would be more interested in investing its capital looking forward rather than behind.

As of October 12, 2017, Canon said it had surpassed production of more than 130 million EF-series interchangeable lenses—just shy of four million per year since the mount’s inception. The number has inevitably gone up by millions since and you can count on it continuing to rise for many years to come, even long after production has stopped.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Canon Europe confirms its focus is on RF, not EF lenses unless the ‘market demand[s] it’

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Photography podcast ‘The Group Chat’ launches with critical look at the preset market

08 Dec

Editor’s note: There is strong language aplenty in this video that is NSFW. Proceed with caution.


A new photography podcast called ‘The Group Chat’ has published its first episode: ‘Presets and Why They Suck.’ The episode is free to watch on YouTube, where hosts Christian Gideon and Nick Goodwin discuss why presents ‘are so detrimental’ to the photography industry.

In a statement to PetaPixel, The Group Chat co-creator Gideon explains, ‘Our first episode is a hard-hitting look at why the industry of selling presets to photographers is mostly BS.’ As the comment indicates, the podcast episode contains adult language and may not be suitable for certain environments.

Additional information about the show, its creators, and their workshops can be found on The Group Chat website.

Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

 
Comments Off on Photography podcast ‘The Group Chat’ launches with critical look at the preset market

Posted in Uncategorized